Why Trump’s ties to Russia would be way worse than Watergate

Posted by DanielS on Saturday, 01 April 2017 08:31.


Illustrations by Sophia den Breems

Why Trump’s ties to Russia would be way worse than Watergate

- Sarah Kendzior, Flyover Country Correspondent, 30 March 2017:

At 5:25 am on Monday, March 20, Donald J. Trump logged onto Twitter and wrote: “James Clapper and others stated that there is no evidence Potus colluded with Russia. This story is FAKE NEWS and everyone knows it!”

Hours later, at a congressional hearing assembled to investigate foreign interference in the 2016 presidential election, FBI director James Comey confirmed the FBI probe into Trump’s ties to Russia that same day. Comey confirmed that Trump and “individuals associated with the Trump campaign” had been under investigation for Russian collusion since late July, and that the investigation was still ongoing.

Contrary to Trump’s assertion, this statement was not “fake news,” nor was it news at all to those who had followed the Russian interference story since it broke last summer.

In August 2016, former Democratic Senator Harry Reid implored Comey to reveal information about Russian interference that he said “is more extensive than is widely known and may include the intent to falsify official election results,” adding that the public had the right to know before the November election. Comey responded, notoriously, not by revealing that Trump was under FBI investigation, but by implying that Hillary Clinton was, in an “October surprise” faux email scandal that was retracted only after the rumor had damaged her campaign.

Reid wrote to Comey again in late October and reemphasized the Russian threat: “It has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government – a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity… and yet, you continue to resist calls to inform the public of this critical information.”

After Trump won, calls for an investigation into Russian interference began in late November, led by Republicans like John McCain and Lindsay Graham as well as Democrats like Elijah Cummings, Maxine Waters, and Adam Schiff, the latter of whom led the interrogation of Comey and NSA head Michael Rogers at the March 20 hearings. Though it has falsely been portrayed by both the Trump administration and some media outlets as a Democrat-led witchhunt, Russian interference in the election was always a bipartisan concern. Any threat to both national security and sovereignty is a bipartisan concern, and the reluctance of the Trump administration to cooperate with the investigation has long been an ominous indication of his limitations and loyalties.

Instead of watchdogs, we have lapdogs

If you were the president of the United States, sworn under oath to protect and serve the public, wouldn’t you want foreign interference in your campaign to be investigated – at the very least, to prevent the recurrence of similar actions?

Or would you try to impede the investigation, by smearing those who seek it (among them intelligence officials, legislators, and reporters) and by installing officials who either benefit from the Russian relationship (like Secretary of State Rex Tillerson), seem selected in order to obfuscate the Russian relationship (like Attorney General Jeff Sessions), or both?

Trump chose to assemble an administration designed to cover up and aid his shady dealings with the Kremlin, leading to an administration so spectacularly corrupt and inept it has no corollary in US history.

Here’s where it currently stands:

The President is under investigation for colluding with a foreign power. He is being investigated by an oversight committee, the head of which, Republican representative Devin Nunes, has functioned less as a watchdog than a lapdog, providing information about the investigation of Trump to Trump in a breach of protocol. And this was not Nunes’ only misdeed: he was also present at a January meeting between Turkish officials and Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn, who in February resigned in disgrace after being revealed to be working secretly for the Turkish and Russian governments for millions of dollars.

In short, the US has employed a president suspected of treason, an oversight committee head who refuses to do oversight, and a national security advisor who undermined US national security.

The Trump clan and the Russian spy recruiter

Unfortunately, that’s only the beginning. There is also attorney general Jeff Sessions, who has had to recuse himself from the Russia interference investigation because he is implicated due to multiple meetings with Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak during the campaign. (Sessions is not alone; Kislyak, rumored to moonlight as a spy recruiter, also met with Flynn, Trump’s son in law Jared Kushner, and Trump, though all have mysteriously foggy memories of these encounters.)

Then there’s Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, recipient of an “Order of Friendship” medal from Vladimir Putin, who does not seem to know why he is even in office, admitting this week, “I didn’t want this job, my wife told me to do this.” Unfortunately, Tillerson came to that revelation only after inflaming military tensions with North Korea.

On top of that, the Trump administration contains a burgeoning and possibly illegal nepotistic dynasty (Jared and Ivanka, currently getting security clearances and White House office space despite no experience in government)....

..multiple Nazis (both confirmed, like advisor Seb Gorka and suspected, like White supremacist Stephen Miller), an admirer of Satan who seeks to destroy the government from within (that would be Trump’s closest advisor, Steve Bannon.)

Putting aside the White House’s nepotism, Nazis, and Satan aficionados – there’s a sentence I never thought I’d have to write – let’s return to the men who got the US in this situation to begin with: Trump’s campaign team members Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and Carter Page, who are all, along with Flynn, under FBI investigation. Shortly after the first round of hearings, all three have offered to testify while Flynn remains salient, leading some to suspect that Flynn has already turned and is ratting the rest out in return for a reduced punishment.

The scandal manages to move both very slow and very fast

It is possible that by the time you read this, one of these individuals will have testified, been arrested, or met the fate of the numerous Russians also tangentially implicated in this scandal, eight of whom have died since the election. It is also possible that no meaningful progress in the investigation will have been made, as has been the case for the majority of the past year. The Russian interference scandal manages to move both extremely slowly and extremely fast, with each abrupt “twist” being more of a straightening out of what seemed obvious but was heretofore unproven.

For example, it was not surprising to learn last week that Manafort, who has built a career of propping up dictators around the world and who has long had ties to Russian oligarchs, was revealed to have Oleg Deripaska to promote Putin’s anti-democratic initiatives. (Deripaska also sued Manafort in a Cayman Islands court in what seems to be further evidence of a money-laundering scheme; that this detail was forgotten only shows the sheer volume of scandal associated with a man whose own daughters claim is paid in “blood money”).

It was also not surprising that Roger Stone – who worked with Manafort in the 1980s, when both men were introduced to Trump by mutual friend Roy Cohn, a ruthless lawyer and political operative best known for his role in the McCarthy hearings – was also under investigation, since he freely bragged of his connection to Wikileaks, to whom hacked emails were allegedly passed.

What is surprising is that something may finally be done about it, after months of deferments and denials. After months of playing down the scandal – the New York Times, a few days before the election, even admitted they had blown the story of the year – leaks and new investigative reporting are giving citizens the information they should have had before the election, much to the Trump administration’s dismay.

Trump’s position is one of unparalleled power and unrivaled weak spots

Lying with a flagrancy typical of autocrats, Trump has until now continued his lifelong streak of shaking down vulnerable institutions for personal profit while counting on a team of backers to bail him out. Unfortunately for Trump, that team is under investigation as well, and as president, Trump is now in a unique position – unparalleled power in one regard; unparalleled public scrutiny in another.

Manafort and Stone, like Trump, are lifelong manipulators of legal and political systems, spinning webs of lies and money that have elevated them – until now – above repercussions. The assorted miscreants that abet the Russian controversy range from these seasoned operatives, to panicked novices like Nunes, to befuddled participants like Tillerson.

What they all have in common is a philosophy that at the very least, puts party before country, but at heart puts everything before country – money, power, and fear of recriminations.

Much as Americans have rediscovered their rights as they lose them, resulting in renewed civic engagement to retain their remaining liberties, there has been a renewed demand for accountability of public officials. The Trump Russia scandal differs from previous corruption scandals – like Watergate and the fabricated pretext for the Iraq War – in that which country our leaders truly serve has never been a guiding concern.

That we genuinely do not know with what nation Trump’s greatest loyalties lie – and if it is indeed with Russia, whether those loyalties were forged through debt, greed, politics, or all of the above – is a new and disturbing question, one that is difficult for many Americans to process.

But finally the investigation is moving forward, with widespread public support. Unlike months ago, when claims that there even was a Russian interference scandal were met with some skepticism, only the most hardcore Putin or Trump disciple now insists that there is no unusual connection between the Trump administration and the Kremlin. It is the job of US officials to determine the exact nature of that connection – preferably through an investigation conducted by an independent, bipartisan commission.

Given the scale of the scandal, a full inquiry will not be easy

The danger, of course, is that this investigation can be challenged by the Trump administration itself, who can delay it, deny it, or put it under the jurisdiction of officials who will aid them, as Nunes has, and has Sessions nearly did before he recused himself. If not given proper oversight, Trump – who has thus far abused executive power, often getting shot down by judges for unconstitutional initiatives – will be in a position akin to a suspected criminal able to select his own judge or delay his own trial.

It is a common tactic of authoritarian leaders facing corruption scandals to attempt to distract the public by engaging in dramatic domestic policy changes or acts of war. Trump has already attempted the former (for reasons beyond merely diverting attention away from Russia) and flirted with the latter in his aggressive rhetoric toward North Korea, China, and in military actions in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.

Given the erratic behavior of not only Trump but members of his administration – and the sheer number of administrative officials who appear to be implicated – it will be difficult to ensure a thorough inquiry. But that is precisely what’s needed, and as quickly and publicly as possible. That the president, ostensibly the protector of our national sovereignty, desperately wants this inquiry ended speaks volumes as to why it must proceed.



We’re heading into dark times. This is how to be your own light in the age of Trump
.

Having studied authoritarian states for over a decade, I would never exaggerate the severity of the threat we face. But an American kleptocracy if exactly where President-elect Trump and his backers are taking us. That’s why I have a favor to ask you, my fellow Americans -

Read Sarah’s story here.



Comments:


1

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:11 | #

Sarah Kendzior is incisive and this is a fascinating article, however, we should observe that Stephen Miller and Seb Gorka are not “Nazis.”

Seb Gorka is a liberal

...and Stephen Miller is Jewish.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: The Visegrád Group Will Not Yield to Blackmail, and Hungary Strengthens Anti-Immigration Policy
Previous entry: It’s time to put an end to classical liberalism.

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Stunning US intel of Putin's direct involvement commented in entry 'There's no "there there" to Russian investigation only where the Alt-Right doesn't want there to be.' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 22:50. (View)

T (formerly the Majorityrights.com blogger 'Alex') commented in entry 'Theresa May's statement in wake of a White man's attack on Finsbury Park Muslims' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 16:10. (View)

T (formerly the Majorityrights.com blogger 'Alex') commented in entry 'Theresa May's statement in wake of a White man's attack on Finsbury Park Muslims' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:53. (View)

Putin’s direct instructions to damage Hillary commented in entry 'There's no "there there" to Russian investigation only where the Alt-Right doesn't want there to be.' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 13:22. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:59. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:38. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 08:17. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 04:20. (View)

Leeds Great Eddie Gray commented in entry 'Euro Cuck Final: a Disgraceful Epitome of The Cucked European Masculine Instinct for Nationalism' on Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:38. (View)

al-Baghdadi's death almost "100% certain" commented in entry 'What happens when WNs accept Russian news reports uncritically?' on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:44. (View)

Greetings to France from Africa commented in entry 'black hyper-assertiveness' on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:27. (View)

Somali genius abetted the fire commented in entry 'LONDON'S BURNING: TOWERING INFERNO EXPECTED TO COLLAPSE' on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:00. (View)

"I can't answer that" commented in entry 'There's no "there there" to Russian investigation only where the Alt-Right doesn't want there to be.' on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:48. (View)

Summer Solstice commented in entry 'Nudity in Pamplona. Fancy dress at Stonehenge. Naked ambition in Manchester.' on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 02:19. (View)

Julia commented in entry 'Nudity in Pamplona. Fancy dress at Stonehenge. Naked ambition in Manchester.' on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:16. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:47. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:06. (View)

Watch your ghostly mouse betray you commented in entry 'There's no "there there" to Russian investigation only where the Alt-Right doesn't want there to be.' on Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:48. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?' on Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:05. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:46. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:06. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'On Sibelius and Heidegger' on Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:24. (View)

Kylie Minogue commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:41. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Social Rules: a deeply important philosophical matter beyond scientistic treatment of emergence' on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 06:44. (View)

What ends up a riddled, bobble-headed Sphinx? commented in entry 'black hyper-assertiveness' on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 05:07. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Social Rules: a deeply important philosophical matter beyond scientistic treatment of emergence' on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:30. (View)

animal crypsis commented in entry 'Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?' on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:10. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Social Rules: a deeply important philosophical matter beyond scientistic treatment of emergence' on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:18. (View)

Out of kindness I suppose commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:27. (View)

Damn, I wish I was your lover commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:58. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity' on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 07:23. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity' on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 06:48. (View)

The Conservative Party Died At Culloden commented in entry 'We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity' on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 05:37. (View)

Remember the Rhino commented in entry 'Survivor located of a branch not seen in 30 years among one of the most endangered species' on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:30. (View)

This tree was young when Culloden was fought commented in entry 'We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity' on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:21. (View)

affection-tone