The late W. Barnett Pearce, a communications scholar, was commemorated by colleagues and students in his passing with their reflections on his work as it influenced and inspired.

One student spoke of a eureka moment provided by a football team analogy that Barnett recommended as a way to look upon how people function together in a coordinated way as opposed to narcissistic, false comparisons that might prop-up dangerous hubris and instigate conflict for non-recognition, if not disrespect for the value, purpose and abilities, in fact, of necessary niche evolutionary differences.

By contrast to better and worse, equal or not-equal, or rendering false comparisons by trying to apply a singular comparative criteria among the people of a group or between groups on the whole, Barnett used the football team analogy to recommend to his student a qualitative way of looking upon group, systemic functioning.

Note, we’re talking about American football in this analogy:

You don’t say one of the offensive linemen positions, say a Left Guard or Right Tackle or a Center, is “not equal” to a Wide Receiver or Fullback. You don’t say that they are not as good, that the Wide Receiver or Half Back is better, the Quarterback is greater than his linemen (Tackles, Guards, Center, Tight End). Well, I guess you can say that, in that the Quarterback position might be harder to fill, but it is fundamentally a stupid comparison, particularly if it fails to recognize his dependence on the Offensive Line for his pass protection and to open up holes for an alternative running game.

Each position has a different set of procedures that is necessary to carry out if the Team is to function effectively, coordinated as a group systemic effort. And toward that end, each position has to be respected as necessary and performing an essential function to the system which is not to be dismissed if the group system is to function effectively.

The positions tend to require qualitatively different abilities, physiology and mentality, true, but they are all necessary if the team is to be a successful system.

Anyway, the analogy provides another resource, along the lines of the concept of commensurability and incommensurability of qualitative niche abilities in and between paradigms (groups), to help people coordinate our White Ethnonationalist efforts. ..as opposed to equality/non equality, false comparisons, hubris of across-the-board supremacism which may leave us vulnerable for lack of an effective “Offensive Line” or lack of respect for their function as such.

Lets suppose for a moment that at times and in ways, England functions as a Quarterback and Italy functions as an Offensive Lineman ...while I would not always want to recommend the analogy of a particular nation to a particular position, you get the idea.

Why are Italians so feisty? Perhaps because they are evolved in interface with Africa and the Middle East, doing grunt work of Offensive Line assertion - faced off against those evolved up against other groups and who fight as a group quite naturally thus, using Manichean, human group trickery that requires a ready recognition of the relative interests of other groups and skepticism of purported good will of other group interests (thus, maintaining prejudice, in a word, and a vigilance on war by deception) .. while the northerners, evolved more to attend to Augustinian (natural) challenges, with an objectivist penchant therefore to be prejudice against prejudice, seeing it as impractical and to be looked down upon, might be doing themselves and our common systemic (race) interests a disservice in looking down upon the Pass Protection (group prejudice) which otherwise allows them to comfortably, if not naively/ disingenuously nerd away; conceiving themselves above such prejudice as they escape into a technocratism, which can ultimately make them into techno slaves to make life convenient for Africans and mixed couples as they attempt to over rationalize African patterns, protected as they are (for a time) in their nerd niches.

This way of thinking can avoid false comparison, throwing other ethnonationals under the bus, and by contrast, lends to the recognition of them as necessary, to be respected for their particular abilities and niche Procedures ..to the maintenance of our systemic homeostasis, to coordinated effort in the defense of our human ecologies.

Once Team Europe is functioning as a coordinated system, then we might develop the courtesy of coordinating with the same idea extended to other peoples, that their niche Procedures are fulfilling different requirements, not necessarily at odds with ours.