Posted by Captainchaos on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:00 | #

What does this mean for white nationalism?

It provides proof that the Jewish “man of the street” is not as intellectually overpowering as we have been led to believe.

Posted by q on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:09 | #

What does this mean for white nationalism?

Nothing, really.

Posted by Frank on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:10 | #

Looks like Jews in a Jewish state are normal while Jews in the US are left-wing nutsos. Lesson learned: people should live with their own.

Posted by Matra on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:36 | #

How come they all had American accents?

Posted by Anonymous on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:39 | #

Looks like Jews in a Jewish state are normal while Jews in the US are left-wing nutsos. Lesson learned: people should live with their own.

Not all of them are normal:  http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/124674

Seriously, these people are insane.

Posted by Frank on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:51 | #

Geert Wilders’s father might be part Jewish? I guess “part” isn’t much to be concerned with, but are there no more fully European Europeans left?

—-

How come they all had American accents?

Most of them are probably dual-citizens… Fully in favour of mass immigration, war, oppressive “Civil Rights” laws, etc. etc. But in Israel they’re right wing - the Holy Land transforms them I guess…

Anonymous, what’s truly incredible is their ex-Prime Minister Irgun. He was more Hitler than Hitler, so to speak. He didn’t see any of us as human at all, though I realise not every Jew thinks like that.

They think we’re all obsessed with them, when it’s really that they’re obsessed with us. They dominate the US left, and probably a lot of the UK left.

Posted by Frank on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:58 | #

Many Ashkenazi Jews believe they are a master race. If they want to join in some sort of white nationalism, then they need to acknowledge that even if they prefer their own that we are human too and that harming the rest of Europe for the benefit of Israel is not good.

The past morality of: “what’s good for Israel is good” must be altered to take into account the rest of us, else what does Europe have to gain from such an alliance? Europeans could conceivably work with East Asians - anything’s possible. But Jews are seem to be too supremacist at times. They too often think they should rule, and that what happens to others doesn’t matter.

Posted by q on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:32 | #

Jewish criminals are in power because they make better (read: more ruthless) criminals than the rest of all other ethnic criminals. But I got a instinctual feeling, the Chinks are soon going to rise to the top and rival the Jews, BIGTIME.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:40 | #

“He didn’t see any of us as human at all, though I realise not every Jew thinks like that.”  (—Frank)

A very large proportion of them do, you’d be surprised.

Posted by q on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:55 | #

The Asian Threat

Lothrop Stoddard
The Rising Tide of Color begins with a description of the various non-white populations of the earth. Although his classifications are sometimes crude, Stoddard makes sharp distinctions between different races of non-whites. In his view, East Asians living in the “yellow man’s land” were the greatest threat to whites. He classified north Asians — as well the west Asians of the “brown man’s world” — as high races with histories of accomplishment that deserve respect. Indeed, he wrote that for a thousand years the East put constant pressure on the West and at one time threatened to conquer all of Europe. By the time of Charlemagne, the “white man’s world” had shrunk to only the lands west of the Elbe River. Charlemagne pushed the invaders out but whites never fully reconquered the lands that had once been theirs — a failure in which Stoddard saw much significance:

“Future generations have a right to demand of us that they shall be born white in a white man’s land.” 

“… [W]est-central Asia, which in the dawn of history was predominantly white man’s country, is today racially brown man’s land in which white blood survives only as vestigial traces of vanishing significance. If this portion of Asia, the former seat of mighty white empires and possibly the very homeland of the white race itself, should have so entirely changed its ethnic character, what assurance can the most impressive political panorama give us that the present world order may not swiftly and utterly pass away?”
Of all the threats to the West, Stoddard believed the Japanese were the most serious. He quotes early British envoys who described Japanese as “highly intelligent children” who could quickly acquire Western techniques. In the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-5 these “highly intelligent children,” shocked the world by becoming the first non-white nation in modern times to defeat a white nation. Since white hegemony was maintained not by love but by respect and fear, Russia’s defeat by Japan was, in Stoddard’s view, “a body blow to white ascendancy.”

Japanese writers and government officials were not shy about drawing conclusions from their victory, and soon began turning western ideas of supremacy on their heads. At the outbreak of the First World War, Japanese writer Yone Noguchi wrote that the conflict meant the ruin of whites. “It means the saddest downfall of the so-called western civilization; our belief that it was builded upon higher and sounder footing than ours was at once knocked down and killed; we are sorry that we somehow overestimated its happy possibility and were deceived and cheated by its superficial glory.”

Stoddard quotes a Japanese imperialist pronouncement written in 1916: “As for America — that fatuous booby with much money and much sentiment, but no cohesion, no brains of government … Well did my friend speak the other day when he called her people a race of thieves with the hearts of rabbits…

“North America alone will support a billion people; that billion will be Japanese with their slaves. Not arid Asia, nor worn-out Europe (which, with its peculiar and quaint relics and customs should in the interests of history and culture, be in any case preserved), nor yet tropical Africa is fit for our people. But North America, that continent so succulently green, fresh, and unsullied — except for the few chattering mongrel Yankees — should have been ours by right of discovery; it shall be ours by the higher, nobler right of conquest.”
A Burmese journal called Buddhism, wrote that the “yellow peril” was nothing more than an expression of Darwinian superiority. “The West has justified — perhaps with some reason — every aggression on weaker races by the doctrine of Survival of the Fittest; on the ground that it is best for future humanity that the unfit should be eliminated and give place to the most able race. That doctrine applies equally well to any possible struggle between Aryan and Mongolian — whichever survives, should it ever come to a struggle between the two for world mastery, will, on their own doctrine, be the one most fit to do so, and if the survivor be the Mongolian, then is the Mongolian no “peril’ to humanity, but the better part of it.”

Threat. 
Although it was partially controlled by Japan, China also was a threat to the West. With one fourth of the world’s population, an armed China would pose an even greater challenge than Japan. Stoddard reported that in 1905 Chinese school children were taught to chant the following lines: “I pray that the frontiers of my country become hard as bronze; that it surpass Europe and America; that it subjugate Japan; that its land and sea armies cover themselves with resplendent glory; that over the whole earth float the Dragon Standard; that the universal mastery of the empire extend and progress. May our empire, like a sleeping tiger suddenly awakened, spring roaring into the arena of combats.” There was good reasons to take note of the Asians.

http://www.amren.com/ar/2000/01/#cover

Posted by OFF TOPIC on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:23 | #

Off Topic:

There is some mumuring/whining about Majority Rights over at Half Sigma.  Maybe someone wants to go over there and stir the pot.  You’ll get some great responses.

Posted by q on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:32 | #

There is some mumuring/whining about Majority Rights over at Half Sigma.  Maybe someone wants to go over there and stir the pot.  You’ll get some great responses

Screw them. Who even gives a flying fig about them.

Posted by Svigor on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:33 | #

A very large proportion of them do, you’d be surprised.

What’s interesting is not so much Jewish supremacy, but how it survives.  Instead of grabbing their book and tugging their sidelocks and referring to a covenant with their g-d, now they refer to the holocaust and “never forget” and hiss about “mystical anti-Semitism.”  They seem to have an infinitely elastic ability to keep the fundamentals and change the trappings whenever necessary.

Posted by Svigor on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:36 | #

I say let Half Sigma and the rest be.  If they want to make HBD respectable, I say more power to them.  They’re building bridges for us.

Posted by q on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:18 | #

Let us give respect where it is due: Some of the the things said in the video were admirable.

Yes, admirable.

Posted by Frank on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:36 | #

What’s interesting is not so much Jewish supremacy, but how it survives.  Instead of grabbing their book and tugging their sidelocks and referring to a covenant with their g-d, now they refer to the holocaust and “never forget” and hiss about “mystical anti-Semitism.” They seem to have an infinitely elastic ability to keep the fundamentals and change the trappings whenever necessary.

We should at the least be attempting to restore a mystical pre-modern West. That look back at a past or at a lost potential can be powerful. And we’ve been screwed over plenty too - even if largely by our own (as well as by Jews but it’s tough to know percentages) it’s still a loss that should be viewed as “never again” - e.g. “never again will we allow in massive waves of immigrants, never again mass democracy, etc. etc.”

Just as you say, we should learn from the Jews where possible - learn from the successful is what Sacrates advised. However, learning from isn’t the same as fully imitating.

Posted by Begin on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:06 | #

what’s truly incredible is their ex-Prime Minister Irgun.

Who?

Posted by Frank on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:18 | #

Menachem Begin, member of the Irgun which morphed into the Herut party which morphed into the Likud party.

Google quotes by him. I meant to call him “Prime Minister Begin of Irgun”. When I looked up the spelling of “Irgun” I replaced the name.

Posted by Frank on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:00 | #

Oh, you were correcting me. Thanks

Maybe folks know about him here, but I certainly didn’t learn of him in school. I was shocked upon first reading some of his speeches.

This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.

That’s really what’s been done regarding our recent history - it’s all a fiction, lies.

Posted by danielj on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:22 | #

What does this mean for white nationalism?

It means Jews - as we already knew - are as incapable of self-reflection and introspection as Blacks and that the younger ones are starting to mimic their behavior in other ways.

Nobody is immune from the poison that is MTV.

Posted by danielj on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:28 | #

...as for what it means for White nationalism, I’m not entirely sure.

Perhaps it means what we’ve already known for quite some time, i.e. that Jews will chiefly look to advance their interests at the expense of ours if it becomes necessary to do so. Maybe this means we should view with careful suspicion and approach with great caution any Jew claiming to be a “White nationalist” or a Jew-friendly incarnation of a “White nationalist.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:10 | #

I don’t have any thoughts on what it means for white nationalism but I can see where that’s potentially an interesting question.  Did James B. have something particular in mind?

Posted by danielj on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:27 | #

I think he was referring to the bits where the Jews in the video were screaming about “niggers” and to the guy that says “White Power!”

Posted by Jupiter on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:03 | #

Very inspiring. Barack Obama is an antiwhite Kenyan bigot. Hoolywood actor William Macy has already turned against The Dear Leader. Ted Rall,who voted for The Dear Leader, has turned against him.

I believe that the hatred expressed by these Israeli youth-who were very likely born and raised in America-comes from a very deep fear that the State of Israel will very likely not exist in the future through a combination of demographic forces and a psychotic foriegn policy.

I suspect that the collective psychosis that has griped the state Israeli will lead to an attack an Iraq very soon-like this summer. Iran will launch almost immediately a hundred missles at Tel Aviv. Israeli will repsond by nuking Iran. Iran will respond by sinking a US aircraft carrier or two. They are quite capable of doing this. The US will then use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. There will then be a confrontation between US carrier aircraft and Russian carrier aircraft in that neck of the woods. There was almost a confrontation between Russia and America last summer.

Native Born White Americans have been in a collective psychosis since 9/11. THE END TIMES ARE NEAR ladies and gentlemen. You do not have to be a pinhead Southern Evangleical Christian to see that this is obvious.

America will no longer exist because of the indifference to the existential threat posed by the Republican-Democratic Beltway invade the world invite the world policy. I’m going to a high school graduation party in a few minutes. There will be a of chit chat between the adult White Men about everything that is trivial and umimportant-sports teams,sport heros and golf swings.

Things will only get better after there is a complete collapse of American society.

Israel attacks Iran on July 4

Posted by q on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:33 | #

I suspect that the collective psychosis that has griped the state Israeli will lead to an attack an Iraq very soon-like this summer. Iran will launch almost immediately a hundred missles at Tel Aviv. Israeli will repsond by nuking Iran. Iran will respond by sinking a US aircraft carrier or two. They are quite capable of doing this. The US will then use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. There will then be a confrontation between US carrier aircraft and Russian carrier aircraft in that neck of the woods. There was almost a confrontation between Russia and America last summer.

In the mean time, China will assemble a 200 million man army and march into the Middle East and take control the oilfields. Checkmate! Game over. USA, you lose.

Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:34 | #

danielj writes: I think he was referring to the bits where the Jews in the video were screaming about “niggers” and to the guy that says “White Power!”

That’s part of the question of course.  Generally, it is an interesting question what the Mossad is doing in white nationalist circles these days and what their real motives are.  As someone who was almost certainly under direct (ie: field agents trying to strike up relationships) surveillance by the Mossad just prior to 9/11, it strikes me as more than an academic exercise.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:59 | #

James: As someone who was almost certainly under direct (ie: field agents trying to strike up relationships) surveillance by the Mossad just prior to 9/11

Explanation?

Posted by White Preservationist (on Jewry) on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:51 | #

Frank: “Looks like Jews in a Jewish state are normal while Jews in the US are left-wing nutsos. Lesson learned: people should live with their own. “

Great point.  Studies have shown that Jews (even the Ashkenazim) in Israel are reverting to the mean in terms of intelligence/IQ after 1-2 generations of being permanently settled there.

Once Jews become a rooted people in their own nation they become ‘normalized’ like every other group and cease to be more intelligent or driven than other groups. 

The only reason for the success of Jews is their nomadic/parasitic lifestyle and their cunning built up from many centuries of ‘hard living’ in the diaspora where they had to be smart to survive. The Jewish problem can be solved forever by settling them in their own homeland(s) and preventing them from continuing to be nomadic parasites/troublemakers who need to constantly build up their cunning in order to outwit other (native/settled) groups in the competition for resources.

“The Jew is a savage, his psychology is: may the stink of your camp drive you onward—herders—having no care but to let their herds grouse and move onward when the pasture is exhausted.” - Ezra Pound (May 11, 1943)

Posted by Cat on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:56 | #

ANYONE who is against The Obamanation is a friend to WN.  The Obamanation is the biggest threat and/or slap in the face to WN that has ever existed.  I LOVE those guys and gals who were interviewed.  I can only hope that among their ranks sits the future hope we are all waiting for.  At least they have the balls to say what we feel in our guts.  I say three cheers for “Fuck Obama” people.

Posted by White Preservationist on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:21 | #

In a similar vein…what do you all think about the theory that Jews were forced to revert back to primitive hunter-gatherer-herder types once they had been largely forced out of their Near Eastern homeland in the first century of the common era (AD)?

As a nomadic/diasporic/wandering minority group, Jews certainly seem to resemble pseudo-hunter-gatherers in a world which is overwhelmingly composed of settled agricultural peoples, though they don’t of course literally hunt animals/game or gather nuts/berries/etc…they ‘hunt down’ potential business opportunities (with native/settled peoples as their prey?) and ‘gather’ the money resulting from those businesses.

Perhaps this is one of the main reasons why Jewry face so much resentment and persecution wherever they go? They are unnaturally living a quasi-hunter-gatherer existence while the vast majority of the other groups around the world have long stopped wandering around and have settled down in to permanent agricultural societies.  This would also partially explain the Jewish aversion to agriculture in general, as well as their undeniable tendency toward constant nomadism/wandering/immigration.

Posted by White Preservationist on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:12 | #

A good reaction to this video was written-up at The Occidental Quarterly Online earlier today; check it out: http://www.toqonline.com/2009/06/our-masters-voice/

Posted by Frank on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:07 | #

Drunken Israelite threatens camera man. I wonder if white Americans will ever feel that way about their homeland again.

Posted by q on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:26 | #

Drunken Israelite threatens camera man. I wonder if white Americans will ever feel that way about their homeland again.

That drunken Jew sounds incredible like the everyday language used by Detroit’s City Council members.

Posted by danielj on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:37 | #

James: As someone who was almost certainly under direct (ie: field agents trying to strike up relationships) surveillance by the Mossad just prior to 9/11

Explanation?

Indeed James. Do tell!

ANYONE who is against The Obamanation is a friend to WN. 

This is incredibly faulty logic.

Posted by Frank on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:55 | #

Q,

his personality is probably well suited for being a settler. Imagine that maniac storming in your house at night! Those settlers are fierce enough to chase out Semites! These aren’t tamed Euros but real-live Semites they’re chasing out. It’d take a real monster to do that kind of work.

I just like that he’s fiercely convinced that that’s his land. How many American whites have any land they think of us “home” in such a deep sense? So many of us are rootless trash nowadays… Such a great fall. Without a place and people to belong, a man is nothing.

Posted by Frank on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:15 | #

ANYONE who is against The Obamanation is a friend to WN.

He who sups with the devil should have a long spoon

While it’s important to remain focused on what’s best for whites as a whole and as more specific nationalities, as opposed to hating Jews or any other group; but politics is very dangerous and very deceptive. “Allies” are rarely benevolent Christians. If they have no motive for helping you, chances are they just want to use you. As the Christian West falls, the stranger should be seen as an increasingly terrible threat. We might have to make a deal with the Devils at various times, but we mustn’t let down our guard ever when among Devils.

The difference between Jews and whites is: Jews think the world is against them when the powers that be really support them. And whites think the world is benevolent when the world is actually very angry at Europe and wants to see it crushed. In the link Rogozin points out that Jews are seen as white, but they don’t seem to care. They’re more anti-Europe than anyone atm…

Posted by q on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:23 | #

Frank,

They’re Jews.  What more can be said? They belong to the most fanatical religion on the planet. Case closed.

Posted by White Preservationist on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:26 | #

Re: Frank - “VIDEO: Drunken Israelite threatens camera man.”

That’s not as bad as the following short video where an Israeli solider calls Palestinians trapped animals living in a jungle/zoo - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQz1OPbVe-4

Posted by Fiotheth on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:31 | #

Excellent post Jupiter!

Obamas trip to the middle east is probably in reality him going and telling the Arabs to stand down when (Persian) Iran is attacked by Israel... or else.

With a new Hawk-ish PM Israel is set to attack and the summer time is the best time for a good weather/ full moon at night air attack (full moon light helps the night vision equipment on aircraft)

Things may become very interesting very soon and all Whites must prepare NOW survivalist style for the coming Collapse.  Get Civil War 2 by Thomas W. Chittum if you can, as it is a good guide. 

in the mean time, China will assemble a 200 million man army and march into the Middle East and take control the oilfields. Checkmate! Game over. USA, you lose.

Also remember that China has a very large diaspora population in Africa… many of them are probably under-cover spec. ops. just waiting to go into action in the Middle East to help clear the way for China-man main military forces to enter the zone. 

Remember that the primary dynamic operating is ZOG vs. SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) aka Warsaw Pact 2 aka Eurasians sick and tired of ZOG!!!!!

The duty of Racialists and WNs in North America is to ride out the coming storm and Collapse (There will be Collapse even if there is no mega-war), mete out justice to traitorous Jewry after the Collapse, and then assemble a Racialist State in the distant after-math.  TOMORROW BELONGS TO ME! 

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:24 | #

Geert Wilders’s father might be part Jewish? I guess “part” isn’t much to be concerned with, but are there no more fully European Europeans left?

I have looked into this question myself and I have never found any evidence besides his own private musings unsupported by anything.

Geert Wilders is a very smart individual who must be very careful in what he says and does. He has chosen to ally himself with Zionist and Right-wing Jews against Islam and Muslim immigration to the Netherlands. If it weren’t for his strong philosemitism he wouldn’t have access to mainstream media, electoral success, and contacts withing Israel and the U.S. However, it’s not all opportunism. Wilders genuinely feels that Israel in at the forefront of the civilizational war against Isalmofascism. At a personal level, he’s the European politician who impresses me the most. I think he purposefully cultivates an ambiguous persona.

Posted by the Narrator... on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:36 | #

What does this mean for white nationalism?

Posted by James Bowery on Friday, June 5, 2009 at 09:48 PM

It means about the same thing as a group of Ethiopians, in a moment of drunken recklessness, expressing their dislike of Kentucky Fried Chicken.

...

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:04 | #

I rather like Lieberman. He seems like a stand up guy. Anyone who upsets liberals so much cannot be a bad person.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtuKO06RAqo

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:19 | #

Jew speaks: When universal and democratic values are in conflict with Jewish interests, Jewish interests should have precedence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jojq5TCQsw&feature=related

Posted by Fiotheth on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:31 | #

I think he purposefully cultivates an ambiguous persona.

One is reminded of Nietzsches quote: “one does not only wish to be understood when one writes; one wishes just as surely not to be understood.”

However it is more then likely Wilders is trying to be ‘all things to all people’ and his ambiguousness is part of a ‘big tent’ policy (a rather intelligent move since people are intrigued by ambiguousness and want to figure out what is going on)

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 12:09 | #

Wilders is very probably an arch-believer in the Single Jewish Cause.  He is a dewdrop spider, aiming to sever the threads of the Jew spider’s Dutch meal without triggering an attack.

His method is to shield himself behind “Judeo-Christian values” and noisy declarations of love for Israel.  This is supposed to lull Organised Jewry while he builds up his political challenge to Islam and Dutch multiculturalism.  The basic Jewish objectives, however, are non-negotiable:

1. Never again!  Amalek must die.

2. G-d will raise up his beloved sons in ways immeasurable and unimaginable when they have made His house perfect for him to enter.

There is no reasoning with this.  The Jew spider will attack rather than allow Amalek to live and the work of tikkun olam to be reversed.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:19 | #

The Jew spider will attack rather than allow Amalek to live and the work of tikkun olam to be reversed.

Yes, but the rules of the game have changed considerably. I’m personally very glad that Israel has become a marauding vandal ethno-state with an overt fascist political class. It becomes more difficult for Jewish organizations in the West to give pious morality lessons to White gentiles, unless they wish to look like ridiculous hypocrites. However, that little fact hasn’t kept Israel in the past from recalling its ambassador to Austria when Haider entered the government, although he, unlike our friend Lieberman, never advocated loyalty oaths or expelling naturalized citizens from Austria. So when Peretz called Lieberman an Israeli version of Haider, he was lying.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:47 | #

Well done Max. You turned over a rock and found a slug. These are not the dangerous people because they are obvious. The dangerous people are the educated, the articulate, who smoothly talk of human rights and democracy but support a Jewish state on more than 50% of the 1947 UN partitioned area. At the end of the day their goals are the same as these idiots. By focusing on extremists, the ‘moderates’ can work their magic.

More comments:

http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2009/06/max-blumenthal-feeling-the-hate-in-jerusalem-on-eve-of-obamas-cairo-address.html

Posted by danielj on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:55 | #

From the co-creator of the video: These people and their families are the core of the opposition to meaningful peace between Israel and her neighbors. This is what Obama is up against.

If that is the case,  I think the Black boy in the White House doesn’t have shit to worry about.

At least not from the Jewish poli-sci majors.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:08 | #

Nobody engages in deception and self-deception like a Jew. Note the usual feelings of intellectual and moral superiority.

Why Not Intermarry
by Rabbi Shraga Simmons, Jewish World Jun 07, 2009

Rabbi Shraga Simmons: Jewish survival is not merely an ethnic issue, but also a moral issue, because the Jews are not only an ethnic group, they are a moral force. The values that the civilized world takes for granted—monotheism, love your neighbor, peace on earth, justice for all, universal education, all men are created equal, dignity of the individual, the preciousness of life—were all revolutionary ideas taught by the Jewish people.

The Jews as a moral force continues to this day, as indicated by the disproportionately high number of Jews in charities and in causes of social welfare, from civil rights to feminism.

As Rabbi Nachum Braverman explains, this is not to say that only Jews are capable of conscience or of goodness. It is to say that of all the nations throughout world history, only the Jews have defined their national mission as bringing moral clarity to the world.

http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/Why_Not_Intermarry$2.asp

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:26 | #

“of all the nations throughout world history, only the Jews have defined their national mission as bringing moral clarity to the world.”  (—quoted by FB)

Bringing moral clarity to the world?  I’m afraid what they’re mainly doing is 1) looking out for themselves and their own interests, and 2) waging genocidal tribal warfare against the Eurochristians. 

Period.  End of story.

Posted by Selous Scout on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:06 | #

Funny video. These slackers remind me Los Angeles-area Jewish teens. These youngsters are straight out of one of those vulgar Jewish comedy films by Jew Judd Apatow (Knocked Up, Superbad, Funny People, Pineapple Express, etc.). If these are the cream of the Jewish crop, then we have nothing to worry about. Classic Jewish-American youth.

The long-haired, bearded Jews wearing tie-dyed t-shirts, rasta clothing, dancing and drinking in the streets, is typical young Israeli behaviour. If you have ever been to Tal Aviv or Eilat and seen these rejects in the streets, as I have, you will know what I am talking about. I wonder, though, what upright Christian Zionists have to say about their money going to these Israeli degenerates.

It is my understanding, having talked to friends from Syria and Lebanon about it, that one of the reasons for Arab hostility to Jews and Israel in particular, is the decadence, drug use, and sexual immorality that prevail in Israeli society.

Posted by Selous Scout on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:08 | #

Tel Aviv

Posted by danielj on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:09 | #

drug use

Hopefully that involves prolonged usage of ecstasy. I’ve seen what that does to people and it ain’t pretty.

Posted by Liberaliter on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:25 | #

“Perhaps this is one of the main reasons why Jewry face so much resentment and persecution wherever they go? They are unnaturally living a quasi-hunter-gatherer existence while the vast majority of the other groups around the world have long stopped wandering around and have settled down in to permanent agricultural societies.  This would also partially explain the Jewish aversion to agriculture in general, as well as their undeniable tendency toward constant nomadism/wandering/immigration.”

How do you explain the sheer stupidity of the Gypsies then? I think it’s more complex than that. One can also suggest that some “Rabbinical eugenics” had been implemented throughout their evolution as wanderers. They are the only tripe on the planet that turned their religion they adopted into a racial manifestation.

Posted by Fiotheth on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:05 | #

One can also suggest that some “Rabbinical eugenics” had been implemented throughout their evolution as wanderers. They are the only tripe on the planet that turned their religion they adopted into a racial manifestation.

Nah.

Although Ancient Roman Religions (a collection of cults really) were not Racialist, they did practice Eugenics.  People born with out limbs for example were immediately put to death.  Roman Society was very hostile to those who didn’t appear ‘normal’. 

The most clearly Racialist White Religion though was that of my Norse Ancestors.  They referred to American Indians as ‘Skraelings’, and would put babies who were not blond and blue eyed out in the forest to be eaten by wolves!!

Norse Paganism was clearly Racialist:  http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism01.shtml

Some have estimated that since Whites adopted the dysgenic practices of Judeo-Christianity Egalitarianism (Gal 3:28) that White IQs have dropped about 10-15 points!!

Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:00 | #

Re the Mossad’s surveillance of me during the summer of 2001:

Silicon Valley had been dead for about a year and I was basically just living off of my savings—the few remaining jobs being almost irreversibly occupied by the new “guest workers” and their ethnic network.  My apartment mate had made the cover of the WSJ and NYT, and also made CNN over the prior few years with security exploits that caused Netscape stock to decline by as much as 5% each of 3 times he hit another major security hole.  He and I had a bit of fun with Netscape since their head of PR was a Rothschild.  The guy was such an imperious twit it was irresistible.

The Mossad contact probably started with a woman, who approached me in my apartment, who was living in a facing apartment and actually told me she was involved with the “Israeli Mafia” and that she didn’t particularly like them.  I avoided further contact with her despite her invitation to go to work with the early version of what has become Flash, and an approach that struck a friend of mine as so overtly sexual that he was aghast that I didn’t follow up.  I won’t go into the details of the next of the pieces of evidence since it was, as is characteristic of the Mossad, a personal situation via which they informed me in no uncertain terms they had my apartment under microwave/ir surveillance.  This was deliberate.  I don’t know why they wanted me to know but they clearly did.  Maybe they thought they could blackmail me with the information but, in any event, they were wrong about what they were seeing and I had the means to prove exactly what was going on which would have proven to be an embarrassment to the blackmailers.  Then, about the time Ricochet went out of business, and I lost my internet access, I took to walking about a mile every day to a cybercafe where I could log on all day for a modest fee.  It was good exercise, cheap and fun, and I didn’t expect to be around SV much longer.  I was approached in the cyber cafe during the days leading up to 9/11 by a male who was associated with a “moving company”.  The male tried to butter me up as a programming legend but I caught him in an inconsistency—merely asking him an innocent question to probe a bit further.  Next thing I know, he was no longer sitting at his seat next to me, his “notebook” was still there leaving the impression he was going to return, but he never did.  At another time, a female sat down next to me and spent a long time browsing an “Israeli Art School” website and yes she looked Jewish.  Maybe that was nothing.  Those are the highlights.  Nothing like that has happened to me since 9/11.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:27 | #

Liberal Jews in New York on the necessity of “wiping out” all Arabs:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FABqq_jjRRo&feature=channel

Posted by danielj on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:02 | #

What?

Get the fuck outta here James.

I knew you were dangerous.

Now we’re all fucked for being on this damn website.

Posted by Fr. John on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:43 | #

“Some have estimated that since Whites adopted the dysgenic practices of Judeo-Christianity Egalitarianism (Gal 3:28) that White IQs have dropped about 10-15 points!!”

Fiotheth- Please understand that egalitarianism is not innate in Christianity. I write over at my blog about the tribal, familial, Ecumene-based nature of historic Apostolic Christianity.

Modern ECUMENICAL ‘X-ianity’ OTOH, is egalitarian to the core, because it is an ‘anti-christian,’ Judeo-idolatrous, false faith.
They may LOOK the same, but are worlds apart.

Posted by q on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:58 | #

Now we’re all fucked for being on this damn website.

You mean to tell me you didn’t know that from the start? Seriously.

Posted by ATBOTL on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:46 | #

Jews lash out at anyone who doesn’t ask “how high?” when they say “jump”.  That’s all there is to this video.

Posted by Gudmund on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:36 | #

Although Ancient Roman Religions (a collection of cults really) were not Racialist, they did practice Eugenics.  People born with out limbs for example were immediately put to death.  Roman Society was very hostile to those who didn’t appear ‘normal’.

The most clearly Racialist White Religion though was that of my Norse Ancestors.  They referred to American Indians as ‘Skraelings’, and would put babies who were not blond and blue eyed out in the forest to be eaten by wolves!!

Norse Paganism was clearly Racialist:  http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism01.shtml

Some have estimated that since Whites adopted the dysgenic practices of Judeo-Christianity Egalitarianism (Gal 3:28) that White IQs have dropped about 10-15 points!!

Not to be rude, but I would take anything written by Varg Vikernes with a grain of salt.  He is well known for his willingness to alter truth to suit his pagan NS ideology.  His criterion for whether someone is race-mixed is whether they’re blond and blue eyed or not.  That is not a valid criterion as we have discovered via genetic analysis that, for example, blue eyes originated ~6000 years ago meaning that prior to the Indo-European arrivals the natives couldn’t have been blue-eyed.  There were and remain different groups of true Europeans and Varg’s way is merely one more Nordicist perspective.

Also it is hard to believe that the ancient Norse were that fanatically racialist given how aracial modern Nords are for the most part.  If they were so, where did that tendency disappear to in the modern day?  Indeed, why are Nordic populations renowned for their altruism toward non-Aryans if racialism so powerful a motivator for their ancestors?

Also the hypothesis that Christianity led to dysgenics is partly credible given some Christian tenets, but one must remember that superstitious, isolated Christian Europe in the Middle Ages enjoyed a technological revolution and considerable high culture prior to the Black Plague so we must be careful in looking to Judeo-Christianity as the single cause.  If anything I think the rise of modernity and democracy has led to organized dysgenics far worse than when Christianity was supreme in the region.  People during Christian Europe’s high point were far more implicitly racialist than those of today.

Ultimately, Varg is just a Norwegian nationalist who should have lived 1000 years earlier and his writings are more or less an expression of the resulting frustration he feels at that fact.

Posted by Gudmund on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:55 | #

It provides proof that the Jewish “man of the street” is not as intellectually overpowering as we have been led to believe.

How true.  And I’ve said this same thing so many times.  But from our side it’s always the same “115 [or 108] average IQ.”  Sorry, my personal experience (which includes monitoring not just jews I’ve known but also monitoring the behavior of all jews worldwide, easy to do since they’re everywhere that publicity is) doesn’t match up with those statistics nor do the age-old characterizations of jews for that matter.  In all the jews are more notable for their cunning criminal stratagems than for their supposedly wondrous intellect.  Duh!  Where are the jewish Goethes, the jewish Kants, the jewish Goedels, etc if they’re so damned superior?

Jews want us to be their fawning sudras and do their bidding.  And this in the face of their endless hositility and criticism.  But when you cross them or frustrate their need to be supreme, you’ve never seen such genocidal burning rage.

The time has come to expel the jews!

Posted by Svigor on Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:19 | #

The time has come to expel the jews!

I’d settle for permission to escape them.

Posted by Wandrin on Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:51 | #

White Preservationist,

In a similar vein…what do you all think about the theory that Jews were forced to revert back to primitive hunter-gatherer-herder types once they had been largely forced out of their Near Eastern homeland in the first century of the common era

As someone else mentioned above I think the contrast with Gypsies is instructive. Gypsies are a kind of open version of jews in they are a tightly knit, separate and (mostly) parasitic tribe living inside a host tribe and who (mostly) see the host tribe as prey. However they seek to preserve as much of their nomadic culture as possible and therefore move around in rural areas on the outskirts of society.

jews are the same in many ways except they prefer to live in the most urban of centres they can find so they need to be able to prey on the host tribe without detection while remaining in plain sight. Maybe that’s where the brains come from. Maybe if they lived in caravans outside the cities and survived on odd jobs and burglary they’d be tough but dumb like gypsies.