|
|
|
No Peace For The Enemies of Native Europe!
It is not time for peace, but for the comprehensive conceptualization of non-European peoples as other, their place overwhelmingly is not among Europeans, and their imposition upon European EGI an act of war that calls for war in response. Further, this calls for the undoing of “anti-racism”, reversing it, to a legitimization of the comprehensive social classification of peoples, including full comprehension of non-Europeans, including their outliers (their “nice exceptions” to their pejorative patterns) as distinct others to be discriminated against in accordance of European interests. Important and true though that statement is, it is necessary to capture the point in a pithy caption, that this is not a time for peace nor to be concerned for “the nice ones”, if “the nice ones” refuse our terms and/or will not go back to their native countries, from amidst our citizenship. We would more assuredly die through differential birthrates and interbreeding with “the nice ones” than we would through acts of terrorism. So, let there be a contest to capture the nuance of our concerns: supply a caption for the image, something like “No peace for non-European imposition”... or “No peace for non-European invaders”, etc.
Despite our pugnacious enthusiasm, Ryan raises a hand of restraint, itemizing “peace as war” campaigns that had backfired. I wonder if that is not all the more reason to be explicit about who our enemies are. Kumiko is going to have some very interesting things to say about that in days to come in a discussion of the neo-cons. And she might add her own evergreen post about the anti-peace sign. In the meantime, I am importing the first few comments by way of responding to them in a first comment, and Kumiko’s first comment will be added here (though I will also leave the comments under the Paris attack thread).
Comments:2
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 16 Nov 2015 03:51 | #
...some reflections on the events. It is salient that these killings were more personal and more directed at European peoples. That makes this, in an important sense, even worse, even more of an affront than 9-11. In 9-11, they went after symbols of Capitalism [World Trade Center] and the Military Industrial Complex [Pentagon] behind Liberal Democracy [Capitol building (i.e., tried to hit it, but failed, with the jet going down in Pennsylvania)]. Civilian casualties, though far more numerous, were incidental and not personally targeted. In the case of the French attacks, however, not only did they choose to target the implicitly White culture of death metal [Bataclan theatre], the implicitly White culture of football [Germany-France match], attended by the President of France, along with football’s not so implicitly White culture [of football hooligans (as Jimmy Marr noted, hooligans tend to be nationalistic)]. They also went after the implicitly White cultural area of Paris in their targeting [the haute bourgeoisie section (as noted by Kumiko)]. But not only did they contrast from 9-11 to narrow their target to these people demographically [implicitly White], in the case of the Bataclan theatre, they focused their attack still more, targeting them, [a death metal audience] as personally as they could [holding them hostage] and shooting them [one by one].
3
Posted by European Sovereignty or Death on Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:04 | # Kumiko was asked to put this caption along with the no-peace badge and she rendered this solution. It is excellent. 4
Posted by In/appropriate to the dignity of the victims on Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:58 | # Coming with a fairly random flow of comments in this thread, this comment “would black metal say about France?”, with its guys in silly Satanist make-up, was inappropriate to the dignity of the victims as it got inadvertently placed here, beneath the commemorative photos of some of the victims. The comment belonged in the Halloween thread from the start; but mistake though it was, that kind of thing can jostle a new way of thinking by forcing a different look - this was indeed a massacre of a rock audience demographic, not likely to be a highly Christian demographic ...and it is an appropriate time to reflect on the quirky idiosyncrasies that distinguish our people, in particular this sensitive, thoughtful and loyal demographic of Whites who were massacred - i.e., they were very White, very much ours. 5
Posted by Sweden high alert: hunt for IS man planning attack on Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:27 | # “The Swedish police enhanced preparedness to position 4 of 5. Apparently a man from Iraq who belongs to IS has entered the country and plans to carry-out an attack” - Per
6
Posted by Nordiskungdom: Refugees Go Home! on Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:18 | # Nordiskungdom: Swedish Nationalists Protest, “Refugees Go Home!” 7
Posted by Swedish nationalists join Poles in march on Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:17 | # 8
Posted by Tweets on Trainspotter's Twitter on Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:54 | #
9
Posted by Crisis: Liberty, Equality, Brotherhood ..with who? on Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:28 | # Charles Lincoln discusses the Liberty, Equality and Brotherhood of France ...especially the crisis of the idea of “brotherhood” with people so different.
10
Posted by Brussels attacks on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:20 | #
Post a comment:
Next entry: Obama reminds East Asians not to do what America did, non-ironically.
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 16 Nov 2015 01:33 | #
Interesting comments on this issue. This is a war, but Ryan well-illustrates raises some objections that we take into consideration in order to conceive of it properly. As I had said above:
DanielS: “Just Sayin’, it is evident that the “Alternative Left” is a false Left, only recently concocted by Jews and Jew friendly people (such as Robert Lindsay), who want to subvert our White Left. There will be no peace with them.
Basically, “the alternative left” is a part of the “alternative right” big tent