Tracking Asshole-Head Joel Davis for Complicitness with Jewish power, influence and misdirection. Updated for clarity’s sake: Sept 21, 9:13 CET As I have been preoccupied with the drudgery of having to shovel out the Augean stables of GW’s endless piles of horseshit, I haven’t gotten around to detailing dubious activity coming from Joel Davis and Neo-Asshole acolyte, Keith Woods. However, in this discussion, there are a few things that should pique the attention of the conscientious in concern of White/European interests… Firstly, note Davis unabashedly follows the advice of a philosophy professor named Katz. Second, look for what Davis is doing when he claims that subjectivism is the distinguishing characterisitic of the European world view… while there is some utility to looking at European difficulties through the artifact of that framing, there is also potential for diversion from the important underlying truth in that subjectivism by itself is Cartesian; subjectivism is certainly limited in the case of “I think therefore I am”, and placed in the service of objectivity; furthermore, the kind of self assertion that would correspond with sustained subjectivism, as opposed to self transcendent strives of objectivism, does not ring true as charactaristically and distinctly European as opposed to characteristic of other peoples. Whether or not he turns to our relative, group interests by contrast to Modernity’s Objective/Subjective Cartesianism, that is where we need to be focused in the interests of European peoples. As Davis has called for Israel to be looked upon as our friend and called upon Paul Gottfried for advice as to where to turn for funding, we may suspect that he is not adverse to putting WN off center; perhaps playing some of its right wing reaction to bolster his own elitism. Note his pandering to Keith Woods’ turd postionism, talking about how appealing that he found Riefenstahl’s “Triumph of The Will’ (whereas, being normal, I find the Hitler rallies repugnant, aesthetically and otherwise, no matter who might film them). Joel Davis has also explicitly denounced the racial focus and priority of White Nationalism. A high i.q. and a committed student of philosophy, one can profit from listening to Davis’ as he covers ground (we may have oversighted) for us to convert into the interest of Europeans as opposed to Jewish misdirection - for example, I gleaned from Davis the important but what should have been obvious idea that there is group genetic emergence as well - however, one would be well advised to be on guard and view with suspicion his motives and prescriptions as one with a dubious kosher seal of approval. There is a big, modernist focus on “creativity” by Joel Davis in this talk, “the sine qua non”....rather, we want creativity to be a feature… otherwise it is just an expressed and impelled obligation of sick modernity, “be different so you can fit in.” ... and something like a kosher diversion of our White Post Modern project to reconstruct the homeostasis of our ethnonational praxis. Post-Liberalism w. Joel Davis (Continuum Ep. 20) Related at Majorityrights: Do Joel Davis and Richard Spencer Want to Suck Jewish Cock?
Comments:2
Posted by "Be Spontaneous" on Sun, 04 Oct 2020 06:53 | #
“Be spontaneous” would be another paradox. “You must be creative” would seem to be a paradoxic injunction as well, if stated thusly as a command and not something that is allowed for in general atmosphere. 3
Posted by Keith Woods on Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:34 | # ...some pretty impressive arguments in there by Keith Woods. - DanieS Post a comment:
Next entry: Ginsburg dies. Opportunity for a less liberal Justice but pro-choicers will rally against Trump.
|
|
![]() Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Adding on Sat, 19 Sep 2020 10:05 | #
I forgot to include this in the first instantiation of the post, but luckily I had it in my notes:
There is a big, modernist focus on “creativity” by Joel Davis in this talk, “the sine qua non”....rather, we want creativity to be a feature… otherwise it is just an expressed and impelled obligation of sick modernity, “be different so you can fit in.” ... and something like a kosher diversion of our White Post Modern project to reconstruct the praxis of our ethnonational homeostasis.