Next!

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 05 June 2012 07:56.

Right on cue this morning Mary Riddell, one of a clique of left-liberal journalists working at the DT, has produced an article titled, Now the stage is set for some sensible immigration policies. “Sensible” for Mary means more - in whatever form the masses will accommodate - because Mary is a moralist par excellence of the universalist persuasion.

I might not contribute much to the thread myself. The postings have started to sky-rocket, and it is always tiresomely difficult with DISQUS to maintain contact when that happens. However, I did get an early swipe in against Mary’s universalism, for which she references Shakespeare, no less, and the influential Oxford academic Marc Stears ...

It appears from Mary’s description of Marc Stears’ influence and thoughts in respect to the English genocide by race-replacement, the euphemism for which is “immigration”, that the guiding political principle on the left is “the common good”. So let us brefly examine the meaning of the words “common” and “good”.

Universalism, as one of the four principles of classical liberalism, is derived from the Paulian dispensation. Paul simply reprocessed and re-focussed the Judaic notion of a chosen tribe distinct from, and superior to, the mass of humanity - a humanity fit only, indeed living only, for service to Jews. This is the anti-universalism of Judaism, and in it the Jewish supremacy is delivered not through an evolutionary process of Jewish goodness, since Jews already have perfect souls, but through the “perfection” of the gentiles.

Perfection means pacification, which in turn means the destruction of all borders, boundaries, difference ... all cause of conflict with Jewry. Gentile ethnicity is one such difference, and anything that leads towards its loss is “good” and anything that leads away from its loss is “bad”.

The Christian ethic of love never escaped this paradigm, and today we Europeans still suffer from the obviously false idea that “good” and “virtue” are somehow wrapped up in self-sacrifice, ie, the loss of ethnicity, which, in truth, is the loss of existence ... genocide.

Of course, this argument is compressed ... just skin and bones. But you should be able to see that the loss of European ethnicity - our genocide - is not at all a good, not virtuous, and the whole of humanity, gentile and Jewish, has no claim on us in that regard. We are not morally obligated to submerge ourselves in the bottomless seas of the Third World. It is, equally obviously, also a lie that this is “good” for the greater number. No genocide is ever good for humanity. “Good” in respect to ethnicity is always the polar opposite - self-preservation.

In sum, the moral truth is that our good, in respect to immigration, resides in our self-preservation. The very idea that we do good by admitting racial aliens who, in a matter of decades, will minoritise us and very rapidly marginalise us thereafter, is an evil contrivance from which our forefathers would have instinctually recoiled. All those who moralise to the contrary today, whether as liberals or Christians or Jews, are doing evil.

Tags: Thread Wars

Comments:

Posted by uh on Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:50 | #

And this why we need Guessedworker—not the fatuous pseudosophic ruminations of Daniel.

Posted by melba peachtoaste on Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:10 | #

uh dear boy! you and daniel ought to come to Oz and join the Wallabees, a fighting force now being assembled to retake Ayers Rock. I see you as a suicide wombat.

Posted by Classic Sparkle on Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:12 | #

No Italians. Just dirty Scots in the big Down Under!

Posted by daniel on Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:17 | #

First, I would like to say “amen” to this post of GW’s

(...though I do secretly wonder how life might be if some people did not exist at all, it is highly impractical as an aim whereas self preservation is not)

It was Brilliant - really good.

And now I have to address this:

Posted by uh on June 05, 2012, 09:50 AM | #

And this why we need Guessedworker—not the fatuous pseudosophic ruminations of Daniel.

Uh, I like to feel (even if to self deceive and enjoy my subjective incentive) that I am having some positive effect, however small. I can see some feedback even if you cannot. I don’t know why you cast matters in competitive terms.

It feels good to see this talented guy, whose heart is in the right place, more confirmed, confident and bold in his activism than ever.

Do you think my feelings are hurt if GW is smart? If he does things well? I am really concerned for our people and grateful for anybody with the ability to help - especially if they have talent enough to have impact. Go at ‘em tigers!! I am cheering your victories on!! I see you as on my team!! I want what you want!! Hooray for us!!!

Do you think I care if your prose are better than mine? Forget it man, you can proofread my essays and shine my shoes.

Anyway, I do have to address the the post before, regarding the discussion with the Irish homo…

back in a few..

Posted by Frank on Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:11 | #

http://www.darkmoon.me/2012/the-mad-dogs-days-are-numbered-by-lasha-darkmoon/

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:51 | #

Universalism, as one of the four principles of classical liberalism, is derived from the Paulian dispensation. Paul simply reprocessed and re-focussed the Judaic notion of a chosen tribe distinct from, and superior to, the mass of humanity - a humanity fit only, indeed living only, for service to Jews. This is the anti-universalism of Judaism, and in it the Jewish supremacy is delivered not through an evolutionary process of Jewish goodness, since Jews already have perfect souls, but through the “perfection” of the gentiles.

Perfection means pacification, which in turn means the destruction of all borders, boundaries, difference ... all cause of conflict with Jewry. Gentile ethnicity is one such difference, and anything that leads towards its loss is “good” and anything that leads away from its loss is “bad”.

The Christian ethic of love never escaped this paradigm, and today we Europeans still suffer from the obviously false idea that “good” and “virtue” are somehow wrapped up in self-sacrifice, ie, the loss of ethnicity, which, in truth, is the loss of existence ... genocide. (GW)

ahhhhh, confused, ignorant, both, and in what quantities?

I realize the UK has pretty much dispensed with the historic faith (replaced not by Vikingism, but multiculturalism - what a world of implications in that fact!), so perhaps peddling ignorance on this level might not actually matter, given the intellectual (as well as behavioral) proletarianization ‘across the pond’. But if a non-ignoramus were to read this, you would not have done yourself credit.

YOU understand, eg, that Pauline universalism has a completely different content than the classical liberal, let alone modern liberal, variety, right? You are not of course claiming that Paul was a Jewish supremacist (heehee!), right? You can of course detail where or at least how Paul argues for the erasure of secular borders (hahaha!), and criticizes the maintenance of ethnic distinctions, right? And you obviously recognize that, while the very essence of virtue lay precisely in self-sacrifice (it was a Jew named Marx, and another named Rand, who especially hated that fact), the object or beneficiary of that sacrifice must itself or himself be morally worthy of it, and that the sacrificial aspect of ethics pertains to individuals and their own interests, not those forcing others to make the sacrifice, right?

Please elaborate on these paragraphs, so I can be sure I completely understand your argument before I expose its inadequacy. (Though first try to grasp that liberalism is a deformation of Christianity, not its secular realization or fulfillment.)

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:22 | #

Leon,

Not only do I hold that the liberal attachment to non-EGI related self-sacrifice originates in the Abrahamic essence, but the Christian notions of sin and salvation, and of faith on the morrow itself. The Jew’s circumcision, the Christian’s faith, the liberal’s “humanity”, the NSDAP member’s uniform are all Abrahamic insignia. Likewise, the Jew’s Age of Mossiac, the Christian’s eternal salvation, the liberal’s unfettered will, the NSDAP member’s Thousand Year Reich are all Abrahamic totems of the morrow.

What belongs belongs, and if what belongs to Christianity has no service to us, then so be it. It’s not our faith anyway, only something we have adopted to our racial character, for the most part. It consigns us to belief not being, and is no small contributor, therefore, to the self-estrangement that we suffer racially today.

Posted by Robert in Arabia on Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:55 | #

O.T:

If I had Larry Auster’s diagnosis, I would check out these link.

http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2009/07/cure-for-cancer-what-is-medical.html
http://scienceblogs.com/scientificactivist/2009/04/02/thc-gives-cancer-cells-the-mun/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0psJhQHk_GI Run from the cure video about hemp
http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2012/06/more-important-health-news-vitamin-d.html
http://apocalypsecometh.com/?p=717
So what else are we being lied to about? How about cancer in general? Back in 2007, the New Scientist ran this in an article:

“It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that kills almost all cancers by switching off their “immortality”. The drug, dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe. It also has no patent, meaning it could be manufactured for a fraction of the cost of newly developed drugs.

Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleagues tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body and found that it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but not healthy cells. Tumours in rats deliberately infected with human cancer also shrank drastically when they were fed DCA-laced water for several weeks.”

This is the pertinent sentence: “It also has no patent, meaning it could be manufactured for a fraction of the cost of newly developed drugs.” Have you heard about the miraculous properties of DCA when used to treat cancer? Nope, me either. I
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10971-cheap-safe-drug-kills-most-cancers.html

http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2012/05/important-health-news-baking-soda.html