Majorityrights Central > Category: Awakenings

In considering this comment by ukn_leo  

“I have learned so much from reading Leon’s posts, Dan. As someone with natural conservative leanings”…

As someone who has natural conservative leanings as well, I thought a discussion might be useful to move toward a better understanding of what we mean by “conservatism”, and to help European peoples better discern the fraudulent “neo-conservatism” being put across to the public: taking the example of David Mamet’s fraud awakening.

Notice in the clip provided below, the slick, Jewish deception that Mamet, via Hayek, makes with the idea of constraint - to focus on limiting government.

To limit and constrain government is Not a big problem for we true conservatives, but it is not the fundamental point.

The fundamental point of true conservatism is constraint on demographics.

 

READ MORE...

I coined the term Pervasive Ecology and hypothesized that it provides a context of the broadest utility that one may take in White advocacy because it may be universalized but not foundationalized.

READ MORE...

From the hubris of objectivism to the implicative force of Mulatto Supremacism

READ MORE...

The gay hussar of BBC history, David Starkey, never a man to turn down the opportunity to provoke, has passed judgement on the white looters who so faithfully copied their black gangsta idols last week.  They have become black, he said.  At least, culturally (he had to say “culturally” because anything else would put a spectacular stop to all future BBC programme commissions).  But it was enough.  Cue the attempts by the Jewish presenter and Starkey’s two fellow talking heads, all three of them even more objectionable than he is, to stop the man approximating truth again.

Meanwhile at the Telegraph, Toby Young’s weak-tea support for Starkey has garnered over three thousand comments so far, many of them uncompromising in sentiment and language.  The mods haven’t been able to keep up!  Likewise with Peter Oborne’s piece on the Tottenham riot which has clocked up well over four thousand comments in two days.

It is starting to look like Humpty-Dumpty, the politically-correct bad egg, has been given a good push in the back.

Some ten hours ago the Daily Mail placed a story on its website about the trial and sentencing of a “British-Asian” paedophile gang who forced a white girl into prostitution.  So far it is the only MSM to carry the story.

No doubt, BNP members everywhere will be saying “we told you so”, and a number of them made this point with comments in the Mail’s thread.  For their trouble they received a four-figure reward of reader ratings, which is extremely rare for this site.  However, making the same point but far out ahead of them ratings-wise, with over 2768 at the time of writing, was this remark by one Steve of County Durham:

Remember how both Channel 4 and the BNP of all people were roundly condemned as racist for trying to get the story out about mainly asian muslim men coercing, forcing, and manipulating young white girls into prostitution.

I know the liberal multi cultural do gooders will try and justify this, but i just dont care any more.

So what, aside from serendipity and the trigger-happy outrage of the average Mail reader, accounts for the thousand plus extra ratings over, say, this comment (1683) which is two below it on the thread:

Sorry to bring this up but wasnt it the BNP who tried to bring this up not so long back that girls were being groomed by Asians.Of course they were only being racist no body wanted to hear the facts dont know why! Oh yes the BNP are treated as not the best of people makes you think when compared to these people.

Or this one (1742) which is five below it:

I have a feeling that some Asians think that they live in some sort of Asian country where they can treat women like they want.

... and is the next highest scorer on the thread, which is currently 215 comments strong.

Well, it’s those last six little words, isn’t it?  The sentiment they contain goes something like: the apologists for diversity will say what they always say.  They will tell me Islam is the religion of peace, and immigration has enriched us.  They will tell me the multiracial future of Britain is “inevitable”.  They will call me a “hater” and a “xenophobe” and a “racist”, a morally illegitimate human being.  Whatever.  Nothing they can tell me will do them any good.  I just dont care any more.

Click.

This disaffection is the future.  It’s inevitablist, of course.  That is, it emerges naturally in the public sentiment, without any engineering.  So I don’t imagine there is anything the Establishment can do about it.  Certainly not liberals.  With their word tools growing more blunt and anti-productive by the day, they are simply too exhausted now to resort to argument by principle (check the thread, which is currently unmoderated).  It will be left increasingly to Africans and Asians to insist upon squatters rights, and that won’t work out at all well for them.

The only points of light for the Establishment are that the BNP is in a deep hole and the Tories are in government, from where they can always advance the Sarko stratagem if they have to.  Oh, and the demographic nightmare is still very much in train.  Other inevitablist sentiments - like “England can never be Africa, Africans can never be English” - are going to have to appear in public consciousness if the BNP cannot lead that debate.  Discourse, as ever, is war.

A Majority Rights Radio presentation of a libertarian nationalist political economy and its traitors is now available. This is the winning political paradigm in the present circumstances. We can ignore, for the sake of argument, that it is also philosophically and practically superior to other political economy paradigms.

Jim Giles interviewed James Bowery a couple of days ago on Radio Free Mississippi. The primary territory is the conflict between Jewish interests and the Enlightenment values of truth and freedom—conflict as exemplified by the hostility of Jews toward the laboratory of the states to found discourse on experimentation rather than argumentation. It is 1 hour 48 minutes.

By David Hamilton

A change of consciousness is spreading through Britain as we realise that we are being discriminated against by our elected representatives.  People can find no work, and one reason they have now understood is that foreigners are brought in as cheap labour to undercut wages.

People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are promoting an agenda which is destroying them.  Politicians are effectively at war with them, and slowly the realisation is dawning.  People hear them degrading white children as “chavs” and “yobs” while praising ethnics.  They see their communities turned from safe areas into places of fear and uncertainty. They see politician’s children sent to the best schools while theirs have to risk knife gangs from imported ethnic communities.

The seeds of revolt have always been there:-

The Cambridge village of Cottenham is an unlikely place for an old-fashioned revolt against authority. But earlier this year, some 1,000 residents declared they would withhold their council tax until something was done about the travellers on the outskirts.

For decades there have been Gypsy communities living legally on two sites for 30 or so families near the village. Then, at Easter 2003, the site grew as a number of Irish Traveller families arrived in the area.

Local tensions rose, as villagers believed their way of life under threat. Angry residents demanded answers and established a campaigning website, Middle England in Revolt.

… but now politicians are beginning to lose confidence:-

 

READ MORE...