Posted by Bill on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:34 | #

UK to have Europe’s biggest population: Migration will force us ahead of Germany, says UN

See below.

I’m sure the Telegraph had this up this morning - I cannot find it now.

I came to the conclusion a long while ago that immigration was being orchestrated from, and by, the UN.  Periodically, the British press seem to get handed such releases, just to let us know we are still being dispossessed and they haven’t forgotten about us.

There’s such an assurance on behalf of our dispossessors, such hubris, nay arrogance, what do they know that we don’t.  Have they thought of every conceivable contingency, those police on the video didn’t look too convincing to me.  I have heard that some military think tank has advised that there will be riots for the next thirty years.  Presumably the elites are cool with that.  No pain, no gain.

This article is tucked away among the usual chaff, it is considered so banal that it doesn’t merit blaring headlines.  When Obama and Cameron are nothing but notes in the margins of history, this article lays out bare that Britain will have achieved the status of a third world heap.

When you come to think of it, it’s as though someone is re-enacting history with revenge in mind.

Read on

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1161365/UK-Europes-biggest-population-Migration-force-ahead-Germany-says-UN.html

Posted by the Narrator... on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:23 | #

There’s such an assurance on behalf of our dispossessors, such hubris, nay arrogance, what do they know that we don’t.

Posted by Bill on March 12, 2009, 12:34 PM

It’s called psychological warfare. They are telling us that we have no hope of winning and should just surrender.
.
.
.
.
In truth they are absolutely terrified of us because the tide has far from turned in their favor. 

This is why all of the surveillance, hate crime laws, media psy-ops and the like. The extreme measures they continue to take (ever escalating) speaks volumes of the ineffectiveness their propaganda is having.

They live in abject terror that the people will react at any minute and defend themselves.

...

Posted by Bill on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:14 | #

Re population increase - UK 2050.  Some random thoughts.

There’s something absurd about these forecasts.

Leaving aside that they don’t have a clue as to how many people there are in the UK at the present time, and in the light of given information that we do have, eg.  Housing stock, food availability, water availability, energy capacity, civil construction infrastructure, roads, hospitals, sewage disposal plants, reservoirs, agricultural expansion, in fact almost everything existing will have to be replicated in order to cope with a burgeoning population.

In a post industrial age, what convinces me these forecasts are charade is where are the jobs to come from to generate the wealth of an immigrant welfare state?  Some might say the newcomers will build the new Britain as they go.  Not much sign of this so far!

One of the main characteristics of our time (besides corruption lol) is diminishing availability of resources, (I notice they are called commodities these days) in almost every area of commodities there are diminishing returns, not least of course, oil.

Then there is also the small matter of money, the talking heads are confident that our present economic woes will be behind us by 2010 -12, but others are saying the system’s bust and some other arrangements will have to be made.

But it is in the area of housing I’m most interested, (and have been for a long time).

One of, and perhaps the most important effects of immigration is finding the newcomers somewhere to live.  Much of Britain’s present housing stock is old and ageing, and in total is woefully short of the number which will be required to meet the demand,  in fact the shortfall will be measured in millions - and here’s the rub.

To our none UK audience this shortage will not strike them as being outlandish, but to we locals, the idea of building millions of new homes, Let’s say 10 million within 40 years in the conditions outlined earlier, I would say it’s a no brainer.  Also bearing in mind all of the other above mentioned requirements.

So from where are these new homes to materialise?  I think they have got a cunning plan, they have no intention of building such quantities of new homes they will simply tip the indigenous families out onto the streets and hand over the property to the newcomers.  I think it’s called appropriation.  Of course, anyone objecting will receive the customary treatment.

The annual number of new arrivals forecast is equivalent to a new town of 200,000 inhabitants being built each year, and in addition, the forecasters seem to have forgotten to allow for the natural increase in birthrates from 2050 onwards.  What is the eventual population of Britain to be?  100 million? 150 million?

It is when I get to this point that I give up and ascend into the realm of La La land, it’s just not on, it’s not doable, so what are these people at the UN trying to do?  Is it as the Narrator says, they are trying to scare the c**p out of us?

If I let my imagination run amok and tell it as I really see it, then it would be another story entirely.

Come to think of it, trying to find material guessing the actual play out of this monstrous race replacement (blank! I can’t think of a word to describe it) is very scarce indeed - anywhere, even here.  Why is that?

Whatever is to become of us?

Posted by Blue-eyedBlondAryanSuperman on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:33 | #

A word about the soldiers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10PDdV2r0EM

Posted by Bert Rustle on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:12 | #

This video, posted by EUCLID at Simon Darby’s blog http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9Jvft6wA-4  shows many women and older men denouncing the counter-demonstrators, in marked contrast to much of the Drive-By Media coverage.

The British Ministry of Defence has a Development Concepts And Doctrine Centre, which has published The DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007 – 2036.

This document implies that civil disturbance is likely to become more widespread.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:12 | #

“This document implies that civil disturbance is likely to become more widespread.”  (—Bert Rustle)

It implies, in other words, very simply that whites will be showing more and more their strong opposition to what’s going on — will stop taking it lying down, in other words, but will start taking to the streets and demonstrating. 

It takes a lot, a lot of provocation to get ordinary whites, ordinary white workingmen and women, and ordinary middle-class folk, just plain dads and housewives and mothers, to take time out of their daily routine, their daily grind, and descend into the streets to demonstrate against an outrage.  I’m not talking about homosexuals and whacked-out “lefty” weirdos and college students who demonstrate at the drop of a hat, but ordinary more or less apolitical grown white men and women.  It takes a lot, yet, as we see here, the government knows that what they’re ramming down white throats will do it, will get ordinary whites manifesting their displeasure by spilling into the streets — knows it damn well.

So ..... they know what they’re doing. 

They know they’re doing something whites hate and nevertheless they fully intend to continue trying to force it down white throats. 

The god damned son of a bitch bastards know exactly what they’re doing.  THIS IS NO ACCIDENT IN OTHER WORDS, BUT DELIBERATE AND COLDLY CALCULATED.

When we win, our side — and I say when, not if, because people are waking up and have had enough, it’s clear — when our side wins we’re going to have a job on our hands preventing attempts by outraged ordinary folk at carrying out summary retribution against whatever specific culprits they can lay hands on at that moment.  Oh yes we’ll prevent it because we oppose lawlessness and summary justice, there’ll be none of that.

But there’ll be justice.  Damn straight there will.

We’re mad now.  Good and mad.  There’ll be legal arrests based on anti-genocide statutes already on the books, and orderly and fair trials with all the protections in place, the right of counsel — counsel provided by the government if necessary, the right to confront the accusers, the right to a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, the right to a trial by a jury of one’s peers, all the legal protections.  The trials will be fair and open.  But arrests and trials there will be because the laws are already on the books my friends, and you know who you are you filthy bastards, the laws against the genocide and against the high treason to the nation which you are busily carrying out are already on the books.  And the public record of your complicity is all over the newspapers and TV reports and government records these past hellish forty-odd years.  So yes, although outraged ordinary folk will certainly be kept by cooler heads from summarily taking the law into their own hands, there will be fair trials for the accused, as fair and open and legally impeccable as trials can be.

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:49 | #

A longer piece of film of the same incident here:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9Jvft6wA-4

... this time showing arguments with the police who shielded the Muslim protesters and also the presence of a BBC photographer.

Posted by Kennie on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:48 | #

These Muslim demonstrators were protesting against the war in Iraq. Do MR readers/commentators support this war? If not, then the “counter demonstrators” should not be applauded. Sorry if this offends WN sentiments - but let’s be, at least, consistent in our opposition to the policies of this Govt.

Posted by Armor on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:33 | #

So ..... they know what they’re doing.

They know they’re doing something whites hate and nevertheless they fully intend to continue trying to force it down white throats.

The god damned son of a bitch bastards know exactly what they’re doing.  THIS IS NO ACCIDENT IN OTHER WORDS, BUT DELIBERATE AND COLDLY CALCULATED. (—F.Scrooby)

There seems to be an alliance between people who want to destroy us, and stupid conformists.

Sometimes, governments will act like that in cases that have nothing to do with immigration. For example, in the past, some governments have done their best to thwart the efforts of organizations that tried to stop the use of asbestos in the construction of buildings. In France, the government has killed hundreds of people by retaining vital information about Aids and blood tranfusion. In 1986, in the days after the Chernobyl disaster, the French government released false data about the radioactive fallout in France. It is also common for governments to release false information about the drinkability of water, for example. In fact, governments are often fanatical about pursuing policies that lead to the deaths of thousands of their own people. On a different note, I’m still waiting for the French government in Paris to realize it has nothing to gain by destroying languages like Breton and Basque.

Sometimes, people and governments become even more fanatical when they begin to realize that they are wrong.

In the film “The Bridge on the River Kwai”, I think the British army officer Alec Guinness gives a good example of misguided fanaticism: he puts his pride in working for the Japanese army!

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:57 | #

Kennie,

I wrote: It would, in my view, have been perfectly legitimate had these Muslim soldiers not been present in our land.

The proper place for them to live and demonstrate is in their own homelands.  Until they remove themselves from mine, they have no moral right to throw their weight around on Iraq or any other issue.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:45 | #

Kennie, yes we’re all against the criminally insane Neocon-Bushite War for Big Oil, the Haliburton Corporation, and Greater Israel (or most of us are, at any rate) but demonstrating against the just-returned soldiers who were out there doing what they were told, whose officers parade them through the streets on their homecoming, isn’t the way to protest that war.  These men aren’t the criminals responsible for it.  There are other ways to protest the criminals.  If you’re a Brit, by the way, may I ask when was the past time you voted for the BNP?  If you’ve had the opportunity but never availed yourself of it, why?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:55 | #

the last time