Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:54 | #

The reason “the white middle class must stay and be steamed” is if it doesn’t the race-replacers will be frustrated in their efforts to breed a majority-mulatto population to replace the unmixed Euros now predominant.  Never lose sight of the fact this is all being done on purpose with malice aforethought and among the perpetrators, admittedly consisting partly of throngs of clueless nitwits like Chimp & The Pixie, is an intelligent, highly motivated behind-the-scenes core that aims explicitly at getting rid of the white race.  Anyone who thinks that’s fantasy is himself living in Fantasyland:  it’s hard to understand String Theory so some people “don’t get parts of String Theory” but it’s not hard to understand that if you fill up a white country with Negroes you get mulattoes:  sorry, but there’s no one who doesn’t get that.  No, they know exactly what they’re striving after, the serious behind-the-scenes core of string-pullers.  They’re striving after this: 

“Off the top of my head, though, I can’t see any particular traits that the [Brazilian] sugar plantations selected for [in their Negro slaves].  Take sprinting ability:  West Indians (sugar [plantations]) and African-Americans (mostly not sugar) are both outstanding, while black Brazilians are not.  Not bad, just not great.  On the other hand, a black Brazilian named Ronaldo da Costa set the marathon world record in 1998, which is almost unimaginable for an African-American or West Indian.  Why?  A.  There is less connection between looks and racial background in Brazil than in America due to the lack of a color line and preference for fair women.  Consider two sisters in Brazil, one fair and one dark.  The fairer one is more likely to marry a richer, whiter man while the darker one is more likely to marry a poorer, black man.  Repeat for 12 generations and you’ve substantially disconnected the genes for looks from all the other genes.  (In the U.S., the color line largely prevented this process.)  So perhaps even somebody as black-looking as da Costa could have the athletic genes of a [white] Portuguese distance runner.”

The white race bothers these string-pullers immensely, just bugs the hell out of them:  unless they’re plotting to hybridize it they can’t sleep nights.

Remember the ‘90s re-make of the 1950s movie “The Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” the re-make starring Donald Sutherland?  I’ve never seen the movie but recently I happened to catch five minutes of it on TV, a scene showing lots of commotion and pod-people milling about, including a fleeting glimpse of a dog running back and forth that had a perfect human face on it instead of a dog’s face, a human-dog hybrid the pod-people had created.  Well, the pod people aren’t the only ones who insist on turning out hybrids.  What gets our masters of immigration policy a good night’s sleep?  Picturing us in one way or another like that dog. 

Shall we disturb their slumbers a bit?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:17 | #

Anyone doubt this?  Remember that assistant of Sarkozy’s, that smug, witless bimbo, telling Frenchmen they were all slated to change from white to mulatto, with governmental pressures to be brought to bear on any who resisted?  Remember that?  That was France’s future, she said.  Sarkozy’s spokesman!  And what else does anyone suppose could be Barak Obama’s raison d’être, the reason for his creation absolutely out of thin air, for his constantly being trotted out, pushed in our faces 24/7, hawked around non-stop to the public on TV, in magazines, in newspapers, in popularity polls, everywhere?  One minute the guy doesn’t exist, the next instant he’s on the verge of becoming President of the United States.  Hello!  Is anybody home?  How did that happen?  Why did it happen?  It’s to get us used to the idea that he’s our future and we’re not our future!  Lord, this isn’t rocket science!  They’re drumming this stuff into our children’s generation right now as we speak, creating a nation aspiring to ... mulattodom ...  Sounds funny?  Smarten up or it’ll sound funny all right ... only the joke’ll be on you and the ones laughing their heads off won’t have white skin ...

Posted by Anon on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:30 | #

Your link isn’t working. I think this is the one that you wnat

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/28/nmuggers128.xml

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:06 | #

Trevor Phillips quoted: “Britain is by far the best place in Europe to live if you are not white.”

But the white man’s fate (in fact the Englishman’s fate) doesn’t seem to be his concern.

Looks like an invasion.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:19 | #

Thanks, anon.  Correction made.

Posted by Kenelm Digby on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:40 | #

It’s a fair bet that Brown and Carty were motivated more by a subliminal urge to harm and injure Whites - particulary those like Tom Ap Rhys Price who appeared young, succesful and good-looking (thereby exposing their own self-loathing), than by the desire to acculmulate money.

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:50 | #

But to white would-be immigrants, the CRE gives the impression that they are not welcome, see: http://www.southafricatimes.co.uk/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=925&Itemid=2

BTW,  does anyone expect the Afrikaners not to learn English as soon as possible when they arrive in London?

Posted by rearguard action on Sun, 03 Dec 2006 00:23 | #

A Mulatto population is desired by middle class liberals for two reasons.

1. To expand the labour pool - mixed race people are likely to have more kids than whites and that means more cheap labour to do the jobs the middle class liberals don’t want to do.

2. A rootless Mulatto population will be less of a political threat to white liberals.

Western civilisation has reached a decadent phase, where all its wants to do is to pamper itself. Now that it has finished developing it no longer has a use for the working and lower middle-class whites that did all the grunt work.

Unfortunately for liberals the white working class is not quite as stupid as liberals make out and is walking off the job, leaving the liberals to clean up their own mess.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 03 Dec 2006 03:31 | #

In the eyes of liberals, the creation of a mulatto population is also a pretext for setting higher standards for wooing and being wooed.  Why would liberal women want higher standards for being wooed?  Because liberal women as a class are extremely status-conscious, extremely class-conscious, and the higher the standards they can hold men to who woo them, the higher their own implicit worth is.  Why would liberal men want higher standards?  Because the class of liberal men we’re talking about aren’t cads by and large but serious family-minded men who tend to be a little less masculine — a little more effeminate — than cads, so appreciate having an additional hurdle placed in the path of the less-serious but far more attractive cads, to filter them out, otherwise they’d have a harder time competing for liberal women.  The game white liberals have invented for themselves goes like so:  1) they pretend to love Negroes, 2) they get as many of them as possible into the country (together with Mexicans, Cambodians, and so on), then 3) they, who are by now married with kids or plan soon to be, move as far away from them, as far away from the Negroes et al, as they can get.  Now, that costs money:  you have to find special all-white or predominantly-white places to buy a house in, and places like that are always more expensive, and the lower the overall white-nonwhite ratio in a region, the more expensive they are.  This situation lets liberal women increase their own implicit worth by invoking a stricter “earning-potential” standard in judging wooers, rejecting men who can’t afford to set them up in safe white communities with good schools, and gives the slightly more effeminate, slightly less masculine liberal men a slight edge over the cads they’re at a competitive disadvantage with:  the higher standard liberal women now feel justified in applying to suitors, since the country is positively flooded with Negroes and Mexicans, etc., scares off the cads who don’t know if all that commitment is worth a few months of sexual access to these chicks before they move on to the next girlfriend regardless.  Of course sooner or later a certain percentage of these liberal women will sleep with the cads behind their liberal husbands’ backs anyway, and a certain percentage of those liaisons will produce children whom the liberal husbands will raise as their own without knowing they’re someone else’s, but hey, what these effeminate liberal husbands don’t know won’t hurt them, and besides, what did they expect, their wives to resist the attractions of the cads forever?  ‘Fraid not, pal — you’re lucky she married you in the first place you whining liberal sniveler, you pathetic excuse for a man, so don’t go expecting her to live a sexually frustrated life into the bargain:  ain’t gonna happen.  As for the liberal wives with effeminate liberal husbands who resist the appeal of the cads and stay faithful, some of these will be lesbians and the others will simply live frustrated lives and as a result will become embittered and tell their daughters not to marry but have a career instead.  That’s the liberal game plan in a nutshell.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 03 Dec 2006 07:16 | #

Check this out to see what white liberal shenanigans are costing Britain ... are costing all of us ...