Posted by Ryan on Sun, 03 Jan 2016 17:00 | #

Hmm not good about Iran, it’s the most red pilled nation against ZOG.

Trump running, whether he wins or not makes implict Pro-Whites think that there are some people within the US establishment who will advocate for implicit White interests. ‘The Gap’:
http://ironmarch.org/index.php?/topic/5294-the-gap/

Posted by Israel bans interracial marriage book on Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:03 | #

New Observer, ‘Israel Bans Interracial Marriage Book’, 3 Jan 2016:

Israel’s Education Ministry has formally banned a book about an interracial affair between a Jew and a Gentile because, the Jewish state’s government says, the book “threatens Jewish identity” and does not deal with the “significance of miscegenation” between “Jews and non-Jews.”

Israeli Education Minister Naftali Bennett, and the book banned for promoting “miscegenation” in Israel.

At the same time, the organized Jewish lobby in America and Europe —which fanatically supports Israel—demands of Europeans that they accept miscegenation and mixed marriages in order not to be “racist.”

According to an article in the Israeli Haaretz newspaper, titled “Israel Bans Novel on Arab-Jewish Romance From Schools for ‘Threatening Jewish Identity‘” (December 31, 2015), Israel’s Education Ministry has “disqualified a novel (called “Gader Haya,” or “Borderlife”) that describes a love story between an Israeli woman and a Palestinian man from use by high schools around the country.”

An official statement released by the ministry said that the book had been banned from schools because of the “need to maintain the identity and the heritage of students in every sector,” and that “intimate relations between Jews and non-Jews threatens our separate identity.”

The Education Ministry added that “young people of adolescent age don’t have the systemic view that includes considerations involving maintaining the national-ethnic identity of the people and the significance of miscegenation.”

The book tells the story of Liat, an Israeli translator, and Hilmi, a Palestinian artist, who meet and fall in love in New York, until they part ways for her to return to Tel Aviv and he to the West Bank city of Ramallah, where Israel’s racial segregation laws force them apart.

The decision to ban the book was endorsed by Education Minister Naftali Bennett’s office, which issued a statement saying “The minister backs the decision made by the professionals.”

In a separate article, Haaretz columnist Alon Idan frankly admitted that the reason why the book was banned was so that Israel could “maintain purity of blood.”

Alon said that the decision meant simply that “Jews and Arabs are forbidden to have sex with one another; Jews and Arabs are forbidden to love one another; Jews and Arabs are forbidden to marry one another; Jews and Arabs are forbidden to have families with one another; Jews and Arabs are forbidden to live together.”

No one with any clear-thinking mind would dispute the right of Jews to maintain their identity in their own country.

However, the organized Jewish lobby in America and Europe—which is one of Israel’s strongest supporters—demands of Europeans that they adopt exactly the opposite policy to that which they support in the Jewish state.

The ADL, for example, which describes itself as “the world’s leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and services that counteract hatred, prejudice, and bigotry,” has an entire section of its website devoted to boasting about the Jewish role in dismantling anti-miscegenation and anti-mixed marriage laws in America.

For example, an ADL press release from March 2015, dealing with the promotion of homosexual marriage (something else which is illegal in Israel), titled “ADL Urges Supreme Court to Overturn State Marriage Bans” quotes Christopher Wolf, ADL Civil Rights Chair, as saying that “Marriage bans unconstitutionally enshrine one particular religious view of marriage into law.”

The ADL goes on to quote Deborah M. Lauter, ADL Civil Rights Director, as saying that “Discriminatory laws targeting disadvantaged groups have long been justified by religious and moral disapproval, but time and time again, the Supreme Court has rejected these arguments. The Court needs only to look at its decisions ending slavery, segregation, interracial-marriage bans, and laws restricting women’s roles in public life to reach the right conclusion.”

The ADL was joined in this demand by The American Jewish Committee; Bend the Arc — A Jewish Partnership for Justice; The Central Conference of American Rabbis and the Women of Reform Judaism; Global Justice Institute; Hadassah — The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc.; Jewish Social Policy Action Network (JSPAN); Keshet; The National Council of Jewish Women; Nehirim; Reconstructionist Rabbinical College and Jewish Reconstructionist Communities; Society for Humanistic Judaism; T’ruah: Rabbis for Human Rights-North America; and Women’s League for Conservative Judaism.

In addition, the ADL was joined by a host of Christian, Asian, and Sikh organizations—but none of them were being hypocritical about their public stance, unlike the Israel-supporting Jewish groups.

The ADL has a special section of its website devoted to explaining to its supporters how to defend Israel. Titled “Israel: A Guide for Activists,” the ADL page provides detailed instructions on every aspect of the Jewish state, and how to answer accusations made against it.

In addition, the ADL—and all the other organized Jewish organizations—set up formal visits to Israel, engage in lobbying on behalf of the Jewish state, and ensure that their controlled media never reports negatively on Jewish political manipulations or their control of Western governments.

It is clear that the Jews know and understand perfectly the principles of race and the need to preserve racial homogeneity in order to maintain Jewish cultural identity.

In Israel, this understanding takes practical effect through the banning of mixed marriages, the outlawing of non-Jewish immigration, racial segregation in schools and living areas, and their ultimate goal—a separate Jews-only state.

Yet, in America, Europe, and anywhere else where there are large numbers of Europeans, the Israel-supporting Jewish lobby actively promotes policies which are the diametric opposite to the policies which their state enforces.

The facts are inescapable:  the Jewish lobby knows perfectly well that miscegenation and mixed marriages will lead to the destruction of Jewish identity and the Jewish nation-state.

They therefore also know that promoting miscegenation and mixed marriages among non-Jews will lead to the destruction of European identity, and the destruction of European nation-states.

This “hypocrisy” is too obvious to be an accident: it can only be the result of a conscious, deliberate decision, aimed at bringing about the destruction of non-Jews.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Mon, 04 Jan 2016 05:37 | #

I’ve only just started watching thing, and I can already see by just 3 minutes in, that Trump is already in the tank for exclusively Jewish interests. He’s chaining together talking points that satisfy the objectives of the “Israeli-Saudi crescent”, and it makes me ask again who his foreign policy advisors are.

There’s also a blatant lie involved, Trump claims that the Saudi embassy in Tehran was burned ‘because they want the oil’. No, the Saudi embassy in Tehran was burned last weekend because the Saudis executed a Shia cleric and the Iranian people got angry and rioted in response (as would only be expected) and attacked the Saudi embassy in Tehran.

That was a religious and demographic argument.

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 04 Jan 2016 05:42 | #

I see, the Saudis themselves incited that, then?

Interesting how Trump doesn’t criticize Saudi Arabia for deliberately inciting the incident.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Mon, 04 Jan 2016 06:00 | #

Yes, it’s probably because his advisors are Jewish members of certain think tanks, and also, of course, Saudi real-estate developers inside the United States who he would have met during his real estate career, and who would of course be parroting the Saudi line on everything.

Posted by Trump's big lead with White workers on Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:43 | #

Breitbart, ‘Trump Expands To 20-Point Lead Among White Blue-Collars Vs. Hillary Clinton’ 10 Jan 2016:

New polling info from Reuters finds a nationwide toss-up 2016 contest between GOP frontrunner Donald Trump and Democrat frontrunner Hillary Clinton — but he’s beating her by 20 points, 46 percent to 26 percent, among white working-class voters.New polling info from Reuters finds a nationwide toss-up 2016 contest between GOP frontrunner Donald Trump and Democrat frontrunner Hillary Clinton — but he’s beating her by 20 points, 46 percent to 26 percent, among white working-class voters.

Posted by D tribe and R tribe on Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:59 | #

Politio, ‘What Rumsfeld Knew We Didn’t Know About Iraq’  24 Jan 2016:

On September 9, 2002, as the George W. Bush administration was launching its campaign to invade Iraq, a classified report landed on the desk of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It came from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and it carried an ominous note.

“Please take a look at this material as to what we don’t know about WMD,” Rumsfeld wrote to Air Force General Richard Myers. “It is big.”

The report was an inventory of what U.S. intelligence knew—or more importantly didn’t know—about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Its assessment was blunt: “We’ve struggled to estimate the unknowns. ... We range from 0% to about 75% knowledge on various aspects of their program.”

Myers already knew about the report. The Joint Staff’s director for intelligence had prepared it, but Rumsfeld’s urgent tone said a great deal about how seriously the head of the Defense Department viewed the report’s potential to undermine the Bush administration’s case for war. But he never shared the eight-page report with key members of the administration such as then-Secretary of State Colin Powell or top officials at the CIA, according to multiple sources at the State Department, White House and CIA who agreed to speak on condition of anonymity. Instead, the report disappeared, and with it a potentially powerful counter-narrative to the administration’s argument that Saddam Hussein’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons posed a grave threat to the U.S. and its allies, which was beginning to gain traction in major news outlets, led by The New York Times.

While the threat posed by a nuclear-armed Iraq was at the heart of the administration’s case for war, the JCS report conceded: “Our knowledge of the Iraqi (nuclear) weapons program is based largely—perhaps 90%—on analysis of imprecise intelligence.”

The rationale for the invasion has long since been discredited, but the JCS report, now declassified, which a former Bush administration official forwarded in December, nevertheless has implications for both sides in the 2016 presidential race, in particular the GOP candidates who are relying for foreign policy advice on some of the architects of the war, and the Democratic front-runner, who once again is coming under fire from her primary opponent for supporting the invasion.

Then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, whose military assistant was on the short list of people copied on the JCS report, is one of Jeb Bush’s foreign policy experts. Other supporters of the war, though they do not appear to have been aware of the JCS report, are involved in the various advisory roles in the 2016 campaign. John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, is advising Ted Cruz; and Elliott Abrams and William Kristol are supporting Marco Rubio, whom Reuters reported is also briefed regularly by former Cheney adviser Eric Edelman.

The rise of ISIL and recent attacks in Paris and San Bernardino have given Democrat Bernie Sanders the ability to draw a straight line from the current Middle East chaos straight back to Clinton’s vote in favor of what he calls “one of the worst foreign policy blunders in the modern history of the United States,” a conflict that has claimed the lives of 4,500 Americans and some 165,000 Iraqis.

Trump boasts of having been against the Iraq war, fine. But what’s all this about Iran now and how he’s ‘the most militaristic person in the room’? His having been against the Iraq war might only increase his ability to take on the next Israeli cause.

Posted by Palin endorsement boosts Trump on Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:00 | #

Palin endorsement factors large boost for Trump in Iowa

Now that should be comforting to White Zionists, er White Nationalists.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Mon, 25 Jan 2016 03:42 | #

I wonder how the people at Daily Stormer and the rest of the ethno-nationalist websites that have been championing Donald Trump for so long feel after this new development?

Trump’s apparently chosen method to gain 11 points in Iowa is to grab the Zionist Evangelical support base away from Ted Cruz, and allocate it to himself by accepting the Sarah Palin endorsement and pandering to the lobby associated with it.

Let’s find out what DS thinks of it:

Daily Stormer, ‘Trump Jumps 11 Points in Iowa, Dominating All’, Andrew Anglin, 24 Jan 2016:

[...]

It is looking like Trump is actually going to be the next President, short of some insane and unpredictable event.

I’m deeply surprised Jews haven’t already launched some serious tricks.

[...]

The DS people seem to be unaware that they already launched a collection of some serious Jewish tricks. It’s called the Donald Trump campaign.

Posted by We’ll protect philo-Semitism, er Christianity on Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:50 | #

       
        We’re going to protect philosemitism, er Christianity

Speaking at the fundamentally Jewish, er Christian, Liberty University, Trump panders to the same group of knuckleheads who followed W. Bush into these Zionist wars.

The Daily Trump, “Christianity ‘Under Siege”, 19 Jan 2016:

“We’re going to protect Christianity…If you look at what’s going on throughout the world…Christianity is under siege.”

Posted by Sarah Palin: like black on Rice on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:50 | #

       
She is pretty hot, but one has to wonder, even before her idiotic Christian-Zionist politics, about a hot White woman who, despite being ensconced in a remote wilderness with a minimal black population, still manages to present her ass to a negro:

New Biography Claims Sarah Palin Had A One-Night Stand With Glen Rice In 1987

The National Enquirer grabbed some details from the upcoming Joe McGinniss Sarah Palin book, and… undefined deadspin.​com

1. Sarah’s Fling with an NBA Player: As a sports reporter at an Anchorage TV station, Palin hooked up with Glen Rice, former NBA player and ex-husband of Real Housewives of Miami star Christy Rice, the Enquirer claims McGinniss’ book reports. Since Rice apparently confirms the fling to McGinniss, I’m leaning towards “true” on this one.

  All the Dirty Rumors About Sarah Palin’s Sexual ‘Fetish’ and Cocaine Use. Sarah hooked up with Rice, a 6-foot-8 junior at the University of Michigan, while he was in town for the 1987 Thanksgiving weekend “Great Alaska Shootout” basketball tournament, according to the book.

  McGinniss quotes a friend as saying Sarah had “hauled his [Rice’s] ass down.” While the pal coyly states: “I can’t say I know they had sex,” the friend is also quoted as saying: “I remember Sarah feeling pretty good that she’d been with a black basketball star,” according to the source.

  Their encounter reportedly occurred in the dorm room of Sarah’s younger sister Molly at the University of Alaska Anchorage, according to the book.

  Rice confirms the hookup in McGinniss’ book, according to the source, “but he’s quoted as saying he didn’t think Sarah harbored any bad feelings over being with him because he was black. And he remembers only nice things about Sarah, recalling her as ‘gorgeous’ and saying she was a big crush of his at the time.”

  According to the book, Rice and Sarah continued to chat on the phone right up until she married Todd just nine months later.

Posted by Trump gives his take on events to O'Reilly on Sun, 01 May 2016 16:18 | #

Trump’s take on events as presented to Fox News O’Reilly on 28 April 2016

Posted by Bobby Knight endorses Trump on Sun, 01 May 2016 22:05 | #

Bobby Knight endorses Trump

What the cuck?

Posted by Isil will get some of Trump's $110 weapons sale on Mon, 22 May 2017 14:50 | #

Trump Sells $110 Billion of Weapons to Saudi Arabia & therefore to ISIS as well…