The NSA collects information on Israeli lobbyists, Jews scream bloody murder. In a story that shows that Jewish-American lobbyists and journalists have very little self-awareness, Adam Entous and Danny Yadron thought that it would be a good idea to publish a story in which they made it appear that the US Government was violating some kind of agreement to not spy on ‘allies’, when the NSA monitored Netanyahu’s activities during the P5+1 negotiations with Iran. The monitoring activities were carried out with the intention of discovering what Netanyahu’s views on the proposed deal were, and what his response to it going forward might be. This monitoring would have been approved by senior figures in the Obama administration, as well as the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.
Of course, what neither of these persons mention in their article is that monitoring Netanyahu’s communications was both legal and necessary. Monitoring what other world leaders are doing so that the United States can have good information from which to make policy decisions is literally the mission statement of the NSA. Furthermore, Israel has chosen to prefer a policy on Iran that is directly at odds with that of the United States, and at odds with that of NATO more broadly. The North Atlantic desired to cultivate Iran as a swing-power which could be peeled away from Russia and utilised for offsetting Russian preponderance over natural gas supplies to Europe, and which would perhaps someday be able to frustrate Russian attempts to consolidate its influence over CIS states that have cultural or historical ties to Iran. Israel has different ideas, because Israel has a different set of priorities. So what are they complaining about? It’s a nonsensical complaint. The Israelis should have expected that they’d be monitored. This of course did not prevent Israel’s most ardent defenders from writing absolutely ridiculous stories for weeks on end about it. But there was an element of this story that was not touched on and which was almost conspicuously not touched on. The fact that spying on Netanyahu would become the same thing as ‘spying on the US Congress’ was what really ought to have been the story. If spying on Netanyahu is almost the same thing as spying on the US Congress, then that is an indicator of there being a serious problem in the political system itself. That problem looks like this:
And also ambassadors getting themselves involved:
But you see, according to present and former US lawmakers who have enormous mouths and are suddenly very concerned about the somewhat nebulous concept of ‘civil liberties’, discovering when someone is trying to plunge a knife into your back is just the gravest violation of the privacy of those who are trying to do the plunging. For example, Representative Ted Lieu, (D-California) who “has consistently voted to curb powers of the NSA”, asserted on twitter that:
That’s the part he objects to. And there was also none other than Pete Hoekstra (formerly R-Michigan), the former congressman who chaired the House Intelligence Committee from 2004—2007, took to twitter to complain, saying:
Perhaps Hoekstra is really upset because he shares something common with former representative Jane Harman (D-California), who in 2006 was being lined up to seamlessly replace him, and whose Israeli tricks were foiled by the NSA at that time too:
Much like Hoekstra, Harman also had something to say about supposed ‘abuses of power’ at that time:
She’s one of the people who approved the budget and the legal framework that would supply the NSA and others with equipment and a mandate to watch PCS networks and collect the data under ONEROOF, but then she thought that the NSA and FBI were going to magically avoid collecting signals from her because she’s special? Whenever Jews or their associates find themselves being treated just like everyone else, they suddenly get very tearful and start talking about how they are so, so, so oppressed. A sad tune needs to be played for them, perhaps, on the tinyest of tiny violins. Comments:2
Posted by Netanyahu's direct line to Congress on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:04 | # Apparently then, Netanyahu has a direct line to every office in U.S. Congress. 3
Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:17 | # Yes. If monitoring Netanyahu is the same thing as monitoring large swathes of the US Congress, then it means that there is a serious problem. 4
Posted by Shabos Hillary & the 7 donors on Sat, 30 Jan 2016 14:43 | # 7 top campaign contributors to Hillary are Jewish: George Soros Haim Saban Cheryl Saban Donald Sussman Stephen Speilberg Jeffrey Katzenberg (media as well) Herbert Sandler (mortgage meldtown) Biggest corporate contributor: Goldman Sachs.
etc. MacDonald and Duke elaborate: 5
Posted by former intelligence officer Scott Rickard on Mon, 23 May 2016 22:24 | # Scott Rickard former intelligence officer for the USAF, the NSA, and the Directorate of National Intelligence (DNI): Post a comment:
Next entry: An exploration of the link between languages and genes.
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by DanielS on Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:32 | #
Excellent job, Kumiko, connecting the dots to show just how much they are pulling strings. And even on a more perceptible political level, it isn’t readily discerned that Harman is a name among them. While pulling rank to get Pelosi to select her to an intelligence post follows “if it’s good for Israel, it’s good for Haim Saban”, it isn’t obvious that the same foreign allegiance apparently has Saban dumping his filthy load on both and any side of the fence, whether Democrat of Republican as it were, that he can get to do its/his bidding:
This time he swears to stand by the Democrats no matter what, but would it really be hard for him to get behind Trump if necessary?
In fact, Saban confirms that he has no worries about the Democrats but neither would he have no problem switching party support: