RRW, “George Soros and the European refugee crisis”, 12 July 2016:
Posted by Ann Corcoran
I hate to use the word ‘refugee’ here because most of the migrants reaching Europe are economic migrants and not legitimate refugees, but who is quibbling over terms, certainly not George Soros.
Zerohedge (hat tip Julia) has posted a big expose (by Garret/Galland Investment Research) on the old man. I know many of you are pretty familiar with his evil record, but it is worth noting that he is considered one of the drivers of the NO Borders movement and thus his fingerprints are all over the European invasion.
Here is just one section of the longer report as it relates to the crisis in Europe:
His Latest Success: the European Refugee Crisis
Soros’s agenda is fundamentally about the destruction of national borders. This has recently been shown very clearly with his funding of the European refugee crisis.
The refugee crisis has been blamed on the civil war currently raging in Syria. But did you ever wonder how all these people suddenly knew Europe would open its gates and let them in?
The refugee crisis is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. It coincided with OSF (Open Society Foundation) donating money to the US-based Migration Policy Institute*** and the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, both Soros-sponsored organizations. Both groups advocate the resettlement of third-world Muslims into Europe.
In 2015, a Sky News reporter found “Migrant Handbooks” on the Greek island of Lesbos. It was later revealed that the handbooks, which are written in Arabic, had been given to refugees before crossing the Mediterranean by a group called “Welcome to the EU.”
Welcome to the EU is funded by—you guessed it—the Open Society Foundations.
Soros has not only backed groups that advocate the resettlement of third-world migrants into Europe, he in fact is the architect of the “Merkel Plan.”
The Merkel Plan was created by the European Stability Initiative whose chairman Gerald Knaus is a senior fellow at none other than the Open Society Foundations.
The plan proposes that Germany should grant asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees. It also states that Germany, along with other European nations, should agree to help Turkey, a country that’s 98% Muslim, gain visa-free travel within the EU starting in 2016.
Remember when it comes to refugees, follow the money!
*** More about the Migration Policy Institute, here.
Interestingly, this story at the UK Express has Soros blaming Merkel for the refugee crisis and the consequent Brexit. They have overplayed their hands, pushed the people of Europe too far and now Soros dumps the blame on Merkel! Is that what is happening here? http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/684723/Angela-Merkel-open-door-policy-caused-Migrant-crisis-George-Soros-EU
Posted by Ryan on Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:51 | #
I know the article is reposted and the writer/website has their position which they adhere to but I woudl propose that the word ‘infiltrator’ be adopted.
In the West the media of the rootless left and the supposely ‘anti-immigration’ right repeat the same disengious terms of ‘refugee’, ‘economic migrant’, ‘asylum seeker’ etc.. Yet in Israel it’s turned on it’s head and call those very same people ‘infiltrators’.
That does not mean we become philosemites but there is a lot to learn from domestic Israeli politics on how they deal with the issue of foreign mass immigration. They construct and frame their arguments in a opposite way to their diaspora justify & legitimise their domestic policies. Unlike in the West where the vast majority of Whites are stigmatised and do not grow up in an enviornment which encourages and teaches skills in verbal argumentation (which Jewish society does).
For example in this video, surprisinly done by Electronic Intifada (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5_kDcrT24w) when Jews are confronted over immigration double standards between Trump’s soundbites and what Israel does they seamlessly change their approach. It’s not neccessarily some Jewish ‘superpower’ but they understand the importance of framing the argument in advantageous terms from the start and selecting the appropriate language to justify their position. Gentiles are not fully aware in the basics of this but can learn easily.
Thus ‘infiltrator’ I believe is the best alternative for robust patriots to adopt rather than ‘migrants’, ‘illegal immigrants’, ‘refugees’, ‘rapefugees’ etc (invader being a bit too strong for consistent normy discourse).