No choices left The cleavage between right- and left-liberalism can be summed up in a word: choice. When people are encouraged to make their own choices they somehow never make the ones that the social engineers require.
This report was a special feature on BBC 1 evening news. Mark Easton examined the educational divide in Blackburn, where ...
Then it was the turn of the government’s favourite race advisor, Professor Ted Cantle. He of “hideously white” fame, the Visiting Professor of Community Cohesion at Coventry University and leading light of the kosher-sounding Institute for Community Cohesion, said “segregation of schools along racial or religious lines is dangerous.”
The BBC website article does not quote the CRE commissar Trevor Phillips, who appeared on TV as a talking head. But the article does end with this:-
These people know, therefore, that their heaven on Earth is not achievable. Up to a point, they even know why. They have no answers, short of a genuinely oppressive state machinery. But, also, they have no vision. They cannot see that even segregation will not be acceptable ad infinitum to a native people threatened with approaching minority status. Nature will out in that respect, as it has already in respect of the choice of schools. Interesting times are around the corner. Comments:2
Posted by JB on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 05:52 | # the parents would have a real choice if the government gave financial help to families who do home schooling. The choice of not going to school at all. I wish I’d been told that it was possible when I was in school 3
Posted by Daveg on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:34 | # Two interest jews are Auster (VFR) and Michael Savage (Wiener). Over the last moth Auster has been about as good as it gets on the immigration and culture issue. MS is generally good as well. See this. Sure, both are big time supporters of Israel. Fine. But what if the following deal was offered: Unconditional support for Israel, including the Jewish identity thereof. In exchange, the “Jewish” community would support at substantaila reduction in immigration, including reasonable “dislocation” of immigrants already in the country. Would you take that deal, if you thought it could be “enforced”? I would. These guys are, overall, on the right side of the most important issues. 4
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:17 | # Daveg, Immigration-restrictionist Jews are rarities and have no purchase on government. It’s the ubiquitous other kind whom Western governments listen to. I am resigned to a perpetual ethnic hostility from organised Jewry and from high profile individual actors like Professor Ted. I don’t believe that a quid pro quo on Israel will appeal because we already give them everything they want on that front for free. 5
Posted by Kenelm Digby on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:44 | # Sorry, but there is no possible way, shape of form that the population of “inner London”, (however it is defined), is “75% White”, as the report claims. 6
Posted by Andrew on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:13 | # “public services risks greater racial segregation” 7
Posted by EC on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:17 | # As a result, they’re liable to try to “get at” parents who home-school, as is being done right now to Paul Belien, editor of the Brussels Journal blog. Don’t know if anyone saw this article a few weeks ago. However, this is an avenue the Marxist elite seem intent on attacking.
8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:22 | # Excellent point, Rusty. As they say, the ten most terrifying words in the English language are, “Hi! We’re from the government, and we’re here to help.” 9
Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:00 | # Fred Scrooby’s “ten most terrifying words in the English language” quote reminds me of the advice of an old British friend,( commanding officer of a special forces regiment of Malayan aboriginal jungle troops) who warned his men : “Whenever you see a government employee coming your way with an offer of help, run like hell”. 10
Posted by President Barbicane on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:22 | # Fred Scrooby’s ‘moratorium plus repatriation’ line brings an interesting question to my mind. Is it possible to repatriate British non-whites? Could a just repatriation plan be practical? 11
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:53 | # Jim as insightful and eloquent as always. Thanks, Fred. The civil rights laws are an expression of a period of extraordinary political centralization through control of economic life and public discussion. That period, which gave us communism, fascism and managerial liberalism as well as the civil rights laws, is dying. The abandonment of socialism and fall of communism are the dawn of a new and less managed age. That age will have its own problems, but there is reason to hope the civil rights laws will not be among them. For me “managerial liberalism”, which is a term really only describing left-liberalism as constituted now under cultural Marxist principles, contains within itself the seeds of its own destruction. I’ve argued here many times that liberalism is a migratory political zeitgeist since, being anti-Nature, the freedoms it concentrates upon do not and cannot exist or sustain and, therefore, change with each political generation. Advocates of both left and right liberalism scarcely seemed to notice the last “Oceania is at war with Eastasia” moment, when classical Marxism was quietly dropped and cultural Marxism adopted. The right-liberals - Reaganites and Thatcherites - actually thought they had “won”! In Britain the beginnings of the Age of Cultural Marxism lay with the post-war British Historians Group of intellectuals, and it received a great boost from the Marxisation of the Birmingham School by Stuart Hall and Raymond Williams in 1970. Gorbachev’s liberalisations in the 1980’s - essentially the exposure to light of the rottenness of the Soviet model - signalled the death of classical Marxism and liberalism’s smooth onset upon a new path, but one that has its own rotten core of unrealisable aims. In that much, I differ from Jim in my reading of events. But I strongly contend that this time liberalism cannot be reborn with some great new teleology in its soul. The Age of Cultural Marxism will be its last age, and its passing will likely be marked by something not less but far more managerial and unjust - but demonstrably illiberal and short-lived. This is simple historical mechanics. The great imponderable, for the moment, is: what will replace the liberal zeitgeist? 12
Posted by Amalek on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:49 | # Daveg wrote: what if the following deal was offered: Unconditional support for Israel, including the Jewish identity thereof. In exchange, the “Jewish” community would support at substantaila reduction in immigration, including reasonable “dislocation” of immigrants already in the country. Would you take that deal, if you thought it could be “enforced”? I would. These guys are, overall, on the right side of the most important issues. So here we go yet again—whites abjectly tying themselves in knots trying to find ‘good Jews’, trying to assure themselves that Jews are ‘on our side’ and really and truly ‘one of us’, trying to cut a deal to save a nation with its most persistent parasites. Why bother? Why not just take Jews at their statistical significance—a dwindling 2pc of America and 0.5pc of Britain—accord them that much political and cultural weight, and not one ounce more? But if we must thrash out a deal with Diaspora Jewry, how about this: If you prefer to stay here, fair enough. Only we desire to hear no more about our sacred duty to defend Israel, no more whining over ancient atrocity stories, no more exaltation of your separate identity, why you’re a light unto the world and all that poloney. Just behave like undividedly loyal citizens of the land whose passport you carry—or it’s off to the Judenstaat, one-way, before you can say ‘Jonathan Pollard’. No more playing both ends against the middle, no more dual citizenship, no more one-rule-for-goyim-and-another-for-us… in a word, no more ‘American Jews’, just ‘Jewish Americans’. Too difficult to change the habits of two millennia? Fair enough. You know where El Al takes off. Post a comment:
Next entry: A cunning plan
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:13. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:11. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 21:35. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 20:51. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:49. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:47. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:29. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:01. (View) Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:52. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:17. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:02. (View) Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:12. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:05. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:32. (View) |
Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:24 | #
Some things need to change and these include the exemption of non-White parents from compulsory education laws. As many of the innately backward Muslims resent having to send their daughters to school, this move would reduce the number of pests burdening White taxpayers.
Of course this would curtail the expensive scholastic warehousing of school-age aliens and further pollute our inner-city streets with gangs of even younger Black mischief-makers, so any crime committed by a group member would be punishable by swift deportation of that nucleur family. Jews love group punishment of Germans so they shouldnt whine when such a measure is applied.
Also, recognition of dual nationality must be withdrawn vis-a vis Third Worlders and all those currently enjoying such status should be repatriated to their country of origin, where White racism is but a distant memory.
As for UK university places, the domestic student intake for minorities must never exceed half of their pro rata percentage of the overall population. This would ensure that the character of such institutions doesnt suffer the terminal degradation visited upon America’s colleges by Jewish and Negro infestation.