No, let’s stick with blaming the Nazis.
I must disagree with the sentiment here. It’s far better to take the weight off of the Germans per se, especially subsequent generations, and place the burden on the Nazi regime and those who went along with it (who were thus, Nazis). Tarring all Germans and leaving them no route of distinction from the Nazi regime is no way to move forward and foster good neighborly relations among nations. The Poles would not appreciate it, and quite rightly not, if the entire nation of their people were blamed for the misdeeds of some rogue regime of theirs from history. ..... This is why I maintain the term “Nazi.” In order to distinguish a rogue regime from German people per se - those who never really thought it was the right course of action and those who went along with it but might not have with the guidance of a better regime; recognizing their human agency as it might pursue neighborly coordination as opposed to the natural fallacy of deterministic conflict and war that was epistemic of Nazi ideology. Further, “Nazi” is used so as to avoid the ennobling, misrepresenting and misleading title, “National Socialist.” Hitler’s regime was imperialist, not nationalist, supremacist not socialist - not “social” in most of the positive connotations of “social” - particularly, not in the non-economic, social sense of humaneness and social accountability; not only to qualitative niches of its own, but also in recognition and respect for the niche qualities of other groups; and in the need to get along with these human ecologies - as the world view of praxis, with its apprehension of reflexive effects, would do. I’m going to keep hammering-home the importance of centralizing our world view through praxis - that is to say our people groups, their biological nature (requiring optimal, not maximal need satisfaction), mammalian nature (caring for relationships) and their distinctly human capacities - for example to learn to get along, to coordinate interests, by means of social accountability to correct runaway trajectories of natural fallacy and ideals beyond human nature; which otherwise rupture human and pervasive ecological systems. If humans are to evolve, devolve as it were, in a dehumanizing eusocial manner, it is far more likely to occur through the kind of natural fallacy that the Nazis operated on. Whereas the Post Modern project - properly understood, which I call the White Post modern project in order to distinguish it - by taking the post modern turn to centralize our world view through praxis, provides for the coherence, social accountability, correctivity and agency to stave-off such pernicious devolution. .... * “White Post Modern Project” - as distinguished from the da da, ironic, hyper relative, hyper critical deconstructionist misrepresentations of the post modern project. Comments:2
Posted by Gleiwitz false flag on Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:01 | #
“OPERATION HIMMLER” - NAZI FALSE FLAG OPERATION TO JUSTIFY INVASION OF POLAND 3
Posted by Equivalent to a 9/11 a day for 5 years on Tue, 01 Sep 2020 05:02 | #
Post a comment:
Next entry: Tommy Can You…? Rose Can You Hear Me? Rose Kitten overcomes childhood trauma & Selective Mutism.
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by "The West" / "Civilization" on Sun, 02 Aug 2020 06:40 | #
And lets not be mislead by the terms “civilization” and “western culture” either… these are the products of what we are defending - which is our people (genus), our ethnonational kinds (species).