A US border wall, as any requirement of border control, is imperative for pervasive ecology, but…

Posted by DanielS on Saturday, 12 January 2019 10:24.

United States Border Patrol at Algodones Sand Dunes, California, USA. The fence on the US-Mexican border is a special construction of narrow, 15 feet tall elements, that are movable vertically. This way they can be lifted on top of the ever shifting sand dunes (image Public Domain, Wikipedia).

Lest there be any misunderstanding, the position here is that the matter of a United States Southern border wall, fence, whatever, as any requirement of border control, is very important.

Border control there is particularly illustrative of a central matter, which is that border control is crucial to the management of populations in human and pervasive ecology; issues which include territorial carrying capacity - hence, at this border, the particular demographic is a secondary matter; salient there is the matter of Mexico’s massive population - Mexico City being among the most overpopulated cities in the world.

Nevertheless, the demographic and rule structure of The United States is already on a disastrous trajectory for Whites, will remain so, even with a wall on the south border.

While border control is essential at any rate, the worst case scenario of its instantiation would be that it will be used to lull complacency of propositional conservatism - “we Americans all being in the same relatively taken-care-of boat” - and further close us in and galvanize us into mulattoization; furthering the trajectory of those who left us susceptible for the Cartesian rule structure of the constitution and to the Jewry which weaponized it against our necessary discrimination both at the border and within the borders.

...galvanizing us with the demographic upshot of this manipulation unfortunately against a population that does have some warrant as native American behind them and which, for their nature, is highly ethnocentric. It is a demographic thus, which has been effective against integration with blacks, against integration with Whites, indifferent to Jewish violin playing; as such, in the most optimistic scenario, could be allied with other Asians and Whites against black power, Jewish supremacism and Islamic imposition over human ecological coordination (agreed, getting Mestizos to cooperate in ecological management is no small trick; perhaps Asians proper could help reason, coordinate and enforce such management).

Failing that is a default “alliance” by contrast in sudden, “conservative” implementation against Meztiso populations that looks suspiciously in line with Jewish interests against an Asian, Mestizo, White alliance as it would resist continued instigation of the Mulattoization of the broad mass of American Whites, while allying Jewry with increasingly rare White sell-out elites; whose precarious situation would be more and more prone to interbreeding with Jewry or the Mulatto mass.

Comments:

Posted by Sic Has Elid g Jewed on Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:29 | #

Posted by Brad on Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:12 | #

President Trump Caves On Government Shutdown

Occidental Dissent, Hunter Wallace, 25 Jan 2019:

So, the partial government shutdown is finally coming to an end.

Trump has been humiliated by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. Senate Republicans caved and that forced Trump to cave. He isn’t getting any funding for his wall. The whole episode was nothing but a waste of time to look like he was fighting for the wall funding after two years of avoiding the issue.

I increasingly think it is a waste of time to sit here, day after day, following the news cycle to document the ongoing failure of Trump and American conservatism. It just discourages me from writing. I’ve been doing it for two years now and have grown tired of it. I will probably end up pivoting to history for a while.

Posted by Tom Brokaw isn't racist, he's wrong on Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:12 | #

CNN, 29 Jan 2019:

It’s not that Tom Brokaw is racist. It’s that he’s wrong

Indeed, the last thing that ethnonationalsts should advocate is assimilation, whether under the rubric of English, Americananism or Christianity.

Why would Kevin Michael Grace and Luke Ford defend Tom Brokaw in his comments and criticize those who’ve reprimanded him?

Why would Pat Buchanan rail against the “sewer of multiculturalism” and by default thus, in favor of integration?

The answer is that because they are advocating foolery - they cannot get out of their modernist way of thinking and adjust to the obvious requirement of (White) post modernity; that is, if one is to advocate a competent way of looking after our human ecology.

Ibid.

Tom Brokaw, the famed NBC News journalist, is very likely not a racist, as many have accused after comments he made on national television about Hispanic-Americans. I suspect the same is true of Duke University professor Megan Neely. Still, each of them recently proved they are blinded by tradition bias and a belief that being white is the default right, true and wise way to live in America.

During a discussion about immigration on “Meet the Press,” Brokaw said this:

“I also happen to believe that the Hispanics should work harder at assimilation. ... That’s one of the things I’ve been saying for a long time. You know, that they ought not to be just codified in their communities but make sure that all their kids are learning to speak English, and that they feel comfortable in the communities. And that’s going to take outreach on both sides, frankly.”

Neely, who was serving as the school’s director of graduate studies in the biostatistics department before resigning on Saturday, used Brokaw’s logic to tell Chinese students to not speak their native tongue. “I have no idea how hard it has been and still is for you to come to the US and have to learn in a non-native language,” she wrote to the students after a couple of her colleagues were disturbed hearing Chinese being spoken in a common area. “As such, I have the upmost (sic) respect for what you are doing. That being said, I encourage you to commit to using English 100% of the time when you are in Hock or any other professional setting.”

There are legitimate reasons to believe Brokaw and Neely intended their words as guidance more than racist putdown. In the United States, the ability to speak and write clear English is an asset and a near-requirement for anyone aiming for the upper rungs in most high-profile industries, including journalism, academia, business and politics. Can you name a single leader in any of those industries in this country who doesn’t have a solid handle of the English language? Immigrants have long known this, which is why they have always been doing what Brokaw suggested they weren’t—adapting to and embracing some of the cultural norms of their adopted country, including the predominant language.

Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:29 | #

If Nordics want their descendants to be brown all they have to do is breed with swarthoids. That’s how swarthoids got brown in the first place - by breeding with Arabs.

Posted by Captain Calm on Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:29 | #

Captainchaos, I don’t know what you mean by “swarthoids”, but the science indicates that people were “swarthoid” in the first place, then mutated lighter skin as their populations migrated north.

As some southern European’s swarthiness may come from admixture with Middle Eastern populations and you are concerned to maintain the distinct European kinds, then you should be advocating the European DNA nation - it is a means (and conceived as such) to maintain and manage our distinct kinds, including the Nordics and those southern European buffering nations in a way - methodically, scientifically - far more effectively than your emotional vitriol will achieve.

...furthermore, if European bounds are occasionally crossed, especially with accountability and kept to a managed minimum, it is far less a transgression of EGI when it occurs with other Europeans.

Here’s a mix of Nothern Italian with Sicilian - doesn’t seem to have harmed her Nordicism to the end.

By MariaSheilaMiani - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=63941617

Here’s one that’s half German/half Sicilian

Speaking for myself, I was disappointed to see how much blonde admixture there was in Italy… not that this type isn’t fine, but I prefer the distinct kinds to be maintained and also value the strikingness of dark haired Italian women. The desire to maintain the distinct European kinds is also a motivation for the European DNA Nations.

Posted by Unite the Oxymorons on Wed, 30 Jan 2019 06:10 | #

Unite the Oxymorons

At Affirmative Right, Matt Parrott writes:

A few hours ago, President Trump capitulated on the government shutdown, handing Schulosi and the open borders lobby a historic victory. He did so after it became clear that the GOP leadership were planning to override him. A few days before that, Rep. Steve King was stripped of all of his committee assignments by the GOP for speaking up on behalf of “Western Civilization.”

At every turn, it’s the GOP which proves to be our true opposition, with the Democrats and the Jewish community cashing in on the concessions, compromises, and capitulations of the nominal “white guy party.” Alex Linder explained this in his essay, “Attack the Conservatives”:

“The rise of nationalism is almost a mathematical function of the decline of conservatism.”

George Lincoln Rockwell put it even more pointedly:

“To hell with the right wing!”

I have lived this myself. Back in 2010, I orchestrated a statewide robocall campaign, set up a plausibly deniable front group, and hustled the hell out of dozens of state legislators to pass Senate Bill 590, an illegal immigration bill. It took a tremendous amount of effort to get the GOP majority to even bring it to a vote. They didn’t want to. Then after it passed, the GOP governor, Mitch Daniels, vetoed it. I pumped thousands of my own money into an even greater putsch to override the veto. And we achieved it; then the Secretary of State, also GOP, declared it unconstitutional, shelved it.

So what does Parrott conclude? More “unite the right against ‘the left’ is needed”....

[...]Ibid.
Charlottesville was a mistake because it was too deep into enemy territory, but the mistake wasn’t street activism. In Pikeville, we had several locals join us, both before, during, and after the event. At the end of the event, even the locals who came out to oppose us turned on the antifa, chasing them back into their charter buses with “Blue Lives Matter!” chants.

[...]

Say what you want about the lawsuits and arrests, the combined forces of America’s east coast left all joined together in one place to physically destroy us, and were decisively defeated. We only lost Charlottesville after they ran home to their attorneys and politicians, a setback which we could be confronting head on instead of with our backs turned.

How were they decisively defeated? More casualties?

Ibid.

Mentorship

Mike Enoch at Pikeville ...

Those Whites who know what’s good for them and their people will really say to hell with the right, stop leading with their chin, uniting line formation with motley anti-social idiots and provocateurs and walking into enemy traps and fire. So long as you want to unite the right, you will be uniting with nuts and infiltrators who are taking what should be provisional a-social perspectives.

Unite the right = unite the anti-social = oxymoronic

Posted by state-by-state cost of illegal immigrants on Sun, 03 Feb 2019 06:40 | #

Posted by "Papers Please" on Sun, 03 Feb 2019 12:03 | #

Particularly as the article is cast in terms of pervasive ecology, at this point there ought to be a counter argument about how the wall would effect other species and natural flows, where a “papers please"policy could be sufficiently effective in reducing illegal immigration and its impact on human ecology.

This argument would, in turn, spawn a counter argument that “papers please” risks a slippery slope of police state level micro accountability - the kind of commonly episodic, or worse, relational level intrusion, that the best run (homogeneous) societies don’t have the need for.

The rebut would be on the order of keeping accounts requested (“papers please”) to a minimum and primarily where and when privileges enjoyed by citizens are being administered.

Posted by John Roberts on Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:45 | #

Border Wall Prototypes Demolished In California

Occidental Dissent, February 28, 2019 Hunter Wallace

The Associated Press@AP
The president’s supporters saw them as a symbol of his commitment to border security. His detractors saw them as monuments to wasted taxpayer dollars.

Now, the border wall prototypes are being reduced to rubble. READ MORE: http://apne.ws/VBhZ7xt

This is okay because he declared a national emergency to build the border wall, right?

“Senate Republicans are offering a choice to President Donald Trump: Withdraw your national emergency declaration at the border or face a potential rebellion from the GOP.

The message was delivered clearly on Thursday by Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), part of an effort by senior Republicans to avoid a direct confrontation with Trump on the Senate floor.

In a much-anticipated floor speech, the retiring senator declined to state whether he will become the deciding vote to block the president’s maneuver. But he signaled broad opposition to the emergency declaration and sought to convince Trump that he has other ways to collect $5.7 billion for the border wall — the precise amount of money he demanded during the government shutdown fight.

“He’s got sufficient funding without a national emergency, he can build a wall and avoid a dangerous precedent,” Alexander told reporters afterward, referring to billions from a drug forfeiture fund and anti-drug smuggling money at the Defense Department.

“That would change the voting situation if he we were to agree to do that.” …”

The GOP Senate is only one vote away from blocking the “national emergency.”

Trump will veto it. It will then go to the federal courts before winding up before the Supreme Court. John Roberts will kill the border wall for being “unconstitutional.”