|
|
|
White American Identity Politics by Christian Miller The American political arena and mainstream media is rigged against White American solidarity. Almost every single race or ethnicity has a political organization to serve its specific racial or ethnic interests. The glaring exception is a mainstream-credited or nationally-recognized political group dedicated to White American interests. There are groups dedicated to White advocacy, but they are invariably plagued by accusations of “extremism” or “hate” or “bigotry.” The Preamble to the United States Constitution lists one of its purposes as to “secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” Perhaps this explicit dedication to the interests of the White founding stock means that no White advocacy groups are needed. Maybe the explicit mandate of the Constitution demands the protection of liberty for the posterity of the White race, so White advocacy groups are superfluous. Until the middle of the twentieth century, this view might hold water. In light of the onslaught of anti-White propaganda, legislation, indoctrination, and social policy that has since followed, this explanation is a recipe for White political suicide. Under oppressive legislation, a hostile media, and an anti-White educational system, the interests of White people have been subverted in favor of a cacophony of minority voices, all of which are alien to the original aims of the Founding Fathers. White Americans can no longer rest assured that the Constitution means what it says, or that the United States exists to preserve the interests of its White founding stock and their progeny. Instead, White Americans must organize specifically and purposefully on racial grounds, realizing that all other groups are slowly destroying each liberty and privilege that White Americans used to take for granted. White Americans have no choice but to participate in racial identity politics. If White Americans remain unorganized and without a unified voice of advocacy, they will eventually succumb to being nothing more than demoralized tax-producers for the growing entitlement class. Even worse, White Americans will face a perfect storm of skyrocketing entitlements, smoldering racial grievances, and violent uprisings emanating from the non-White racial groups. This will not be a safe or secure future for White Americans. Look to the fates of Whites in the formerly productive countries of South Africa or Zimbabwe for examples of what happens when Whites are subject to a ruling majority of non-Whites. South Africa used to be the jewel of Africa. Rhodesia (the predecessor to the failed state of Zimbabwe) was the breadbasket of Africa, exporting food to its neighbors. Now, South Africa and Zimbabwe are the rape and murder capitols of the world, and Zimbabwe cannot even feed itself, let alone its neighbors. More than five thousand Whites have been murdered since the transition to a black government in South Africa, and the numbers of rapes and robberies are too many to accurately list. American Whites need to take decisive and organized political action before they become a hated minority in their own nation. Latinos, Hispanics, and mestizos - whatever the gatekeepers of morality decide to call them - are free to organize, protest, and advance political goals strictly on the basis of race or ethnicity. Consider some of the mission statements of these advocacy groups: The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is busy:
The National Council of La Raza:
... and:
Note that the translation of “la raza” into English is “the race.” Jews are free to advocate specifically and exclusively for other Jewish people. Among other goals, the Anti-Defamation League:
The American Jewish Congress is:
Similarly, Asians are free to rally around race:
Blacks have a multitude of race-based advocacy groups. A special group for black practitioners exists for almost every professional occupation. Furthermore, the Congressional Black Caucus exists as an exclusively black organization and is comprised of exclusively black Congressmen advancing exclusively black interests. In fact, all “people of color” (meaning all non-White people) have an implicit license to politically organize according to racial identity. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) states:
Blacks, Jews, Asians, Hispanics, “people of color” - all of these groups advocate and organize on the basis of race or ethnicity. Yet White Americans may do no such thing without an onslaught of defamatory remarks, negative press coverage, and accusations of “hate” or “extremism.” The knee-jerk negative reaction to a White identity organization is not natural. Suspicion regarding an explicitly White political group is the product of intense conditioning from a very young age. The origin and methodology of this conditioning is too complicated to adequately explain herein, but much of it stems from public education, globalist elites, and the corporate media. In short, from a very young age, White Americans are taught that love and admiration for the race and ethnicity of non-Whites is a healthy and sociable trait, but love and admiration for Whites by Whites is strictly forbidden. White Americans are conditioned to scorn their own heritage and to fawn over all other races. According to the ruling orthodoxy, admiration of non-Whites is tolerance and love but admiration of Whites is hate and bigotry. No other group in America is taught or conditioned to have the same amount of self-sacrificial aims or self-loathing emotions. In fact, most other ethnic groups are encouraged to have a deep and profound sense of heritage and ethnic identity. Perversely, Whites are expected to enthusiastically jump on the non-White bandwagon while abandoning their own families. Whites must celebrate the achievements of every other race and ethnicity. Only Whites are forbidden from celebrating their own extended family, heritage, and history. Any sense of pride or identity stemming from a genetic origin must only be experienced vicariously for White Americans. An entire month has been dedicated to a celebration of the contributions to high culture, technology, art, philosophy, and civilization produced by black Americans. If someone protests that an entire month seems like immense favoritism towards blacks, then calls of “racism” are certain. Any opposition to the politically correct viewpoint is met with swift “justice” and the punishment is summary social execution. The mere accusation of “racism” is enough to ruin a career, sink a political campaign, cancel an entertainment show, or alienate an individual. Perhaps this is a better explanation for the dearth of White political groups. Most of the nonsensical “truths” that modern Americans are forced to swallow are nothing more than shibboleths. If the shibboleth is met with anything other than the proper response, the “outsider” has been successfully identified, and swift countermeasures will be undertaken. Instead of American spies inside Germany’s Third Reich being discovered by holding up the pointer, middle, and ring fingers to signify the number three, American citizens within the border are identified as racist outcasts by merely questioning the dubious notion that “diversity is our greatest strength.” Instead of asking a gringo to pronounce a Spanish word with a rolling ‘r’, ask the sociology professor who is up for tenure about her thoughts about the long-term viability of an increasingly diverse America. She had better work on her “accent” and toe the party line if she wants to have a successful academic career. Otherwise, she may infect future legions with the disease of critical thought, healthy dissent, or individuality. Heaven forbid, she may even fail in her greatest duty - to indoctrinate her pupils with the glorious fonts of wisdom which are Political Correctness and Tolerance for Diversity. Joseph Goebbels would be proud of this efficient method for political cleansing. A Soviet apparatchik would shriek with joy at the simplicity of this plan for purging the undesirables from the New Plan for Humanity. As non-White Americans are free to create political organizations for the sole purpose of advancing the interests of a specific ethnicity, and White Americans are forbidden to do so, non-Whites enjoy fundamental rights and benefits which are denied to Whites. The logical implications of these thoughts and observations are non-controversial, but the act of drawing attention to it is definitely controversial. It might even be . . . “racist.” As White Americans are prevented from organizing, thinking, or acting in a unified manner, and yet all other non-White groups are permitted and encouraged to do so, White Americans are at a distinct political disadvantage. Social pressure, media influence, legislation, and educational indoctrination combine to influence Whites against organizing or even thinking on the basis of race. This injustice must not stand. White Americans must organize to advance their own interests or they will fade into a dispossessed minority in the nation their forefathers carved from the unforgiving wilderness. White Americans must regain the political power they have implicitly relinquished. White Americans need not fear their own shadows any longer. Instead, White Americans must take back the reins and restore the conditions that made the United States of America into an exemplary society and a first-order civilization. Comments:2
Posted by majix on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:22 | # “As non-White Americans are free to create political organizations for the sole purpose of advancing the interests of a specific ethnicity, and White Americans are forbidden to do so, non-Whites enjoy fundamental rights and benefits which are denied to Whites.” Another fine post from C Miller. It seems all non-whites in America enjoy a fundamental constitutional right, the right to organize, that white American citizens are denied. Non-whites enjoy these rights even if they are recent legal or illegal immigrants! Why can’t this be challenged legally: that white Americans have the same constitutional right to organize and defend our interests as every other race. Considering the decayed state of the judicial system we might not win but it would be worth it to hear them tying themselves in legal knots in an attempt to justify such blatant anti-white racism.
I wonder how much they had to pay for her insults. 5 cents is too much. The myth of White privilege is another color-coded word game like “racist” and “anti-semite” that needs to be challenged and destroyed. 3
Posted by BOMBkangaroo on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:11 | #
Probably because most of it doesn’t happen in the courts or on Capitol Hill. Strictly speaking they’re not doing anything unconstitutional or illegal. They’re free to continue to sensationalise and defame white advocates until we can afford the prohibitively expensive campaign of litigation necessary to make them think twice. (which will probably never happen) 4
Posted by majix on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:01 | # “Probably because most of it doesn’t happen in the courts or on Capitol Hill.” Right. But a legal challenge would force the issue into the courts, the official public forum of debate. Funding is always a problem but not necessarily prohibitive. Cost could be kept down by using pro-white lawyers willing to work for the cause either pro bono or at low-cost and possibly making a name for themselves. Have they all been murdered by blacks or rotting in jail? (Richard Barrett, Edgar Steele) The mission statements posted on the internet could be used as a template by substituting the word white for hispanic, black, or jewish. The pro-white organization would have to be careful to limit themselves to the same kinds of activities and policies as other race groups, document every instance of abuse and harrassment directed against them, apply for funding from big money foundations like the Ford Foundation that we already know funds La Raza. If they refuse funding sue them for racial discrimination. The point would be to get official on-the-record statements and force the debate into public awareness that the official policy of US ruling elites is dicrimination against white Americans. 5
Posted by one on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:27 | # Rusty Mason is on fire at OD. He’s tearing Hunter Wallace’s nonsense apart.
Some good comments by Celestial Time also
6
Posted by one on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:39 | # James Edwards: Glenn Beck 8/28 rally – the death rattle of mainstream conservatism
7
Posted by John on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:14 | # “Here’s a photo from the rally” To answer their quesiton, no you don’t look racist. You look like People of Wal-Mart. 8
Posted by Lena on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:08 | # http://www.martinlutherking.org/thebeast.html
Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as “Daddy King.” “Daddy King” named his son Michael. In 1935, “Daddy King” had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as “Martin Luther King” and to his son as “Martin Luther King, Jr.” None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. “Daddy” King’s son’s real name is to this day Michael King. King’s Brazen Cheating We read in Michael Hoffman’s “Holiday for a Cheater”: The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled “Life is What You Make It,” according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams.
Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn’t really “Martin Luther King, Jr.” What’s left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people. From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King’s associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the “Los Angeles Times” reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned. Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King’s famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, “The Worker,- - openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King’s employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963. Bayard Rustin’s replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O’Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O’Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O’Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O’Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis “Globe-Democrat - -of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O’Dell’s party membership became known. What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O’Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, “immediately hired him again- - as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the “Richmond News-Leader - -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King’s 1963 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King’s movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title “Radio Free Dixie.” In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans. During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled “Negroes With Guns.” The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee. According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” In his 1981 book, “The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.”, Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, “...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution…. The whole structure of American life must be changed…. We are engaged in the class struggle.” Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes “handler.” Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King’s mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King’s more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King’s book, “Stride Toward Freedom.” It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King’s income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King’s speeches. King described Levison as one of his “closest friends.” FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money .....
Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called King. I want you to start to think for yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media’s active promotion of King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie? You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up. 9
Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:17 | # I have a mixed reaction to Mr. Miller. I agree with everything he has written. I, and lots of others, have also felt this way, and talked this way, for at least 20+ years. The first issue of American Renaissance plaintively asked “who speaks for us”. There is literally nothing in this post that hasn’t been said, including here at MR. What’s new or original? Indeed, even recently, per the perennial question of WN strategy, I have argued that, propagandistically, we should be ‘pure anti-immigrationists’, focusing on the (non-racial) problems of immigration, but also future security concerns of whites (as eg in Rhodesia, and as Sam Francis argued for decades). So, yes, you’re a good man, Miller, keep it up. But you might want to write less like a campaign speech, and try for a pithier approach, highlighting new ideas per strategy or whatnot, as opposed to regurgitations re ‘our plight’. 10
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:50 | # Matt Parrott’s take on the Tea Party movement: it’s The American Revolutionary Cargo Cult: hoping that engaging in some symbolic gestures in imitation of what they saw produce a good outcome before, without any understanding of the underlying mechanisms then or now, or what they really have to oppose and aim at, they’ll be exploited to the hilt by the other side and finally rolled up and disposed of without seeing a single one of their goals achieved, not one: http://www.counter-currents.com/2010/08/the-american-revolutionary-cargo-cult/ . We can’t get where we have to go without frank talk about race. The word “racist” as used today is meaningless yet the Tea Party is enslaved to it and is going to flush itself down the toilet as a result. Sarah Palin is a very nice lady whom I adore. But where politics are concerned she’s an air-headed neocon creation and puppet. Listen to her, you might as well be listening to Bill Kristol or even David Frum. 11
Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:03 | # “As non-White Americans are free to create political organizations for the sole purpose of advancing the interests of a specific ethnicity, and White Americans are forbidden to do so, non-Whites enjoy fundamental rights and benefits which are denied to Whites.” Who or what law or legal body has said whites cannot form pro-white groups? 12
Posted by Notus Wind on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:06 | # Hitchens has the best take on the most recent Tea Party rally.
The mainstream Right in America is like that of a body that has an immune system but no head. The people that attend these rallies don’t consciously understand the sociological forces that are fueling their movement. 13
Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:23 | # We can’t get where we have to go without frank talk about race. The word “racist” as used today is meaningless yet the Tea Party is enslaved to it and is going to flush itself down the toilet as a result. A violent yes and a violent no. Ultimately, the first sentence is correct. Ultimately. And yes the TP is worthless, though its grassroots isn’t. Those are mostly our people. Who are we trying to save? But, Fred, a frank racial talk at this stage in our people’s consciousness raising will simply send the TPers scurrying for cover! Those left will be the same old WNs. What is needed is a practical organization containing the TPers, but oriented towards WN concerns (not this appalling MLK asskissing - Beck is a worthless - and stupid - neocon). Do you think the TPers would have gotten offended if an intelligent person had spoken of the need to secure the border, stabilize the US population by ending artificial immigration, and abolish unjust affirmative action, along with lots of other standard conservative fare? Of course not! They would have cheered. Candidates advocating policies which protect whites do well. Candidates advocating openly pro-white policies go nowhere. Logical? No. Reality? Yeah. 14
Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:33 | # Notus Wind, But you omitted the most interesting paragraph (the filthy rats smell the Middle American Revolution coming!): “Concerns of this kind are not confined to the Tea Party belt. Late professors Arthur Schlesinger and Samuel Huntington both published books expressing misgivings about, respectively, multiculturalism and rapid demographic change. But these were phrased so carefully as almost to avoid starting the argument they flirted with. More recently, almost every European country has seen the emergence of populist parties that call upon nativism and give vent to the idea that the majority population now feels itself unwelcome in its own country. [Haller: its own planet!] The ugliness of Islamic fundamentalism in particular has given energy and direction to such movements. It will be astonishing if the United States is not faced, in the very near future, with a similar phenomenon. Quite a lot will depend on what kind of politicians emerge to put themselves at the head of it. Saturday’s rally was quite largely confined to expressions of pathos and insecurity, voiced in a sickly and pious tone. The emotions that underlay it, however, may not be uttered that way indefinitely.” Exactly why I wanted Obongo to beat McAmnesty. Get ready for the whirlwind awakening of our people, Hitchshit! 15
Posted by Notus Wind on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:37 | # Leon,
I would like to see the TP types spend their energy advancing a Tenth Amendment (or state sovereignty) movement that seeks to force a showdown between a subset of the White American people and their federal government. Imagine, for a moment, the possibilities that would be available to us if just a handful of states were able to secure their independence to the point where the local population had the freedom to pass and enforce laws without fear of some federal authority declaring them unconstitutional. In my opinion, the politics of immigration and population stabilization are too limited. Even if all the TP types were to secure “conservative” majorities in Congress do you seriously believe that they would pass (and enforce) the legislation needed to secure our borders and stabilize the population? Our real solution lies in securing our independence from the federal beast and not the stopgap politics of immigration. 16
Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:10 | # I would like to see the TP types spend their energy advancing a Tenth Amendment (or state sovereignty) movement that seeks to force a showdown between a subset of the White American people and their federal government. Imagine, for a moment, the possibilities that would be available to us if just a handful of states were able to secure their independence to the point where the local population had the freedom to pass and enforce laws without fear of some federal authority declaring them unconstitutional. In my opinion, the politics of immigration and population stabilization are too limited. Even if all the TP types were to secure “conservative” majorities in Congress do you seriously believe that they would pass (and enforce) the legislation needed to secure our borders and stabilize the population? Our real solution lies in securing our independence from the federal beast and not the stopgap politics of immigration.(Notus Wind) _________ I fear you are regressing, sir. Bit early in the morn? This is the first commentary from you on this site that has caused me to hoot in derision. I support states’ rights as a conservative, not just WN. But what world are you living in - politically or constitutionally? The Constitution died in ‘the late unpleasantness’; states’ rights when the by then lesser South capitulated to school integration. The South in the 50s-60s was a more ‘integral national’ place than anywhere today. Its whites (as everywhere else) were much tougher than today’s. The South collapsed when federal troops (far whiter than in today’s military) were brought in. How will a handful of states (with hands full of desperately pleaded for federal largesse) secure any independence to pass laws without fear of federal authority? Why would they? How would they? Which handful? And what possibilities? To declare the Ethnostate?! Our only hope of securing our independence from the Federal beast is to STOP IMMIGRATION NOW! Immigrants from the Mud World are increasingly interpenetrating the entirety of the US. If we don’t end the deluge (as I said to a teacher in 1982), we lose everything - and the possibility of anything. The beauty of making immigration cessation our signature (non-radical) issue is that it is the issue that best advances white EGI, while also being justifiable in totally race-neutral terms (see Roy Beck’s and Mark Krikorian’s books), so that frightened and confused little TPers don’t scamper off. But the bigger bounty is that an America First immigration policy can bring (white) Americans together. It represents the best way to develop implicit whiteness. Toughen the spines of conservatives on job-taking immigration (20% real unemployment - we heard of our present predicament, right?), and a world of real possibilities can start to be not only imagined, but pursued ... 17
Posted by Notus Wind on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:44 | # Leon,
Presumably, they would want to get out from under the federal thumb, that’s why. How will this happen. It could start with a simple act of defiance where some state passes a popular law that is then declared unconstitutional by a federal judge but instead of respecting the federal ruling the state government decides to enforce the law anyway. At that moment the federal government has a decision to make, either coerce the state government through force and risk the national consequences that would follow or allow the state to go its own way on this matter so long as other aspects of American life remain unaffected. Is this really so hard to imagine? If there was a movement in place to prepare the popular imagination for such an event I don’t think that we’d see a repeat of what happened to the South in the 50s and 60s. Furthermore, all of this is in line with current trends as White Americans are more alienated from their federal government then ever before in the post-War era (and possibly earlier). Unfortunately, the ethnostate would have to come later. We’re not going to get to where we need to be in one fell swoop.
The Constitution may be dead as a body of law but it’s very much alive as a political force. It remains a powerful symbol in the minds of White conservatives and could easily be used as a rallying point for declaring independence from the federal government.
I’ve been involved in the immigration restriction movement longer than I’ve thought about nationalist politics and I don’t see how we’ll ever meaningfully restrict immigration or close the Southern border under the current political setup. The political establishment is completely unwilling to do any of this and the regionally concentrated segments of the population that agree with us on these issues are powerless to do anything through local politics. Yes, the message of immigration restriction can be communicated to TP types, but to what effect other than blocking future amnesties? 18
Posted by PF on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:08 | # Thanks for interesting paragraphs Notus and one. I for one am content with what has happened. Given the status of our people - still indoctrinated, still believing - Glenn Beck and TP is all we can have. I know it won’t work, but imagine what beast of a carefully-laid plan would work. Then look at our people and realize, they just aren’t ready for work of that kind. They aren’t hungry enough, they don’t yet want it enough. In the main. People have not really begun to understand what this struggle means or is about, and just looking at them reveals their lack of seriousness. You’ve seen how fitness experts draw up the most meticulous, specific plans of diet and exercise for their clients. The internet is alive with 100,000 different suggested workout routines and schedules - just go to a bodybuilding site, and there are a thousand plans about which day to do arms, legs and back. Yet we’re all aware that a man who was motivated to lose weight and gain muscle, and understood some general principles of how it was effected, could take any one of these plans or indeed no proper plan at all, and begin to lose weight and gain muscle. Reversing the situation, how many times have you seen or known someone with a meticulously crafted workout plan - how did they look after 6 months? They should have looked like a greek god, but they look the same, or worse. Crafting a beautiful strategy for an absent will is not useful. I take comfort in knowing that none of this noise was very much tolerated in the public discourse of the 90s. Having an angry blonde man on the air with the face-time Beck is getting was unthinkable. I walk into a bookstore and see on the ‘Popular Suggestions’ rack two books about surviving armaggedon and one book supposedly by Glenn Beck himself, called the Overton Window. The first paragraph explains how shifts in discourse can make ideas that once appeared radical become mainstream. Even if the man is a puppet, the paragraph in question read like something from a Soren Renner speech. It proves that something is happening, even if things aren’t going as fast as we want. 19
Posted by Notus Wind on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:29 | # PF, I agree, there are a number of encouraging signs and while many of our people are not where we would like them to be they have nevertheless started along a path that will lead them to more radical considerations in time. 20
Posted by one on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:44 | # The apologies continue: Glenn Beck regrets calling Obama a ‘racist’
21
Posted by For:GW on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:06 | # Gaddafi wants EU cash to stop African migrants Libyan leader Col Muammar Gaddafi (left) in Rome with Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi, 30 Aug 10 Despite historical tensions Col Gaddafi has forged friendlier relations with Italy Libyan leader Col Muammar Gaddafi says the EU should pay Libya at least 5bn euros (£4bn; $6.3bn) a year to stop illegal African immigration and avoid a “black Europe”. Speaking on a visit to Italy, Col Gaddafi said Europe “could turn into Africa” as “there are millions of Africans who want to come in”. Far fewer now reach Italy from Libya. We don’t know… what will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans” European Commission figures show that in 2009 the number of people caught trying to enter Italy illegally fell to 7,300, from 32,052 in 2008. The data was collected under the EU’s Eurodac fingerprinting system. Col Gaddafi has forged close ties with Italy since a friendship treaty was signed two years ago. It sought to draw a line under historic bitterness between Libya and Italy, its former colonial master. “Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European, and even black, as there are millions who want to come in,” said Col Gaddafi, quoted by the AFP news agency. 22
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:50 | # Geopolitics in North Africa, I imagine. The fact that the influx of SSAs can be turned off suggests that they were always tools for Libya to use to get something it wanted from the EU. Now we know what it was. 23
Posted by majix on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 05:55 | # It’s not Libya or Africans causing Europe’s immigration problems. It’s the leadership of the EU. Last week I read an article (sorry I don’t have the link) an EU minister issued an official report that Europe will need at least 56 million more African immigrants in the next decade because of the declining birthrate of native white Europeans. 56 million MORE uneducated African “workers” when Europe is already being overwhelmed with non-white immigrants dependent on government handouts during a time European unemployment is rising. It seems to me what Gadaffi, who is often described as “shrewd,” is saying is that the Libyan government won’t cooperate in reclaiming it’s citizens unless he’s paid billions of dollars. In other words, extortion. 24
Posted by Bill on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:18 | # This is some rabbit hole. The New Yorker. Jane Mayers’ Covert Operations. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?printable=true H/T linked by Justin Raimondo. In Defense of the Kochtopus. Justin Raimondo antiwar.com 30.8.2010 http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/08/29/in-defense-of-the-kochtopus/ It’s lengthy but well worth the time spent. 25
Posted by BGD on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:13 | #
One of the main psychological hurdles for the unenlightened Europeans among whom we live is conceiving exactly how to reverse race replacement. Many are not willing to do what would need to be done to accomplish this. They picture Third World hell holes remembered from crisis laden news programmes in their mind’s eye and can’t bring themselves to pull the lever. They would rather their own family tree become a thing of history than cause temporary discomfort to non-Euro populations. The appeal of the ideas above is that if something like this could be effected in the US and in tandem with this a group of laws put in place that ended positive discrimination, some types of welfare, Medicaid and so forth then just like the illegals in Arizona, many of these non European populations would vacate the state(s) in question without any coercion and go to a more conducive environment within the US itself (or Mexico). That would of course increase the burdens on those localities and encourage other states to take similar steps. As LH said above southern states were more hardened at the time of forced integration and are weaker now. But so is the general culture and one would assume the tolerance for a militarised society on their own doorstep. Which to me seems to suggest that the Federal Government would not be sending their Iraq and Afghanistan blooded warriors in to force lockdown. Any supposed use of such a tool by the government would potentially hasten the demise of the US as currently constituted. 26
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:23 | # ”I read an article (sorry I don’t have the link) an EU minister issued an official report that Europe will need at least 56 million more African immigrants in the next decade” (—Majix) That did happen and that is the EU’s plan, to import at least 56 million more African Negroes into the EU (I’d say more like triple that number) and force them down whites’ throats — they’re implementing it right now as we speak — but even if you had the link Dan Dare would be on here requiring the official documents in black and white, duly notarized, signed, sealed, and delivered complete with the Pope’s imprimatur and ten European monarchs co-signing in blood. Otherwise, according to Dan “We’re Doing It To Ourselves” Dare it’s just rumors, worthless lies spread by alarmists, ain’t gonna happen, ever. So watch out when you cite that sort of news here, DD is watching and he’s gonna call you to account. Call the ones doing it to account? Never. But he’ll call you to account for connecting the dots and sounding the alarm. No one’s allowed to connect the dots around here, you see. So watch out next time you post anything like that here: according to Double-D it’s false and you’re a troublemaker for repeating it. Come back in fifteen years though, and take a look at the 150 million additional African Negroes all over Europe fathering mulatto babies, additional over and above what we have in the year 2010, and ask DD how that happened if it wasn’t a plan, and he’ll scratch his head and say “I dunno but since we never had a black and white document duly notarized with the King’s and the Pope’s official seals on it, we can’t say it was intended. It must have just happened .... or .... wait, I know ....... We did it to ourselves! That’s it! We simply must have done it to ourselves! In the absence of duly notarized documents that’s the only explanation possible.” Now excuse me while I resume Dot-Connecting Patrol. Hey you! You, over there, yes you! Quit connecting those dots or you’ll find yourself in big trouble around here! No dot-connecting allowed at this blog! 27
Posted by Fr. John on Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:46 | # All good observations,but they merely re-hash what we: a) already know I, for one, care for Europe, her children, and her ancestral faith (Conciliar, Trinitarian Christianity). to my readers. Some of them are: a) Rome (and post-schism Roman Catholi-‘schism’) are severely marred by the philosophical error of the Filioque, which has detrimentally influenced all of European thought, since at least 1100. We need to look to our roots, and not the perverted fruit of a post-Vatican II’ized sodomized cult, frankly. Rome is dead- ‘Let the dead bury the dead.’ Well, that’s my take. But it sure as hell beats out the eternal talking AROUND the issues. But THEY have agendas. What about us? But then, there are others- with whom I am in disagreement as well, who are on the ‘other side:’ But at least they see the enemy, and we are in agreement as to WHO that is. And that old saying, ‘The enemy of my enemy has become my friend’ begins to take on far greater import, if the ‘friends’ on sites such as this, can only sit and ‘piddle, twiddle, and resolve, not one damn thing do we solve,’ - as John Adams sings in the musical 1776. Gentlemen, it is time to act. The time for words is over. Perhaps you all should read Alinsky’s book, and see what the Obamanation is doing, whether the entire nation of the USA wants him to, or not…. And then ACT in our own way, to TAKE OUR CIVILIZATION BACK. 28
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:46 | # Has Steve Sailer been reading MR.com? (—this entry for example; also, long a frequent theme in James Bowery’s thread commentary):
29
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:06 | # Matt Parrott got an e-mail from a typical anti-racist nincompoop who happened to see his blog. Instead of treating the imbecile the way I would have, he actually responded in a serious, respectful way (e-mail your nominations of Matt for canonization to: the Pope care of Vatican City, Italy). After performing that saintly act, Matt wondered if his reply to the creep had been too soft and conciliatory, and he invites criticisms. See what you think: http://delightsome.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/mailbag-standing-up-to-evil/ . 30
Posted by Notus Wind on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:39 | # Scrooby, Did you not see Matt slander GW in the same article? 31
Posted by Lurker on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:55 | # NW
But that was so obviously a joke. Or ar you joking too? 32
Posted by Notus Wind on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 03:45 | # Lurker,
I wasn’t joking and I don’t think Matt was either. But, at the same time, you could be right and I’m just wildly off the mark on this. 33
Posted by Jimmy Marr on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:10 | # Lurker, For those of us in the States, who are constantly plagued by crank calls from rude Englishmen, this is no laughing matter. 34
Posted by Jimmy Marr on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:14 | # We can always expect a rash of these incidents whenever the Captain has been on a roll. 35
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:16 | # Notus, Lurker’s right, clearly Matt was joking there. Sheeesh! I’d have thought it was obvious! 37
Posted by Jimmy Marr on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:54 | # Stick to your guns, Notus. I think you may be on to something. Often when I get these calls, there’s classical music blaring in the background. One time the caller referred to me as a filthy palengenicist. I’m relieved Matt has had the courage to pierce the veil of silence that has long shrouded this mystery. I thought I was the only one. 38
Posted by Notus Wind on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:09 | #
No one makes me laugh like you Jimmy. 39
Posted by Matt Parrott on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:17 | # Notus Wind, The incident itself definitely did happen, but I was joking about it being GuessedWorker. 40
Posted by Lurker on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:48 | #
What can I say, its a compulsion. The domestic authorities are starting to complain about the size of the phone bill though. 41
Posted by invisible on Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:35 | # The sad news is thzt the tea party movement is years behind and that a large reason why the white conservative christian man is being pushed out is due to the unfortunate treasonous back stabbing by white polititions and the re education of our youth by the marxist hippie minority that has overtaken our education system. The media continues to flaunt the rediculous ideas that revolve around white guilt and whites continue to allow themselves to fall for it. These small minority of super rich ruling class whites who swindled the masses durring reconstruction and still swindle today need to be whiped from the slate of washington, followed by the overwhelming majority of blacks, hispanics, and miiddle easterners who poison this country. Oh, and let’s not forget the asians, ie, china. Did you like growing up in america? Well, if we can’t come togeather and put some boots to asses our kids will never understand that feeling. Post a comment:
Next entry: Logic: our sometime-friend, sometime-enemy
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by one on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:40 | #
The latest news regarding White American identity politics is Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally.
Hunter Wallace believes Beck is “striking the right chord” and “can now speak with authority for the White majority” and thinks the Tea Party is “Sarah Palin-style ‘implicit White Nationalism.’”
Vanishing American, on the other hand, had a very dim view of the rally. She said, “Beck seems to be shilling for a new religion, sort of a Politically Correct cult where MLK and the Founding Fathers are co-venerated.”
One of the speakers at Beck’s rally was Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King. ABC News reports, “While speaking in front of tens of thousands today in DC, King said that she hopes that white privilege will become human privilege and that America will soon repent of the sin of racism and return itself to honor.”
Here’s a photo from the rally