|
|
|
YKW liberalism, coalitions, feminism, black civil rights/power vs Hippie agenda for White male Being
Three important, five minute podcasts in this distinction: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3And here is the text of the current three podcasts of this post in distinction of the agenda for White/Being Midtdasein as opposed to incommensurate YKW Marxist and its Anti-White man coalition agendas:
Part 1While I’ve written about this before and I have distinguished the incommensurate gender agendas of feminists and hippies in the first five podcasts of this series, because Right Wingers continue to buy into the YKW obfuscation, associating and muddling the so-called “counter-culture” of the 60s with radical liberalism of White bounds and borders, through YKW international Marxism and coalition building as such, not only with feminism, but markedly of the times, with the also incommensurate agendas of black civil rights and power, it is thus necessary to distinguish this YKW radical liberalism from the authentic and profoundly legitimate motives of White men. It is infuriating, for example, when right wing women criticize “hippie-dippies” because these right wing women have their basic needs taken care of and don’t want to be inconvenienced with negotiation of social justice; thus seek excuses in a “natural” way to dispose of the “dead wood” that they relegate these White men as, “lefties”, betas what ever asshole attributions they would make. This is a case, in fact, where traditional women can be every bit as obnoxious to White interests as feminists. It is of paramount importance to distinguish particularly the neglected intrinsic valuation of White male being, that is dasein and midtdasein, which White women do not lack so; rather it is the key motive to making White social systemic homeostasis, our social systemic maintenance and circulatory reconstruction function. Instead, White male being continues to be denied through the charmed loop of didactic incitement which instigates social systemic runaway as opposed to White group homeostasis, social reconstruction. And right wing men and women are the dupes ever, swallowing whatever depiction of events that the YKW spew: encouraging people to write off “the hippie-dippies” as trivial and liberally motivated, the ykw say that the 60s were about radical liberalism, “free love,” if not “polymorphous perversion”, peace and passivity no matter what for White men, even if their bounds and peoplehood are violated, pacifying yourself with drugs to stultification, until further top down instruction from the SDS (the YKW, Marxist organized anti-Vietnam war movement)... never mind a true self interest not to be drafted, if the YKW say you were to yield to “black civil rights and power, feminism and be sandle-wearing house-cucks - then that must be what “the 60’s counter culture was about.” By contrast the neo-trads and right wingers say, “men need to be real men, dammit, none of these soy boys”, the trad women have told us so, and more importantly, the YKW have told us so, none of this intellectual calculation, we need swagger and sheer confidence, we need nothing but to deal with brute objective facts of life, amidst hoards of primeval black men that women, both feminist and trad women, with the encouragement of YKW, are inciting us to competition against; despite that momentary episodic basis of competition that modernity’s disorder allows for only, favoring black constitutional hyper assertiveness over our sublimated and protracted strategy in group pattern that has been disrupted by YKW activism, instigating modernity to runaway, to systemic runaway. Its not that women, girls, shouldn’t conduct themselves like pigs, should be accountable to White social systemic capital or suffer the consequences of ostracism and banishment for example to the black or Muslim way of life that they’ve engaged; it is that White men shouldn’t discriminate and should be subject to universal maturity and subject to limitless burden, lack of freedom, inauthenticty, effective slavery as such.
Conspiracy theorist David McGowan proposed that Hippies were a “conspiracy of the military industrial complex to get behind hippies in order to repulse people to the anti-war movement.” Along with that absurd theory, he displayed the absurd audacity of hypnotic technique - ignoring the obvious: ‘Right there isn’t it?’ If hypnotic techniques, even, are being used to distract from the organic motive of hippies (which McGowan insists was not organic) then the powers-that-be must be really concerned to distract from it, so that it is not well understood. Note that McGowan never mentions the organic motive of Being against the draft; note further that he is anti-racist and never mentions the YKW. It’s a typical and catastrophic mistake of right wingers and traditionalists to write-off the motive for White male being as hippie naivete, a degenerate fad popular among naive youths misguided by radicals to initiate downfall of White group interests, western civilization. This misapprehension has partly do with the hippies own ineloquence, with even its own prominent representatives being inarticulate of its essential motivation. It should have represented, would represent for the penetrating, a radical turn in White post-modern movement, to represent an integral and missing element of White social systemic function and correction for homeostasis for White male being and midtdasein - the representation of intrinsic value in the White bio-system through a recognition of a certain level of intrinsic value even in White men, which had traditionally been more withheld, guilty until proven innocent, as it were, until proven through rather severe rites of passage if not through overwhelming, socially dominant self actualization. This should not come across as a fixation on hippies, their look, aesthetics and practices - such fixation is the opposite of organic socialization - we call attention rather to the unresolved function of a part of a process of systemic homeostasis. End Part 1 Part 2Hippies represented a manifestation for being and midtdasein, a secure enough intrinsic value of the ages recognized as carried in White men also- innocent until proven guilty - ensconced in one’s folk, i.e. having reasonable borders, neither transgressed of our own doing nor transgressing others of our doing. And it is our nature as Europeans that natural, Augustinan devils determine more who lives and dies in respect, rather than the Manichean trickster devils of Middle Eastern tribalism. It is exceedingly important to distinguish the agenda underlying, that is for White male Being/Midtdasein as its been un-articulated and grossly misrepresented to right wing perception by the YKW media as a passive and trivially idealistic aspect of a broader counter-culture - fundamentally a liberal prescription to us, and radically Marxist in origin, disingenuous Marxist anti-war politics, cultural Marxism in its “free love, polymorphous perversion” and coalitions, feminism, black civil rights and power. So that this crucial mechanism for White systemic homeostasis does not continue to be obfuscated by YKW academia, media and right wing reaction, these few more essential interfaces have to be sorted out for an optimized social systemic delimitation.when transforming Maslow’s hierarchy at the intersection of individuation, gender differentiation and socialization… It is typical for right wingers and traditionalist to blame not only feminists but of course hippie men for the downfall of White group interests, not recognizing legitimate organic motivation and its incommensuration with YKW liberal and Marxist agendas along with the incommensuration of feminist and black coalitions. They are ignorant for the fact and the hippies, especially, were inarticulate for the essential and important motive of their agenda - that is, White male being; thus, as traditionalists or right wing thats-the-way-it-isers, they engage in didactic incitement. And as reactionaries, they react to some of the grungy organicism of the systemic correction in praxis that these modernist men and women represented, as White women after actualization and White men after Being - not realizing that not only was it not a threat to them if properly understood, but a correction to the systemic runaway that was being instigated. It’s worse than that as the YKW brains behind our antagonists do not want the White male agenda understood and so buried it, misrepresenting it through their media and PC academia as essentially a “counter cultural” movement largely about the interests of their client coalitions in cultural Marxism, blacks and feminists… It is necessary thus, to not only sort out the feminist and hippie agenda as incommensurate, but black civil rights and black power movement also, as entirely incommensurate, having had nothing to do with hippies, but largely YKW promoted organization. Most fundamentally, the YKW/Marxist agenda as radically incommensurate to the White male agenda for being… Though the YKW have misrepresented and packaged these agendas as being unified, rather than incommensurate, and even radically incommensurate as they were…. ..obfuscating the matter with their own particular projects for White dissolution… Notably Herbert Marcuse’s Eros and civilizations and its prescription of polymorphous perversion, “free love” as it were, was not a matter of White male being at all - just the opposite. This program of hyperbolic sexual liberalism put profound genetic resources at risk to an opportunistic free for all competition increasingly antagonistic and stressful to White being and evolution - our evolution for a wider arc of sublimation to maturation requiring protection from the incessant stress of continual YKW activism abetting of modernist upheaval, of untoward competition for our co evolutionary females, ever suffocating authentic being and midtdasein (which would provide comfortable ensconcement among our people for a sufficient range of functional autonomy) - but, instead, is more and more subject to pandering from these YKW politics and solicitation from genetically distant outgroups, even racial outgroups, blacks, Muslim and YKW. In fact, this erstwhile importunate vying for our co-evolutionary females from all sides, is why it is evident by contrast, that it is crucial to respect option, commensurate with White male being and midtdasein, for a sacrosanct treatment of monogamy to motivate loyalty, to guard against cynicism, despair and resignation. This “free love” and liberalism on the other hand was a YKW affection of the times, that pandered to the one up position of White females in the disorder of modernity, their base inclination to incite genetic competition, exacerbated by YKW activism as social classificatory boundaries were inveighed against, particularly by the second weaponized coalition, black civil rights and black power (now again Muslims as well, of course) . Also YKW coalition impositions. End part 2 Part 3And as the YKW have turned rightward, they encourage supposedly “objective” facticity” as opposed to its correction in the relative interests of social systemic reconstruction. While the YKW of the 60s times, even, pandered with this scientism, purporting a theory of liberation from quote “dangerous” sexual inhibition, and with that, going below socialization in praxis and sublimation; pandering instead to the base female inclination to a truly dangerous puerile female incitement to genetic competition, and suspension of disbelief in empathy before motherhood - to a feminism and hyperbolic traditionalism become most cruel and destructive to White males, as the women they were born to love turned against them, putting some of them into intolerable internal conflict. At the same time, the black agendas, particularly as weaponized by YKW in the form of black civil rights (enslavement of Whites, as they were denied free contract and association, part and parcel of the right to discriminate) and black power directed against Whites (by active measures, etc) were an enormous challenge as well; in the disorder of modernity as its evaluative criteria truncated classificatory patterns to judgment on momentary and episodic bases favoring black evolution and ignoring the best features of White male evolution. The black civil rights movement as notably trained by the Marxist “Highlander School” of Tennessee featured a demand to be treated with dignity and recognition as such for their prim, mannerly traditional dress, suits and narrow ties, women in dresses and horned rim glasses - contrast that, in incommensuration, to the hippie-freaks whose organicism and being called for being defiantly grungy and weird by traditional standards, whose being by contrast was seeking to take on the sometimes weird organicism of praxis in contrast to the crew cuts and military regimentation of look in previous generations (reified teleology and) theoria. The civil rights Negroes were thus upholding the middle of Maslow’s hierarchy, in their “integrity” (look at the White boy, he’s got no integritae) and straight-lacing, they were maintaining traditional strictures overly constraining to White men and women…. nondiscriminatory civil rights for all, not allowing for relative judgement and the preserving of profound White genetic interests, including the foibles and bugs on the water that signify organic health… And the black power movement was also incommensurate with the Hippie agenda for White male ease and latitude of being; black powerists seeking the top of Maslow’s hierarchy - in actualization of their aggressive, hyper-assertive of native black nature in their genetic interests, minimally sublimated, momentarily and episodically assertive. ... rape is a black thing. The White boy has no sou-eou-eou-eou-eou -oo-ow-oo-owhel. The YKW agenda was about radical liberalism for Whites - a Saul Alinsky strategy for making American Whites live up to their own rule structure of Lockeatine “civil individual rights” prohibition of social group classification and discrimination (as that would be in the interests of Whites, anyway), i.e. it was about opening the borders and bounds of Whites, and rupturing any such movement as manifest by Hippies for White male being and midtdasein for organic ensconcement in our people. Hippies were not a motive for universal peace, it was about not warring with people if they were not warring with us first, e.g., in Vietnam. It wann’t about inhuman, invariable traditions of war, nor any universal rule or fixed role at all outside their group homeostasis, but rather allowing for ongoing organic process of being, routine, sacrament and actualization in an overall process of social systemic homeostasis. In fact, the Marxists were notoriously frustrated by the Hippies, that they could not get them on board with their revolutionary agenda - an agenda that would rupture the organic corrective process of their human ecology, The Hippie agenda was as incommensurate with Marxist YKW radicalism as it was with right wing war mongering tradition. This was illustrated in the contrast between the Berkeley Free speech movement and the San Francisco Hippies. While there was thin common ground in being against the Vietnam war, the motive for hippies was in the organic interest of their being and midtdasein, not a part of SDS directives from Marxist revolutionaries as it was for the YKW radicals. Not only have YKW interests liberalized erstwhile White borders and boundaries through a weaponization of civil individual rights, anti-racism, that is, anti-social group classification, while buying off opportunistic right wing complicity to this end - their typically disingenuously promoting of sheer objectivity (for Whites) beyond the relative accountability to the group interests from which they came, thus instigates a disordering effect as opposed to group homeostasis - and with that, YKW interests have pandered to the increased one up position of females within the disorder of modernity - their base inclination to incite arbitrarily genetic competition. The crass right wing women of generation internet bubble will be encouraaged to write White male being off instead, as the Lefty ... hippie dippies ...they should prefer instead Hitlerism be popular again and, as some of these alt right women have literally said…oh yeah….lets clear away the dead wood. ...basically, lets clear away the homeostatic mechanism of our race as opposed to the the natural fallacy and racial anarchism which serves their pig asses… men expendable to the liberal tyranny which serves their short term gains at the expense of our people. end Part 3 I would also encourage a listen to these podcasts from the prior set primarily because they have been under-attended while being important and to some extent preliminary: Part 4, part 5 Transforming Maslow in regard to gender relations, social optima.
The Dark Sided of Self Actualization and Incommensurate Gender Agendas A Narrative of The Intersection of Individuation and Gender Differentiation Re-evaluating the hierarchy of motives, optimized for the White Class Massacre of My Lai, Vietnam, life, land, expresses incitement against White male being/midtdasein
Comments:2
Posted by Right there, isn't it? on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:04 | #
A Conspiracy Theory of A Conspiracy Theory to Divert From White Male Dasein. Conspiracy theorist David McGowan proposed that Hippies were a “conspiracy of the military industrial complex to get behind hippies in order to repulse people to the anti-war movement. Along with that absurd theory, he displayed the absurd audacity of hypnotic technique - ignoring the obvious: ‘Right there isn’t it?’ If hypnotic techniques, even, are being used to distract from the organic motive of hippies (which McGowan asserts was not organic) then the powers-that-be must be really concerned to distract from it, so that it is not well understood. Note that McGowan never mentions the organic motive of Being against the draft; note further that he is anti-racist and never mentions the YKW. 3
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:52 | # I am not highly motivated to listen to JF Gariepy’s two most recent posts as his 128 i.q. has been shown inadequate to handle important theoretical issues before and he augurs in the title of his last two podcasts to fail again - or to cover ground that I’ve already dealt with by way of better minds than his. A title of a recent post of his is “the defense that it’s ‘just’ a social construct” can be debunked every time. Well, as I’ve said, the word ‘just’ is instrumental, because that is what corrupts the would-be anti-Cartesian theory of social constructionism and makes it Cartesian, betraying its mandate. Thus, if those who purport social constructionism are offering-up such corruption of theory then JF is taking on an easy straw man indeed. Next he’s got a post up titled “Incels Are (Largely) Correct | w/ Frame Game” Again, you can tell right from the start that he’s proceeding on false premises. Firstly, “Incels” are clearly a Jewish concocted marketing device (like “Dark Enlightenment” or “Neo-Reaction”) and secondly, the premise is NOT largely correct. They take the premise that they are entitled to sex and being denied it. The correct premise, rather, is being entitled to a well confirmed and respected option for monogamy within a well bounded social system. And more importantly even is the fact that the racial/national boarder needs to be addressed and secured. I don’t want to hear any White man’s grievances until they’ve addressed these two issues, and the issue of duty to group boundaries in particular. Lastly, he’s talking to (((Frame Games))) again, so you’ve got to be on your toes for the back door for (((entryism))) that JF Gariepy is aiding and abetting. 4
Posted by Woman actualizes nomadism, loses dasein on Thu, 23 Aug 2018 17:31 | # This women experienced a loss of being/dasein when she pursued actualization of nomadic existence.
5
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:48 | # The lady in the video didn’t lose there-being. No one can lose there-being. Even in the depths of psychological and physical oppression one might experience, say, with gulag imprisonment or with permanent physical pain, still that is what there is, which a human being’s there-being necessarily witnesses for the cognitive structures of the brain to process as meaning. What she gave up for a nomadic and superficially free and autonomous existence was her physical security in a world still made not by her but by others - uniquely, world-making or worldification is what humans collectively do - but, of course, others who were bent on committing criminal acts of one kind or another against her. Her there-being in that world was the same essential as her there-being in a world made by what she loosely describes as “tribe”. But the data abstracted (quite involuntarily and spontaneously) from it for interpretation by the cognitive machinery produced the very different meanings she seeks to communicate in the video. Now, the question as to what is a “white there-being” and the question as to what is a white-made world are intimately connected and worth asking. They might be the most important philosophical questions of our time. 6
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:21 | # While not presuming that you will find it a sufficient answer to your question, I see good faith to a Heideggerian schema that you uphold, and thus offer in correction to my own, that I should have said that in pursuit of self actualization in individual nomadism through the disorder of modernity and its dissolution of folk accountability, that she was getting yet farther estranged not necessarily from there-being but from midtdasein - a there being ensconced in her folk. Again, that is according to the schema as I see it/ use it. Nor is this a criticism of her choice per se, but rather the lack of a stable White society, in which she should be able to be a nomad without fear for her being from men; but in absence of which stable order, partly as upshot of modernity and partly through vain pursuits of anti-social, individual self actualization, a reflexive effect of male aberration will proliferate. 7
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:49 | # That’s OK on all counts. I just think, though ... actually, I have always thought ... that it is necessary in this philosophical moment, at the end not of our racial paradigm of techne but the philosophically liberal rendering of it as modernity, when we as nationalists critique from outside the system yet do so without an extant philosophical account of our own, to question rather than rely on our presumed certainties. Which is where the two questions I left hanging come in, and also the question germaine to both, which I have endeavoured to answer in the past, of how the totality of world and person come into being ... how creatively inter-dependent the two halves are, and how the qualitative determinant of their product … the lived life ... is the degree to which pathologies come, like bacteria in a drain, to inhabit the truly entropic and all-too-human inner declension towards mechanicity and absence (which afflicts Man at all times actually). You spoke rightly or wrongly of loss of Dasein. But properly speaking, it is the plunge into the cognitive barrenness of False Dasein, and the loss of our light and truth. 8
Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 25 Aug 2018 08:27 | # In the same sense that I tried to go beyond Heidegger’s own detailing of his account of transitionality, and beyond, say, Sloterdijk’s account also, which I encountered a couple of year’s ago and which also expands on Heidegger’s, I believe that I, like Otto with his ancestral, indigenous Of-Being, have at least gestured towards an advance on being-with - that work being unfinished at present. Being-with has a kind of limitation through openness ... its essence is spread too thin. Specifically, it lacks the acknowledging and discriminating instinct ... the Darwinian predisposition inherent to Dasein (by which I mean Being’s there-being as a permanent state or act or site of witness and data gathering), and provides the larger portion of its structure (the other portion being, I think, something to do with responsiveness and adaptibility). Anyway, in this sense I’ve suggested that Being is pre-structured ... equipped ... but in contrast the natural Identity is singular and intact, and if we restrict our account to Being-with that singularity quickly becomes at odds with the multivarious and indiscriminate nature of the “with”. Being-with is being among, and while it works very well as a perpetual corrective to the strange but endemic notion of the single, infinitely remote human island in an unfathomable cosmic ocean of Being, still it does not go nearly far enough to provide us with the relational and ecological truth of us. So I’ve arrived via Otto’s “Of” (which I think may tend to weigh more on Identity than on Being) at Being-in-kind as the optimum existential substrate for the natural Identity. I wonder if that term might aid in your own definitions? Always, the struggle here is to arrive at the truth of the human experience, and from that truth, eventually, at ethnic nationalism as the politics of the nature of Man, which I believe will contain the seed of all our revolutionary action. 9
Posted by DanielS on Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:31 | #
Yes, I believe your reasoning and terms help to clarify essential check points around dasein and midtdasein in the onto-hermenuetic circle for a process of social systemic (group) homeostasis. These additional specs are an enchancement and help prevent our running the risk of going off course for an overly individualistic emphasis in dasein, or an insufficiently discriminatory treatment of midtdasein - there can be too much openness indeed, that is the rubric under which we meet. And you stop deftly short of what would be an error in this specificity. Your specifying maintains clarifying rigor while stopping short of Cartesian reification for the suggestion (which you don’t make here) that other specificatory structures (check points, as it were) that I propose are wholly irrelevant or redundant. These terms remain specificatory structures which arguably allow for the inferences of check points of largely the same aims as yours - which I may take for granted - but on the other hand probably allow for authentic breadth in process; the system must allow for a enough openness, ambiguity as it were and interactivity in order to function in praxis. We should not fall prey to the engineer and physicist’s aversion to a certain amount of ambiguity in specificatory structures as proposed in guidance of our socio-bio-systemic function, as that is the grease which affords the process of authentic negotiation of specification, correction and going beyond, as you like. While working toward the same aims as you, I was inclined to ignore, for the moment, until account requested, for example that the “folk” aspect of midtdasein - there being amidst one’s folk - could probably do with some clarification if not refinement, with clarifying specs such as you’ve equipped us to check for at the pit stop (emergence and full interactive systemic survey are in a slow car race) - being of and being in kind. 10
Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 25 Aug 2018 22:33 | # It might help, Daniel, if you jettisoned the Cartesian references. It’s very probably preventing you, all by itself, from approaching the unending transitional estate of human being with interest and understanding. 11
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 26 Aug 2018 01:19 | # Not a chance. Rather, it would help if you and Bowery would finally end your resistance and complaint as such - upgrade, or remain in philosophical irrelevance, obsolescence and idiocy. Either that or get out of the realm of human, philosophical inquiry - go back to tinkering on car engines and stop making obstruction which has made of you, in effect, the best friends our enemies could have. Anti-racism is not only a Jewish construct. Anti-racism is Cartesian, it is prejudice against prejudice, it is not innocent, it is hurting and it is killing people. In Cartesian prescription, Anti-Racism is anti-the relative and median classificatory, working hypothesis of the social group and discrimination on its basis (particularly as far as Whites are concerned). 13
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 26 Aug 2018 07:34 | # Jew receptors love them some cliched, pre-packaged (((Madison Ave anti-White marketing campaign))) lingo - e.g., “sperg” - right out of the (((Alt-Right))) nomenclature. Why don’t you ask Tanstaafl’s wife for permission to use a new word ...or perhaps Vox Day ...you might find him in church, kneeling before Jewsus. 14
Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 26 Aug 2018 08:14 | # All spergs should be frog-marched into the gas chamber. 15
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:20 | # You lead and I’ll send your followers - your Alt-Right friends can provide you with some kek memes to thematize the lure of the frog-march there to meet you. 18
Posted by Johns Hopkins says Shrooms should be legal on Wed, 03 Oct 2018 19:13 | #
19
Posted by Lonejack on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 09:29 | # I always (DanielS) like to be reminded that my assessment of the times and its meaning as opposed to what we’re told it was about by MSM found agreement in the following comment by a Vietnam vet - it was written in the context of an article by Richard Spencer at the original Alternative Right site. Needless to say, Richard’s assessment of the times wasn’t very deep - A Vietnam vet calling himself Lonejack agreed with my assessment:
20
Posted by Lana doesn't like hippies on Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:11 | # Lana doesn’t like hippies….wants you to have this experience as a man. 21
Posted by Love is Everywhere on Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:50 | #
Midtdasein There being in kind. 22
Posted by Galt MacDermot on Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:06 | #
Walking in Space was one such song showing a particular concern for organic being. While My Conviction clued me onto the male “liberation” aspect so to speak: Walking in Space Galt MacDermot Doors locked (doors locked) My body (my body) My body (my body) My body Floating, flipping Tripping from Pottsville to Mainline (Tripping from “Pot"sville to Starlight On a rocket to My mind is as clear as country air Red black All the clouds are cumuloft How dare they try to end this beauty? To keep us under foot In this dive Walking in space Our eyes are open
My Conviction Galt MacDermot You know kids, I wish every mom
Post a comment:
Next entry: Promulgating the DNA Nation
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:34. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:42. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:27. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:01. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:52. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:23. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:07. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:39. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:20. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:01. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:31. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:52. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:21. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:25. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:49. (View) |
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:05 | #
I’m afraid that at first in this post, I had accidentally pasted-in notes and not cut from a cleaned up text version (which did have prepared) and so what went on line for the past day was much more sloppy than I realized - sorry about that. I was fatigued and eager to step away from the project. However, it is cleared-up now.
Apologies for the temporary oversight.