Posted by Guest Blogger on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:42 | #

Not getting the link on the radio page

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:55 | #

OK, checking that now.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:14 | #

OK, the MP3 is streaming.

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:47 | #

In listening back on this interview, it becomes evident that I need to clarify the hermeneutic circle in order to demonstrate how it can reconcile “intellectualism” with practical application.

I also need to develop the notion of dishonesty and liberalism among males as secondary sexual characteristics, displays of extraneous logical capacity to attract females (the younger of whom find a short term advantage in liberalism as it allows them to play men off of one another; while men being liberal, bespeak a more independent type), similar as upper classes professing “anti-racism” to lord their “moral superiority” over the lower classes who, being more at risk, are not quite so at leisure to make garish displays of liberalism.

And what to do about it when this dishonesty is at odds with E.G.I.

How much pretending liberalism in order to attract a female is too much pretending? As a recent Ted Sallis article at Counter Currents asked (analogously regarding of mainstream “safe politics”)

http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/09/against-mainstreaming

when does the pretense become the real agenda… how many times have we shook are heads to find, “they are serious”.  With that, how much expecting of liberalism of males is unreasonable…

Stan does some fantastic work in presenting European advocacy as common sense. However, he is taking for granted some of his own and others intellectual work in preparation for that step. For example, “The Century of Self.”

I don’t agree with the dismissal of intellectualism and I do side with GW’s belief that we need to rebuild the world in our image as Europeans.

Having grown up basically being surrounded by anti-intellectualism (“it’s all bullshit”) I know all too well that sufficient intellectual bearings are imperative to making sense of the world. To be denied this is a vast, arbitrary disservice and to be put at a disadvantage.

While there is such a thing as “pseudo-intellectualsm” it does not apply where relevance of purpose and appropriate intellectual tools for its end are maintained.

I do believe that Stan should have a point that a perfect distinction should not and cannot be drawn between intellectual theorizing and practical application, but Majority Rights will not be a site that quickly bandies charges of “pseudo-intellectualism.”

Our purposes are at hand and never out of sight.

Having said that, if Stan can abide that in the main, MR will tend to heavily favor the intellectual end over popular implementation, features from his perspective of “world Eury” could complement MR.

Posted by Dude on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:12 | #

Not sure about this guy, but some of the same territory. Might be an option for an interview:

http://www.staffandscrip.com/pp011.shtml

Posted by Dude on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:13 | #

NB That piece (Traditionalism is the Only Radicalism) is the title of his latest self-published book.

Posted by Thorn(troll) on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:36 | #

Thorn, take your own advice and stay away.

My original purpose was to interview Stan.

Then it was suggested that I handle* the bulk of the conversation and I prepared for it that way, though the intro didn’t quite foreshadow that plan.

* A misunderstanding there between “handle”, as in, “do the interviewing” as opposed to “handle” the bulk of the conversation as in “do the bulk of the talking.”

Though it wasn’t my idea, Stan agreed that whatever was fine and improvised with the talk as it turned-out…and it did turn-over some issues, clarifying some, showing others still needing to be clarified. Hence, it was useful.

Dude (5 and 6) John Dunn doesn’t fit with MR’s platform.

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 04 Oct 2014 08:15 | #

Renegade noted the fact that Miss Belgium had “converted to Islam.”...but made no mention of what she married to..lots of reverence for the usual regime though…

miscegenation is equivalent to rape.

Footballer from Mali married to Miss Belgium

A point that I had not articulated sufficiently in the Stan Hess conversation: Stan suggested that we European men boycott any sport which smacks of non-White ownership and participants.

That is well and good. A boycott recognized by consensus is not placing undue influence on “individual will”

However, I called attention to the fact that this still places a bit too much weight on the “demand” side.

An analogy can be drawn to telling people that they ought to recycle and change consumer habits in order to control pollution - fine; but while the supply side continues to manufacture invincible garbage and effluent unabated crucial attention needs to be given to the supply sides as well; the same would hold true of sports.

Posted by Be-In on Sun, 05 Oct 2014 05:53 | #

The Crown of Creation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOrb0G0tw08

Can’t Find My Home:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TyynO6O0kc

“High Yellow” was a term to refer to Mulattoes in the old south. Here is one homage to a “high yellow guru”

Ella Guru
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsiDDtX6cdU

Perhaps this one would be better for the more conventional minded mulatto consolationists:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LArGlfEVYqM

Posted by Dude on Sun, 05 Oct 2014 15:44 | #

“John Dunn doesn’t fit with MR’s platform.”

DanielS, in a way that was why I thought the discussion would be of interest. A discussion of the benefits and limits of Dunn’s form of pre-liberal traditionalism set against MR’s own POV.

As you know 99% of interviewees on MR don’t “fit with MR’s platform” either, so what’s the beef?

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:02 | #

Dude,

John Dunn is religious.  Really that’s as far as we need to go in examining what he has to say.  It is not possible to interrogate faith, and neither can faith interrogate anything else, since its very being prescribes value and place.  The presumption is always total with faith.

Posted by Hymiewood on Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:06 | #

Stan offered this telling compendium of Jewish born (and a few convert) Hollywood actors and actresses:

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008929586/?start=1&view=detail&sort=listorian:asc

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008929586/?start=101&view=detail&sort=listorian:asc

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008929586/?start=201&view=detail&sort=listorian:asc

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008929586/?start=301&view=detail&sort=listorian:asc

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008929586/?start=401&view=detail&sort=listorian:asc

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008929586/?start=501&view=detail&sort=listorian:asc