Posted by Onions too on Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:41 | #

Posted by The Color of Crime 2016 on Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:31 | #

The Color of Crime 2016

Posted by Chicago murder up 86% on Thu, 31 Mar 2016 02:20 | #

The Murder Rate in Chicago Is Up 84 Percent This Year

Posted by A disservice from Counter-Currents & Red Ice on Fri, 01 Apr 2016 06:36 | #

In this conversation regarding norms, Greg Johnson makes some excellent points, of course.

However, he belabors something that only ostensibly appears to be the opposite of the advice that I (DanielS) gave to the White lesbian girl who was debating whether to get beast implants.

He takes what may appear to be simply the other side of the argument, by saying that “we should NOT accept people no matter what and that there is an important place for shaming people so that they are compelled to improve themselves and adjust to social norms” - it is a necessary point but he belabors it (and he does belabor, ad nauseam) to the the point of eclipse of its opposite, more important point, in regard to optimal balance. I would guess that he is displaying a reaction to a strategy (a Jewish strategy that I have been monitoring) of our enemies, which is to take a good idea - viz., to begin from a point of default acceptance of yourself if you are doing the optimal best that you can and to be more inclined, instead, to be critical of society where it is quite likely to be unreasonable and unfair in its judgement of your biology - as the Jews have (with social constructionism also) and exaggerate that otherwise good argument to the point where it is absurd, didactic and socially destructive (to White people).

Of course there is a an Aristotelian golden mean between the two extremes, while Greg loses sight and exaggerates the significance of “correcting” one side. I will venture a guess that he errs in that direction for a few reasons:

He is immersed among demographics where Jewish PC exaggeration of that end is both adopted all too readily and where his predilections are often confronted by that sort of exaggerated PC social “critique.”

However, it is a disservice to exaggerate a reactionary right wing position to the Jewish abuse of this concept of social norms.

Most normal White men are not overly relieved of criticism. Most White men are not taught to be inclined to unanimity, that the problem is not likely to be in our heads and not in our bodies, but rather that we should first turn critical attention to societal expectations - are they valid? Quite obviously, Greg, where Jews and liberals are in control and dictating social norms, that is the direction that we should be erring - being critical of “social norms” and not merely accepting more of the sickening, brutal, idiotically destructive, toxic oceans of criticism that we have been subject to.

Posted by In New York City on Mon, 30 May 2016 02:11 | #

In New York City, blacks are 31-times more likely than whites to be arrested for murder

Posted by Another kind of crime in NYC on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 03:04 | #

WNYC News, “The Long History of a Police Precinct and an Ultra-Orthodox Community”, 22 June 2016:

The arrest of three high-ranking New York Police Department officials earlier this week continues to reverberate through the city’s power centers. As part of a wide-ranging federal probe, they face corruption charges for allegedly accepting gifts from two Brooklyn businessmen in exchange for favors.

The two businessmen in question have ties to the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community in Borough Park, the Brooklyn home of the department’s 66th precinct. It’s there, as The New York Times reports this morning, that many NYPD commanders have made or broken their careers.

According to the Times, the precinct earned the nickname “Fort Surrender” after a 1978 riot ended up in the police station and no one was arrested, despite injuries to dozens of police officers. In another incident, police scuffled with ultra-Orthodox community members over the release of a young man who was arrested when police tried to tow his car.

But the alleged bribes reflect an outlandish new twist, said Jim Dwyer, a columnist for the Times, to WNYC’s Soterios Johnson.

“This is a departure in that there are allegations of gross bribery,” said Dwyer. “Crazy stuff like Orthodox businessmen dressing up as elves to deliver bribes disguised as Christmas presents to some of the police commanders involved. That kind of stuff has never surfaced before.”

WNYC News,“Top NYPD Officials Arrested in Corruption Probe,” 20 June 2016:

Three senior NYPD officials and others, including a fundraiser for Mayor Bill de Blasio, are facing corruption charges in the wake of a sprawling federal investigation. A fourth police officer has already pleaded guilty and is cooperating with investigators.

Deputy Chief Michael Harrington and Deputy Inspector James Grant were charged with taking bribes, according to a criminal complaint unsealed Monday. The two allegedly received trips, expensive meals and even prostitutes from Brooklyn businessman Jeremy Reichberg, who was also charged, and another man who already pleaded guilty and is now cooperating with the feds. Reichberg and the cooperating witness even wore elf hats one Christmas and delivered gifts to the homes of the two top cops.

In exchange, the NYPD officials allegedly provided “cops on call,” according to U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. That meant help fixing tickets and settling disputes, among other favors.

In a separate case stemming from the same broader investigation, Sergeant David Villanueva was accused of accepting bribes in exchange for gun licenses, including some for people with arrest records. Another police officer in the gun licensing division, Richard Ochetal, has already pleaded guilty for his involvement in the scheme and is cooperating with the feds, according to prosecutors. Alex Lichtenstein, head of an Orthodox Jewish safety patrol, had already been charged for paying the bribes and is named in the superseding indictment.

Close to a dozen NYPD officials have been put on modified assignment or left the department in the wake of the probe.

Still, Commissioner William Bratton said the issues with the officers are nothing like the cases that led to the Knapp Commission in the 1970s or the Mollen Commission in the 1990s. Those commissions were formed to investigate widespread corruption within the department. Bratton said the issues are confined to a few individual officers.

Reichberg was a fundraiser for de Blasio. Bharara said there’s no connection between the charges unsealed Monday and the mayor.

Outside the federal courthouse Monday, Grant’s attorney John Meringolo said they’ll assess the evidence as it becomes available.

“We don’t believe there was a federal crime committed,” Meringolo said.

Villanueva’s attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment from WNYC.

Andrew Weinstein, Harrington’s lawyer, told the Associated Press the charges were politically motivated.

“Chief Harrington is a loyal and devoted family man who has an unblemished record and has spent the last three decades working tirelessly to keep New York City safe,” Weinstein is quoted as saying. “One would be hard-pressed to find a straighter arrow in their quiver.”

Susan Necheles, Reichberg’s lawyer, wrote in an email to the AP: “Mr. Reichberg did not commit a crime.”

Reichberg’s “only mistake,” Necheles reportedly said, was befriending a government cooperator “who is desperately trying to get others in trouble in order to curry favor with prosecutors and save his own skin.”

With additional reporting by the Associated Press.

Posted by wisdom of the body vs social norms on Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:31 | #

A thought occurs to me in contrast to my long standing position in deference to “the wisdom of the body for its tens of thousands of years of evolution” by contrast to social judgment.

​I usually like to take the side of the “abnormal” because, like everybody, I have witnessed ignorant bullying of certain nonstandard types by crassly subjective people - those oblivious to the fact that others may object to the complete dismissal of what really are other valid values (perhaps even necessary from an ecological standpoint) and aesthetics (a recent example: Don Black saying Mika Brzezinski “looks like a bird”... that’s his stupid opinion. I admit that his wife Chloe is hot - though its a bit weird that she was Duke’s wife first. And I must object that Mike Brezinski is a pretty lady too.

I still maintain the wisdom of the body as a correct bias and a correct basis for social critique - especially with regard to bodily shapes, forms, functions that really cannot be helped. And I am on the record as saying that women with big noses and flat chests can be beautiful as well - even though these things can be “helped.” I had a girlfriend who was flat chested and she was quite fine to me. Neither she nor other flat chested women should have breast implants nor should most women who have bigger noses have nose jobs - there is a such thing as ugly big, but more often such a thing as elegant, impressive big noses. I hate it when people take the position that “a woman cannot look that way” (when in fact, they can sometimes look better than women with big boobs and small noses).

But a contrasting position occurs to me with regard to fat - and the “fat shaming” which I suspect that the YKW are lobbying against.

It is valid too, to an extent, to object to getting heavy handed with fat shaming, along with other arguments against the tyrannical regularity of certain types presented as normal and beautiful - viz., in respect to the fact that it is truly a bit harder for some people, especially as they get older to stay thin….another side to it has unfolded before me - though it is not really a side which in this case that I had been fully against anyway, which would have been discovered if anyone had questioned me

I just completed an 8 day fast. No food. Plenty of water. Coffee (sorry, I know the pro’s and cons, not going to stop it); vitamins and minerals: vitamin D, Zinc,  Omega 3 with B6, Magnesium, Vitamin C pellets); and my one caloric indulgence - over the course of the 8 days, I had a total of 5 small cups of tomato juice.

I did some exercise also - went pretty easy, only pushing myself in a few moments, overall doing slower, steadier activity - like walking. I like mostly to exercise by doing something that gets something done, like shoveling a ditch that I need - and so I did some of that too.

It wasn’t a really big surprise but it was a little surprise to find myself fatter than I thought that I would still be after this. I don’t look very fat, but I do look like the guy who is perhaps confident, if not a bit too comfortable with himself - more comfortable than I really am in that regard. However, I will not be fat, even if my body does not sense that yet. This is where I am getting to a semi-interesting realization that I had today.

Having finally eaten 3 ounces of steak, 4 ounces of chicken (with pieces of garlic in it), a cup of blackberries, a half kilo of cherries, an apricot, an avocado, beansprouts, a red and a yellow bell pepper, a small red hot chili pepper, a small amount of coleslaw and a small amount of beat salad, and a half a head of broccoli…

I am not really surprised to find my mind more fixated on food and my brain signaling, “tasty food,” “eat” - even more than when I was in the midst of the 8 day fast - because that is what happened last time that I fasted. My body is saying, “boy wasn’t that steak tasty” mmm and “that avocado, yum.”

But I am not starving. My gut is not issuing hunger pains, I believe these are secondary signals long evolved from the time when food might not be available in days to come, so my body encourages me (and I will now say) a bit stupidly, and not wisely, to eat more and even get fat for the possibility that I may not have access to food in the near future. In this episode, my body and its biology are “stupider” than my conscious mind and society.

My conscious mind does know that I will be eating again before long - I will fast again tomorrow but then have a modest meal on Saturday and then eat on alternating days until I get to the weight I want, at which point I will figure out a maintenance diet and regime.

But especially when you are NOT starving, not nutrient deprived, will not be, then you know that your body’s sending faint warning signals against these things, necessary and wise though these signals are to have in place, can and should at this time be overridden by conscious intelligence - an intelligence which connects with the social patterns which keep telling me: “hey, you don’t look so bad - but your stomach is sticking out.”

I also have observed that the first thing women instinctively look at is the top of my stomach - (not that I am necessarily trying to pick them up, but I don’t like having social engagement cut off as abruptly as that, either) that seems to be a place by which they can intuitively gauge your age: too old if the top part of your stomach is protruding—probably because its harder for older people to stay thin and a typical indicator.

Anyway, so while the “fat shaming” can be overdone, it can be underdone as well - and that is a case where conscious and social wisdom can, at times, be wiser than the “wisdom of the body.”​

But that’s the thing - people on the right don’‘t realize that the YKW are exaggerating good social positions and critiques beyond all reason in order to make them didactic.

Posted by Tullamore all blend on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 04:35 | #

Irish Savant, “The perils of blending”, 9 Oct 2017:

This from Nilus, popular commentator and ace jewdar sleuth in the comment section of the previous post: “Tell me there’s not an Irishman that could watch this and not get furious”. Well nilus here’s one Irishman who got seriously furious, suffused with a cold anger. He was referring to a series of ads running for Tullamore Dew blended Irish whiskey (here and here). No surprise that they’re straight out of the Great Book Of Diversity Cliches.

Authoritative-Black-Female walks out on Mewling-White-Beta boyfriend contemptuously dismissing the ‘Irish’ on her way. This of course is most certainly not racist, just cute. Cut to panel of typical Irish bar-flies, White-guy, Black-guy, Asian-guy to whom Mewling-White-Beta spouts stage Oirish ‘poetry’ (the Oirish are all poets you know) as he mourns the loss of his magic negress. Then, in a stunning demonstration of their Irishness the mystery meat barflies break into a heartfelt rendition of ‘Danny Boy’. See, they’re just as Irish as any of us!

Which leads me to my first question. If blacks and Asians (and by inference anybody else roosting here) can be authentically Irish then what does being Irish mean?  Prior to the very recent immivasion the Irish gene pool was made up virtually 100% of Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans. This blending over a thousand years and more gave us the characteristics that today define Irishness, the memes the company deploys to hype its products while portraying typical Irish barflies as multiracial hybrids. Inconsistency?

Then we come to the central dilemma of diversity: We’re bombarded day and night with the manifold (though never explained) benefits and joys of diversity. Yet the race-mixing that they promote with equal enthusiasm will logically lead to the elimination of diversity as we all become coffee-coloured mongrels. Indeed Tullamore Dew lay great emphasis on the subtle blending that’s gone into the development of their products. So they’d be the first to admit that should some naughty employee drop a juicy turd into the whiskey vat the blend might suffer somewhat.  Indeed. Point being, blending can make something worse or better whether you’re making whiskey or making a nation. As one commentator put it “a successful blend needs to be poured slowly, be well thought out, with ingredients that complement it and improve it, whilst staying true to it’s natural character. “

In conclusion I reiterate my cold bitterness towards those who develop and publish the traitorous bilge that these ads represent. Frank Galton reveals that the ad campaign was developed by NY agency (((Opperman Weiss).

Every…..fucking…..time.

Tullamore: “We’re all a blend”

Posted by Matty Maher on Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:15 | #

Life in Legacy:

Matty Maher (80) patriarch of only the third family to own the dive bar McSorley’s Old Ale House since it opened in the East Village of Manhattan in the mid-19th century. Maher began by tending bar at the saloon in 1964 as an Irish immigrant. He graduated to manager as the beer hall, surrounded by neighborhood blight near the Bowery, tottered at the brink of bankruptcy. He survived the loss of a gender discrimination case in 1970 that forced McSorley’s to delete the last two words of its durable slogan vowing “Good Ale, Raw Onions, & No Ladies,” and endured a Health Department ordinance that, while it banned smoking, had the unintended consequence, Maher said, of encouraging customers to drink more. Maher died of lung cancer in Queens, New York on January 11, 2020.