The Jewish Quarterly on porn While I was doing some quick research for a recent comment on another thread I came across this article by Nathan Abrams from the Winter 2004 issue of The Jewish Quarterly. Many MR readers may know this anonymous piece at Heretical.com. It’s something of a staple for the right on the vexing issue of Jews and pornography. But unforced confession is so much more convincing than allegation, and TJQ’s piece - which I, for one, had not seen before - is not short of it. For example:-
Comments:2
Posted by JB on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:41 | #
hence the production of lots of interracial filth. There’s essentially no difference between “White Sluts Black Cocks” and Hollywood productions like “Save the Last Dance”, “O”, “Finding Forrester”, “Guess who’s coming to dinner”, etc.
3
Posted by JudiasmFromMosesToChertoff on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:10 | # All our degeneracy is approved by the jewish religion through esoteric kalbalistic and talmudic teachings, it’s fundamental(ism). It doesn’t lead to the end of their society now does it? Our society is crumbling and Jews couldn’t be more wealthy. “Liberal” judiasm would be the religion whose adherents would not seek the destruction of their hosts. 4
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:54 | # The talkative Nina Hartley, , provides insights into the Jewish mentality towards sex, pornography and America. See here, here and here. This self-centred clap-trap, for example:-
Whatever effect she really has, she sees herself as a revolutionary riding for freedom. 5
Posted by JB on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:17 | # GW:“Whatever effect she really has, she sees herself as a revolutionary riding for freedom.” http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=4042
6
Posted by Amalek on Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:51 | # Circumcision helps account for many of the Jews’ screwed-up attitudes to sexuality and, perhaps, their destructiveness in other spheres. Imagine being ritually mutilated as a baby at your father’s behest by the priest, so that for ever after your half-dead dick will remind you that you are a member of a tribal minority. Imagine knowing that you get less from sex than the ‘cattle’ (except the dumb Americans of whom more than half are still ‘cut’ as a sign of ZOG’s covenant) and that you are more prone to infections of the penis. Imagine knowing that your momma acceded to all this, and that most doctors consider it unnecessary and problematic. Yet you are of the Chosen! Should we not seek to explain the Jews’ vengefulness, spite and avarice as epiphenomena of projected, sublimated resentment against their fathers, and by extension against the father-God that commands this mutilation? Hence also the prominence of Jews in every movement to subvert the stability of society: another kind of greed, for psychological control. They cannot bear to denounce the real perps (too close to home) so they make enemies out of outsiders—and the paranoia often becomes self-fulfilling. Anti-social preaching and behaviour can be more than the self-protective instincts of a minority trying to demoralise a potentially hostile host, as Kevin MacDonald argues. Such nihilism can be just as subversive of the Jews’ own traditions, once the emancipated, secular but still circumcised Jew evaluates his disability because he is no longer only among his own kind. He then turns on his tribe’s traditions and trashes his faith, trying to transcend the divide between devout Jew and devout Christian by sabotaging both sets of mores with his ‘progressive’ talk. At bottom the sublimated protest against infant genital mutilation is a death wish: a clamour for ‘self-fulfilment’ which refuses to see humans as social beings who have obligations as well as rights. As the fount of authority, the treacherous father becomes, indirectly for the ashamed assailant, the true enemy—the keystone of family and of the race which is an extension of family. To undermine them is a kind of revenge on poppa and G-d, those knife-wielding tormentors. The angry Jew advocates either the submersion of the individual spirit in some collective utopia or atomisation: Man as an island, a hedonistically ‘free’ puppet of base desires a la Rand or Al Goldstein. Father, family and society must be ignored or destroyed. It is a grotesque overcompensation for having been deprived of the full use of the organ that, next to the brain, embodies the most potential for self-expression in the true sense: cementing love of a wife and creating the next generation. Hatred of the mutilating father finds its most logical resolution—in sterility. The one thing porn is never about is reproduction. The circumcised producers and performers circumvent the central purpose of sex. 7
Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:49 | # The ‘respectability’ in the US of the disgusting and barbaric tribal rite of circumcision was the baneful result of Jewish doctors gaining control of the American Medical Association and publishing papers on the so-called health benefits of the ancient Yiddish art of penis-clipping. 8
Posted by lurksalot on Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:45 | # “Half-dead dick”! LOL! Obviously, Amalek doesn’t have the slightest idea what the effects of circumcision are. But he has quite an imagination. Perhaps his wacky anti-semitic theorizing makes him feel more virile and is intended to combat his own insecurity about his own manhood (both kinds). 9
Posted by JB on Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:04 | #
the latest propaganda: Male circumcision ‘lowers risk of HIV infection by 60%’
http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030262
Circumcisions leave 20 dead http://www.cirp.org/news/sapa07-19-05/
10
Posted by Lurker on Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:20 | # Ive never seen Amalek zoom off into uncharted waters quite like that before. It sonds like him though, maybe a very clever parody? 12
Posted by Delmore Macnamara on Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:04 | # Amalek’s bit is presumably a parody of that well-known jew Freud’s theory of penis envy. I thort it was quite funny. Now that Harry’s Place is no fun anymore, I wish you’d post here more Amalek.. 13
Posted by Amalek on Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:42 | # You don’t need me. You’ve got that wonderfully wise, witty Australian geezer. Post a comment:
Next entry: Mahmood Ahmadinejad goes blogging
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) Computer say no by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. (View) |
Posted by onetwothree on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:35 | #
Let me use this chance to publicly propose a simple way to destroy the pornography business without touching the first amendment:
Simply this: Alter the copyright duration of all pornographic works to 1 (one) day.
The first amendment is happy, the mass of consumers is happy, conservatives are (if they have it carefully explained to them) happy. Everyone’s happy, except for the producers (you know who).