An example of why the European penchant for attendance to Augustinian devils is not ultimately naive Even if we can survive the manichean devils (interpersonal and intergroup trickery of other peoples), our survival will ultimately depend upon our capacity to solve Augustinian devils (natural challenges and affliction) - e.g., the ability to track asteroids and devise a way to intervene with them when they would otherwise crash into the earth and cause mass extinction as in the case of the dinosaurs.
Comments:2
Posted by Langdon proof continued on Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:40 | # Langdon continues…
Rather, right wingers are chasing the Jewish red cape in arguing anti-equality, when, as White advocates, they should be arguing for our system and its necessary niche constituents, including our moon walkers, our women and the other supporting cast of characters who make life on this (still) green planet, eminently more beautiful than the moon or any planet yet seen, worthwhile to enjoy even for its “ordinary” day-to-day offerings aside from the spectacular accomplishments of a moon landing or an asteroid intervening projectile… the appreciation of those with the “lowly concern"of our relative interests to discriminate, to make time to not rationalize away the patterns and the episodic destructiveness of ...
By fighting for pure objectivity and wasting so much money and time in its defense, right wingers are threatening the entire human race.
Speaking of selfish. I was recently asked what I thought of Dr. Duke’s books. Duke, like many right wingers, provides some very good content. And, typical of right wingers, he is theoretically retarded and pandering in his/the anti social perspective. And where he promotes the halfway decent idea of diversity, it is not at all original, though he would claim it as “his” paradigm. Sorry, David, the White race is a social construct (and very real and most important at that*) and Hitler was not making offers in good faith which could have prevented World War II.
3
Posted by NASA Hubble on Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:24 | #
4
Posted by Dangerous Asteroids lurking near Jupiter on Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:26 | # Post a comment:
Next entry: Michael Laitman & Dr. Christian Lindner Talk | Kabbalah, India and Pythagoreans: What’s in Common?
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Tobias Landgon proofed on Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:39 | #
Why We Are Not Going to Mars: How Chasing After the Red Cape Against Equality as Opposed to Maintaining the Anti-Cartesian Proposition of Racial Group Classifications and Necessary Discrimination Thereupon Could Mean the Death of Humanity.
Corrected: Classification, including racial/social classification or categorization as it were, is a psychological necessity that cannot be avoided as an inborn requirement to facilitate the identification of patterns dangerous to one’s person and species network.
Right wingers have been chasing the the red cape of anti-equality, and making themselves look very bad at that, while being distracted from what should be the main goal of group homeostasis. Instead…
America is pursuing a dangerous Lockeatine misconception: the impossible, illogical and insane goal of anti-classification in favor of civic individual rights. All other Western nations have wasted huge sums on the same quest to overcome “racism.”
Corrected: But the Fight for Anti-Classification and discrimination thereupon (in flattery of a permanent state of objective superiority, doesn’t just involve Blacks and other non-Whites. Huge sums have also been spent to rescue women and homosexuals from Anti-Classification and discrimination thereupon, in flattery of a permanent state of objective superiority, false comparison and insult. Again, the money has been wasted — in effect, wasted twice over.
The money spent pursuing the unachievable, Cartesian goal of racial, i.e., rational blindness….
...should have gone to the eminently achievable goal of permanent bases in outer space. We have to get there because we are not safe here. And we could have been there by now, if we weren’t spending so much in the vain pursuit of
equality.Corrected:..in the vain, Cartesian pursuit of rational blindness to racial group classification and necessary discrimination thereupon.
Here we go, into the right wing deep end…
As if right wing vanity such as boundless growth and the invisible hand capitalism don’t pollute the earth to our detriment.
There are no narcissistic and egotistical rewards in the STEM professions? Of course, there are.
If it weren’t for our co-evolution with women, our having born with their nurturing, care and support, where would we be?
No, White men should not be abused and denigrated, but just as Collins remained in the capsule orbiting the moon, waiting to retrieve his colleagues in time while Aldrin and Armstrong got the glory for stepping on the moon, so too right wingers continue to miss the important point of respecting and honoring the necessary positions of our full system, including those who have supportive and non starring roles in the systems maintenance and achievements.
Maybe not, but without women, we would not exist. And, as we’ve evolved from Africans, an argument can be made along those lines for them as well (not that we should be compelled to go back or die in reverence and assimilation to them).
Arguing for the right to exist on the trajectory of the self transcendence and its yields to all is a bit obsequious and pathetic. Is it really so hard to assert that we believe that we have the right to exist as White men, to assert our racial classification, even if we and our members are not always the best and even if our system is interrelated to some extent with other systems and niches (like our women!). At the same time of the moon landing ordinary White men were pleading for our essential cause, the value of their existence as opposed to being considered so intrinsically valueless as to be drafted into an unnecessary war.
Here again, Langdon demonstrates that right wingers are playing opposite day with me because they can’t accept their theoretical anachronism and get up to speed.
This rubric is a straw man, replacing the very necessary centering of our praxis with the idea of “self worship.” ..it is not self worship to prioritize our relative interests over continuous, pure objectivity. Objectivity, rather, is a provisional state to serve our relative interests.