Bill, Synagogue Audience, Ogle Prospect of Hillary ‘Including’ Another ‘Marginal’ on Supreme Court

Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 09 March 2016 11:27.

Click the image for a video of Bill Clinton presenting his usual stump on behalf of Hillary to a synagogue audience in Illinois.

The “inclusive, inclusive, inclusive” bit was frightening in the 1990s, when he was running for President, because “inclusive” can be a good concept when applied within a legitimate classification; and at the time there was more chance that it could have been honestly mistaken as if that’s what he meant; and not heard as what he actually means, which is the Jewish “inclusive” - a hyper-liberal inclusiveness that would include everybody [and he does emphasize everybody] - people formerly from without of a racial classification and formerly outside of the nation. This paradoxical “inclusiveness” would ultimately dissolve the classification, the nation, the people, the tribe altogether - viz., it would dissolve the very thing to be included-in.

It would dissolved to a vague catch-all category of undifferentiated gentile others; while one tribe would maintain its distinction, of course.

In 2016 it sounds less frightening than totally absurd given the floods of immigration into The U.S. and Europe. This audience in the synagogue reacts only with applause either because they are completely blind to the fact that they are being herded, thinking that they can maintain their Jewish sanctioned activist distinctions indefinitely, or because they are in on the joke.

Their biggest applause are reserved for when Bill says that what he is most proud of is that Hillary distinguishes herself from the other candidates by more fervently denouncing prejudice against Muslim Americans (following the Noachide laws apparently being good enough to qualify people for inclusion as Americans). Bill concludes by rubbing his hands together with the audience over the prospect (given Scalia’s death) of Hillary putting through another “Justice” just as good as the one that he put on the Court -

Bill literally wept before America, so moved as he was when his nominee had ascended to The Supreme Court.

(Doug Mills/Associated Press)

Among Chief Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s first statements was to maintain her long standing conviction as a “civil rights” advocate that nobody should be discriminated against on the basis of immutable characteristics.

European peoples, the time for being alarmed or despairing over this has long since passed. The neo-liberal complicity with the Jewish notion of “including ‘marginals” is, as I have said in several places, a paradoxical notion of “inclusion” that they have put together with an inverted notion of “marginals” - a notion of “marginals” by which they mean not marginals, as that would imply those who are just within our boundaries but being pushed to the side and ultimately outside - they mean rather taking in those from without.

With the flooding incursion of migrants and the chutzpah of this inclusion rhetoric absurdly unabated, it is time to see all of this for what it is and to organize as Whites/Native Europeans - maintaining our important distinctions and bounds as they provide accountability and serve our human ecologies, sure; but recognizing that we must coordinate our defense with overall organization as European peoples.

We are under attack for that reason in essence, no matter where or what we might take recourse to in lieu of defending ourselves on that basis. Wherever we are, we are in need of a union, unions and coordination of defense based on our most precious and essential bond - that is our DNA.

Europeans can no longer afford to tarry uncritically with those who would proceed with the modernist bastard child that is universal principles and rights, nor cater to those who would attempt to “save us” with neo-traditional re-organizations under the anachronistic rubric and poison rule structures of “Christendom.”

These aren’t surrogates for our DNA and biology - in lieu of that rather, they are midwives to the birthing of pan-mixia and our genocide.

Picture a cartoon illustration here that I had to take down due to EU law. Its title reads “Jews, Musilims, Christians.” Beneath that title it shows the identical happy self hand clasping merchant three times - their only being dressed differently and having slightly different skin tone - the obvious implication being that there is no important difference. There is a sarcastic sub-title: “know the difference, it could save your nation” and a conclusive line, “Semitic Religion, not even once.” Which is the same as saying, Abrahamic religion, not even once.

The time has also passed to be surprised or despair at how the all too kosher Merkel will act quite similarly with regard to our borders on the European end, and how the Noachide sheep will react to those who would oppose her - marking little difference between Europeans in America or here in Europe, as they continue to operate under the same neo-liberal rule structures and Noachide law. The time is now to wrest and forge our rule structure anew in organization and activism of the White Class.

Comments:

Posted by Putin's daugther marries a on Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:13 | #

Another right wing hero (Putin) has his daughter married to a Jewish oligarch -

And what a seedy thing he is

Doesn’t just have the look either

FAST RISE: Kirill Shamalov is a director and part-owner of Sibur, one of Russia’s largest gas-processing and petrochemicals companies. REUTERS/Kommersant Photo/Dmitry Dukhanin

Do these right wingers seriously believe that it does not matter who their heroes are marrying their daughters away to? - seriously wealthy ones at that.

Ivanka Trump and Jewish husband

Chelsea Clinton and Jewish husband

Posted by Meier Suchowlański on Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:05 | #

I (DanielS) sometimes take my free speech for granted as an American and when I believe that lowest register would ideally be an appropriate response to our antagonists - i.e., that they and their advocated groups should not be the only ones to be able to get down and dirty in this fight - I can have an inclination to project the bully pulpit of one of America’s better amendments.

Since “we are all living in America” in many of its bad ways, I am inclined to leverage one of its better features and bully pulpit for our side. But we are not all living in America and there is something to be said for the discipline of elevating one’s register. While it can put a straight jacked on at times, at other time is forces one to a better, more accurate conception of events.

In a bit of serendipity in regard of stereotypes insufficiently subtle, I happened to be listening to an interview of Meyer Lansky’s daughter, and it prompted my memories of Jewish people that I’ve known along the way who were rather hard working and often competent. True, it was not often menial labor that they were engaged in but..

The notion of “the parasite” needs refinement. It is not that there isn’t truth value to the conception as a pattern. In essence, however, they are a people, a different people, whose patterns are detrimental to ours and thus we require to separate from them.

Nevertheless, we will not so easily persuade people of any truths behind our hypotheses, if these means of understanding them do not closely enough reflect the reality.

I have known several Jews who were kind to me in my life. Some who were very kind at important times and important ways. I have also seen and experienced many hard working and competent Jews.

While I have known Jewish doctors (good ones), a fisherman perhaps (who did not have to fish for a living, as his father was a business owner), it is true, however, that their pattern tends toward the parasitic kind. It is reliably true that the secular ones especially tend to prescribe liberalism to us. Nevertheless, GW has a good point. Our language ought to capture the reality more accurately in order respect our audience’s perception of reality and help guide them to better understanding of differences that make a difference. They are people, with parasitic practices, but they are not parasitic organisms proper.

For a better sense of the nuance we are up against, I recommend listening to this interview of Meyer Lansky’s daughter and grandson. The love they had for him and the thoughtfulness they describe of Lansky can be surprising.

http://www.newstalkflorida.com/tbf-memories-about-the-mob

One thing that stood out in particular, however, was that Lansky’s grandson was/is apparently a pretty hard working guy. Ok, he and his people were backed, the lines were drawn, he had all the advice he needed. That is where you need to look, because when you can take those things for granted, then putting your nose to the grindstone make sense, because you can see the where from and what for.

Then you can go on for points of style of “how hard working you are and how you ‘never asked anybody for anything and were never given anything, not even by your grandfather, Meyer lansky” That is BS, of course. You were given things.. but the manifestation can be very subtle… I suppose crypsis can be a behavioral phenomenon as well…even in regard to one who can be looked upon as one of the most infamous parasites - Meyer Lansky.

“The Mafia” has an Italian name, it has an Italian heritage and Lucky Luciano is the archetype. He was perhaps even more significant than Meyer Lansky in the creation of its heyday, but probably not - as it took off as an organization and business as a result of his teaming up with Lansky early on in their criminal joint venture.

Luciano violated his culture, his people and the strict rule of the Sicilian Mafia - “Cosa Nostra” - by working with non-Sicilians.

Lansky’s people in fact, helped to kill off the first generation Sicilian mobsters in America.

Posted by Neo-Cohens prepare shift to Democrats on Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:17 | #

TNO, Jewish lobby getting behind Hillary in anticipation of showdown with Trump, 11 March 2016:

The Jewish Daily Forward—one of America’s largest Jewish newspapers—has openly declared Hilary Clinton to be Israel’s candidate in the event of a Trump-Clinton presidential clash in November.

In the meantime, the Neo-Cohens are apparently going to shift allegiance to the Democractic party.

Apparently the “neo-con” strategy started with Irving Kristol’s disillusionment with the Red Left’s anti-Israel and pacificist stances which did not serve Israel’s right wing militaristic requirements.

He hatched the idea of the “neo-cons” to use whatever American party, the Republicans if need be, to serve Israel’s military aims. But as in the case of red leftism, allegiance to the Republicans ends where it conflicts with Israeli supremacism. They got their way in particular with Wolfowitz puppet, George Bush junior, and his Republican administration. Wolfowitz has subsequently aligned with Jeb Bush to try to do Israel’s military bidding again. Now that Jeb has fizzled, it seems the Neo-Cohens are taking an option from their charter mandate - through their current Kristol spearhead - William Kristol - to go with whatever party and candidate would best conform to their interests. Apparently that’s more like Clinton, although Jewish interests certainly have means to hamper Trump’s options in the event of his victory.

Pat Buchanan reports on “The Sea Island Conspiracy”

Over the long weekend before the Mississippi and Michigan primaries, the sky above Sea Island was black with corporate jets.

Apple’s Tim Cook, Google’s Larry Page and Eric Schmidt, Napster’s Sean Parker, Tesla Motors’ Elon Musk, and other members of the super-rich were jetting in to the exclusive Georgia resort, ostensibly to participate in the annual World Forum of the American Enterprise Institute.

Among the advertised topics of discussion: “Millennials: How Much Do They Matter and What Do They Want?”

That was the cover story.

As revealed by the Huffington Post, Sea Island last weekend was host to a secret conclave at the Cloisters where oligarchs colluded with Beltway elites to reverse the democratic decisions of millions of voters and abort the candidacy of Donald Trump.

Among the journalists at Sea Island were Rich Lowry of National Review, which just devoted an entire issue to the topic: “Against Trump,” and Arthur Sulzberger, publisher of the Trumphobic New York Times.

Bush guru Karl Rove of FOX News was on hand, as were Speaker Paul Ryan, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. Lindsey Graham, dispatched by Trump in New Hampshire and a berserker on the subject of the Donald.

So, too, was William Kristol, editor of the rabidly anti-Trump Weekly Standard, who reported back to comrades: “The key task now, to … paraphrase Karl Marx, is less to understand Trump than to stop him.”

Kristol earlier tweeted that the Sea Island conclave is “off the record, so please do consider my tweets from there off the record.”

Posted by Lansky daughter-son, seek assets lost to Castro on Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:22 | #

Meyer Lansky’s daughter and grandson seek to reclaim hotel-casino and other assets lost to Castro’s Cuban revolution.

Posted by Hilliar on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:11 | #

Posted by quivering upper-lip on Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:06 | #

Tony Blair was always something of a kindred spirit to Bill Clinton: a wimp who hid is evil treachery behind the pathos of a quivering upper lip and unconscionable liberal pandering.

TOO, “The Legacy of Tony Blair”, 14 March 2016:

Few political indiscretions in Britain have had the effect of the Andrew Neather leak of six years ago. The former speech writer for Tony Blair recalled a speech on immigration he had worked on and wrote:

Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended—even if this wasn’t its main purpose—to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.

The effects of this slip still reverberate today. Only now as we look back only eighteen years can we really discern the outline of something that had long been suspected—that there was a hostile secret agenda to impose multiculturalism on Britain and to transform the country beyond recognition.

More evidence for this has been gathered in a new book by journalist Tom Bower titled Broken Vows. Bower has interviewed 200 members of Blair’s administrations including the civil servants closest to immigration decision making. The sheer scale of the deception takes the breath away. Blair is said to have told ministers and officials: “Don’t mention the advantages of immigration in public because they won’t even want that.”

Posted by Hillary's Class on Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:06 | #

Hillary gives revolutionary speech as valedictorian to the graduating class of Wellesley in 1969

The seeds of radicalism have grown dragon’s teeth to the sowers.

Tony Martin, professor at Wellesley from 1973 to 2007.

On the Jewish role in the African slave trade

Tony Martin (February 21, 1942 – January 17, 2013) was a Trinidad-born professor of Africana Studies at Wellesley College. He retired in June 2007 as professor emeritus after 34 years teaching at the Africana Studies Department, where he was a founding member.

He was a lecturer and author of scholarly articles about Black History, primarily the Black Nationalist leader Marcus Garvey, and his written works and statements regarding Jewish involvement in the American slave trade, which echo allegations made by the Nation of Islam, have been a source of ongoing controversy.

Posted by Ginsberg & Steinam on Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:58 | #

Some background on Ginsberg in this article, “Ginsberg and Steinem”

Posted by Overthrow on Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:55 | #

Posted by Supreme Court upholds 1.75 decision against Iran on Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:07 | #

TJP, “US Supreme Court Upholds $1.75 b Claim Against Iranian Terror Attacks,” 21 April 2016:

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a $1.75 billion dollar claim Wednesday against Iran by more than 1,300 relatives of U.S. military personnel who died in the 1983 bombing attack on their barracks in Beirut, and victims of other terror attacks linked to Iran by the courts.

The case, Bank Markazi v. Peterson, 14-770, involved relatives of victims of the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut, the 19 victims of the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia and victims of other Iranian state-sponsored terror attacks. The lead plaintiff is Deborah Peterson, whose brother U.S. Marine Lance Cpl. James C. Knipple was killed in Beirut.

Iran’s Bank Markazi had appealed against the prior ruling, arguing the Congress, as the legislative branch could not intervene in the judicial branch when it passed a 2012 law ordering the banks’ assets in the U.S. be turned over to the families.

President Barack Obama had signed an executive order earlier in that year freezing the assets of the Iranian central bank in the United States, held by Citibank in New York.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion for the Court, rejecting the appeal by the Iranian central bank.

Ginsburg wrote that the law “does not transgress restraints placed on Congress and the president by the Constitution.”

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, with Roberts writing the dissenting opinion. “The authority of the political branches is sufficient; they have no need to seize ours,” he wrote.

Although American law allows victims of state-sponsored terror to seek redress in U.S. courts for having been attacked, Iran does not comply with judgments. As a result, attorneys hunt for Iranian assets within the United States.

Source

Posted by Clinton boasts of over 2,000 women on Sat, 11 Jun 2016 03:37 | #

Breitbart 10 June 2016:
Former Dallas lawyer Dolly Kyle, who says she had a long-running affair with Bill Clinton, has spilled the beans about what she says she knows about the Clintons in a tell-all book and in recent interviews.

Kyle claimed in a recent interview with this reporter that “Billy” Clinton, as she called him, once boasted to her that he had had sex with about 2,000 women. She described Clinton as a “sex addict” who has some “sick, sick need” to “control women.”