Crypsis deployed for Starbucks property vulture (((Harold Schultz))) in launch of political campaign

Posted by DanielS on Saturday, 02 February 2019 15:44.

(((Schultz/Starbucks vulture capitalism - governmental collusion with NGO’s and tribal interests)))

I haven’t visited Morgoth’s for several months, and not for more than a moment in over a year… but having taken a peek today, a fine comment jumped out…

Augur Mayson rendered a fine comment in response to the question of why people hate journalists.

In regard to his example that the (((media))) conveniently promulgated Harold Schultz’ crypsis, referring to him as “a white man”, Augur might have added discussion of which (((Frame Games))) spilled the beans - it is still on line: [url=The Perplexing Case of Starbucks The Perplexing Case of Starbucks) about the scheme that Starbucks is involved in, making deals with black NGO leaders in order to buy-up inner city property on the cheap and then gentrifying it to turn huge profits in sales and rent. ...while these blacks were moved in as block busters to begin with by tribal elders who benefited by driving out Whites, taking advantage of driving down property values and welfare slum lording.

A Starbucks in your neighborhood means this racket is coming to your city.

One wonders, given Starbucks property vulturism, if Trump and his cronies don’t figure into the Schultz deal - as Kumiko surmised, they are mostly about a second tier of wealth, based on real estate investment, particularly U.S., and their concerns as such.

* I took the liberty to correct the malapopriative term, “left”, for him and replaced it with what it should be - “liberal”

Augur Mayson • 6 days ago

Because journalists enhance Jewish racial crypsis, is my current reason. They’re statists posing as rebels. The major media outlets either through commingling with the state or via self-interested owners of a certain ((( race ))) typically parrot whatever ridiculous claims are coming out of the government, either about domestic social issues or correctness of foreign policy. They are not some unelected but real check against government abuses. They are attack dogs. They are megaphones for the rich and the state. They are overwhelmingly ~~leftists~~ liberals* and disproportionately Jewish.

For example, in America now the presidential election in 2020 is shaping up as follows: Trump for the Republicans, because it’s unprecedented for a party to not run an incumbent, unknown candidate for the Democrats, maybe Mrs. Clinton, maybe Joe Biden, maybe someone else, they have a young gay guy they’re trying to talk up now. And the only big independent as yet talked about in the media is former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, who’s a Jew, who has used Starbucks to push progressive social policies. For example a few Blacks got thrown out of a Starbucks for presumed loitering; media uproar ensued, Schultz declared to do the exact opposite in future, now they have beggars out front, heroin needles in one bathroom and people giving birth in the other.

So this article in the Judenpresse in America talks up Schultz and says point blank he’s a White man.

“And at 65, he’d have to do that as an older white man who’s never run for office before and has zero national name recognition.” https://www.theatlantic.com...

False, as a CEO of a major corporation he had major exposure and name recognition only second to say Hollywood stars and politicians and media. So the journalist paints Schultz as an unknown (read: underdog, as in, a fetching backstory) and says he’s White when he’s really a Jew.

This is why I hate journalists. Plus if you have a Jewish war you’d like to wage in the desert for no good reason you can always count on the likes of CNN or the BBC to carry the load of b.s. you’re pushing.

NEW YORK: Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz, credited with taking the company from small beginnings to an international behemoth, is stepping down as CEO to focus on new high-end coffee shops, handing the reins to Chief Operating Officer Kevin Johnson.

Schultz, 63, will continue to serve as chairman of the Board and will be appointed executive chairman effective April next year. He handpicked 56-year-old Johnson, the company’s president, chief operating officer and a 7-year member of the Starbucks Board of Directors, to serve as the new CEO.

The Seattle-based company said in his new role, Schultz will focus on the “next wave of retail innovation”, design and development of Starbucks Reserve Roasteries around the world, expansion of the Starbucks Reserve retail store format and the company’s social impact initiatives.

“I will remain Starbucks executive chairman, focusing full-time on the incredible growth opportunities we have in expanding Roasteries and building out our portfolio of Reserve stores and on Starbucks social impact agenda which will be a significant part of the focus going forward,” Schultz said in an investor and media conference call yesterday.

Schultz, who was named by Fortune magazine this month in its list of Businessperson of Year is credited with doubling the company’s revenues since he returned for his second stint in 2008, surpassing USD 20 billion for the first time over the past 12 months

Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55746311.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Related at Majorityrights:

(((Frame Games))) Hardens-Up and Greg Johnson Presents His Right-Wing Rear For Entryism (as does JF)

(((Frame Games))) on ethnic component of 2008 crisis & why you need to care about identity politics

Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?

The Perplexing Case of Starbucks: Frame Games discusses Starbucks with Gariepy

Comments:

Posted by mancinblack on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:17 | #

“Augur Mayson” is an arsehole but you know what is said of the one eyed man.

Posted by I believe it on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 21:07 | #

I believe you. But all kinds of people, including people listing right, get some things right sometimes…. so, we take what we might like and leave the rest.

Posted by Billy and Norvin on Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:18 | #

Speaking of taking what you like and no endorsement of the individual or his views implied: Billy Roper has some interesting ideas - in the context of a discussion of Balkanization, he mentions that WN will not find a reliable ally in either YKW diaspora or Zionism because any separatist project, whether national sovereignty or balkanization, will threaten the power they derive of parasitism - in the case of Israel, the tens of millions a day and other resources it would lose by balkanization of the US, in addition to the break down of the political, cultural and military might that it exploits.

Posted by Verbo Tempestas on Wed, 06 Feb 2019 06:09 | #

Verbo Tempestas with Patrick Little

Little is a sharp dude, has keen insights, but his laser focus causes him to go soft on other groups to the point of proposing friendship with groups who are NOT friends of White interests. ...a classic myopia.

Posted by Duel Citizens in Public Trust on Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:29 | #

The idea of throwing duel citizens out of positions of public trust is particularly well warranted.

However, when Little speaks of the “phony divide and conquer distinction of right vs left” he is speaking like a typical right wing dupe.

Left ethnonationalism divides, yes - people loyal to the group and its bounds are divided from those who are not loyal to the group and its bounds, but to pseudo objectivity, transcendent “purity”, or exclusively to themselves and perhaps a narrow few others who are of no account to the people from whom they came.

Posted by (((Howard Schultz))) on Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:22 | #

Zero Hedge, 13 Feb 2019:

Howard Schultz Rips “Unrealistic” , “Immoral” Green New Deal

Potential 2020 presidential candidate Howard Schultz slammed Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ “Green New Deal,” which he called “unrealistic” and “immoral.”

Speaking at a CNN town hall, Schultz - the billionaire Starbucks Chairman Emeritus suggested that Democrats be “truthful” about their environmental goals instead of just throwing ideas “against the wall because it’s a good slogan.”

“I read that by 2030 they’re suggesting that every building in America becomes clean energy, conforms to clean energy, just to put that in perspective, because it’s not realistic, that would mean that between 2,000 and 3,000 buildings a day would have to be reconstructed to conform to what they’re saying,” Schultz said. “So let’s be sensible about what we’re suggesting.”

- wouldn’t want to hurt his real estate racket.

Ibid:

Schultz, a spoiler candidate who pledged to drop out if it becomes clear he wouldn’t be able to win the 2020 election, also knocked grandiose job guarantees in the Green New Deal.

“I don’t understand how you’re going to give a job for everybody, how you’re going to give free college to everybody, how you’re going to create clean energy throughout the country in every building of the land,” he said. “I think it’s immoral to suggest that we can tally up $20, $30, $40, $50 trillion of debt to solve a problem that could be solved in a different way.

On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had some fun - rushing the “Green New Deal” resolution up for a vote in the Senate, forcing some Democrats to take a position on the controversial legislation.

Schultz also told the CNN town hall audience that he doesn’t see color.

“As somebody who grew up in a very diverse background as a young boy in the projects, I didn’t see color as a young boy and I honestly don’t see color now,” said the billionaire, responding to an audience question about an April 2018 racial profiling incident which took place in a Philadelphia Starbucks store after the manager called police on two black men who were waiting for a friend.

“Injustice in America of any kind—especially racial injustice, which continues—is not something that we should be proud of and we need to resolve,” said Schultz, when asked if he thought the incident would be an issue for voters, adding that the Philadelphia incident was “something that we learned a great deal from,” adding “We realized that we had a problem. And it’s a problem that I think exists widely in this country, and it’s something that I would characterize as unconscious bias that many of us have based on our own life experiences.”

“We have to be able to have uncomfortable conversations. We have to talk to people who are different than ourselves,” said Schultz. “We have to embrace the diversity of the nation.”

Related (counter argument):

This Radical Plan to Fund the ‘Green New Deal’ Just Might Work

Posted by (((Starbucks))) spread in Europe on Sat, 11 May 2019 15:33 | #

Simon Kuestenmacher
@simongerman600
19h19 hours ago
More
Map shows the number of Starbucks stores in Europe as of 2019. I am very sad that Italy now has three Starbucks. I loved the fact that they were a Starbucks-free zone for so long. Source: https://buff.ly/2WwQlDc

Starbucks is a part of a (((property vulturism scheme))) and its presence a sign that the brackets are moving in, not just to install one franchise, but to take control of an area.

Posted by I smell a rat: Perplexing case of Starbucks on Tue, 18 Aug 2020 20:53 | #