|
|
|
The English Defence League march in Birmingham, 4th July 2009 This is an outgrowth of the Luton anti-Islamist protest from two months back - itself a result of the al Muhajiroun protest in Luton during the homecoming parade of the Royal Anglian Regiment in March. More details of the Birmingham protest here. By way of some background on the general immigrant situation in Birmingham, the Ken Livingstone supporter and pudgy-faced Guardian blogger Simon Fletcher put up an anti-BNP piece today about the party’s claims of anti-white bias in the provision of council (or social) housing. One commenter named zacsmith had the drop on him, however. This was his comment:
Assuming that the balance of native and non-native is reflected across the two categories where no racial origin has been ascribed (“Information Not Yet Obtained” and “Refused”), the allottment of council housing in Birmingham to non-natives is running at 45%. Probably less than half of those are Moslems. Comments:2
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:14 | # There are two great unknowns concerning the organisers of the Luton and, now, the Birmingham protests. Who are they, and what is their agenda? The Luton protest looked a very ad hoc affair. I had assumed it was organised by Luton Town football supporters. It certainly wasn’t put together by recognised nationalists. Some of the individuals involved wore balaclavas, which was odd, given that the protest was non-political and even included a few black (ish) faces. There were signs warning off the National Front (who, presumably, had attempted to infiltrate the march). According to this video, after Luton came a walk through enriched Whitechapel in London on 27th June, billed as being by the English and Welsh Defence Leagues. It was a very small affair: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiTUG-2nOcA&feature=related Overall, it is an interesting development. Like a lot of people, I’d just like to know more about it. 3
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:39 | # Can someone say where Griffin’s Mindbenders can be found online? 5
Posted by Dan Dare on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:43 | # Bill asked
The answer appears to depend on who they are and why they came. According to the report from the LSE The Impact of Recent Immigration on the London Economy published in 2007 (available for download here [pdf file]), migrants in general appear to ‘drift’ into social housing in greater numbers over time. The report has a table on page 38 which gives the percentage of each of four population groups occupying each type type of housing by period of residence (under/over three years): - Migrants from ‘rich’ countries in social rented housing: 6% of those resident less that 3 years, 21% of those resident for three years or more; - Migrants from ‘asylum-seeking’ countries: 35% and 46%, respectively; - Migrants from ‘other poor’ countries: 21% and 37%, respectively. For comparison, 26% of UK-born residents occupy social housing. All these figures apply to London. This data would seem to give the lie to the Guardian’s propagandizing that foreigners do not enjoy a disproportionate share of the available social housing, at least in London. 6
Posted by Bill on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:26 | # How come Griffin’s Who are the Mindbenders has lain dormant all this time? The most influential manner in which the MSM manipulates the populace is by setting the discussed agenda. Poll after poll over the years, indicate that immigration is of the greatest concern to the British people, and yet every time the subject is raised, especially at election time, the subject of immigration is hijacked by the MSM and supplanted with the economy. In short, immigration becomes sidelined to oblivion, within a very short time the subject of immigration is quietly forgotten. The number of times that this has happened is legion, during the 2005 general election a semi determined effort was raised to pursue the immigration debate, I’ve heard tell that the message came down from on high that this discussion was to be terminated by all parties. Immigration disappeared of the map. As millions more immigrants arrive the more the people become aware of what is happening. The MSM and politicians have to redouble their efforts to steer the subject off limits, each time it becomes more and more difficult, but the MSM still succeed. These diversionary tactics are taking place as I punch this keyboard, the subject aunt Sallies to distract us are endless and we all know what they are, from celebrity to sport, soaps, to reality TV. We collectively call these distractions bread and circuses, but there is one subject that the MSM resort to every time, for they know this subject will deliver, that subject is the economy, as slick Willy Clinton once famously said, it’s the economy stoopid. It’s true, steering the immigration debate to the economy is a killer - works every time. As I tap out these words I become so dismayed, for I am not saying anything new here, it’s all been said before ad infinitum, but it makes no difference, and the reason it makes no difference is because we, as a people are stoopid, the MSM know this and treat us accordingly. There is absolutely no question, that flat screen in our living room is the most potent weapon ever devised to manipulate the emotions and opinions of the masses, again, I’m not saying anything new, Orwell knew all this years ago. And what’s more he warned us about its evil powers. It is a pity it was only the other side who took advantage of it. Do you think Griffin would like to be reminded of what he wrote some twelve years ago? Perhaps it’s time to blow the dust of the covers. 7
Posted by Bill on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:39 | # Re above - Sorry, a couple of of’s should be off, if you get what I mean. 8
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:56 | # Thanks, D.D. I’ll check it out since the MSM has brought to my attention. 9
Posted by Bill on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:01 | # Who are they, and what is their agenda? If they are football supporters it raises an interesting question, a question I have often asked. (myself) The most successful infiltratation and assimilation by the ‘other’ into our culture is the non white footballer, he has been accepted and feted by every club in the land. Hmmm, interesting? The football entertainment industry is supported by tens of thousands of such young men (and women) up and down the country, so it does seem odd that they are in turn at odds with race. Perhaps they are not at odds with race per se, perhaps they are only at odds with the ‘other’ who don’t play or support foootball at all, ie Asian Muslims. I’ve posted before, what a potent force a few tens of thousands of these types could be in the future, *Not in Education, Employment or Training. 10
Posted by Bill on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:45 | # It’s odd that the term White Flight hasn’t really caught on in Britain. Like every other Western nation white flight is a phenomenon that affects each and all. The term white flight I assume was coined in America, for how long white flight has been a feature of American life I have no idea. Here in Britain I have never seen the term white flight in print or heard it mentioned on the MSM, all of which would seem to indicate that there is no such thing - but which of course there is. Britain has and is being badly affect by white flight, no mystery really, where non whites move in, whites who can, move out. Not exactly rocket science you might say. Which all brings a mysterious and far reaching consequences for British people. For years now, the price of property has been going through the proverbial roof. As the inner cities succumb to the enriched, then whites move out to the suburbs, thereby by ratcheting up the price of houses, which in turn pushes out the indigenous first time buyer - who then has to either move on or turn to the private rented sector for shelter. The problem becomes twofold, increased prices and acute shortage of availability. But the connection is never made to immigration, the MSM simply ignore the effects of immigration on the price and availability of property as though it didn’t exist. Since the subprime bubble burst, the price of property has plummeted, but this hasn’t alleviated these problems one iota. The lack of mortgages and the over demand caused by continued immigration ensure these problems will still exist and get worse. There is one huge problem building up here, this circle is not going to be squared, I really don’t see a solution. We cannot build new houses at the required rate - not ever! The question becomes ever more urgent, where are the newcomers going to live? Shanty towns anybody? Converted sea containers? You never know. 11
Posted by david roach on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:44 | # Who are the English Defence league or the Welsh Defence league? Are they a Zionist front group? 12
Posted by Bo Sears on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:15 | # To Bill on July 02, 2009, 06:45 AM— The term “white flight” isn’t a term used by Euro-Americans or the diverse white American peoples. It is used against them. The real description of what you call “white flight” is simply “ethnic cleansing” by the other, not a voluntary act by the diverse whites. A good example of this phenomenon was when a rabid Latino who writes for the San Jose Mercury News wrote a story comparing Latino departures from California as a “Latino diaspora” while calling the Euro-American departures from California as “white flight.” It’s like “reverse discrimination.” There’s no such thing as “reverse discrimination,” there’s just discrimination. And there’s no such thing as “white flight,” there’s just ethnic cleansing. 13
Posted by Ethnomasochism-in-Action on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:18 | # Self-loathing Canadian journalist Jeffrey Simpson of the Globe & Mail offers a luminous example of why Whites are being dispossessed from their lands, without providing any resistance. In the case of Simpson, he’s an enthusiastic cheerleader of our replacement. Note the same old same old Left-liberal, multiculti, progressive, immigrationist, pluralistic, peecee, and, above all else, “modern” propaganda one continuously is exposed to in our irrelevant and conformist (and dying, thank God!) )papers. One cannot imagine a column that strays from the multicultural party line getting published in a major Western journal. Michaelle Jean is Canada’s first Negro (Haitian) governor general (following in the footsteps of the first Oriental, and equally exotic, Andrienne Clarkson), she made international headlines recently for eating a seal’s raw heart, arguably one of the most bizarre moments this century:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/why-canadians-owe-great-thanks-to-michalle-jean/article1202410/http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/640978 What a piece of shit. 14
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:28 | # She’s just a visible sign of our ongoing dispossession. 15
Posted by John on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:09 | #
I was really saddened by the tone of frustration and resignation in the comments (though nearly all against the multicult) about “Swiss” “youths” running amok in Munich. 16
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:58 | # Good job, Scotch-Irish! You got rid of the gypsy invader! Never for one second did you even consider listening to the Jew World Order commanding you to subordinate yourselves to the non-whites, to accept your race-replacement, and to suck it up: http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/03/how-do-they-do-it/ My hat’s off to you. Great race of men, both in Ulster and in Dixie! And my middle finger is held high in the air as a gesture in the direction of Gerry Adams who, with Sinn Fein, has ostentatiously sided with the Sub-Saharan African Negro invaders of the Republic against his own white countrymen, telling the invaders he “stands shoulder-to-shoulder with them”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yJ87y7BR80 Gerry, you and the Sinn Fein are sewage, not to mention unrepentant cowardly murderers of women, children, infants, and old men. You were bad before, now you’ve gone from bad to worse. May you all rot in hell. 17
Posted by Gerry Adams Irishman or Jew? on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:32 | # Am I the only one who is struck by Gerry Adams’ strongly non-Irish appearance? He does not look like any Irishmen I’ve met - rather, everything about him says JEW. It would hardly surprise if the archives show Sinn Fein an example of “controlled opposition”. 18
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:36 | # Mangan, citing a new entry posted at n/a’s HBD blog, reports findings from the mid-1950s that the best U.S. WW II combat pilots had British, Irish, German, or Scand ancestry, in that order (and Jews, being good at figures, got sent instead to navigator school): http://mangans.blogspot.com/2009/07/old-americans-more-successful-wwii.html (Just kidding about the Jews — I’m sure they made fine pilots, and Latté Island’s Jewish uncle was one, but Mangan does refer to one true story he heard over National Public Radio ...) Only one percent of combat pilots were of Med descent (eat your heart out, Dienekes!). (Why do I go out of my way to racially taunt Dienekes? Because he goes out of his way to 1) gloat over any and all instances of race-replacement of Northern/Northwestern Euros, and 2) he has now gone to the pathetic extreme, astounding even for a dagoe like him, of denying the existence of a European race altogether and of an ethnocultural/historic entity known as Europe, creating instead, in his pathetic narrow little oh-so-fragile, wounded, and resentment-filled dagoe mind, a concentric Med/Turkish world extending out in all directions including eastward from a Greek center, oblivious to anything distinctive lying northward or westward. Dienekes, there are plenty of white Greeks, tons. I’ve personally known many. But you certainly aren’t one. And you’ll never be. You’re hopeless, pathetic, and a race-traitor.) (File under: “Pontic Greeks With So Much Personal Turk Ancestry They Go To The Extreme of Denying Europe’s Existence In An Effort To Cover It Up By Blurring Out Euro-NonEuro Ethnoracial Distinctions”) 19
Posted by Q on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:55 | #
I have an Irish Catholic in-law that could pass for Gerry Adams identical twin. The hair style the beard the glasses the attire the gait the age, the multicultural/multiracial zeal—all the same. I’ve always thought: Irish liberals are the only people more nauseating than “liberal” Jews. 20
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:56 | # To the guy who posted signing as “Gerry Adams, Irishman or Jew?”: maybe I’m not one to talk, since I do a huge amount of Jew-critique and many find my stuff illegitimate, abrasive, and wrong, but there’s a right way and a wrong way to do Jew-criticism and your way of doing it (I’m certain you’ve posted many comments that engage in it, signing each time with a different name) seems the kind someone would post who was trying to condemn-by-caricature. Change the way you do it, please. 21
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:02 | # To Q: of course there’s nothing whatsoever unIrish-looking about Gerry Adams, absolutely nothing. The guy who posted that comment may be here trying to attack the site by what he hopes is damaging “caricature.” He’s posted lots of commentary exactly like that, and I ask him above to stop. 22
Posted by Gerry Adams Irishman or Jew? on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:58 | # “Fred Scrooby” hasn’t left any soft readers for other commentators to scare off. No one’s offended but the part-Jew, which is understandable. 23
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:43 | # I can see my reputation travels. Just mind your manners and your style and you won’t draw criticism. 24
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:31 | # The English Defence League now has a website: 25
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:01 | # Letter to the English Defence League: Your group’s home page says, “This is not about race or colour, it’s about having the piss taken out of us.” You may not readily see that it’s about race and colour — but rest assured, whether you see it yet or not, you’re having the piss taken out of you on a race-and-colour basis, not just a religious (militant Islam) basis. If you don’t see it, you will. Just as the British overlords would like to impose Islam as Britain’s religion and culture, they would like to impose non-whites as Britain’s race and get you, the whites, permanently out of the picture: the wages you demand are too high, you see, the workplace safety you expect too expensive, the promise you hold (thanks to your inborn racial intelligence) for eventually moving up and competing with today’s powerful too unwelcome. The men “in place” now want low wages, an end to demands for worker benefits and safe workplaces, and an end to any threat of competition from whites who, currently “lower down,” may in future have what it takes to “move up.” Have these same unscrupulous, deceitful overlords brainwashed you to think protesting your own race-replacement is “evil” because it is “racist”? Yes obviously they have and why’s that, do you suppose? To ask the question is to answer it. In fact, to protest against your own race-replacement is neither “evil” nor “racist,” but right, proper, and necessary, a solemn moral obligation owed yourselves, your ancestors, and your offspring unto remotest future posterity. Don’t stop at protesting just “militant Islam.” Consider protesting against the current “race and colour” transformations of Britain as well, which aren’t happening by themselves but are being forced from the men at the top — give that some thought, for the same ones shoving Islam down Britain’s throat (and it’s not the Moslems doing the shoving, it’s your own white governments both Labour and Tory doing it) intend to shove race-replacement down your throats until you, the whites, are a vulnerable minority in your own ancestral homeland. Unbelievable? Yes. But true. Expand your protests beyond militant Islam so as to take into account the full scope of the crime being perpetrated against the British people, including that crime’s race and colour dimension. Best wishes. 26
Posted by Aun Doorback on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:28 | # Fred They’re making a good start FFS. They say more than their prayers. 27
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:35 | # I agree, Aun. Never meant to imply otherwise. 28
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:00 | # Some inside info: http://lionheartuk.blogspot.com/2009/07/english-welsh-defence-league-london.html 29
Posted by Bill on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:57 | # GW July 03, 2009, 09:00 PM Just had a quick look-see over at the link on this post. Prompted a quick search. Here’s something that is rarely discussed here - if at all. This was the first result of search Left’s alliance with Muslims An unlikely alliance http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/30/islam.religion 30
Posted by Conservatism in the West is a Joke on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:16 | # Conservatives funding sexual deviants and perverts with our tax dollars: Last week’s announcement of a $400,000 grant to Toronto’s Gay Pride Week is the latest indication of how detached the Harper Conservatives have become from their key supporters and how incoherent their evolving electoral strategy is as a result. That the government has not triggered a grassroots revolt by now is remarkable, a testament to the discipline of party members more than their loyalty. A few more announcements like this, however, and it won’t be able to count on that either. Anyone who has attended Gay Pride Week knows that it has nothing whatsoever to do with being gay and everything to do with being as lewd and offensive as possible. It’s Marti Gras run amok. Public nudity is de rigueur at a gay pride parade, as are simulated sex acts of all kind, and some not so simulated. I’m not gay, but I suspect that such shockingly bawdy behaviour is embarrassing to many who are. But this isn’t about Gay Pride Week and its climactic parade through the streets of downtown Toronto – it’s about what the Harper Conservatives stand for… if anything. A few months ago the Prime Minister himself gave a keynote address to grassroots conservatives attending a major conference in Ottawa in which he extolled the importance of faith, family and community to the country in general and his government in particular. One wonders how he can reconcile those words with the decision of his Secretary of State for Small Business and Tourism to authorize this grant. After all, there isn’t much faith, family or community in evidence in the weeklong event – unless you count Toronto’s BDSM community that is. (For those of you who don’t know what BDSM stands for – trust me, you probably don’t really want to.) Even from a purely electoral point of view, the grant makes no sense. It’s been said that the only things certain in life are death and taxes. I’m pretty confident that you can add to that list that fact that nobody – I repeat, nobody – will vote conservative simply because the Harper government suddenly decided to celebrate and promote a radical version of gay “culture”. On the contrary, if anything the conservatives will lose votes, and not just amongst social conservatives either. Fiscal conservatives, already unnerved by the growing debt and ballooning deficit, are sure to be turned off by this grant as well, especially since it is being justified, in part, as part of the government’s economic stimulus package. ... http://josephbenami.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=93&Itemid=34 31
Posted by Bill on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:59 | # The more I dig into this pile of **** the more I get confused, so much so my political compass just keeps spinning like a top. Here’s a few thoughts, in no particular order as they say. It is said that since the end of the Soviet Union in 1989 ‘ish, the terms left and right became obsolete, as Francic Fukuyama declared, it was the end of history. I don’t buy that, I think there is such a thing as right and left but maybe it’s become more of a pick’n mix thing. Essentially there is fundamentally such a thing as a leftist and a rightist conservative way of thinking, I think it’s genetic or whatever. I mentioned in a recent post, that when I first started out, I confronted myself with the question of who is facilitating mass immigration? I was sure of one thing, and that was the capitalist bosses were cool with the idea, as they didn’t give a damn about the colour of the money they were raking in - other than that - I was left floundering. Then I learned of of the phenomena of Liberal guilt, which took some digesting. Then I learned of what has become known as the Unholy Alliance between liberals and Islam. Then I learned about neoConservatism and how they were not conservative at all but something called Straussists or Trotskyites. Then I learned of postmodernism and non judgementalism, relativism, oppressors and victim hood, the culture war and the whole gamut of the ‘60’s counterculture, the new left, the EU, the New World Order, the Holocaust, Hitler, Fascism, the Media, the Bankers, Traitorous Politicians. And so it goes on and on and on. Just as thought I’d got it, something else appeared and it was back to the drawing board, I used to do a line dance called one step forward two steps back - how appropriate. I know I’ve left lots of stuff out but please don’t tell me about it. I suppose when all of this is distilled and the kaleidoscope settles, the bottom line is the white race is under mortal threat, and that’s all we need to know - all else is secondary. (or is it?) What doesn’t add up is the police, (and all the other useful idiots) even if they are all hard core leftists surely they can see that the process of replacing them has already begun, same with Civil Servants, the Military, Town Hall Jobsworths, Social Workers, Judges, in fact all the long march usurpers are in turn, being replaced. The term the Invasion of the Body Snatchers is so apt here. Who will be the last man standing? Thinking about it, is it any wonder that the average soap viewer doesn’t get any of this, in fact it’s a wonder anybody does. Footnote. As usual I’m in a hurry, consequently, I meander and veer off my intended path, thereby leaving out stuff I feel is important. Never mind there’s always another post. 32
Posted by Dasein on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:43 | #
Does Jobling have a theory as to why Jewish organizations are so opposed to anyone who would keep Third Worlder out of their country? His criticism of MacDonald, as far as I have seen, is on issues that don’t really affect his central thesis. Jobling’s big thing is to deny that Jews are hyper-ethnocentric. But this is not crucial to MacDonald’s theory. Even if their mean ethnocentrism is the same as other groups, they could have more variability, meaning that the tail ends would more densely populated than in other groups. Furthermore, MacDonald’s theory of Jewish influence as outlined in CoC does not depend on Jews as a group being ethnocentric. It’s enough that these people and movements he described were acting in what they perceived to be the interest of Jews. A group evolutionary strategy does not require any sort of uniform distribution of traits that make the group strategy adaptive. 33
Posted by Dasein on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:48 | # Jobling also thinks there is absolutely no genetic basis for ethnocentrism. He takes a completely environmentalist perspective on this. He is ignoring all the research on implicit attitudes. Jobling is very selective in what bits of science he’s willing to accept. 34
Posted by Dasein on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:55 | # As for whether Jews on average are hyper-ethnocentric, I suspect that they are. I have not looked at the psychological literature and I don’t know how easily such a thing can be measured (i.e. what sorts of tests exist), but the most powerful organized ethnic interest groups are Jewish. 35
Posted by English Defence League on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:32 | # Nice to see we are so popular! Re fred, We dont need to expand past anti islamic protests as this is the reason we have been formed, That is the threat as we see it and that is what we are protesting against, Militant islam operating in our country, If our SCUM government done their job there would be no need for us to exist, Today there is two protests, I see you have only discussed our birmingham protest, The one in london maybe of more interest to you as we are protesting direct at anjem choudarys hate roadshow, Lets see how they react to finally being challenged ey! Regards… 36
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:42 | #
It’s not the threat (or not the sole threat) as the Englishmen who used to live in race-replaced Nonwhitechapel see it but all right, you’ve chosen your battleground and good luck to you, godspeed, stay out of trouble as best you can, come back safe and sound from each “encounter” and “live to fight another day” until this cancer be cut out and sent back where it came from. God bless! 37
Posted by Bill on Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:06 | # “Before I sign off I have had unconfirmed reports of hundreds of Asians rioting in Birmingham but I doubt that has much to do with Caspian terns although in Britain nowadays who knows?” Simon Darby (Deputy Leader BNP) blog 4th July 2009. Nothing to do with this I wonder? 38
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:00 | #
Here’s the citation, http://www.islamineurope.net/2009/06/european-jewish-congress-frets.html (which I also referred to here, http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/european_heritage/#c76969 ). 39
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:13 | # Bill, I can’t find any report of this Asian riot in Brom. Did find an article on a Civitas investigation of Sharia, though: There is supposed to have been only two Sharia courts operating in the Midlands. Civitas found eighty-five! What these people have to riot about God alone knows. They seem to be getting everything they want. 40
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:52 | #
Question: we know that Labour and the Tories after them are going to start deliberately packing the areas where the BNP have won seats with non-white immigrants so they’ll lose the next election. Can anything be done about that? 41
Posted by Dasein on Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:23 | #
42
Posted by Q on Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:10 | # Ye another example of loony liberal-mental-disorderdism protecting the “Religion Of Peace.” In this instance its of the “happy/gay” variety:
43
Posted by Iceman / Daryl on Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:14 | # Our people really need to learn how to make professional looking propaganda videos. I advise everyone here to LEARN CINELERRA, a powerful video editing tool used by hollywood. It’s free. Create propaganda videos with this tool. They will look a thousand times more professionaler than anything you can get with Windows Media Player (i.e. windows SHIT creater). BTW check out my website freemediaproductions.info—geniuses are alloud to enter only. No scum. 45
Posted by frank on Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:53 | # why do we live in a country that gives no rites to a english man and whats worse no identity if our so called goverment that is run by a scotsman and teaches us to respect other cultures and does not give us the right to teach ours and the right to freedom of speech which is taken away from us and all the english men that died in the secound world have been sold out by a goverment who has sold them out and us for a country who cares more for immigrant workers than thier own people i work on the olympic park site and i have seen the way english workers are treated and how the foriegn workers are taken on and the english are ushered out the back door for the foriegn worker to start the goverment tell us thier is a shortage of english workers i say bollocks it makes me sick to my stomach and confussed about my background and my future we need a goverment that speaks for the people and is at one with the people and is trully english 48
Posted by Birmingham Tickets on Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:08 | # Thanks for this. I got the link from a comment you left at another site and found it to be a great compilation of the story thus far. Here’s praying for the integrity of the trade. 49
Posted by peace on Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:38 | # EDL is fueling the issue more and created a new conflict between the religions. Read this article in relation The English Defense League (EDL) is poised to fuel the interfaith confrontation in UK 50
Posted by hohum on Thu, 26 May 2011 04:13 | # What a hate filled site. On the plus side, such people are generally uneducated as bigotry and ignorance go hand in glove. They rarely achieve positions of influence, replace intelligence with cunning and while admired by fellow lowlife, they attract only revulsion from normal people. No need for concern here as they are merely spouting fantasies that will never become reality. Talk on. No harm in (empty) words. 51
Posted by Lurker on Thu, 26 May 2011 10:23 | #
peace - Why dont you understand the reality? The people who imported Muslims here are the ones creating the conflict. The EDL are a reaction to that conflict, not the cause of it. Post a comment:
Next entry: Italy challenges the EU Commission on migration
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Bill on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:32 | #
SIX KEY FACTS
From Migration Watch.
Net immigration has quadrupled since 1997 to 237,000 a year.
A migrant now arrives nearly every minute.
We must build a new home every six minutes for new migrants.
England is already the most crowded country in Europe (except Malta)
Immigration will add 7 million to the population of England in the next 20 years - that is 7 times the population of Birmingham.
To keep the population of the UK below 70 million, immigration must be reduced by 75%. Government measures so far may reduce it by 5%.
http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/
Now then let’s see, where do these people live when they get here? There are private houses, there is private rented accommodation, there is social housing (mainly housing associations?) there is bed and breakfast accommodation and hotel accommodation and that’s about it.
Every year, with natural population increase, (mainly immigrant) plus newcomers equates roughly to 1/3 of a million new souls added to the population. These people need shelter in some form another.
The social housing building programme is nowhere near reaching these numbers so there is nowhere to go but to the list I’ve just given.
Whatever the mix of accommodation is, I would opine that it is the taxpayer who is footing the bill, and that bill must total in the billions of pounds.
This is a huge transfer of wealth from the taxpayer to the private sector.
My information is purely intuitive, I haven’t a clue of any official figures, not I suspect there are any.
If a migrant family step of a 747 and apply for housing then where do they live? They must live somewhere or there would be families living in shop door-ways and I don’t see any evidence of that.
So you Guardianistas where do they live, and who allocated the property? And who was elbowed aside?
Whatever happened to those three million houses to be built that Brown dreamed up?
As I’ve said before, most things don’t make sense, are people disappearing down a black hole or what?
I’ve also said that new Labour’s ten year boom was down to immigration and the housing bubble. Now that bubble has burst and it ain’t coming back, we’re broke and getting broker by the day, trouble is, the immigrant gravy train is still careering down the the track and new homes will be needed by the millions (over-time)
I think it ain’t going to happen, by then we’ll have passed the tipping point, tipping being the operative word, they’ll just tip us out.
This crazy situation must be intentional, our elites must intend destabilising our country, to bring about chaos, tension and violence - but our politicians are so dysfunctional I still wonder if they really know what’s they’re doing?
I find myself asking the question more and more, how far down the system do the hierarchy know the the real score, do Brown and Cameron really know what the eventual aim is?