Regarding Trump’s Statement on “Fake News”, Political Cesspool Advocates Jailing Critics of State ![]() Upon Trump declaring ‘fake news’ media ‘the enemy of the American people’
The Political Cesspool advocates “locking them-up” - i.e., Trump should jail creators of “fake-news” in accordance with his oath to defend The U.S. Constitution against “enemies both alien and domestic.” Note: The US Constitution has no explicit means to defend racial biological systems, but facilitates means to destroy them. Pursuant of The Alien and Sedition Act and his sworn oath upon Inauguration:
The Political Cesspool is a key tent of the (((Alt Right))) tentosphere, representing the bible-thumping, patriotard American South; this tent is CENTRAL to the paleocon basis of The Alternative Right: If you want to gauge who can always be deemed acceptable for the audience of the Regnery Circus (The Alt Right), think in terms of who might appear as a presenter or guest on the The Political Cesspool.
Coming back to the press conference that set this controversy in motion, Trump responded to a Jewish journalist’s concerns:
Then:
Translation, he will meet with Jewish and black caucuses to hear their concerns about their EGI. Trump met with the Mossad Chief even before taking his oath as President:
Comments:2
Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:10 | # Also, I’ll add, that if the American Alt-Rightists like James Edwards want to invoke the issue of oaths, then they should abandon immediately the absurdist concept of a functioning ‘Anglosphere’ that includes the United States in any way. This is the oath that is sworn in the American armed forces:
This is oath sworn in British armed forces:
The differences there are not frivolous, but in fact underline a complete and total difference in fundamental world view. The Americans are swearing to defend a deracinated—racially and economically disinterested—set of transcendental values on a piece of paper written in the 1770s by a collection of liberals who had a disagreement with the British East India Company on the management of tea imports and exports. The British are swearing to be the Leibstandarte of actual flesh and blood persons whose path can be traced back to the Kings of Wessex, and who represent actual flesh and blood people and their economic interests stemming from the arising of sedentary agriculture about 14 thousand years ago. 3
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:50 | # Kumiko, did you ever read Tom Sunic’s underrated little book, Homo americanus? Read alongside Salter it generates a paradigm shift from the personal, futurative and biological to the national, historical and organic which, I think, leads in the direction you are gesturing towards here. Post a comment:
Next entry: #Cloudbleed: The rank system perspective.
|
|
![]() Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Into the authoritarian future by Guessedworker on Friday, 21 February 2025 12:51. (View) On an image now lost: Part 2 by Guessedworker on Saturday, 15 February 2025 14:21. (View) An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) — NEWS — Shame in the Oval Office by Guessedworker on Saturday, 01 March 2025 00:23. (View) A father and a just cause by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 February 2025 23:21. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Mon, 03 Mar 2025 01:40. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Mon, 03 Mar 2025 01:28. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:05. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Sun, 02 Mar 2025 23:38. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Sun, 02 Mar 2025 22:41. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Sun, 02 Mar 2025 22:15. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Sun, 02 Mar 2025 18:08. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:20. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Shame in the Oval Office' on Sun, 02 Mar 2025 14:52. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sun, 02 Mar 2025 00:14. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sat, 01 Mar 2025 22:50. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sat, 01 Mar 2025 20:49. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sat, 01 Mar 2025 18:09. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sat, 01 Mar 2025 11:45. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Fri, 28 Feb 2025 02:00. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:57. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Thu, 27 Feb 2025 23:42. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Thu, 27 Feb 2025 23:06. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:44. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:17. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:39. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:44. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:15. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:40. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Wed, 26 Feb 2025 01:52. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Tue, 25 Feb 2025 23:19. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:22. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:51. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:16. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:52. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:13. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sun, 23 Feb 2025 19:12. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sun, 23 Feb 2025 17:56. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Into the authoritarian future' on Sun, 23 Feb 2025 07:45. (View) |
Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:30 | #
Very well done article, DanielS.
It’s also yet more proof that 1776 was a mistake and the American revolution ought to have been crushed either then or at latest in 1812, in case anyone was still sitting on the fence about that element of world history. There should always come a point where a realisation comes that America is the enemy and that we cannot control it. A battle was waged for the heart and soul of America over the past forty years, and unfortunately the Jews won decisively in America and have now consolidated their position in that country. Perhaps it was never going to be any other way.
Enoch Powell’s sentiments from 1943 could now be revisited:
I consider that it is not a coincidence that as soon as Donald Trump was elected, the entire Alt-Right and Russian Active Measure sphere of communications began crafting negative signals about the premiership of Theresa May that mirrored and complimented each other. They understand this is an iron law of a geographical nature.
Everything is once again as it used to be.
Britain’s principal enemies will be: Israel, the United States, and the Russian Federation. Added to that list of enemies may be Germany given that Germany is making a choice between Schulz and Merkel—which is a non-choice—and perhaps France if the negotiations with Peugeot don’t work out.
As good students of geography, history and economics, most British patriots understand that the world is not governed by ‘democracy’ or ‘principles’, it’s governed by energy and access to mineral resources, and by the enforcement of legal frameworks that drive innovation, and by the maintenance of the dominance of specific ethnic groups over particular geographic spaces (also known as ‘having a homeland’).
The British Empire never ended in the sense that most people understand it. Rather, it simply underwent a dramatic economic transformation and receded out of public institutional view. Out of all of the imperial powers in the world today, the British one remains above all the most progressive with the most global developmental mileage remaining. Allies of ‘the empire’ never die because ‘the empire’ itself never dies. As such, ‘the empire’ expects its allies—one way or another—to fight for ‘it’ eternally, either consciously or unconsciously. That is neither inherently bad nor good. It simply is.
If the Americans disagree, then I guess they can go and fuck themselves. Let the meme-wars commence.
Or at least, that’s one way of looking at it. The reason I’m very interested in stimulating thought like this, is because I’d like to see a narrative that is not being led by American modes of thought. One of the biggest problems since 1991 has been the intellectual leadership of Americans among the Atlantic ethnic nationalists. Seeing everything through the framework of ‘what is good for America’s transcendental values enshrined in the constitution’ is how people keep getting into ridiculous problems. Fuck middle America, frankly, and fuck their stupid irrelevant values. I can’t eat values, nor can I run an internal combustion engine by burning values. And I definitely can’t defend my ethnic genetic interests with them either.
The rest of the world will not be simply cucked by the Americans and their Israeli and Russian friends.
We need to fight them everywhere from now on. We should fight them in every global institution to defend the contours of trade in the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, we should fight them everywhere to defend the existence of the JCPOA Iran Deal, and we should fight them everywhere to defend the development of trade routes in Central Asia via the OBOR. The economic ease of actually implementing Brexit will be dependent on maintaining those factors!
And we should also support Theresa May in her efforts to ban the American Alt-Right figures from entering Britain. Yes, I’m serious. They should indeed be banned from entering Britain. If they want to complain that Brexit Britain is somehow ‘anti-white’, then that absurd American complaint should be met with the laughter and derision it deserves.