‘The Old Continent: Your Eye on Europe’, a site helpful with facts, dubious in terms of patterns A relatively new site called The Old Continent: Your Eye on Europe might be of some limited utility to ethnonationalism, but requires significant caveat. Its four listed “authors”, Timon Dias, Vincent van den Born, Frank Kasteel and Benjamin de Wolf all seem to be coming from some sort of military / policing background - and thus given to a platform that aspires to an objective presentation of criminality and its sources antagonistic to, where not outrightly designated the enemy of European civic union. The site is performing a service in reporting on migrant rape crimes, a type of crime very very important to us and under-reported by the media to date; however, their purported objectivity fails to conceal a pandering to a prejudicial social classification that nevertheless remains salient despite the objectivist prejudice against discriminatory social classification - i.e. the classification female remains, irrespective of the prejudice against social classifications - in fact, emerges to impose itself as a category undeniably. And through the disingenuous objectivist premise, males, any males who are most “objectively” manly, are suitable to look after the interests of European union females: Case in point - of the posts that Timon Dias has recently put up at the time of this writing, two of them are lauding the virtue and strength of black boxing champions, here and here, one post is some voodoo about a cloud that formed in the sky “miraculously” in the shape of Great Britain - “forming a sign from God for Brexit,” and finally he put up a story about a police car having been burned in Amsterdam by migrants. So, we may guess that Dias is black, part black, perhaps otherwise colored, but at least “philo-black”, i.e., not having European people’s subjective and relative interests as empirically grounded systemic wholes, close to heart. The other writers seem to be more coherently focused on reporting migrant crime in Europe, particularly as it comes by way of Islam. In pursuing these crime stories as an objective matter, emphasizing previously under-reported incidents of migrant rape, they can supply facts that counter the heretofore mainstream media’s liberal prejudices against ethno-nationalism. Though “Old Continent” is the same as the legacy media in that it purports to be objective, it differs in its undeclared bias in this way of having a prejudicial eye on immigrant crime and particularly Islamic sourcing of that criminal behavior. Whereas the heretofore mainstream media has had a prejudicial eye against conservative reaction to liberal causes, such as problems perpetrated through immigration and Muslim people. This liberal prejudice and de-emphasis on the crimes aided and abetted by liberalism has left us acutely susceptible. Thus, the site can be helpful to us for this “objective” angle in a few different ways. Firstly by directly providing us with factual events to help supply and support our own arguments and secondly their “objectivity” can help us indirectly to put together our arguments for ethnonationalism as a means of systemic accountability and protection - indirectly, for example, through their “objective” reporting on sources of “anti-Semitism” they can inadvertently call attention to Jewish culpability as Muslim “anti-Semitism” is “objectively” aired. That helps us, of course, because Jewish prejudice and culpability has been something that you cannot talk about in mainstream media as it has been under their sway, but the facts get out through a back door of “objectivity”, despite that, albeit indirectly. Nevertheless, while the site is helpful to us in providing factual episodes to supply argument against liberal and Jewish media bias, it remains incumbent upon the wise, upon the ethnonationalist, to put together an assessment of patterns from these factual reports, to overcome the pseudo-objectivity that Jews, right-wingers and liberals have enforced upon us, and to warrant necessary prejudicial, discriminatory social classification, to marshal these patterns in our relative interests by contrast to show the way to our salvation - warrant that ethno-national activists can take up in the cause of its implementation. Thus, where I have not published information from enemy sources or sites with platforms markedly different form ours for the fact that they didactically reveal their prejudices, then I have done so because they are presenting information that is basically factual enough such that much spin cannot be applied to mislead our audience. This would be the case, for example, when I publish material, e.g., from NPR, Haaretz, the Jerusalem Post ..and where I reluctantly publish material from Russian Active Measures organs, RT and Sputnik. Thus, I issue the caveat about this site, The Old Continent: Your Eye on Europe, that I cannot vouch that they are operating fundamentally in ethnonational interests, they seem rather to be operating as civic European unionists at best. At worst, and this is likely, they are of the counter-Jihadist mold. In fact, not only are they not likely to ask the “J.Q.”, their kosherness is evident in their focus on “extreme” Islam, their pro-Geert Wilders articles, e.g., here and here (as opposed to our stance on Wilders); the site’s apparent institutional sympathy, technical and informational backing, along with its verbal i.q. are still more kosher indication. With that caveat, and given that Majority Rights will run information coming through sites with platforms a bit off, or even from opposing platforms, we might avail ourselves of facts that help our cause, where they supply them. Let’s try this story for starters… ...with one more preliminary remark: note the glib and inappropriate caption to the inappropriate image placed with the article - does that reflect subjective and heartfelt relative concern?
Comments:2
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:41 | # Foolish comment, Serg. I stated clearly that I am not promoting the site. It is occasion rather for critique of the site and to look at some of the content that it carries - such as migrant crimes of rape - issues (“nonsense” do you say?) which do need to be “promoted.” 3
Posted by Between group selecton on Sat, 17 Jun 2017 12:02 | #
Having called out Turkheimer for his scientism in the sham argument that we should not look into scientific basis for different group (racial) behaviors and performance because it would effect our sensibilities and “intuition”, MacDonald argues persuasively for a motive behind the feeble argument: i.e., that it is a sheer convenience for Jewish interests (which see Whites as dangerous to their interests), as it would lead to the exposition of their hypocrisy, their own eugenic practice; and it would also expose the fact that they are falsely attributing the poor performance of blacks, for salient example, to White racism. With that, they are punishing and victimizing Whites by penalizing them for less mutable characteristics of themselves and of blacks that would be exposed and allow people to take corrective action upon scientific inquiry into racial differences. MacDonald refers back to Turkheimer where he is being true to his science of behavioral genetics:
With that, MacDonald indicates how Turkheimer’s Jewish politicking against even application of the science impacts upon us: MacDonald responds:
4
Posted by Near Sacré-Coeur, a no-go zone for women. on Sat, 17 Jun 2017 12:44 | #
5
Posted by DanielS on Sat, 17 Jun 2017 12:52 | # In 1998 I had the privilege of escorting a fellow tourist in Paris, one Anna Thompson, to Sacré-Coeur. My jaw dropped when she answered “well, so what?” to my question, “what if Europe were to be overwhelmed by African population?” The population auguries were available and apparent even then. An otherwise exquisite English woman, part Irish (related to Berkeley), one hopes she’s changed her mind, markedly. Post a comment:
Next entry: The Flame. Here is the sexy fascist torch bearer.
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Serg on Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:25 | #
Why do not you promote the videos of varg vikernes instead of promoting this counterjihadist jewish nonsense?