Nämä viestit lähetettiin, kun olit offline-tilassa.

Posted by Guest Blogger on Sunday, 02 May 2010 00:59.

Tags:

Comments:

Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 02 May 2010 02:27 | #

What do they actually discuss at these tea parties?

I’m guessing Obama is a socialist/Marxist Communist (well his staff looks like the first post revolutionary government of Russia, hell probably financed by the same Jewish banks as well) and that we should bomb Iran.

Probably talk a little about immigration maybe?

Posted by Frank on Sun, 02 May 2010 02:33 | #

The taboo they apparently use is everyone repeats over and again “we are not racists; we are conservatives”. “Conservative” apparently means one blindly serves the state, war (any war), Israel, Christian moral values, and lower taxes - something from those. Images of lone black or Mexican activists are displayed as poster boys to remind how unracist everyone is, though the crowds are overwhelmingly white.

Though they take it a step forward by demonising Ron Paul, so those who want lower taxes have no idea what they want to cut, not that I like Paul (useful fanatic).

They ultimately support team Republican, but more importantly they oppose team Democrat who is scary and “socialist”.

The Tea Parties started off more strongly against immigration, but now that they have leaders they seem to be less opposed to it.

Posted by Guest Blogger on Sun, 02 May 2010 02:36 | #

Who took that photograph?

Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 02 May 2010 02:45 | #

@Frank

I think they will create a third party that will focus on immigration, smaller government which is the mantra both parties use already and support for Israel.

Posted by sirrealpolitik on Sun, 02 May 2010 03:16 | #

the neo-cohens have hijacked much of the tea party’s mojo, as neo-cohens are wont to do.

but there’s still some vital, un-shilled energy there.

and yes they’re mostly too busy trying to prove they’re not raaaayyycissss.

i will say i like ron paul: anti aipac, anti federal reserve. are you saying we should reject him for some (presumably petty) reason? if you can’t like paul, who then? beggars can’t be choosers here. he’s our best pol, as it were.

Posted by Frank on Sun, 02 May 2010 03:32 | #

jamesUK,

A3P is already up and running. Who needs a new party when you’ve got perfection?

Posted by Frank on Sun, 02 May 2010 03:37 | #

sirrealpolitik,

the term I used is “useful fanatic”, so yes I find him useful. Perhaps I should be dishonest and praise the man, but the past in America has taught that election competitions will replace ethnicity in a heart beat. Americans / Southerners / whatever cease being human (in spirit…) and become “party members” or “ideologues”.

He stood up for “us”, and I have no definition, so I’ll become him! Me too, this is so fun - my life has meaning!

I’d rather whites embraced that we have no leaders and are a people on the brink of disaster. Our future is dire, and delusions are not helpful. Though note, we’re destined only for destruction if we don’t change ourselves.

Posted by Frank on Sun, 02 May 2010 03:40 | #

Lest we forget the true strength of democracy: all of that energy that would have been channeled through competent action is wasted in the election process.

And after the election results are in, the losing sides accept the results and go home, otherwise serving and acknowledging those leaders. People learn to be happy instead of sticking with their ideals, and the world goes to Hell. Short-term sacrifices are required for long term happiness, and most people just won’t readily fight for anything they can stuff in their mouths or pimp on their rides. If the future will clearly deprive them of the food, they don’t care. That’s the future, and the future is “unknown” (can be ignored).

Posted by Frank on Sun, 02 May 2010 03:42 | #

The same sell outs act differently in other systems I strongly suspect, though as democracy spreads like a plague we see fewer examples to learn from.

Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 02 May 2010 05:27 | #

@Frank

I mean a main stream controlled 3rd party like the Liberal Democrats whose first leader was headed by MI6 agent Paddy Ashdown.

I think there was talk a couple of years ago of Mayor Bloomberg financing a third party.

A3P is never going to have a significant impact in US politics which has been tried before with America First Party.

http://www.americafirstparty.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_First_Party_(2002)

A more wise approach would have been to create A3P inspired movement/political faction inside the Republican Party.

Posted by PF on Sun, 02 May 2010 07:51 | #

deracinated white intellectuals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0caAJkChD8&feature=channel

for some reason, they break my heart. Each one feels like a new treachery.

“Et tu, brute?”, as we lay dying.

Posted by Frank on Sun, 02 May 2010 19:13 | #

jamesUK,

along with James Edwards apparently, I was a fairly early member of the AFP. It’s the first party I joined - I was never a Republican.

The AFP was always too libertarian. The A3P is the real thing: America’s BNP. Actually, I’m hopeful it’ll surpass the BNP with its incredible leaders. America’s just larger, and the A3P team is impressive.

A faction with the GOP? It’s been tried and has failed too. I’m doubtful the strategy is the problem so much as the efforts put into the strategies, which is a cultural and spiritual failure.

If we had the motivation, we could run an A3P, a GOP faction, a white advocacy group, a mainstream anti-immigration group (e.g. numbersUSA) to rope in nonwhites and fringe whites, AND secessionist groups. If… we had the motivation.

The symptoms are political failures. The disease is something else (partly cultural).

In the 1990s there was a conservative movement to get leaders into the GOP. Newt Gingrich was a[n evil] leader of this, and it was eaten and absorbed. The young, new leaders became young, new pigs at the trough. They couldn’t resist Rome’s gold.

Posted by Frank on Sun, 02 May 2010 20:02 | #

When he sobers, I’m sure he’ll put a shirt on; but the picture at the right aside:

White liberal is raped in Haiti, blames whites for it (even to the point of being “grateful”)

Hilarious yes?

His dog is funny too.

And he’s not an Israel worshiper either.

GW, maybe send the guy a message that if he puts on a shirt you’ll add him to your list? Heh, or perhaps your manners are better than mine. I hate to see the guy embarrass himself though… I presume the picture is of him.

Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 02 May 2010 22:09 | #

And he’s not an Israel worshiper either.

He sounds pretty pro-Jewish to me.

http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2009/10/oleg-jews-and-rape-of-mother-russia.html

Posted by Frank on Mon, 03 May 2010 00:39 | #

jamesUK,

good eye. Maybe he’s still waking up / in denial, but he at least doesn’t serve the Israeli state.

Fred,

it sounds like that German was reconstructed well. He learned his lesson from WWII, and is now preaching to the Irish.

Attempts were made to reconstruct the South too after we lost, but we fought back. Germany’s rulers had a wee bit more power.

Reg. immigrants in Ireland, here’s a revolutionary idea: toss them back out. They can leave just as easily as they entered. If no one will take them, pay someone to take them. Problem solved - Ireland can get back to its confused Catholic v. Protestant wars which line up rather well along ethnic lines but don’t allow anyone to admit that, it’s purely religious, yes…

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 03 May 2010 01:49 | #

As we’re in the mood for promoting links I’ll say yet again how about a link to:

antiwhitemedia.blogspot.com

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 03 May 2010 01:52 | #

Ireland can get back to its confused Catholic v. Protestant wars which line up rather well along ethnic lines but don’t allow anyone to admit that, it’s purely religious, yes…

I favour a more detailed repartition to solve that.

Posted by Frank on Mon, 03 May 2010 03:50 | #

Lurker,

excellent site, and if a partition will bring peace I’m all for it. Someone ought to inform them that Cromwell died quiet a long time ago as well…

Posted by jamesUK on Mon, 03 May 2010 04:32 | #

When did Curt Maynard die?

According to this he went postal and killed his ex-wife

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/?zx=4f9452a4714dae8a

@Frank

I left a comment on the oleg, jews and rape of mother Russia article. Do you think it will get published?

Posted by Frank on Mon, 03 May 2010 07:24 | #

That’s bizarre about Maynard. I’d corresponded with him briefly at another board… I don’t want to read about that though: that’s his business. The guy I met seemed nice enough though - shame how things turn out sometimes.

I’m sure that guy will publish your comment.

Posted by jamesUK on Mon, 03 May 2010 23:21 | #

@Frank