The Alt-Right has given birth to “new” (((White))) leadership

Posted by DanielS on Thursday, 10 November 2016 14:04.

The Alt-Right/Alt-Left has given birth to “new” (((White))) leadership.

“And this will be a sign for you: You will find a baby wrapped in strips of cloth and lying in a feeding trough.”—Luke 2:12 (ISV)

State of the art Jewish agenda - how it looks at this point vis-a-vis Trump:

At this point it is evident that top echelon of Jewish interests have come to recognize that they and their race mixing agenda are so far ahead that they’ve decided to get good with the White right-wing, to blend with and steer their reaction.

Hence they have gotten out in front of the reaction that their PC liberalism has created in Whites; and with that, they are orchestrating the “White” us / them, friend / enemy distinction.

Though I disagree with him on some important, fundamental issues, to give credit where credit is due, Wolf Wallstreet was incisive in his hypothesizing two differing agendas among Jewish elites: Plan A, of the Noel Ignatiev kind, wants to wipe Whites out completely - relatively more expressed by Hillary and Bill than Trump.

Plan B is taken by the kind of Jewish elite not quite so crazy and a bit more fore-thinking - realizing that they can use what they perceive as the “better breeds” of Whites, they want to leave some of them around to interbreed with and help steer their elitist political agenda - against interests that ethnonationalists shouldn’t be against and on behalf of interests that ethnonationalists should not be for.

Rather than wanting America, the proposition nation, to fall, with its neo-liberal component being a world’s foremost manufacturer and exporter of race mixing, rivaled only by Judaic, Islamic and Christian influences; they want the American political institution along with other Abrahamic/proposition nations to come more thematically, if not comprehensively under Jewish and neo-liberal lackey guidance.

A Trump victory does not only buy us some time, it buys them and their word-smiths some time - for one thing, to make (((the USA))) and (((the Russian Federation))) into good friends, and at one with (((White))) national politics.

Following the U.S. as an alternative right base, the Russian Federation is the Jews first option after Israel for a vector of parasitic control.

Needless to say that the U.S. is not an ethnostate, but neither is the Russian Federation, in either its vast size or content. As proposition nations, both are susceptible and heavily influenced by Jewish interests. Don’t believe the stuff that (((they))) have gotten (((the Alternative Right))) to believe about Russia being good friends to Assad - they disarmed a defense program that took Assad decades to develop in defense against Israel. And now Trump wants to let ISIL destroy Assad. Even more laughable is The Orthodox Nationalist claim that China is a solid ally with the Russian Federation. Not true to say the least.

The Russian Federation is not opposed to Israel and to Jews. The Russian Federation was complicit in the overthrow of Gaddafi.

The proposition nations of the US and the Russian Federation, along with those nations that Jewish and neo-liberal interests are turning into proposition nations through immigration and race mixing, are not strictly opposed to Islam as they are guided, but use Islam as shock troops and compradors to destroy ethnonationalism - as in the case of what they did to Gaddafi and in what Putin has done and Trump would do to Assad. Such is the case of Trump’s and Putin’s position with regard to Asian ethnonationalism.

Trump and the Jewish political class have installed a stance which is hostile to the idea of Asian ethnonationalisms entering any cooperation with White American ethnonationalist counterparts; as if Trump and the Jewish political class have as their chief concern a common interest with White American workers - that is Not true:

Business Insider, “Donald Trump said wages are ‘too high’ in his opening debate statement”, 10 Nov 2016

NPR, ‘How Trump Broke Campaign Norms But Still Won The Election’, 09 Nov 2016 (emphasis added):

JAMES FALLOWS: So [Trump’s] main point, it’s based on something that is in my view largely just wrong [...] factually incorrect—and that is the idea that essentially the economic problems America has is because China is—in particular but also Mexico and Japan and South Korea - are stealing our factories and stealing our jobs. [...] They’ve been losing them mainly to automation. They’ve been losing them mainly to the robotization of factories around the world. And that is why I can tell you from going back and forth to China that in every single country of the world, including China and Japan and South Korea and Mexico, the employment problem is the hollowing out of factory-type jobs because of automation.

It is a dubious prospect for ethnonationalists to want to “protect” the proposition nation anyway.

Right/Alt Right Misguidance Against Left Nationalism

By contrast to the right-wing objectivism that the Alternative Right is beholden to, which is manipulated and susceptible to Jewish and neo-liberal entryism, White ethnonationalism needs a position more characteristically White Left Nationalist: this would turn a critical eye toward the (((corruption))) of leaders of proposition nations such as Trump and Putin (if it can be said at all that Putin is in charge of ‘a nation’ rather than a parasitic aggrandizement larger than the moon) and what are becoming proposition nations ... such as those in Western Europe; at the same time it would turn a sympathetic eye toward and a cooperative stance toward the legitimate basis of ethnonationalism in Asia and the rest of the second world - in Europe exemplified by the Intermarium - to cooperate in our sovereign justice against the hegemony of Jewish interests, their misguiding of neo-liberal internationalism; as it backs shock troops and compradors among Islam and African population and biopower.

Trump has installed his contrasting, friendly, supportive stance toward black Americans (his singular racial/ethnic sponsorship, in fact) with his highly combative stance regarding Mexicans as if the former stance is strictly common ground with White ethnonationalism and both responses are anything but “solutions” to problems that his friends (YKW and right-wingers) created. But did you know that La Raza see themselves as a neo-race, aligned against blacks and against Jews? Who would have a problem with that?

Wikipedia, ‘Texas’ (emphasis added):

Under the Mexican immigration system, large swathes of land were allotted to empresarios, who recruited settlers from the United States, Europe, and the Mexican interior. The first grant, to Moses Austin, was passed to his son Stephen F. Austin after his death.

Austin’s settlers, the Old Three Hundred, made places along the Brazos River in 1822. Twenty-three other empresarios brought settlers to the state, the majority of whom were from the United States. The population of Texas grew rapidly. In 1825, Texas had about 3,500 people, with most of Mexican descent. By 1834, the population had grown to about 37,800 people, with only 7,800 of Mexican descent.

Many immigrants openly flouted Mexican law, especially the prohibition against slavery. Combined with United States’ attempts to purchase Texas, Mexican authorities decided in 1830 to prohibit continued immigration from the United States.

That law was an expression of Mexicans’ express prohibition of blacks in their territory. What’s the problem with prohibiting them?

A policy such as that, wrapped up in the fundamental base of La Raza’s ethnonationalism, is something that White ethnonationalists could strive to leverage cooperation with. “But no!” say the Alternative Right, “they are Leftist, we cannot cooperate with Leftists!”

White ethnonationalism might perhaps even cooperate with the Turkish Kurds against Erdogan ..but “no!”, say the Alt-Right, “we cannot cooperate with Leftist Kurds against Erdogan! - He believes in ‘god’, the god of Abraham… he follows laws in line with our Christian laws”, they continue, “... in line with…”

Erdogan’s administration, by the way, was almost as quick to congratulate Trump as Putin was.

Trump has aligned White interests with an obsequious stance toward Jews.

Say what you will, make your arrogant, snarky, condescending comments, gloating as you look downward, as the somebodies that you are now - bullfrogs perched on lily-pads - but if you think a choice between Hillary and Trump was anything but an expression of just how pathetic your objectivist aversion to decency and cooperation is, as it has been manipulated by the powers that be and continues to be, then you only increase the chance that your legacy will breed with Jews and other non-Whites, and your opportunity to participate as stewards of human and pervasive ecology will steadily decrease and steadily become more Jewish..

While we might take note of bonafide and cooperative ethnonational reasons as to why Japan was 93% in favor of Clinton, why the Philippines have set about to break with The US, etc…lets take a moment to give some kudos to White Americans and their advocates for exercising what was their better of two choices in a rigged deck.

Let me return a condescending congratulations to the Alt-Right on the stay of their execution….there is time to boil the frog slowly, where Kek does not jump out of the pot to reclaim itself as an Asian font of energy, culturally appropriated by Jewish hubris and misapplied by the Alt-Right, in near equal hubris.

Lawrence Murray is an excellent writer, obviously intelligent, not completely off theoretically - though still off, lets take a look at his victory lap with the still too meager, if not distorted, alternative right light that is thrown from the right wing torch that he carries:

The Right Stuff / Lawrence Murray, ‘Now I am become President, Leader of the Free World’, 09 Nov 2016:

On the far end of Manhattan’s West Side, a different story was unfolding at the Jacob Javits Center. A massive convention hall named after former New York senator (((Jacob Javits))), it was supposedly chosen for its glass ceiling, which Clinton would symbolically shatter as our first female president-elect. Instead, it became a glass pitcher of liberal tears. The choice for Clinton’s ill-fated coronation symbolized something else as well. (((Javits))) was a major force behind the 1965 Hart-Celler Act, which ended the country’s eurocentric immigration quotas and resulted in the rising tide of color we are currently grappling with. Each generation has become more “diverse,” and so in turn each cohort of new voters. It’s why New York was a solid lock for parachute candidate Clinton, and a hopeless cause for its native son, President Trump.

(((Native step-son indeed)))

ibid:

As the post mortems will surely tell us in the next few days, there just wasn’t enough turnout from voters of color. There just weren’t enough Hart-Celler Americans to stop President Trump. Not even the creation of an entirely new minority class over the last 50 years, Latinos, was enough to prevent a nativist and civic nationalist from being elected. But frankly, this was our last opportunity to strike back at the ballot. President Trump won by a wavy Caucasian hair. Having to literally drive the Amish to the polls in order to save the White race was poetic, though not a long-term solution.

But such problems are for another time, for now we celebrate. We celebrate the year that White populism shattered the glass ceiling of identity politics in the postwar West, as predicted. An article in The Atlantic puts it succinctly: “[President] Trump was carried to victory by a wave of right-wing populist nationalism, as working- and middle-class white Americans turned out in droves to vote.” President Trump’s victory is a monumental paradigm shift, or has the potential to solidify into one. The media called Teflon Don every name in the book and tried to tie him to all manner of anti-establishment heretics. President Trump did not waver; he undertook the hero’s journey and emerged victoriously in the name of the Amerikaner Shire.

Rather did (((The Atlantic))) inaugurate a paradigm shift from Jewish plan A to Jewish plan B - the slow Kek boil, the intermarrying with the frogs, er “Keks” who manage to jump out of the boiling pot.

ibid:

There is now a biblical flood of authors and pundits talking about “working class Whites,” “White voters,” “White males,” “non-college Whites,” “less-educated Whites,” “blue-collar Whites,” “rural Whites,” and even the unspeakable phrase “White identity politics.” This is yuuuge. We have a mandate from our folk for nationalism. The largest ethnic group in the West, the native peoples of Europe and their descendants in Greater Europe, is being recognized as an important political interest. Granted, it’s an interest that our rulers on both sides of the Atlantic insist must be vanquished, but that they must now name us explicitly is massively important to the spread of our ideas.

The concept of the enemy has returned to politics.

(((Whites))) with “leftist” enemies, with Asian enemies, “Islamic extremist” enemies and so far as they can help it (((and they can force choices that you should not want to make, such as Hillary or Trump))), “friends” with “moderate Jews”...“moderate Islam”....“moderate blacks”... “friends with the right wing” - the “that’s the way it is” club, the Jesus suicide map club and friendkinstein club 88 - European neighbors be damned ..be friends with “the alternative right” and its (((entryist big tent, and with that perhaps the “alternative left”))).

ibid:

Get ready for the storm, because White people, this is your fault. Because of your existence, millions of members of designed oppressed groups must live in fear of being treated like outsiders.

While you are at it, brace yourself if you are an ethnonationalist, for the reality that the US has been the adversary of ethnonationalism in most cases, as in Vietnam, the Philippines, in Japan, the Turkish Kurds and more - indeed, where have they defended ethnonationalism?

ibid:

Americans will have to decide very soon—quickly—where they stand on President Trump. The choice now is pro-Trump or anti-Trump, and nationalists as much as anti-nationalists have made him into an avatar of American Whiteness.

That’s right, the Alternative Right has been co-opted into representation of their interests by that fool: that crass businessman, that mere promoter of the brand name attached to his failed, toxic assets as a means to pay off the Jewish financiers saddled with his shallow but grandiose vision, now intimately entwined with Jewish values - Donald Trump is here to represent (((White interests))).

ibid:

With his opponent out of the way (probably for good), where people stand on this choice will become much more salient.

With Hillary, the quintessential personification of the White man hating bitch out of the way, hopefully it will continue to feed their right-wing hubris to help highlight and distinguish them as they tend to obfuscate and muck-up the ethnonationalist agenda.

ibid:

Our position is not unassailable, but it is stronger than ever before. So we celebrate, that President Trump has given rise to nationalism, to America First, to formal recognition of the Alt-Right, to outing cuckservatives as #NeverTrump turncoats, to (((anti-globalist))) memes entering the public consciousness, to levels of shvitzing that shouldn’t even be possible, and more than anything else to hope for the future of our people, not just in the United States but around the world. This is as much a victory for White Americans as it is for Swedes, Australians, the British, the French, and other European peoples. We will make the world save for ethnocracy.

Jews have money and they know that they can buy their way into enough of you such that your (((Whiteness))) around the world will be mixed with their motives.

ibid:

We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the shitlord scripture the Bhagavad Reeeeeeeta; Kek is trying to persuade the prince that he should save his people, and to impress him takes on his frog-headed form, and says, “Now I am become meme, the destroyer of cucks.” I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.

You aren’t Kek, but you are frogs, you are somebodies, somebody frogs on lily-pads; on water boiling slowly now; perhaps you’ll jump out of the pot and into the waiting arms of your kosher mates; before that, to prove your anti-Jewish credentials, perhaps you’ll do them a favor by exterminating the undesirables from among them, while also true to your (((Fuhrer))), killing those inferior “lefty” Whites.

Comments:

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:19 | #

Absolutely great article, Daniel. The insert image really pops out of the page in a life-like way, only like a religious devotional icon can. It really rounds the whole thing out.

Posted by JB on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:27 | #

“the main function of the common people is to beat the lily pads at night to keep the frogs quiet.”

Posted by MOB on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 17:41 | #

And then there’s Ivanka’s son of a Jewish criminal multimillionaire husband, Jared Kushner. Some other names mentioned, neocon John Bolton, Jewish Steven Mnuchin - Jews may go marching on, under “new leadership” - or maybe Trump will surprise us!

Kushner takes a walk with McDonough, stoking chief of staff speculation By Politico Staff
11/10/16

As Donald Trump huddled behind closed doors with President Barack Obama at the White House, chief of staff Denis McDonough walked with Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner around the South Lawn. The private talk stokes speculation that Kushner could be in the running to be Trump’s chief of staff, after having served as his shadow campaign manager throughout the presidential race.

Kushner, who is married to Trump’s eldest daughter Ivanka, is also a New York real estate developer and in 2006, he expanded his business portfolio to media, buying the New York Observer. Kushner kept a relatively low profile on the campaign trail, appearing silently on stages, off to the side, during big primary nights and at some rallies. But he played an outsized role in Trump’s inner circle, often guiding the erratic candidate as he sought to build up a formidable digital media campaign that would ultimately help Trump win the White House.

Posted by mancinblack on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:59 | #

Excellent, Daniel. Thank you for providing an oasis of sanity.

Posted by Farage: Trump needs to follow Thatcher/ Reagan on Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:47 | #

@Nigel_Farage: “What we have to do is follow the example given to us over thirty years ago by Reagan and Thatcher.

Posted by Euro on Sun, 13 Nov 2016 14:20 | #

Daniel,

I’ve only skimmed through this essay so far. From what I gather your thinking on this subject mirrors mine in many important ways. I think the source of the Alt-Right’s shortcomings are primarily the result of it’s core being Anglo-American. I will try to say more about this in the future.

Posted by Alternative Right cements Jewish friendly image on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 02:59 | #

The Alt Right flagship site, Alternative Right, is talking with (((David Cole))) and the Jewish friendly, Richard Wolstencroft.

Characteristically, (((David Cole))) wanted Trump to win.

Of course a significant pattern of Jews wanted Trump to win - Trump protects them now that they are on top.

Cole/Stein reconstructs the story that Cheney was pulling W. Bush’s strings and not the Wolfwowitz’s (etc).

Wolstencroft encourages several Jewy perspectives

Posted by Trump, (((the insider))) man on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 04:52 | #

Trump, (((the insider))) man

Posted by flagship poster on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:58 | #

The Alt Right flagship site, Alternative Right,

Lol. Flagship site? It’s almost as marginalized and insignificant as Majorityrights.

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:04 | #

OK, lets call it the namesake site then - it still wouldn’t be accurate to call it marginalized and insignificant to the Alt Right - it’s well within the Richard Spencer, NPI, Kevin MacDonald orbit - definitively Alt Right - its even in Greg Johnson’s orbit ...needless to say OK with Jared Taylor, Trad Youth, Robert Stark and co.

And as for your attribution to Majorityrights, that is your wishful thinking.

You are either a Jew or some idiot right-winger. Fuck off.

Oh, I see, you are the same old German Nazi who’s tried for years to mis-attribute to me an anti-German stance. Doubly fuck off.

Posted by The (((Sailer))) Strategy on Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:59 | #

Echoes and emphasis added -

Observer, “America’s Emerging Nationalism Crisis”, 14 Nov 2016:

John R. Schindler writes for Observer.com: At a certain level, how Trump won is so simple that most pundits—the same people who gave the president-elect no chance of winning—can’t see it. The Republican nominee got enough white votes—especially among the working class, particularly in the upper Mid-West—to offset huge Democratic advantages among minorities and white professionals. This was the (((Sailer))) Strategy, named after the insightful blogger who coined the notion back in 2000. (((Steve Sailer’s))) essential idea, that the GOP needed to max out the white vote to keep winning national elections in the face of changing demographics, was rejected by most Republicans as smacking of racism.

It cannot be stated too many times that the GOP establishment repeatedly rejected (((Sailerism))). Indeed, leading Republicans often seemed to run in the other direction from its commonsense logic. The facts are clear: that Mitt Romney failed to get many votes from working-class whites in the very places where Trump just attracted them in droves caused the GOP to lose the White House in 2012.

“At a certain level, how Trump won is so simple that most pundits—the same people who gave the president-elect no chance of winning—can’t see it.”

That’s because at another level, it is not so simple. To win in the manner that (((Sailer))) recommended required treating Jews as White, at which point Jewish interests pulled strings to shape public opinion enough against Hillary and for Trump - a victory that could have gone the other way if Jewish interests had not successfully made it seem to the White public that they were rebelling against the “elite interests”, including the mainstream media perspective, political correctness and international banking; at the same time the strategy was to make it clear that Trump was safe enough for Jews - evident with Trump in a myriad of ways.

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:43 | #

Holy shit was this speech from Millennial Woes infuriatingly stupid.

Before a group of (((Alt Righters))) in Seattle, he is still making the retarded argument (which he was coaxed into with the help of (((The Truth Will Live))) that “The Left” is the enemy’ - typically with that, he refers to White liberals as “White Leftists.”

He won’t apologize because he’s of an enculturation that one should never apologize, even if one is dead wrong. Nor will I forgive it.

To make matters worse, he’s got this retarded idea that what Whites need is psychological reconditioning - (part of the Jewish encouraged idea of pathological altruism, trying to locate the problem inside the heads of Whites and “White’s innate inability to overcome their individualism”) as if personal understandings are not re-shaped with social critique, by examining different logics of meaning and action which are inextricably social - cultivated in the social realm - with an examination of social power, coalitions, niche control, its appropriate use or abuse.

Maintaining the confusion of that oxymoron that (the social group) “left” = “liberal” (anti-socialism) is a key Jewish trick that people like him perpetuate - why?

Perhaps because for Millennial Woes a chief motivation is his celebrity.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:10 | #

personal understandings are ... re-shaped with social critique, by examining different logics of meaning and action which are inextricably social - cultivated in the social realm - with an examination of social power, coalitions, niche control, its appropriate use or abuse.

Is it not yet apparent that 60 million voters can’t perform “examinations”. They think from the gut and the self-interest of the gut - a place, incidentally, where “the social”, as apprehended by sociologists, does not and cannot be made to exist. Stand in a football crowd. Listen.

You have to step away from your own academic background, which leads nowhere, and look instead into men’s hearts and at their sense of self.

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:41 | #

The gut, like the (((football crowd))), is orchestrated, like a fiddle.

Meet 9 Jews in Donald Trump’s Inner Circle.

(JTA) — President-elect Donald Trump has a complicated history with Jews. On the one hand, his daughter Ivanka converted to Orthodox Judaism before marrying Jared Kushner, and he’s spoken fondly about having Jewish grandchildren.

On the other, some of Trump’s supporters identify with anti-Semtiic elements of the alt-right movement, and he’s a favorite of prominent white supremacist David Duke. On Sunday, Trump appointed Stephen Bannon — the former chairman of Breitbart News, a site with ties to the alt-right — as his chief strategist in a move that sparked swift criticism from the Anti-Defamation League.

Still, Trump’s cadre of advisers is not short on Jews. While the real estate magnate and former reality TV star may not officially appoint family members to his Cabinet because of federal anti-nepotism regulations, here’s a look at his Jewish advisers, their views and possible roles in his administration.

Jason Greenblatt

Greenblatt has worked as a real-estate lawyer for Trump for 19 years, and he is one of two Jewish lawyers whom Trump has said he would appoint as his Israel advisers. An Orthodox Jew and Yeshiva University graduate, Greenblatt studied at a West Bank yeshiva in the mid-1980s and even did armed guard duty there.

The father of six from Teaneck, New Jersey, does not have any political experience. Greenblatt has said he speaks with people involved in the Israeli government but has not spoken to any Palestinians since his yeshiva studies. He has cited the American Israel Public Affairs Committee as one of his main sources for staying informed about the Jewish state, and helped draft Trump’s speech at the lobbying group’s annual conference in March.

Greenblatt, who has said he supports the two-state solution, has implied that Trump will take a more laissez-faire approach to peace building.

“He is not going to impose any solution on Israel,” Greenblatt told Israel’s Army Radio last week. He also said that Trump “does not view Jewish settlements as an obstacle to peace.”

David Friedman

Alongside Greenblatt, Trump named Friedman, 57, as an Israel adviser. Friedman, a bankruptcy expert and partner at the Kasowitz law firm in New York, is the president-elect’s longtime attorney. The son of a Conservative rabbi with a family history of ties to Republican presidential candidates — his family hosted Ronald Reagan for a Shabbat lunch in 1984, the year he won re-election — Friedman lives in Woodmere, New York, and owns a house in Jerusalem’s Talbiyeh neighborhood, according to Haaretz.

Friedman has expressed doubt about the future of the two-state solution, traditionally a pillar of bipartisan U.S. policy in the region. Prior to the Republican Party passing a platform that omitted references to the two-state solution, he said it might be time for the party to reject the concept.

“The two-state solution might be one answer, but I don’t think it’s the only answer anymore,” he said in July.

Friedman has also said that annexing the West Bank would not damage Israel’s status as a Jewish state.

Jared Kushner

Kushner — the 35-year-old scion of one of New York’s most prominent real estate families and, since 2009, the husband of Trump’s daughter Ivanka — played a crucial role in the president-elect’s campaign, especially with regards to Israel. He worked on Trump’s speech to the AIPAC annual policy conference that earned Trump a standing ovation, and helped plan a trip to Israel for his father-in-law last year. (Trump canceled the trip after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed his call to ban Muslim immigration to the United States.)

Trump appears to be smitten with Kushner, often referring to his “fantastic” son-in-law when boasting of his pro-Israel credentials. Kushner, an Orthodox Jew who lives with his wife and their three children on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, may have become a household name during the campaign, but he’s no stranger to the limelight. In 2006, at 25, he bought the Observer newspaper. Two years later he became CEO of his father’s company, Kushner Properties, four years after his father was sent to jail for tax evasion, illegal campaign donations and witness tampering. In 2015, Fortune named Kushner to its 40 Under 40 list, its “annual ranking of the most influential young people in business.”

Ivanka Trump

Trump’s daughter Ivanka, 35, who converted to Orthodox Judaism, has served as the polished, softer face of her father’s campaign. A successful businesswoman whose brand is centered around empowering working women, she stood by him when recordings were released that caught the president-elect bragging about sexually assaulting women.

Ivanka has reportedly tried — not always successfully — to have her father tone down or walk back some of his most inflammatory remarks, including having called Mexican immigrants rapists, according to New York magazine.

She is the founder of the Ivanka Trump Collection, a fashion and lifestyle brand, and serves as executive vice president of development and acquisitions for the Trump Organization, her father’s company. Ivanka, who gave birth to her third child in March, belongs to the Upper East Side Orthodox synagogue Kehilath Jeshurun with Kushner and has described her family as “pretty observant.” She made Fortune’s 40 Under 40 list in 2014, a year before her husband did.

**Boris Epshteyn
**

Epshteyn, 34, is a Republican political strategist and staunch defender of Trump who has appeared as the president-elect’s surrogate on major TV networks over 100 times, The New York Times reported.

A New York-based investment banker and finance attorney, Epshteyn worked as a communications aide for Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008, focusing his efforts on the Arizona senator’s running mate, then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, whom Trump is reportedly considering for interior secretary, according to Politico.

Epshteyn, a Moscow native, moved to the United States in 1993. A fluent Russian speaker who has moderated a panel encouraging investment in Moscow, he may serve as an asset for Trump in navigating relations with Russia — Trump has expressed his desire to improve ties with President Vladimir Putin.

Then again, Epshteyn’s temper may make him less of an asset to Trump. TV hosts described him as “very combative” and “abrasive,” and in 2014, Epshteyn was charged with misdemeanor assault after he was involved in a bar tussle. The charge was dropped after Epshteyn agreed to undergo anger management training and perform community service.

Stephen Miller

Miller, 30, has played a crucial role in Trump’s campaign, helping to warm up crowds at rallies and drafting speeches, including the president-elect’s acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention.

Miller, who has described himself as “a practicing Jew,” joined the Trump campaign in January, quickly rising through the ranks to become “one of the most important people in the campaign,” as Trump’s campaign manager told The Wall Street Journal. Previously he worked for seven years as an aide to Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., helping the lawmaker draft materials to kill a bipartisan Senate immigration reform bill. Some of Sessions’ arguments contain similarities to Trump’s harsh and often controversial statements on the issue, such as calling for building a wall on the Mexican border and banning Muslim immigration to the country.

Though Miller grew up in a liberal Jewish home in Southern California, he was drawn to conservative causes early. As a high school student he wrote a letter to the editor of a local paper in which he slammed his school for providing free condoms to students and for making announcements both in English and Spanish, among other things.

**Steven Mnuchin
**

Mnuchin, a former Goldman Sachs executive, worked as Trump’s national finance chairman during the campaign with the aim of raising more than $1 billion for the candidate.

Trump and Mnuchin have been friends for 15 years, and prior to being in charge of Trump’s campaign finances, Mnuchin served as an adviser. Part of what The New York Times describes as one of Manhattan’s elite “most influential families,” Mnuchin and his father both got rich working at Goldman Sachs. The younger Mnuchin also co-founded the entertainment company RatPac-Dune Entertainment, which has worked on such Hollywood hits as “Avatar” and “Black Swan.”

Some saw Trump teaming up with Mnuchin as unusual, considering that the real-estate mogul had consistently bashed Goldman Sachs. But it didn’t seem to get in the way of a good working relationship — Trump is now reportedly considering Mnuchin for the position of Treasury secretary, according to Politico.

Lewis Eisenberg

Eisenberg, the private equity chief for Granite Capital International Group, serves as finance chairman for the Republican National Committee. He was one of a small group of Republican Jewish Coalition board members who did not flee from Trump’s candidacy, and was a major contributor to groups backing Trump’s election — only nine of 55 RJC board members gave to Trump. Alongside Mnuchin, he worked to raise funds for the candidate.

Eisenberg grew up in New Jersey, the Forward reported, and he has been floated as a possible pick for commerce secretary in the Trump administration. He was the chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey at the time of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center.

Eisenberg told JTA that he was “extremely enthusiastic” about a Trump presidency, calling him “a strong advocate for Israel, a strong advocate for justice and order.”

Michael Glassner

Glassner was not new to Republican presidential campaigns when Trump appointed him last year to serve as his national political director. He worked as director of vice presidential operations for McCain’s 2008 campaign and ran Geogre W. Bush’s campaign in Iowa in 2000. He has also worked with Palin and Sen. Bob Dole, a former presidential candidate.

Like many of Trump’s Jewish advisers, Glassner is outspoken in his support of Israel. Prior to joining the Trump campaign, he worked as the political director for AIPAC’s Southwest Regional. Glassner has praised the anti-establishment movement, and he told Jewish Insider that his experience with Palin and the fact that he lives in New Jersey, not Washington, D.C., made him a good fit for Trump’s political outsider message. He also served as a senior adviser to Eisenberg when he was the Port Authority chairman.

I don’t want to say that there is nothing to your hypotheses (as you constantly and ridiculously, say to mine), there is: a personal psychology, i.e., its corporeality, can bring with it invaluable personal insight and social capital less influenced by propaganda, time and place. The problem is that for your arrogance, you (incorrectly) grant no validity to my hypotheses which are in fact of superior relevance to yours.

Furthermore, there is nothing more academic and Jewish prescriptive than the libertarian school of philosophy behind your ontology project.

Posted by Captainchaos on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:15 | #

Btw, wouldn’t the Dasein experience which presents the individual with a direct conscious portal to his instinctual imperatives vary according to an individual’s nature? Individuals are unique, as are the collections of individuals that form ethnicities, no? And what if the collection of Kraut Daseins averages out to something like a chorus of a million voices screaming, “We are a Master Race!” And what if likewise for the English that equals, “We like to explore, so long as it is not too hard, to find new ways to make money. We are money grubbing pussies!”

Which do YOU suppose would be more useful in a blood and death struggle against extinction? And which do you suppose would be more symptomatic of the attitude which led to this predicament in the first place?

Posted by Captainchaos on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:14 | #

“60 million voters”

Lulz

If the Jew controlled Roosevelt administration had not existed America would not have entered WWII. Germany would have won. Lindbergh spoke for the vast majority of Americans, and German Americans. The Anglophilic south would have been overridden; the descendants of the same British, money grubbing, race betraying faggots that imported niggers as their slaves.

The Nordic German farmers of the Midwest are and always have been what is best about America. We will be the salvation of the entire race. Fuck english money grubbing and the moral corruption that is bred to the bone in all England’s descendants.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:13 | #

Oh Daniel, Daniel, Daniel! You are so stubborn!

OK, you claim to have an hypothesis. It reduces to an exercise of criticism conducted by sociologists and other intellectuals, followed by a prescription written out for the masses. Well, obviously, over the last century and more, methods which oppose the will of the people outright, as it arises out of its character and interests, have been developed to manipulate European Man towards some partisan political end. The gramscian method is often cited as such. But it does not explore and articulate the philosophy (Marx did that) or its ideologisation, and it does not perform the actual critique (Gramsci’s “intellects” do that). It is not, therefore, a complete statement. It just sets forth the two great methodological wars of discourse and position (which Alain de Benoist commended us to replicate years ago). You, however, are talking only about a rather narrow and prescriptive approach to the war of discourse. It’s too thin.

The take-home point here is that philosophy, ideology, critique, and political war together constitute a real working model, scaled to the particular task in hand of securing the existence of Europe’s peoples and providing a future for their children.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:19 | #

Just to correct Daniel on another matter. A football crowd is not libertarian. The common expression it allows to itself is of the freedom in being ... the natural liberty of Man as a sensory organism ... not in liberalism’s unconstrained freedom to make choices.

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:03 | #

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13 | #

Oh Daniel, Daniel, Daniel! You are so stubborn!

OK, you claim to have an hypothesis. It reduces to an exercise of criticism conducted by sociologists and other intellectuals, followed by a prescription written out for the masses.

Oh Guessedworker, Guessedorker, Guessedworker - as a typical amateur stuck in puerile contentiousness against the strawmen it jealously attributes to ‘academia’, stubbornly projecting its psychologisms onto me -

I am not a sociologist, and you won’t get that through your Cartesian, reifying skull!

Well, obviously, over the last century and more, methods which oppose the will of the people outright, as it arises out of its character and interests, have been developed to manipulate European Man towards some partisan political end.

Something like that, yes, and now we have the opportunity to use logics of meaning and action which serve our interests instead.

The gramscian method is often cited as such. But it does not explore and articulate the philosophy (Marx did that) or its ideologisation, and it does not perform the actual critique (Gramsci’s “intellects” do that). It is not, therefore, a complete statement.

Neither is yours nor will it ever be - as you remain niggardly in your misattribution to my efforts and stubbornly lame in your premises.

It just sets forth the two great methodological wars of discourse and position (which Alain de Benoist commended us to replicate years ago). You, however, are talking only about a rather narrow and prescriptive approach to the war of discourse. It’s too thin

On the contrary, that it is your willful misreading and projection of your horrendously thin approach - which amounts to prescribing an adulteration of Heidegger with Austrian school logical positivism derived of Wittgenstein’s (correctly) aborted tractatus’ ambition.

The take-home point here is that philosophy, ideology, critique, and political war together constitute a real working model, scaled to the particular task in hand of securing the existence of Europe’s peoples and providing a future for their children.

Which I am doing and you are obstructing with all the might you can conceitedly muster of the Jewish precriptions for Goyim that you’ve introjected.

18 Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:19 | #

Just to correct Daniel on another matter. A football crowd is not libertarian. The common expression it allows to itself is of the freedom in being ... the natural liberty of Man as a sensory organism ... not in liberalism’s unconstrained freedom to make choices.

A football crowd is the false identification -particularly in the sense of an American football crowd as I meant it - but anywhere where the fans are routing for mercenary players (as opposed to representatives of their people). It is a result of the residual wish for tribal identification despite its prohibition under the libertarian ideology which backs your “philosophy.”

You have rejected Jesus, the king of the Jews (that’s good).

You have adopted instead Margret, “no such thing as society” Thatcher - queen pawn of the Jews (not good).

......

..a note on the “unmediated Dasein”... it is rather the case that natural selection mediates, i.e., our corporeality is inexorably mediated by the social.

Posted by BannonWorldview-Judeo-Christianity vs BarbaricEast on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:10 | #

Buzzfeed: This Is How Steve Bannon Sees The Entire World.

LINK: The soon-to-be White House chief strategist laid out a global vision in a rare 2014 talk, one where he said racism in the far right gets “washed out” and called Vladimir Putin a kleptocrat. BuzzFeed News publishes the complete transcript for the first time:

Steve Bannon: [World War I] triggered a century of barbaric — unparalleled in mankind’s history — virtually 180 to 200 million people were killed in the 20th century, and I believe that, you know, hundreds of years from now when they look back, we’re children of that: We’re children of that barbarity. This will be looked at almost as a new Dark Age.

But the thing that got us out of it, the organizing principle that met this, was not just the heroism of our people — whether it was French resistance fighters, whether it was the Polish resistance fighters, or it’s the young men from Kansas City or the Midwest who stormed the beaches of Normandy, commandos in England that fought with the Royal Air Force, that fought this great war, really the Judeo-Christian West versus atheists, right? The underlying principle is an enlightened form of capitalism, that capitalism really gave us the wherewithal. It kind of organized and built the materials needed to support, whether it’s the Soviet Union, England, the United States, and eventually to take back continental Europe and to beat back a barbaric empire in the Far East.

That capitalism really generated tremendous wealth. And that wealth was really distributed among a middle class, a rising middle class, people who come from really working-class environments and created what we really call a Pax Americana. It was many, many years and decades of peace. And I believe we’ve come partly offtrack in the years since the fall of the Soviet Union and we’re starting now in the 21st century, which I believe, strongly, is a crisis both of our church, a crisis of our faith, a crisis of the West, a crisis of capitalism.

Posted by Orthodox Jews voted for Trump on Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:06 | #

Jewish attitudes toward Trump, and how 71% of Jews Voted for Clinton, while 24% Backed Trump, with the exception of Orthodox Jews who supported Trump

Posted by Andrew on Sun, 12 May 2019 09:36 | #

Reflections on Jewish Intermarriage into Native Elites

New Observer, October 26, 2015/106 Comments/in Featured Articles, Jewish Genetic Segregation, Jews as An Elite /by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

“I want to thank my Jewish daughter. I have a Jewish daughter. This wasn’t in the plan but I’m very glad it happened.”

- Donald Trump, February 2015.

Right/Alt Right Misguidance Against Left Nationalism

Comments:

Post a comment:

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Links

MR Central & News

Comments