As extensively covered here previously XDR-TB or Extreme Drug Resistant Tuberculosis is an extreme threat to the world brought on by vectorist politics.  But even with growing realization of the magnitude of the pandemic threat:

“There is somewhere between 25,000 and 30,000, we roughly estimate, cases of extensive drug resistant TB each year,” Paul Nunn, coordinator of WHO’s Stop TB Department, told a briefing.

the so-called “authorities” still don’t get the real threat it poses:

“The possibility is that you could replace that epidemic with a drug-resistant epidemic, in other words you could have 8 million cases of drug-resistant TB wandering around. And then you will be back to the pre-antibiotic era,” said Nunn.

Mr. Nunn is supposed to be able to think about the epidemiological models but this comment demonstrates he doesn’t have the first clue about how this would unfold.

The pre-antibiotic era didn’t have the profoundly vectorist combination of:

• Over 6 billion people.
• Hyper-urbanization.
• “anti-racist” monstrosities like the United States controlling the world’s reserve currency, nuclear stockpiles, world-dominant media/academia propaganda machine and prisons full of HIV-infected ethnic rape gangs aimed at anyone, including their own citizens, resisting the “anti-racist” flow of virulence across neighborhood, city, county, state and national borders worldwide.
• Immune suppressed populations of HIV-infected concentrated in the high population, high density, urban black holes of hypercivilization.
• An airline industry carrying so many passengers between continents that it could, if instead aimed at space settlements with appropriate engines, depopulate the world very quickly using no more fuel than it does now.

Of course, we know the idiot elites-that-be can’t possibly do the right thing and control their vectorist urges.  But they can’t even set up multi-billion dollar prize awards for affordable drugs that kill many of these emerging drug resistant virulent strains to save their bacon.  They really are aware at some level that they have usurped power and that fair contests would show the real winners to the world.  That’s why it took an Iranian American family to fully fund the X-Prize.  The idiot elites-that-be would rather free-ride technological civilization itself down.  Let us hope they don’t take the biosphere down along with it.

in Tom Coburn: The Shame of the Senate mcjoan blogs:

Yesterday the House passed landmark civil rights legislation, H.R. 923, the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crime Act, by a vote of 422-2. The bill, sponsored by Representatives John Lewis (D-GA) and Kenny Hulshof (R-MO), would re-open hate crime cases during the Civil Rights Era, focusing on investigating and prosecuting murder cases occurring prior to 1970.

The two votes against? Georgia’s Lynn Westmoreland and that darling of people who aren’t paying close enough attention to reality, Ron Paul.

From the bill:

There are authorized to be appropriated, in addition to any other amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated for this purpose, to the Attorney General $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2017 for the purpose of investigating and prosecuting violations of criminal civil rights statutes that occurred not later than December 31, 1969, and resulted in a death. These funds shall be allocated by the Attorney General to the Deputy Chief of the Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division and the Supervisory Special Agent of the Civil Rights Unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in order to advance the purposes set forth in this Act.

So since they’re putting up $10M/year to solve old interracial crimes, because interracial crimes are so heinous, how much should they be putting into tracking down old black on white interracial crimes?  Better yet, how about black on white interracial crimes where the trail isn’t cold hence the likelihood of apprehension is much higher?  (That all assumes, of course, that there is equal justice regardless of race.)

And finally, how much money should be put into apprehending people like those who force integration on the rest of us so that there is a systemic bias toward minority on majority interracial crime?  If they cause an aggregate level of, say, 1000 assaults, murders, rape, etc., each, due to their violation of our right to associate with those we prefer—how can we make punishment fit the crime?  Oh, wait… those are the “civil rights workers” who are to be accorded special protection from those they victimize.

When two sea anemones are placed together, and their tentacles intertwine, the anemones can either remain in contact, disband, or begin stinging each other with the “stinging cells” (nematocysts) on their acrorhagi. The third option constitutes an evolutionary example of aggression, seeing as the nematocysts are basically spring-loaded coils which inject paralyzing neurotoxin into their targets, killing them or forcing them to withdraw. Some scientists doing work in the 70’s and 80’s discovered that the likelihood that the anemones would wage war on each other was dependent on size, and,

genetic similarity

. Until now the SPLC has done nothing to combat this form of Ocean-floor Racism. I say: A polyp-on-polyp hate crime is still a hate crime.

Anatomy of a hater ...

Excerpt:

Adult Actinia tenebrosa are able to distinguish between adult and juvenile clonemates and non-clonemates on tentacle contact, and aggression is directed only against non-clonemates. These findings support similar results for other anemones (Francis, 1973a,b; 1976, 1979; Bigger, 1976, 1980; Purcell, 1977) corals (Hildemann et al., 1975; Bigger and Runyan, 1979) and a colonial hydroid (Ivker, 1972).
+.
Adult aggression is able to cause the death of juvenile non-clonemates and results in the separation of genotypically dissimilar adults. + Since defending adults are almost always successful in adult-adult conflicts (Ottaway, 1978), the immigration of dissimilar adults should be prevented by conflict with the resident clone.

D.J. Ayre, Inter-Genotype Aggression in the Solitary Sea Anemone Actinia tenebrosa. 1982.

PF

The following essay by “John Boisdarc” provides some background and support to the intriguing concept of Alexander Thiele, as presented by him to this month’s Ateney (Athenaeum) in Moscow.  Much of his presentation I reproduce at the end of John’s piece.  It announces itself as “a Successful Group Evolutionary Strategy using Subliminal Audio Programming”.

GW

Let me first of all attempt to dispel any preconceived notions that subliminal programming is bunk.  It is a curious aspect of subliminal programming that people do not wish to recognize its effectiveness, even while it is being worked upon them successfully, non-stop, 24/7, via television, radio, and almost every other form of electronic entertainment (including, since the 80’s, subliminal messages embedded in screen savers used on personal computers).

The question must be asked: why do the victims of this precision technology refuse to recognize its efficacy, despite the fact that it is being constantly, successfully used against them?  In order to answer the question, we must examine the relatively recent origins of subliminal programming as it is perceived by the public.  I will strive to be as mercifully brief as possible.

In 1957, a journalist named Vance Packard produced a book, The Hidden Persuaders.  It was a huge hit.  Among other things addressed in his book, he examined the use of subliminal advertising techniques. (Subliminal means “below the limen”, a term psychologists use to describe the threshold of consciousness.)  Mr Packard also critiqued the use of subliminal methodology in swaying the body politic in its choice of elected politicians - a practice he had studied and documented in depth.

As I have said, the book was immensely popular, and the public outcry of indignation, at having been abused in such a sinister manner caused US Representatives Frank Boykin (AL) and Craig Hosmer (CA), in 1958, to introduce into Congress two bills proposing to outlaw the use of subliminal advertising and projection by radio and television, and prescribing penalties for the same.  Both bills died on the vine, quite probably because the politicians, having witnessed in recent elections the powerful effects of subliminal persuasion upon the body politic, were disinclined to discard this powerful weapon.  Therefore, subliminal projection, not having been outlawed, continued to be used and refined.

READ MORE...

Politicians are starting to ignore Iowa.  Big surprise given the fact that America is no more.  The zombies may wake up but sometimes they need a little help.  What follows is my response to a story about Iowa’s loss of political relevance as candidates skip the Ames straw poll.

READ MORE...

An interesting article by Tom Stanwell titled The power of the people was posted today at Welf Herfurth’s quite radical New Right Australia/New Zealand blog.  It offers a means - somewhat alcoholic it’s true - to bypass the usual governmental and crazed-antifa blocks on the development of local nationalist organisations.  Here is the article in full.

GW

1. Introduction

In past articles, we have discussed mass movements and how important mass mobilisation is for building a political base and eventually achieving political power. This really is the question of all politics: how to get a sufficient majority on one’s side in order to carry out one’s political agenda. All politicians, no matter their affiliation or ideology, have to struggle with this. Nationalists are no different. Nationalism, I think, is even more mass-based than conventional liberal-democratic ideologies. It relies on mass force, mass mobilisation, and is democratic (by Carl Schmitt’s definition of democracy). Through people power, and the dictatorship of the democratic mass, nationalists can overturn existing laws and bring about radical constitutional change.

This is easy enough to understand: it is the doing that is the problem. The majority of nationalists, in Australia, at least, are isolated. They exist behind the Internet, find it hard to reach out to nationalists, and certainly cannot build up the numbers to put together a decent demo. So how do we go about building up a mass support base? In this article, I will concentrate on how to form the beginnings of a political movement, starting with the most basic steps. (As Mao Tse-Tung put it, the longest journey starts with the smallest steps). I will be talking about some of the organisational techniques by nationalists in Germany - in particular, those used by the Freie Kameradschaften/Freie Nationalisten(Free Comradeships/Free Nationalists) movements, already detailed, to a certain extent, in Welf Herfurth’s previous article, On Kameradenschaft. This is particularly relevant to the nationalist struggle in Australia because these ideas have been applied in nationalist circles in my capital city with some success. These methods are already being applied, equally successfully, in other capital cities in Australia.

I have often heard other nationalist activists complain that ‘We don’t have the numbers’ that our European comrades are blessed with, and that we lack their organisational élan. Here I say no, it is not the case at all: we do have the numbers in Australia, and we do have grounds for optimism - it is that we are going about it the wrong way. Fortunately for us, the solutions are simple, and easy to apply.

READ MORE...

Martin Hutchinson’s latest offering at Prudent Bear revisits the geopolitics of Ukraine.  It is a subject we have covered only once, quite early on in the Orange Revolution.

GW

The apparent revival of the Cold War by Vladimir Putin causes those of us nostalgic for the unpleasant certainties of a bipolar world to ponder whether the Domino Theory should also be revived. Indeed it should, and the domino currently wobbling most vigorously, magnificent in its precariousness, is Ukraine. Ukraine gets limited press in the West, but its fate over this long summer may well determine the geo-strategic and economic outlook for the next generation.

Contrary to most Western reporting on Ukraine, the struggle there is not bipolar but tripolar. Favoring an economy dominated by publicly owned behemoths of heavy industry is the current prime minister Viktor Yanukovych, strong in the ethnically Russian eastern areas of the country and proponent of closer ties with Moscow.

Vladimir Putin regarded Yanukovych as the natural successor to Ukraine’s previous corrupt and economically stagnant president Leonid Kuchma, so when in 2004 his election was opposed by the “Orange Revolution” of pro-Western forces he was furious, believing that the West had no business interfering in an election so close to the Russian heartland.

He need not have worried. The Orange Revolution candidate for President Viktor Yushchenko, in spite of having married an American wife and during the campaign suffering a mysterious poisoning that would foreshadow the unexpected demise of so many of Russia’s opponents in years to come, was a weak social democrat, also favoring a group of big corporate oligarchs, those of ethnically Ukrainian nationality from western Ukraine. 

Essentially, like so many East European leaders from Mikhail Gorbachev through the socialists currently running Hungary, Yushchenko believed in an a non-existent “Third Way” under which a nominally capitalist economy would avoid the disruption of rapid change and preserve existing business structures. He was thus favored by the EU, the Financial Times and the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, all of whom tend to like social democrat compromisers who won’t rock the boat. Nevertheless, when the Orange Revolution won the election re-run in December 2004, the world outside the Kremlin rejoiced.

It quickly became obvious that the Orange Revolution forces were far from united. Yushchenko appointed as prime minister his main ally, Julia Tymoshenko, but within a year had fallen out with her, to the extent that he dismissed her and called new elections in early 2006. These resulted in the revival of Yanukovych as leader of the largest party in parliament, with Tymoshenko second and Yushchenko’s forces reduced to third. Even though Yushchenko and Tymoshenko still had a parliamentary majority if their forces combined, Yushchenko chose to throw in his lot with Yanukovych.

READ MORE...

The NY Times reports that:

“Senate leaders announced an agreement this evening to put a comprehensive immigration bill back on track for further debate and possible passage.”

“Senators Harry Reid, the Democratic majority leader from Nevada, and Mitch McConnell, the Republican minority leader from Kentucky, agreed on a timetable for the bill and for a limited number of amendments to be offered.”

I suspect they wouldn’t have tried this without having actor/senator Fred Thompson to wave around at the Republican base to distract them from Ron Paul.  But this ain’t 1980, umpteen-channel cable TV ain’t 3-network broadcast TV, Thompson ain’t Reagan and the Internet is here.  Just look at what happened to Fred’s website traffic after the initial push by Mossad plant, Jim Robinson over at Freerepublic.com and compare to Ron Paul (whose sportsbook.com odds have gone from 200:1 to 7:1 during the last month):

What are they going to try next?  They’re getting desperate. 

PS: Perhaps this is unrelated but Google has stopped updating their Google trends statistics which means you can’t compare how the various candidates are faring in search engine queries.  That they stopped updating at the point where Mossad candidate Rudy Giuliani started falling behind Ron Paul even as LDS candidate Mitt Romney showed strength is circumstantially suspicious.