|
|
|
Paleoconservatism as “Cultural Controlled Opposition” to Neo-Conservatism and its Clean Break Memo. Paleoconservatism as “Cultural Controlled Opposition” in response to Neo-Conservatism and its Clean Break Memo. They typically come across as your best asset. If you recognize it for what it is and keep it on the radar screen as such, not getting caught up, controlled opposition can have its utility as they are often funded to provide valuable resource, typically enlisting intelligent people and allowing them fine and clear articulation of some important information for WN. Nick Fuentes nicely articulates Israeli Operation Clean Break, a.k.a., “Project for a New America Century.” Although Nick’s Paleoconservatism is not what most people consider to be classic controlled opposition, make no mistake. While we are tossing around the word “culture” of late, adding “cultural capitalism” and “cultural nationalism” on the radar screen with cultural Marxism, it can be said quite accurately that Paleoconservatism is a “cultural controlled opposition”.... a bit softer and more flexible perhaps than classic, but undoubtedly allowing the enemies of European peoples to act on key points. Comments:2
Posted by Nick tries to cover his tracks... on Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:25 | # Nick Fuentes | Beware of Fake Populism (aka. PaleoConservitism Inc) Nick Fuentes checks all the boxes to say that he is not a Paleoconservative, or not that kind, “oh, I’m not that kind of diversion from racial nationalism, or this kind of diversion from racial nationalism” ...until the most important check box: Christian (Jewish) as the organizing factor of our most important concerns, the basis of our moral order. 3
Posted by mancinblack on Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:23 | # @1
Having screwed up badly, and thankfully, where the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was concerned, the false god placed the flaming idiot before the tree of life so humans would die. 4
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:59 | # .... Kevin MacDonald fails in his criticism of Fuentes, accusing him of being pro-Jewish across the board and specifically, incorrectly accusing him of being “pro-Zionist.” Because MacDonald does not understand paleoconservatism as Jewish - viz. Jewish controlled opposition. The only controlled opposition that he is seeing is Neo-Conservatism, which is pro-Zionist, favoring aggressive foreign policy, particularly as it serves Israel’s interests as in Operation Clean Break. However, the paleocons are not like the neocons about Zionizm and its wars, they are about interests of the Jewish diaspora and placating American reactionaries…. particularly maintaining control through Christianity. (((Frank Meyer))) fathered Paleoconservatism, a “fusionism” as he called it, which is a false conservatism blending Enlightenment (really liberal) values and Judeo-Christianity (again, liberal values as pertaining to Whites). This fusionism doesn’t fuse all that well but Americans are used to this juggling act and Ronald Reagan fell for it, being Frank Meyer’s most important protege in this false opposition; along with Paul Gottfried, Pat Buchanan, Joe Sobran and Sam Francis ....and then Richard Spencer with a revamped Paleoconservatism through the Alt Right tentosphere…and now Nick Fuentes is carrying the Paleocon torch (though he is pretending not to….see comment #2) Therefore, Fuentes articulating the Operation Clean Break document and its Zionist goals to use American military to effect regime change (to Israeli friendly regimes in the nations around Israel) is entirely in keeping with the Paleocon angle on controlled opposition. As a matter of fact, this critical angle is the ultimate expression of paleoconservatism being controlled (Jewish) opposition. I may have to take down my recent Youtube video because it has mysteriously been reduced in size from 4 hours to 2 and will not allow me to reload to put it on to Bitchute. I discuss the paleocon false opposition, Clean Break and how the Maidan Operations in Ukraine under Victoria Nuland’s auspices appears to be another facet of Operation Clean Break.
Victoria Nuland’s husband is Robert Kagan, one of the authors of Clean Break/Project for a New American Century.
An additional note. In that Youtube video, I also correct the record to state that I am NOT typically in favor of name changes for infrastructure nor monument removal in America. However, I did add that I do not see Columbus as a big, positive deal to venerate. And that there are already monuments and place names in respect of Amerindians; also blacks, for that matter. 5
Posted by Trump delivers remarks to CPAC on Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:44 | # Post a comment:
Next entry: Social Distancing: Michelle Malkin Hosted by John Derbyshire
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Nick Fuentes being an idiot. on Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:48 | #
Nick Fuentes showing that he’s perfectly capable of being a flaming idiot.