Wage War by Deception: A CMM rules based analysis of altercast White identity & didactic opposition.

Posted by DanielS on Thursday, 18 July 2019 06:05.

Contextual Force (from top down force of context) provides -

[Constitutive Rule] Normative Rule Structure -

Cultural Pattern [CP] Modernity/Liberalism:

Modernity/Liberalism has precedents in northern Europeans particularly, as they were evolved more against the challenges of nature and not so much against other tribes, the northerners being much the same, a liberal mindedness to mixing with others who were not so other was not a big problem.

But there are precedents in the Classical Greeks as well, viz., non interactive teleology and in (apparently Jewish promoted) Christian notions of individual souls being equal, the undifferentiated gentile other (as GW observes), pacifism, notions of pure morality, conceived apparently, to overthrow Rome. Christianity thus, was an early Jewish weaponization - war by deception - of White liberal mentality and controlled opposition against them.

But modernity’s characteristic prejudice against prejudice (as Gadamer astutely referred to it) reaches its apex with Descartes and markedly with Locke’s prejudice against social classifications, considering them non-empirical fictions of the mind which should give way to individual civil rights. This “Enlightenment” prejudice against prejudice found [Implicative Force] beyond the British Aristocratic Class which Locke resented, as the “empirical” concept of individual rights over discriminatory social classifications made its way into the hegemonic [Contextual Force] of The American Constitution; and then was weaponized by Jewry (Alinsky style “rules for radicals”, i.e., while the union of Jewry and its coalitions are solid enough, make the enemy live up to its rules ad infinitum to prevent it’s solidarity/ unionization) in its [Implicative Force] against Whites with the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision, the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Immigration & Naturalization Act: which, practically speaking, prevented White men only from classifiying in their interests and discriminating accordingly (as other groups were granted permission to classify on the basis of alleged historical grievances - [Cultural Patterns]). This prohibition of social classificatory bounds (for the White majorities) effectively ruptures accountability to group homeostatic maintenance and Reflexively, Recursively Effects the Disorder of Modernity, abetting systemic runaway.

Deontic Operator [Obligatory] promote Modernist/Liberal project ad infinitum: continual testing of gentile (non-Jewish) social group bounds from within or from without; encourage and flatter characteristic European predilection for objectivist quest and concomitant notion that putting resources at continual risk in experimentalism necessarily leads to foundational progress. [Regulative Rule] Change counts as progress, celebrate change [Strange Loop] Reflexive Reversal of Context - “this is no longer new” [Obligatory] work to change.

Contextual Force of modernity/liberalism predominantly upheld and initiated by -

1. Jewry: through bottom up [implicative force] as a small, biological-systemic tribal pattern/ nation - Israel - ensconced among (perceived/conceived) hostile others, thus highly ethnocentric of perceived necessity; and with that, believing in their divinity as ‘the chosen people’; when scattered - in Diaspora - take on a messianism as such and develop an antagonistic disposition to insubordinate gentile nations by way of top down [contextual force] rule structuring of ethnocentric middle-man / elite niche occupation among largely (perceived/conceived) alien and hostile others.

Deontic Operator [Obligatory] Disrupt and re-direct (the greatest potential threat to Jewish power and influence) potential of European/ White ethnonationalism to marshal social systemic homeostasis, non-Jewish coalitions and hegemony thereupon - make tacit deals/enticements with -

2. White right-wing elites/ and rank and file White liberals; both going by pseudo warrant of objectivism

- both rule structures, right wing and liberal are liberal with regard to their group interests; liberalism defined as the opening of social group boundaries to other influences or subject to influences beyond social account (thus maneuverable against group interests by those not quite so naive).

Objectivism (really pseudo objectivism, the prejudice against prejudice) renders people susceptible to this (liberalism) as it facilitates the pragmatic convenience of paying short shrift to social accountability and relative interests with facile (often fairly credible, hard to efficiently counter without appearing like a weakling, would-be despot), “that’s just the way it is” accounts; while those of its less theoretically ambitious, more pragmatically liberal offshoot are disposed to its facilitation of over rationalized liberal deviations (thus prematurely dismissive as trivial) and are more programmatically bound according to objectivist rule structure to experiment for themselves; the more theoretically ambitious, the right wing practitioners, are prone to rational blindness to broad perspective and social accountability to relative and interrelated interests as they similarly conceive of themselves as based in the fate of detached experiment, thus not especially quick to respond to differences among their group, prejudiced against prejudice as their perspective is as well.

* Note, of course you want/need to be objective, provisionally, to understand what’s going on irrespective of your personal and relative interests, but you also need to be accountable to your group as to the purpose of these inquiries, their applicability to personal and relative interests thereof - forgetting and paying short shrift to this has caused a kind of estrangement, as Heidegger calls it, which leaves us vulnerable as an organic system. Objective truth inquiries should provide feedback to serve the default calibration of relative, group interests (which entail sufficient coordination with other groups).

Group Autobiographies:

Jewry: Initially, traditionally and generally claiming warrant and authority over others as ‘the chosen people’, chosen through their Abrahamic god [de-ontic operator], which they propose as THE god, above (other people’s) nature;

Abrahamic god consecrates them as beacon unto the world, the chosen people to bring light and their perfection to the world and its people - as “undifferentiated other” ( G.W.) and thereby easily pacified gentile others; and as compassionate Davids, the chosen fancy themselves representing those oppressed and misunderstood by the rigid, hegemonic Goliath of straight, White right-wing male reactionaries; nevertheless, as Jewry themselves are a minority [ontic constraint] among this coalition up against such ungodly, uncivilized Philistine masses, they see it as Legitimate [de-ontic operator] to wage war by deception.

Which also suits the ontology [ontic operator] of their evolution as manichean - waging war by deception, trickery and rule changing - since they were evolved in the middle east, where the most important challenge was not so much shelter from the elements and attainment of resource to sustain them through seasonal and other natural challenges, but rather competition with other tribes, therefore requiring them to look after themselves more ethnocentrically, to be in high vigilance to defend against outside attack, to develop and cultivate adeptness with trickery/deception.

[Deontic Operator] Prohibit Whites (i.e., Europeans), as majority, from discriminating in advocacy of their group interests; compel them to live up to their penchant for objectivity ad absurdem; while rendering [Legitimate] non-European group advocacy, positive discrimination for these “oppressed” minorities with the “proviso” (a proviso that is rather ongoing) claim of Obligatory compensation for their having been subject to historical discrimination and exploitation.

Promote new religion installing the Abrahamic god and worship of the Jew incarnate thereof - sacrificed at hands of new Babylonian oppressor of Jews and other minorities, i.e., Rome, to be overthrown in favor of undifferentiated submission to the Abrahamic god, its universal and obsequious golden rule, purified Noahide Law; embrace and renounce original sin of (not being Jewish but having the nerve to have) subjective and relative interest at once, on pain of eternal hell for non-compliance; and proposed reward of eternal heaven in a life hereafter for sacrifice of concern for political ambition, group autonomy and material well being for one’s people and legacy.

[Reflexive Need] [Deontic Operator] Impose the Contextual Force of “The Moral Order”

“Christianity” - pure law and warrant in they eyes of god; born with “original sin” (of not being Jewish) even if you think of transgressing Noahide law, you are so culpable that you are better off plucking-out your eye.

The manichean penchant of Jewry was exacerbated by horizontal transmission as they were moved from their primeval habitat.

Beginning with Babylonian captivity when, as a small group captive and scattered among conquering/host nations, they were [blocked] from vertical transmission of skills and cultivated resource from their native grounding upward to national sovereignty and began evolving into and for elite niche control [from top down contextual force] over other nations instead.

The shifting over national boundaries created a horizontal transmission as they had minimal vested interest in the host nations; they developed a hostile, parasitic and exploitative relation to alien host nations, playing native nations against one another to their advantage; usurping native resources, shifting them over borders if threatened, a horizontal transmission that was exacerbated by Rome’s scattering them into Europe, where they made their way into control point niches; followed by continued horizontal transmission with the pogroms, the inquisition and then the holocaust, which continued selection against the more integrated, those Jews in position to interbreed with natives (a form of miscegenation which their more orthodox would detest), those situated for accountability, in favor of selection for their more virulently parasitic types, shifting many of their more virulent into pursuit of elite American niches.

8 Power Niches, Contextual Force from which Jewry establishes and maintains Constitutive and Regulative Rules:

1. Religion (viz. the Abrahamic Religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam), a massive coup for Jewish control to impose the moral order (if you can call Christianity moral or ordering as opposed to yoking and confusing) of Europeans 2. Media (Bowery Notes, Abrahamic Bible was the media in large part esp. prior to printing press) 3. Money/Finance (markedly with the exponential effects of usury) 4. Academia 5. Organized Crime 6. Law and Courts (e.g., the egregious “Disparate Impact”) 7. Politics 8. International Business. The niches branching into NGO’s, foundations, government programs, industrial, military, genetic technology ...the professions (and professional societies).

As ‘light unto the world” [Autob.]

As light unto the world [Prefiguative Force] and beleaguered group [Autob.] among hostile others, Jewry become [Practical Force] experts at organizing and maintaining their group interests; also adept at marshaling others, where opportune, in coalition with their interests. This marshaling [of Implicative and Contextual force] is done by control of the idea of unionization (“leftism”), (unionization facile/ or literal) and prohibition/disruption [Deontic Operator] of social systemic organization, homeostasis by unionization (“leftism”) for other ethnonations/ethnonationals, especially European peoples.

What unionization Jewry allows and coalitions it forms, in advocating their designated oppressed are largely constituted and regulated by themselves to Not allow the concept of unionization to be organized on powerful ethnonational lines, especially not for Whites, but on the contrary to get them to react negatively to the concept of ethnonational unionization in the abstract altogether, with facile, provocatively distorted, didactic misrepresentation of unionization and coalitions of perceived groups and grievances against White male authority.

[Reflexive Need] Deontic Operator [Obligatory] Disrupt White social systemic homeostasis

Altercast European/White identity, at once allowing them to flatter themselves [Autobiography] of their objective merit; further induced through complicit deals with right-wing elites, payoffs, and with enticements and license for rank and file liberals to stray from tradition and inherited moral standards. Thus, Altercast:

European/White Identity = “The Right” and Far Right (later Alt-Right and Dissident Right)

To be right wing means to be as acutely (narrowly) and purely warranted in one’s autobiographical/group [CP] claims to authority, truth, analysis free of the messy, agentive, socially trammeling rhetoric (“sophistry”) and its Reflexive Effects as possible, whether connecting the smaller group or individual above nature, perhaps above themselves even, in pure principles or god; or in immutable laws of nature, below the agentive flux, semi-disorder and negotiation (at its most severe, below the correctability) of human praxis.

White right wingers and liberals, both: maintain [Constitutive Rule] of liberalism with the assertion that they have what they have and are able to do what they do by dint of their objective, individual (or narrowing group) ability and virtue which owes little to their broader genetic/racial group in the way of fact or account.

[Implicative Rule] Modernity, objective experimentation and liberalization/change leads to progress

Modernist/Objectivist tradition began in the European South with the Greeks and in the North, with early Europeans pitted more-so against the elements of harsh nature (Augustinian devils) than other tribes; it reached its sine qua non with Descartes. Locke took the empirical end of Cartesianism to assert (for his prejudice against the English Aristocratic class prejudice) that social classifications were a fiction of the mind that should give way to individual rights - since all individuals have the same perceptions they should have the same civic rights. This Cartesian notion (technologically separating individual from their varying ecological positions in systemic process of relation and essential indebtedness to others of their group and beyond) was taken and became essential to America’s Constitutive Rules (the [Implicative Force] of which would become world hegemonic with the unleashing of rampant, unbridled competition to runaway as interests are unconstrained by group account) as it was written-in by Thomas Jefferson.

* Of Historico/Autobiographical note, given the Norman take-over in 1066 and lording of themselves over the Anglo-Saxons and Celts ever since, there would be a great deal of logical force [Implicative] to Locke’s “prejudice against this prejudice” .... and provided that it would remain a prejudice against inter-English class separation in favor of integration with ethnonational constraint, it is a well founded prejudice. The problem comes in where it was weaponized in the American context (by YKW) to extend as a prejudice against prejudice beyond ethnonational and racial bounds.

[Reflexive Need] [Obligatory] Prevent this rule of hegemonic majority from rupturing Jewish group (classificatory) organization; [Legitimate] Wage war by deception: turn, weaponize liberalization of Aristocratic social classificatory bounds against them.

Implication for Jewry: [Regulative Rule] Make their rules work against Whites; flatter their objectivity and at once, make them live up to their penchant for objectivity and pure warrant ad absurdem.

[Reflexive Need] [Deontic Operator: Prohibition] Prohibit Whites, as “hegemonic majority”, from discriminating in advocacy of their ethnonational group interests; render Legitimate group advocacy, discrimination for “oppressed” minorities.

[Reflexive Need] [Constitute Rule] secular opposition formed by Jewry:

A similar notion of minority and “internationalist-worker unionization/coalition” advocacy had been advanced by Jewry in the Russian/Marxist revolution of international communism. In America…

[Reflexive Need] [Legitimate] Weaponize Lockeatine, individual “Civil Rights” - prohibit Europeans/White Americans to begin with, from classifying social groups and discriminating thus for themselves.

[Prohibited] “Racism” - the prohibition of White people to classify social groups and discriminate thereupon.

[Reflexive Effects] Rupturing of social classificatory bounds and discrimination thereupon effects the Disorder of Modernity, Over-Valuation of [Momentary and Episodic] skills as waiting for protracted yield is too unreliable, increases atavistic values and pandering to females exponentially (especially White females), over-representation of their puerile predilections, intoxication of increased empowerment (increased one-up position in partner selection) causing a [Charmed Loop] of puerile female inclination to incite genetic competition - incitement itself causing a pernicious charmed loop if the hegemony indeed has sufficient contextual force) as White men are Prohibited from discriminating.

[Obligatory] Wage war by deception

[Legitimate] “Liberating tolerance” (Marcuse): Obligatory to tolerate anything from the Internationalist Left/ Prohibit Corrective feedback from Right Wing reaction.

[Obligatory] Distort beyond reason, even reverse all socially organizing and coordinating theories as presented to Whites, any proposal meant to mollify rigid, inhumane rendering of natural law, represent social advocacy theories as unnatural, anti White, international Leftism. ... get Whites to react against social organization, including in their own best interests.

European/White Autob. [Obligatory] - Identify with the Right, with “The Truth.” White identity is right wing (never mind Heideggerian liberation from mere facticity and all that - that “nonsense is for “The Left”, for colored people (never mind why they in their YKW led coalition has routed us; we could never be so impure as to be “racists” ...as to be so non empirical as to classify social groups and discriminate thereupon!

[Constitute Rule] secular opposition advanced by Jewry:

1. Marx, Freud, Frankfurt School - i.e., cultural Marxism, P.C. victim group advocacy, starting with blacks, women and gays; later extending to Muslims, etc.

Capture and re-direct human potential movements from White ethnocentrism along with feminism and black civil rights, maintaining culture of critique against traditional White/European societies.

Human potential movements are a particularly compelling narrative in coincidence with the American dream, land of individual opportunity, compounding civil rights propensity to obliviously rupture social systemic homesostasis; particularly hard for a male to renounce but also females who are under the influence of second wave feminism, Friedan having been a student of Maslow and prescribing individual self actualization as necessary for women’s liberation from oppressive, inhumane societal gender role constraints.

Reflexive Effect: As social group classificatory bounds are ruptured through weaponized “civil rights” and “human potential”, the natural one up position of White females in partner selection and address is pandered to from all angles, causing it to re emerge with increased significance; they become more articulate, confident and powerful gate keepers, knowing that they can maintain their very powerful position by letting through only liberal males, call in the thugs with any contention of their liberal prerogative - a constraint of their rule structure largely pandered-to by Jewry. They pander to their base and puerile female inclination to incite genetic competition (which would be mitigated in a bounded, controlled society in the empathy of motherhood of their kind). The puerile female tends to pose a litmus test in initial interaction episodes: what do you think of blacks (the oldest and maxed-out masculine form/test), are you a racist?” Hence the runaway disorder of modernity is exacerbated by this increased female one up position as she is encouraged [in a Charmed Loop] to maintain the opening of social borders and bounds.

And because the category of female gender is harder to ignore, along with blacks, because they are so markedly different, the human necessity to categorize classify with these groups is singularly amplified for the erstwhile prohibition of classifications; an over attendance to group interests exacerbated by the high contrast tropism of black and white. This strengthens their coherence to the expense of others who would be more cared for in bounded system.

2. Randian “Objectivism” (really subjectivism) as an extension of Austrian School economics, Hayek, von Mises and so on; the “invisible hand” guides the economy (Alan Greenspan).

[Obligatory[ Capture, control and re-direct “Conservatism”, conservative reaction

[Regulative Rule] Controlled opposition:

1. “Paleoconservatism” - Frank Meyers (Jewish)’ proposed “fusionism"of Judeo-Christianity and Enlightenment values - i.e., conserving the American values, conserving liberalism (liberal democratic rights/neo liberal capitalism).

[Legitimate] Take the already Jewish usurping “moral order”, enmeshment with Christianity - it’s obligation for gentiles of pure law and warrant in the eyes of god; e.g., even if you think of transgressing Noahide law, you are profoundly guilty - and entangle it still further with whatever angle of it is best for Jewry to ensure that their enemy will not fight back.

[Obligatory]Reinforce its ties to Jewry with Scofield Bible and Evangelical Christianity, tying salvation to Israel.

2. “Neo-Conservatism” - Irving Kristol (Jewish, obviously). Similar as paleoconservatism, with even less emphasis on traditional Christianity and more the evangelical version, in pursuit of aggressive foreign policy for Operation Clean Break (to secure the realm around Israel). While conserving liberalism (liberal democratic rights/neo liberal capitalism).

.........

[Legitimate] Use Media to promulgate the notion of what the “progressive fifties” and the “swinging sixties” were about.

The “Progressive fifties” were about “Civil Rights” which began with [Obligatory] school integration 1954, 58.

Frankfurter was instigating Earl Warren’s ‘Activist’ court on behalf of “Civil Rights” to liberalization of White boundaries, e.g. opposing school integration.

[Legitimate] Use the language of the enemy and make them live up to its own rule, weaponize it against them - “Civil Rights” becomes a weapon, basically a “right” to violate White freedom from association.

[Prohibition] of Whites from organizing as a group and discriminating in their interests; while it is [Legitimate] for others to organize in their group interests and broach traditional, even if only implicit, White boundaries given [Autobiography] ‘the history of prejudice against them and their having been discriminated against accordingly.’

“Civil Rights Activism” continues into the sixties, with “Sit-Ins” at Woolworths in 1962, leading to legislation [Prohibiting] private businesses from discriminating (America, land of freedom and all), culminating in “The Civil Rights Act” of 1964, The Immigration and Naturalization Act 1965, and Rumford Fair Housing Act 1968.

(((The Media and Academia is going along with Law & Courts and Politicians, Religion, big Money ..and international business, too))) in saying this is all good, all progress against backward White male bigots (who are ‘whining’ when they should be picking themselves up by their bootstraps as rugged individualists in pursuit of all America has to offer).

[Obligatory] Capture American Dream and Human Potential Movement

Abraham Maslow captures Aritotle’s concept of Self Actualization, which was based in a teleology of human nature (as biological creatures, in need of optimal, not maximal need satisfaction and as mammals ensconced in praxis (human relations) needing and caring about our relationships most fundamentally.

de Beauvoir, Sarte and Che Guevara

[Obligatory] Capture the feminist movement from its world wide apex in the Marxist Simone de Beauvoir, 1948, who had the nerve to attack European males as if they were singularly privileged in the wake of two World Wars in which millions of them were brutally expended. With her point of departure as de Beauvoir’s statement, “this utility of the housekeeper’s heaven is why she prefers the Aristotlean morality of the the golden mean, i.e., of mediocrity.”....

Abraham Maslow’s student, Betty Friedan, depicts the maximizing pursuit of self actualization as necessary to women’s liberation; and in accordance to Maslow’s lineal hierarchy, that any achievements by men would follow from their satisfaction on basic levels, no sacrifice or overcompensating for deprivation. At the same time it takes for granted what advantages that females have on the basic and mid-range of “the hierarchy of needs” ... it does great damage to Aristotle’s profoundly important observation that humans are evolved for Optimal, not Maximal need satisfaction; and the implication for a circulating concern in systemic homeostasis of optimal levels of need satisfaction; furthermore, in flouting Aristotle, it shuns the concern for relational complementarity, e.g., in niche complementarity, if a woman is not strictly bound there, she might choose and enjoy being “a house keeper”, in complement to her husband, with time to look after some of the fundamentals of a smooth running society, at the PTA and so on…

[Prohibited] Still, with the Vietnam war raging and draft still in effect, it was a bit too obvious that being a White male was not a strict privilege across the board. “High grumbles” coming from women, expressing the “need” for the top of the heirarchy of needs would be particularly offensive to men who could scarcely articulate [Prohibited] their “Low grumbles” for the basics on the hierarchy of needs.

[Legitimate] But while black men were also drafted and serving in Vietnam, amplification of the black power movement and civil rights for blacks (Katzenbach) went full speed ahead.

It is interesting to note that just as the controlled feminist movement was incommensurate with White men, as feminists sought the top of the hierarhcy while White men sought the bottom, so too was black civil rights and power incommensurate - as their civil rights sought ordinary level participation and “dignity” (compare that in awkward contrast to the weird organicism of the white hippy motive for fundamental organic being); and black power, which sought the top of the hierarchy in extreme, militant form.

[Legitimate] It was also legitimate to go full speed ahead with the Frankfurt’s school’s subversion of The (White male) Authoritarian Personality with the concept of “free love” and polymorphous perversion (Marcuse extrapolating Freud) - free love is anathema to the organic motive of Being (Dasein) and Being among our people (Midtdasein) for White males. As you’ve got men from all parts vying for your would be natural partners and no protection to them being there for you unexploited or jaded, when the meandering of your being comes ripe to maturity for marriage.

It is particularly irritating thus, when the hippies motive as being about “free love”, when, in fact, that was Marcuse’s motive in high antagonism to White male Being amidst their people.

[Obligatory] Obfuscate and re-direct these incipient movements which are corrective for White/European social systemic homeostasis following World War II. 

As America was particularly war weary and the Vietnam War was particularly unpopular, ripe to stimulate a re-thinking and corrective to concerns for midtdasein (White social systemic homeostasis).

[Obligatory] Control opposition to unpopular war with SDS (Jewish led “Students for a Democratic Society”).

[Obligatory] Obfuscate the organic motive of White men for Dasein and Midtdasein (expressed in the hippie movement, i.e., for the Being (Daesin) and Being amidst our people (MidtDasein) of White men as opposed to the Tradition of being considered so intrinsically valueless as a male as to be subject to draft into a speculative war far removed from clear and immanent danger to our people.

[Legitimate] Allow for some outlet for expression of this protest (for organic Being for White men) and relief thereof while the Vietnam War is going on.

[Prohibited] Do not allow it articulation as an incipient White male movement; not even so much expression as a men’s rights on pain of stigmatic violation, invoking not only the Traditional trajectory of Masculinity, i.e., toward the top of the “heirarchy of motives”, but also stigma to masculinity for turning away from the American dream of “being-all-you can be” as an individual in your human potential; no thought is to be given as to how that quest might impact White social systemic homeostasis, perhaps become toxic, causing [Reflexive Effect] of social aberration, even rupture it to runaway.

Do not allow it to go too far in violation of Traditional stigma where it would, in defiance of that stigma by contrast, pursue and satisfy its “low grumbles” on the Maslowian hierarchy and Turn into a White social systemic corrective to achieve authentic existential balance of White manhood and peoplehood (White social systemic homeostasis); by contrast to the estrangement of the right wing’s Universal Maturity”, which is more easily directed away from White interests and for the group interests of others.

[Legitimate] As the Vietnam war and the draft ends, obvious doubts about alleged White male privilege are more easily set aside, feminism in PC coalition with blacks and other groups arrayed in critique against White men are stepped-up through the 1970’s, 1980’s into the 1990’s.

Meanwhile, the controlled opposition of Paleoconservatism is ushered in with Frank Meyer’s protege, Ronald Reagan. Along with Pat Buchanan, Joe Sobran, Sam Francis and the Jewish Paul Gottfried, they offer only weak opposition to liberalism, conserving liberalism as the fusionism of paleoconservatism does.

Reagonomics moved (((the invisible hand))) of Austrian school economics through boom/bust cycles to the increasing power of Jewry…

With Jewry having effectively placated White conservative corrective by the 90’s (effectively conserving liberalism instead), there was a Reflexive Effect of preparedness to exercise greater influence over American foreign policy in Jewish interests, specifically to deploy American military to more offensive strategy for its Zionist aims ...

Neo-Conservatism was drawn into the forefront to hoodwink Americans, especially Christian Zionists, into wars to secure the realm around Israel - regime change to Israel compliant regimes in the nations around Israel - Operation Clean Break/Project for a New American Century).

[Legitimate] Hypnotize a David McGowan with the idea for a best seller, that (to paraphrase) ‘the hippie movement was all a contrivance of the military industrial complex to turn off the mainstream anti-war movement through representation of it by dirty hippies, that there was no organic motive to it (as if it was not an organic motive to not want to be drafted to die in a foolish war on behalf of greedy corporations). Anything, even a stupid idea like that, is considered legitimate compared to allowing White men corrective being (Dasein/ MidtDasein), organization and discrimination on racial grounds - anything but a White Post Modern Turn in contrast to the Tradition of Cartesian, Objectivist estrangement (conserving liberalism) for White men.

Episode [Ep] 2008 Financial Bust

Inevitable reactions [Reflexive Effect] to the PC and Randian onslaught on White men, growing awareness that this is Jewish steered activism - the Jewish controlled opposition of the Neo “Conservatives” being blatant - and further awareness that it was beginning to intersect against their own conservative Jewish interests grew as the boom/ bust cycle culminated in the 2008 financial crisis - when Jewish niche power and influence achieved its greatest hegemony, bringing with it a major intersectional problem from their culture of critique and the Reflexive Need for damage control and a re-tooled controlled opposition.

Enter The Alternative Right.

[Reflexive Reversal]

With the 2008 financial bust Jewry cleaned up and ascended to greater hegemony than ever in its niche power positions; to present themselves as the underdogs was more difficult [Reflexive Reversal] and they become frantic to do damage control and stave off revenge; they need to foster the right wing narrative that their achievements were objectively merited (as opposed to nepotistic) and identify “The Left”, particularly its organizational capacity against those in power, as “The enemy.” They need Whites in power and aspirants as such, to identify with them in a new kind of Right, and Alternative Right (a big tent including and going beyond Paleoconservatism as it were) objectively merited beyond social accountability against “The Left” - marketing an anthropomorphized characterology of it as “unnatural, against science, objective truth and morality” etc (as if something “leftist” like a hypothesis doesn’t have a certain momentary detachment from empirical testing, which can then be subject to testing against the veracity of science, nature, truth and the corrections of morality in the social realm).

They had to capture and control a new generation of reactionaries, those reacting to Political Correcteness (anti-White unions and coalitions) and NeoConservatism’s marshaling of U.S. military for Israeli interests.

As a result of the Implicative Force of Jewish steered Modernity/Liberalism and the Left unionizations and coalitions it had previously extolled and marshaled for this end of overthrowing White power, these left organized social unionization and their critiques are no longer “needed”/wanted by Jewry to be quite so thorough, especially not as they intersect with Jewish interests and may be used conceptually (including by Whites) against their hegemony and traitors in tow, whether right wing or liberal.

While Jewry always had Altercast White identity and interest advocacy as “Right” and “Far Right” in order to get them to react into rigid, socially disorganizing and stigmatizing objectivist rule structures above or beyond the social correctability of praxis, it became imperative for the new hegemony for Jewry to [Altercast Right of Display] of animus toward “The Left.” With that concern, Paul Gottfried saw the need to call for a revised paleoconservatism, 2.0, an “alternative right.”

The great concern being that if Whites gained a sense that beneath the concept of the left is unionization, not “equality”, that Whites would unionize (ultimately ethnonationally), organize their power and see who is on top and oppressing them - the YKW from their biopatterns and power niches in tandem with right wing sell outs and liberals taking the license offered of objectivism (“that’s just the way it is” ...little or no social account to broader implications and impact).

[Regulative Rule]

Maintain paradox to mystify potential White organization - construe the left as liberalism (unionization conserves, it is not liberal).

Wave the red cape (straw man) for White reactionaries to chase after, of the left being about an unrealistic quest for “equality”, misdirecting them and making them look bad at once, as they are pitted “against equality.” ...(as opposed to negotiating niche complementary of commensurability and incommensurate qualities within and between groups, which could provide means for amicable coordination as opposed to false, symmetrical comparisons which abet disrespect, conflict and reciprocally escalating diatribe).

Maintain this ambiguity further with other misrepresentations of group and marginal advocacy as liberalization of White bounds, by proffering utterly bizarre candidates to scab would be unionization - wave the rainbow flag for these bulls to chase after, trans-sexuals, 57 genders to distort would-be correctives to overly and unnaturally rigid gender assignments, univeralisms ill-fitting for particular races, including White - to underscore the promotion of the stereotype that “The Left” is not dealing with reality and “not dealing with nature.” ...when, n fact, working hypotheses are a normal part of empirical inquiry, subject to verification. A social group, a race, [Alternative Range of Functional Autonomy] among gender assignments are minimally speculative working hypothesis as such.

Autobiography Number 2 Promoted by Jewry: While they have always wielded this autobiography as well, as of 2008 it became amplified. Deny intersectionality of “leftist” critique of supremacism, imperialism, nepotism (e.g., at Harvard) and toxic ethnocentrism, promote the story that Jews and others are on top because of Objective merit and that “THE” Left is the problem; point to the way in which Jewish academia misrepresented advocacy, group and individual, and say this represents “The Left”, so that Whites who fancy themselves objective, who are comfortable with the Altercast anti-social identity as Right Wing, will be primed to join them through pay off, enticed by license (licentiousness, if you will), and finally intermarriage against any would-be ethnonational unionization and coalition to threaten their power, all the more hegemonic since 2008.

Reflexive Effect: The Alternative Right is sufficiently disorganized for its right wing, anti social litmus test - [Regulative Rule for Inclusion - some stigmatic, anti-social position] - that it makes it hard to counter and control its sniping, now that it has served its function to help get Trump elected so that he could un-do the Iran Deal.

Enlist TRS to Market (((Madison Ave. memes))) to gain adherents against “the left” and to the right, displaying anti-Semitism with vulgar impunity in order to gain control of the reaction, encourage Richard Spencer (a protege inheritor of Gottfried and Francis’s Paleoconservatim with the Alt-Right) to dog whistle Nazism: Enoch starts straight-arm salutes, Richard, “Hail Trump, hail our people, hail victory…over the lugenpresser…we’re going to party like it’s 1933”...etc.

Reflexive Need: “Unite The Right” ...

Reflexive Effect: effectively ends the credibility and effectiveness of the brand name.

Reflexive Need: Maintain White disorganization and reactionary rigidity by proposing a re-branding - e.g., “Dissident Right.”

Wage War by Deception:

A C.M.M. rules based analysis of White identity Altercast as right wing against THE left in order to rupture White social social systemic homeostasis.

Rupturing White Social Systemic Homeostasis through Altercasting as Right, doubled down as such in reaction against THE Left, Didactic Misrepresentation thereof - Social group advocacy as strictly anti White.

A rules based* analysis of anti-social altercasting, incitement through didactic misrepresentation and distortion of social group advocacy.

Anti-social rigidity, inherently unstable bereft the correctability of praxis as they cling white knuckle after perceived pure warrant beyond Jewish rhetoric and casuistry, only more ready for rash, headlong misdirection into destruction.

Misrepresent the anti Cartesian means of social systemic homeostasis.

Moral Order: Christianity, inspired by Abrahamic god beyond nature, misdirect Whites with golden rule of obsequious self sacrifice; disruption of cause and effect. Altercast non-Jews as “Gentiles”, the ever more undifferentiated (de-unionized as a racial group) other.

Hermeneutics - misrepresent as anti science and trivial flight of fancy rather than a necessary means for coherence and authenticity despite Cartesian estrangement and arbitrariness.

Social Constructionism: misrepresent it as solipsism, that one can make of themselves and events what they want; when in reality, that kind of “pure agency” would be Cartesian in the way that social constructionism was meant to cure; social constructionism is meant to centralize our attention through the praxis of our social group, our interrelatedness, indebtedness and accountability to our people - where you CANNOT just make of yourself and events whatever you merely wish/want.

The left: Misrepresent as liberalism and a quest for universal equality, anti nature and anti reality…when, in fact, it is about unionization of the broad people against would be elite abuse and rank and file betrayal as well. National and ethnonational boundaries are perfectly analogous to “union.”

Hence, Whites would be well served by ethnonational unionization of our relative interests (viz. as white left ethnonationalists: the white class) not a defense of mere, objective truths.

Human Bio-Diversity: misrepresent what should be a concern for the horizontal, qualitative diversity of niche evolution, its potential for coordinating coalition building on the basis of respect for divergent necessary functions of in favor of a lateral concern for I.Q. - to serve elitist Ashkenazi interests - precipitating false comparisons, disrespect and conflict.

Post Modernity: a means to negotiate and maintain groups of peoples through modernity’s narcissistic oblivion to differences (and penchant to run rough-shod over them in “service of progress to universal foundations”) and also the means to coordinate/negotiate inherited forms and traditions, maintaining them where helpful, leaving them behind where not, coordinating with the differing, sometimes antagonistic traditions of other groups. This necessary Post Modern Coordination is instead misrepresented as ironic, hyper relative da-da nonsense - really a hyper modernity to divert Whites from necessary understanding of post modernity for their social systemic homeostasis.

Multiculturalism =  monoculuralism.

Diversity = integration and blending of peoples.

Marginals to be included: means Not our own marginals, those just within our (would-be) union boundaries, who are of good will to our people, who can provide valuable perspective and feedback on the system, what is necessary for its maintenance, knowing acutely where the shoe pinches - or more nobly, acting as centurions as it were, on the frontier of where the systemic boundaries are encroached - but rather “marginals” become a weaponized notion of sympathy for those outside or of bad will to our systemic union, potential scabs to be included ....you can see how a mere, brutal, right wing laws-of-nature-position toward these people (i.e., our own marginals), rather than reaching out to them, would fail to rally popular support and thus be encouraged in the war of deception.


*  It is important to understand that when we talk about rules that we are more interpretive/descriptive in attempting to ascertain and analyze the logics of meaning and action at work in interaction, particularly group pattern interaction, though of course we might hope to draw some prescriptive implications as well.



Comments:


1

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:17 | #

This post is a work in progress. I will be developing it today and in days to come;

I beg the pardon of those who might be bothered by this approach.

On the other hand, proceeding in bits should be more digestible.


2

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:59 | #

To whom it may concern: while adding thoroughly completed bits as new sections upon what was the previous last paragraph might have in fact been a more “digestible process” for the reader, I’m afraid that I have been mainly working back in and developing sentences and paragraphs already posted. That is, this process might not make it “easier” for the reader as they would have to re-read things to follow changes. The saving grace is that it is not a very long piece (and will not be).

At this point, I have reworked it to the part that is now above the fold, where it says:

[Deontic Operator: Prohibit Whites, as majority, from discriminating in advocacy of their ethnonational group interests; render Legitimate group advocacy, discrimination for “oppressed” minorities]


3

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 27 Jul 2019 18:11 | #

I’m temporarily putting this all above the fold as it nears a sufficient gestalt - though I’ll continue working back into it and extending it.

In case it hasn’t been observed, I have been sketching things out which can look quite funny in their place-holder form .. I find this process much like Tony Robinson’s archaeologist videos, in which they uncover some mucky and dirty items and slowly begin to piece them together in their proper form…


4

Posted by White Left Ethnonationalism/ vs Third Position on Sun, 28 Jul 2019 05:58 | #

In a discussion yesterday, I was asked to justify the distinction between White Left Ethnonationalism and Third Positionism.

First of all, for the purpose of starting afresh, leaving behind association with Nazism, supremacism and other foibles that many third positionists embrace, but more abstractly I have argued, that it facilitates infiltration and destabilization of the unionization which is the crucial component of the left aspect.

It was objected that third positionism is not susceptible to infiltration as I have contended. Even where that might be so, right wing aspects introduced by third positionism tend toward an objectivist/idealist rigidity beyond nature or within nature below praxis that pay short shrift to social accountability - at least for leadership positions, which can in turn, lead to the nightmare of over accountability for rank and file - and an overall social rigidity that allows for their maneuvering and steering into reaction, e.g., by the YKW into traps of reactive aggression, ill conceived war (catastrophe for the group).

The basis must be the bounded ethnonation, the union, and its praxis which allows for ongoing correctability in accordance to its maintenance - that is the essence of the systemic homeostasis which we seek.

DanielS

White Left Ethnonationalism is distinguished from communism/Marxism by several lines as well.

While the same interlocutor claimed that Marx endorsed nationalism, I believe that would only be seen as a step in a process. Rather, “the withering away of the state” was seen as the ultimate end state of communist utopia.

In further distinction from communism:

White Left ethnonationalism would allow for private property (while recognizing that some natural assets and industries are best run by the state).

White Left ethnonationalism recognizes that some blend of socialism and free enterprise is natural, unavoidable and optimal in order to leverage freedom in the sovereignty that our paradigmatic conservatism offers (paradigmatic conservatism: borders are tight, individual liberties within, fairly free).

For those who recoil at the mere term “left”, I understand, and propose a synonym with “The White Class” to further represent the fact that we are not dividing the ethnonstate by classes - workers are crucial, no doubt, but we want to reward them for their account in a way that does not exclude other nationals from the union and the reward and rightful honor that their part in its maintenance merits.

This would require another distinction from Marxist / communism, i.e. that there be a religious and sacral aspect institutionalized - particularly featuring the important option for monogamy as deeply respected by the union members.

This kind of thing, giving reasonable protection to all stages in organic developmental processes, staves off cynicism, facilitates loyalty to the union and maintenance of the systemic pattern.


5

Posted by Memory & Intelligence on Thu, 15 Aug 2019 06:02 | #

... as Social Construct

With all the right wing reactionary hoopla (encouraged by YKW) about the significance of I.Q., it might be worthwhile to examine other qualities that go into a healthy system, individual systems and necessary systemic connections beyond the individual’s head.

Focusing on the significance of I.Q., so convenient an emphasis by YKW in an attempt to exonerate unjust ascendance to rule and hegemony - as illustrated by their phony ruse to depict the concept of “HBD” in lateral, narrowing, quantifying terms of I.Q. as opposed to an honest examination of the niche human biodiversity indicative of healthy systems - serves also to flatter and co-opt White right wing reactionaries who’ve done well for their individual selves despite systemic toxins; facilitating disingenuous emphasis on their individual, independent merit as opposed to systemic indebtedness and accountability; leaving taken for granted and uncritqued it’s inclination to narrowing, lateral, quantifying, potentially oppressive and exploitative hierarchicization over and against our marshaling of systemic unionization through respect and account for all necessary systemic qualities. It might be worthwhile thus to examine other qualities that go into individual systemic homeostasis and necessary systemic connections beyond the individual.

Individual qualities besides I.Q. extend through

Health

Strength

Sensory Acuity

Immuno-efficiency

Longevity

Fecundity

Beauty

Virility

Agility

...to name just a few qualities, which are yet laying on an assumption.

An assumption that memory and intelligence are strictly located in the head.

Once the obvious inference is made that all memory is not located singularly in the head but is rather reconstrucable from without and that feedback can come from an array of individuals contributing to systemic intelligence, the perspective arises of potentially elevating the significance of those with honesty, loyalty and good will toward our people (good will to our people meaning effectively that they are accountable and caring enough to require account of others as to what is necessary or not, or downright destructive to our systemic maintenance) - a good elevation of value, to take Kant in a White post modern turn, for without good will toward our people, the responsibility of good will to our ‘system’, recognizing indebtedness therein, other individual qualities only make a person more terrible.

And without accountability to our people, our system, we are not going to be able to marshal accountability in respect of other peoples and other systems beyond our group.

We might then have necessary patience, therefore, where I.Q. otherwise emphasizes speed and efficiency to the ignorance of protracted systemic concern, patterns which “the lower i.q.” might be necessarily attending to in our long term systemic interest.


6

Posted by Women's psychology: "safety pragma" on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:33 | #

Insight into Women’s Psychology: “If I Can’t Have Me”


7

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:59 | #

Josh Neal has agreed to talk with me for a podcast this coming Monday the 24th, 2:00PMEST/8:00PMCET.

I was prompted to contact him after hearing his talk with one Joel Davis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHATsPqk_8w&t=34s

It is not my concern to critique Mr. Davis nor his work, which I have no familiarity with beyond this discussion.

Rather, for a wrong turn that Mr. Davis was taking, I ascertained what would be an excellent point of departure to set White Nationalism/European advocacy on a proper course.

I’ll be adding a few more remarks to this comment…


8

Posted by Hermeneutics on Wed, 28 Aug 2019 01:38 | #

I have not listened back to this discussion that I had with Josh Neal (NAL #76: Responding to Joel Davis w/Daniel Sienkiewicz) ..and perhaps made a mistake for winging it without more adherence to my careful notes. So as not to have important points missed then, let me make this clear.

In service of a clear take-away from hermeneutics properly understood: Hermeneutics (the anti Cartesian deployment of narrative engagement in a circulating process of inquiry from broad, imaginative hypotheses (beyond the moment and episode, into the pattern and then back into empirical verification as need be) facilitates a liberation from mere facticity (providing means for amendment beyond the arbitrary confusion, apparent paradoxes and contradictions thereof), which facilitates coherence (of both individual and group), which facilitates accountability, which facilitates a degree of agency, which facilitates warranted assertability.

Coherence is certainly a pre eminent feature of what Heidegger is talking about with “authenticity” (as facilitated by the liberation from mere facticity)...but more broadly, it seems to correspond to Alternative Range of Functional Autonomy (in CMM terms) which would include some of the benefits of coherence, i.e., accountability, agency and warrant.


9

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:00 | #

So what has that got to do with securing the existence of our people and a white future for our children?


10

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:20 | #

It allows us to engage in a process of surveying all relevant variables necessary to reconstructing our social (group) systemic homeostasis (securing the existence of our people and a future for our children) as opposed to getting fixated on one variable in reaction, which would leave us tactlessly imbalanced, vulnerable on other fronts, susceptible to misdirection, headlong overcompensation against our own interests (immunity, borders, bounds) and against our own people in ‘service’ of reactionary quest of ‘pure’ (Cartesian) warrant above nature (in principle or deity above nature) or in nature (e.g., might makes right) below praxis - our people.

...which is not to say that we should not prioritize (in that hermeneutic/systemic survey) that one variable, right along with a critical eye holding to account the right wingers/liberals who sell out, or are blinded by their objectivism, hoodwinked, enticed away from accountability to our people.

In other words, it has everything to do with it.


11

Posted by Unionization works against Marxists too on Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:38 | #

Unionization works against Marxists too…

Including ethnonational unionization against Marxist communism, with its deracinating, liberal totalitarian agenda..

Jim Slater@69mib
30 AUGUST 1980
Striking Polish dock workers led by Lech Walesa won the right to form independent trade unions & the right to strike. The Solidarity movement was seen as a defining moment in the struggle against Communist rule in eastern European.

AJCCentral Europe@AJCCE


     


12

Posted by Memory interactive on Mon, 09 Sep 2019 09:40 | #

...elaborating and correcting further the question of the “where of memory”, comment #5...

I might have added that memory is not singularly located in the head, though there will, of course, be associative neural clusters, which are expressions of co-evolution that are triggered by interactive phenomenon, which can, in turn, provide feedback locus of additional storage to reinforce the memory from the shared social realm, whether in language, writing, computers, or indeed, in the neural networks of other people and creature’s brains and their adaptive networks.

DanielS


13

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:55 | #

Lyceum Round-Table #2: Problems with Liberalism

They don’t quite arrive at “a substantive view of the good” being a fostering of human well being through human ecology (which naturally corresponds to pervasive ecology), a protection and fostering of historical social/genetic capital (incl. non-human resource), most powerfully sustained from neoliberal forces by an ethnonational level, approximately synonymous with group unionization of that level of borders and bounds.

But they are apparently coming into line, compelled by the better understanding brought to bear here, to focus on the pervasiveness and destructiveness of liberalism as it has gained hegemony through the Modernist, Cartesian/Lockeatine notion of civil individual rights imbued in The American Declaration of Independence, Constitution and jurisprudence.

Preston does well to point out that the notion of rights went off the rails to over-liberalism onset by modernity; when the concept was conceived as universal, taken off the rails of group concern and responsibility - which would entail not only group privileges for the taking but also entailed the flip side of rights, that is obligations and duties - specifically, obligations and duties to the group delimitation, e.g., the nation. But Preston does not quite emphasize duty and obligation a means of responsibility to the human ecological group; instead, his examples are cast in terms of civic duty and obligation, such as the draft, voting, paying taxes.

Locke, as written into the Declaration of Independence and so on, proposed to found civil individual rights on universal principle, inalienable to all men. Kant attempted to rescue the moral order from the arbitrariness that would result from this non discrimination, non recognition of group delimitation and interests, to rescue moral order from that arbitrary rupture of group bounds with the prosthesis of universal foundations, proposing that principles, duty and obligation could be demonstrated as imperative (you are obligated/have a duty to) as the principles were tested for their foundational value to hold up against the arbitrariness (flux, disorder implicated by unrecognized, ruptured group bounds) if the principles were universalizable, i.e., if they could be good for all people at all times - then the obligation and duty is not something you could opt-out of, it is a “categorical imperative.” This attempted rescue of the moral order failed because it was still Cartesian.

Thus, while Preston is correct to point out that duty and obligation is a flip side of rights, his anarchism inhibits him from taking the step to the effective means of human ecology, social historical genetic capital, and group accountability thereof, that coordinated coalitions of ethnonationalist unions provides.


14

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:44 | #

Considering the emergent qualities not only of the individual but also of the social group system, viz. from their DNA system, the fact that the emergent whole is of different qualities, and greater than the sum of its parts, non-reducible to natural fallacy such as “might makes right”, it is conceivable that war is not the inevitable means of conflict resolution.

Most of day to day interaction is of a cooperative nature, not at all belligerent, and most social systems are typically cooperative as well - this would seem to be an expression of the emergent qualities of praxis, which, together with hermeneutics liberation from mere facticity and episodic/momentary myopia, provide the means for ethnonational coordination as opposed to war.

Sperm battle for the egg. Only one wins. The emergent quality of humans, especially in the social realm of praxis, is of a very different quality.

Recall once again Plato’s rejoinder to the concept of might makes right - i.e., the collective, union, as it were, can offset the tyrant’s might and make it wrong.


15

Posted by Barbara Spectre Is Back on Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:31 | #

Barbara Spectre Is Back

...in summit with Jewish luminaries, held in Israel to unite worldwide Jewry in a “foundationalization’ of their common destiny.

...also discussed will be the obligations for the rest of mankind - the renewing of Noah’s covenant, The Noahide obligations incumbent upon all mankind.

...an international court based on biblical principles.


16

Posted by mancinblack on Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:16 | #

@15 An answer to the question “what would the reaction be if Europeans said the same things” wasn’t long in coming.

The incoming European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, has come under intensifying pressure to drop a controversial mission to protect “our European Way of Life” from the title of the commissioner in charge of immigration.

https://www.rte.ie/news/newslens/2019/0912/1075533-way-of-life/

Elsewhere, an unnamed Dutch MP has called the proposal “disgusting” and a spokesperson for Amnesty International said it was “worrying”.


17

Posted by Oswald Mosley on Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:27 | #

Mosley addresses a post modern concern in this quote.


It is an interesting question as to how to manage White post modernity, and one that is eminently worth commentary, would have commentary feedback if White Nationalism could muster a modicum of intellectual pragmatism.

For particular reasons (falling for deceptive language games profusely slathered over the public, stupidity perhaps), the struggle can’t get past reactionary mode yet..

Perhaps an age, a period, would not decide entirely what to maintain and what to leave behind, but clearly Mosley meant that there are times for a people to band together in defense, to drastically curtail the more experimental ventures in order to protect their inherited forms, and those ways which remain conducive.


18

Posted by DanielS on Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:55 | #

In fact, the emergent qualities of our genetic patterns into the social realm of praxis (the whole being greater than the sum of its parts) is a great argument against over emphasizing individualism ..as parts of the system will complement each other and rely on each other, being incomplete as they are, in need of completion and systemic correction as they are.

The correction (homeostasis) of our system requires the White post modern turn away from Cartesian estrangement and into the praxis of our social systemic homeostasis.

.. an epistemological correction that is facilitated by hermeneutics and social constructionism.

Epistemology ... how to think ...

Social Constructionism centers our outlook in the praxis of our people, our group(s) interests.

It is a later version of Aristotle’s argument that “Politics” should be the first concern, as all else is moot if the realm of praxis is not in order.

In Praxis (the social world), phronesis, i.e. practical judgment is required (because people have agency and motivations which are not as deterministic as physics models).

This is not against nature, science truth and facts, it only maintains that at very least, there is a modicum of agency in the determination of how facts come to count post hoc and how facts are framed.

This is not a small matter when you have blockheads purporting that “Truth” and “Nature” should be our religions. Well, which truth? and isn’t natural effect, e.g., disease or injury, or conflict over resource, something that we try to correct in service of our social interests?

The answer is yes, of course, and Hermeneutics facilitates broader reframings to transcend momentary and episodic short sightedness, consternation, paradoxes, dilemmas and so on..

It also facilitates the agency, accountability and correctability that can stave-off the disasters of deterministic logics that are for some reason held to be more important than human interests.

Recognition of the emergent qualities of praxis (from our DNA) will indeed allow the second epistemological realm, of Poesis, to function properly as the default mindset (in calling back from the Cartesian estrangment, Heidegger stated that poetry was more like thinking than science).

In Poesis, intuition is the dominant means.

And then the third epistemological realm, Theoria, its instrumentality aimed at arrival at pure and strictly determined logic, can be relegated to its proper place to serve in the assistance of praxis, as need be, and as Poesis and Praxis turn attention to issues requiring its rigorous methods.


19

Posted by Hermeneutics wrested from bad audio, etc. on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:33 | #

No Apologies
4.5K subscribers

REMEMBER TO LIKE, SHARE, & SUBSCRIBE.  Excerpted from this video: https://youtu.be/PqwprH_iJ1o

Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/T93n...
Bitcoin - 1LXzuHDJEEkHAbey5Mq9z5G8MwfUXLGBVu
Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/NoApologiesLive
Dlive - https://dlive.tv/noapologies

To get your questions read on air, request a guest, or appear on the No Apologies Livestream, email me at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Daniel Sienkiewicz on Hermeneutics

To purchase my book, click here: https://www.amazon.com/love-travel-ot...
2 Comments

1 Daniel Sienkiewicz

43 minutes ago (edited)
First of all, apologies for the terrible audio glitches: again, I was under the impression it had been straightened out. On a content level, the title of this bit is somewhat of a misnomer as being about hermeneutics, as I am only here touching on certain aspects of hermeneutics as being misrepresented to Whites as a kind of solipsisistic nonsense wherein people can interpret events however they like where, in fact, hermeneutics’ anti Cartesian purpose, its circulating process of inquiry, would not accept the rejection of empirical, interactive verification (but would insist upon it as need be). Hermeneutics is a crucial factor in the post modern turn - also a crucial necessity to understand properly for our group interests -  facilitating the management of the best and rejection of the worst aspects of modernity and tradition in order to facilitate our group maintenance against the ravages of modernity and destructive traditions, but misrepresented to Whites as hyper relative dada nonsense.


Hermeneutics allows us to overcome the arbitrary flux of the empirical end of Cartesianism, by facilitating the transcendence of momentary observations, the limited perspective of episode and the paradoxes, contradictions and confusions thereof, taking us rather into narrative coherence - a liberation from mere facticity (as Heidegger would call it) which is the first task not only of any person in order to establish accountability and thus a degree of agency and warrant, but also for the group - markedly, for the racial group social systemic homeostasis which is otherwise under attack. It is a non Cartesian process of inquiry which allows us to make use of imaginative and working hypotheses (e.g., as to our group’s existence beyond the episode) of the group pattern and then moving to and engaging empirical, interactive verification as need be. These shared narratives provide for the management of our historical capital as a people, again, crucially, facilitating group coherence, accountability, agency and warrant.

This achievement of coherence through hermeneutics is thus crucial to be understood properly - whereas even KMac was under the impression that it was anti science. It is not anti science, it is rather the facilitator of the hypotheses beyond moment and episode, so crucial to our survival as a group system in its necessarily protracted, historical form.

Coherence is aligned with what Heidegger calls “authenticity” - more broadly, alternative range of functional autonomy, for both individual and group.

With the hermeneutic process, we are able to transcend the arbitrary thrownness, our existential condition, in which we find ourselves as a people, as our peoplehood is somewhat arbitrary given that we can interbreed with other races - recognizing our importance, our genetic capital nevertheless,  it is necessary to distinguish crucial patterns beyond moment and episode as hermeneutics affords in order to maintain our difference, our group social systemic homeostasis - which is under attack by “anti racism”...

Anti Racism is Cartesian, it is prejudice against prejudice (as Heidegger’s student, the hermeneuticist Hans Georg Gadamer observed), it is not innocent, it is hurting and it is killing people.

Hermeneutics is the means of engagement that takes us back from the Cartesian estrangement, the objectivist purity spiral and susceptibilities thereof, that has been weaponized against Whites by YKW.

2 Elliott Blatt

11 minutes ago
I need a team of lawyers to explain to me what the hell he was saying to me.

Daniel Sienkiewicz

7 minutes ago (edited)
Nice try Elliott, if you are honest (and I don’t think that you are speaking in good faith) all you need to do is re-read my comment above. It isn’t so hard. But maybe its hard to for you to figure out how to re-mystify this subject matter all over again and that’s what your overture is about.


20

Posted by DanielS on Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:13 | #

Note, I have made some changes to the first few paragraphs of this post. This will make it a bit more clear and add some factors up front that should have been there from the onset but which I had previously mentioned only paragraphs later.

However, my primary reason for this comment is to call attention to the fact that this post remains a work in progress.


21

Posted by ZOG: The Bush Years on Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:27 | #

ZOG: The Bush Years


22

Posted by Aid to Israel and... on Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:46 | #

Inasmuch as it is true that key benefiiaries, if not ‘the greatest beneficiary’, of U.S. aid to Israel and its pugnaciousness, are White rmavens of the U.S. military industrial complex, it is nevertheless consonant with MR’s platform, which maintains an ongoing recognition of complicitness of White right wing elite with Jewish interesrs even where they conflict and sell-out White interesrs.

WHO BENEFITS MOST FROM U.S. AID TO ISRAEL?

https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2019/11/who-benefits-most-from-us-aid-to-israel.html



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: State of the Fart Right: Why the bum steers from Jonathan Pohl,  et. al?
Previous entry: L’VIV, Ukraine, 6 - 7 July 2019: Parts 1, 2 and 3

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:09. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:41. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:24. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:16. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:58. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:11. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 07:20. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:54. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:47. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:44. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:28. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:19. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:04. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:35. (View)

affection-tone