Involuntary contract of Whites to blacks already slavery by definition: Kamala seeks more extortion

Posted by DanielS on Saturday, 27 July 2019 10:34.

Eric “my people” Holder Kamala Harris

Kamala Harris
@SenKamalaHarris

America’s history of slavery and institutional racism continues to cause great pain and inequality toward communities of color—particularly Black males. We introduced a bipartisan bill recently to start a long overdue effort to confront the negative treatment of Black men & boys.

8:18 PM · Jul 28, 2019·Twitter for iPhone

Who can say anything to black males? What government program, institution or job isn’t aimed at discriminating IN THEIR FAVOR? To be prohibited discrimination against blacks and forced into involuntary contract with blacks as Whites have been for decades has made White men slaves to blacks by definition. Black men have been indulged extravagantly at White men’s expense for decades. Black males owe Whites trillions in reparations.

Tags: Activism, Anthropology, Anti-racism, Blacks & Black Behaviour, Boundaries and Borders, Cultural Marxism, Demographics, Economics & Finance, Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests, Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity, Global Elitism, Law & Order, Population, Race realism, Social liberalism, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, White Genocide: America

Comments:

Posted by Eric "my people" Holder on Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:01 | #

New Black Panther Party voter intimidation incident

See also: New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case

Alleged instance of voter intimidation in Philadelphia during the 2008 US presidential election.

In May 2009, Holder’s Department of Justice completed a civil suit originally brought by J. Christian Adams of the Bush Justice Department against the New Black Panther Party, its chairman, and two of its members for voter intimidation due to their conduct during the 2008 election. Two members of the Party had stood outside a polling station during the election in paramilitary uniforms, one carrying a nightstick. Claiming a lack of evidence, the DOJ dropped charges against the party, its chairman, and one of the two members who had stood outside the polling station. With the evidence presented, the Department of Justice successfully obtained a narrow injunction against the other. Former lawyers who had served under the Bush Administration have stated that the current DOJ under Holder is unwilling to prosecute minorities for civil rights violations. Three other Justice Department lawyers, in recent interviews, gave the same description of the department’s culture, which department officials strongly deny. In the months after the case ended, tensions persisted. Eventually, Christopher Coates (of the Justice’s Civil Rights Division) acknowledged telling attorneys at a September 2009 lunch that the Obama administration was interested in filing cases – under a key voting rights section – only on behalf of minorities.

During a meeting with a House subcommittee, Holder argued that the behavior (standing in a menacing way while brandishing a weapon) of the New Black Panther Party was not comparable to historical voter intimidation against minorities, which often involved acts of violence and murder.

Holder said, “When you compare what people endured in the South in the ‘60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia… I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people.”

Holder