It’s happening again.  Yesterday’s British GP at Silverstone had an interesting opening lap in which the diversity-boy, having been humbled for several GPs by Red Bull’s Max Verstappen, duly sent his nemesis spinning into the tyre barrier at Copse Corner at around 190 mph.

Not all the fans were charmed to see the perp suffer no significant penalty for his wrecklessness.  Because the race had to be stopped to recover Verstappen’s badly damaged car and repair the tyre wall, the BLM-boy got a free change of nose for his Mercedes in the pits.  The race marshals then awarded him only a ten second hold in the pit at his forthcoming tyre change.  Ten seconds means nothing given that the Merc is so much faster than every other car in the race except the surviving Red Bull of Perez, who was out of contention.  To absolutely no one’s surprise, the kneeling-boy duly won, and celebrated as if he is someone who might not possess large reserves of self-awareness.  All in all, it did not go down incredibly well with some folks who are sick to death of the antics of this person.

The DM picks up the story in suitably indignant mode:

Mercedes demands Facebook take action against racist users after Lewis Hamilton was abused with monkey and gorilla emojis following his controversial British Grand Prix win against Max Verstappen

Facebook is today under even more pressure to ‘eliminate’ racist abuse on Instagram after Lewis Hamilton was bombarded with monkey emojis and called a gorilla after winning the British Grand Prix in controversial fashion yesterday.

Mercedes has hinted that police should investigate some of the vile slurs aimed at their star driver and called on social media companies to do more to stop racist posts before they go online - and close the accounts of the culprits. 

Seven-time world champion Hamilton, 36, was involved in a crash that saw championship leader and rival Max Verstappen plough his Red Bull into a wall and out of the race at Silverstone.

Hamilton, who is a vocal supporter of the BLM movement is leading a campaign for more racing drivers from black and ethnic minority groups, was hit by a 10 second penalty but went on to win the race and close the gap in the title race to just eight points. 

Following the race, Sir Lewis received a slew of racist abuse including monkey and gorilla emojis on Instagram - the platform of choice for racists who abused Bukayo Saka, Jadon Sancho and Marcus Rashford after their penalty misses in the Euro 2020 final this month.

Today Mercedes, Hamilton’s team, released a joint statement with Formula One and the sport’s governing body, the FIA, condemning the abuse, and piled more pressure on social media giants to take steps to filter comments, ban racists and help police punish them if necessary.

Well, first let us state here and now, for the benefit of kneelers everywhere, that it is very, very, very, very wrong, indeed terribly, terribly wrong, in fact, so wrong that it’s as wrong as wrong can ever be, to claim some equivalence between a monkey and an African.  The claim is based on a total misreading of physiognomy and intelligence, and even when obviously retailed by Africans themselves as a self-effacing joke, for example thus:

... it can never be acceptable in liberal company.  Members of every race do some extremely stupid things.  The equality-boy, for example, is said to have two rooms of his ultra-luxury Monaco home filled with his shoe collection.  No sign of narcissism there then.  No, no, all perfectly normal for anybody with two hundred million quid in the bank.

One imagines that it will be even tougher for the media to turn the mad knight of Copse Corner into a Person of Suffering than it was with the multi-millionaire black penalty-failures of the Euros final.  That won’t stop them trying, though.

History, it seems, repeats all of its repeats under the weird two-stage French voting system.  Marine Le Pen’s National Rally has again fallen short in an important election, this time the regionals.

French far-Right loses two key regional votes, dealing blow to Marine le Pen’s presidential ambitions
Centre-Right candidates have retained their seats in all regions

The candidates of Marine Le Pen’s far-Right party have failed to win over any regions in the final round of France’s regional elections on Sunday, as mainstream conservatives delivered a blow to her presidential ambitions.

In the highly-contested battleground of Provence, the poll was seen as a major test of whether the far-Right leader can win votes ahead of an election next year expected to pit her against President Emmanuel Macron.

Thierry Mariani, a former conservative minister, hoped to be the first elected regional leader in France to hail from Ms Le Pen’s National Rally (RN).

But two exit polls showed Mr Mariani winning around 45 per cent of the vote in the southwestern region, while the conservative incumbent, Renaud Muselier, grabbed roughly 55 per cent.

Turnout in both rounds, it should be said, was miserably low.  Only around a third of the registered voters bothered to exercise their rights.  But it now seems unlikely that enough stay-at-home supporters will come out for her at the presidential elections between 8 and 23 April next year.  The centre-right UMP is on the up, and will fancy its chances of dumping Le Pen out in the first round.

Of absolutely no surprise to anyone outside Westminster, it now emerges that the British government has had no idea how many migrants came from the 27 European Union member states:

EU immigration to the UK was underestimated by more than 1.6 million between 2012-2020, it has emerged, after the ONS revised its methodology to produce new figures that dwarf previous estimates.

Previous immigration figures were based on surveys contributing to a model known as Long Term International Migration (LTIM), which now appears to have wildly missed the mark.

The new technique, called Rapid, is based on actual tax and benefits data instead, and “has the benefit of removing uncertainty”, said the ONS. It reveals that in many years of the last decade the number of EU migrants was more than, or close to, double previous estimates.

“The statistical narrative is just completely different to what we thought,” Madeleine Sumption, director, Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, told The Telegraph.

In the year ending March 2019, for example, 410,000 are now assumed to have arrived, as opposed to the 186,000 previously estimated, up a substantial 120 per cent.

I often find the comments under the line more instructive than the journalism, so here is one that explains what it all means:

EU Survivor
24 Jun 2021 10:28PM
In the years prior to the Brexit Referendum, the leave campaigners argued that the immigration figures massively underestimated the true picture, and cited NI numbers issued as evidence that there must have been far more immigrants than admitted to.

This was denied by those pushing the remain side of the argument, including the then Government led by Cameron.

We now hear that looking at tax and benefits, the figures were massively underestimated.

While this is suggested as new information, following a new methodology, it appears to me that there was a form of corporate wilful negligence in avoiding using such a system previously, when it was clear it would demonstrate more accurate, and far higher levels of immigration.

So, despite all the claims from remainers of false information from the leave side - the remain side had been providing and I believe lying about the levels of immigration for years.

For Remain read government.  For government read corporate whores.

... at a stroke (blamed, of course, on China and/or Russia) ... shutting down the energy and communications sectors, among many critical sectors, and curtailing food supply

Likely timing: within two months of the WEF’s wargame Cyber Polygon, scheduled for July.

Winter starvation?  Well, that’s Brandon Smith’s fear, anyway:

https://alt-market.us/cyberpolygon-will-the-next-globalist-war-game-lead-to-another-convenient-catastrophe/

London’s white racists are today holding a vigil and lighting candles for would-be black power politician Sasha Johnson, who, according to witnesses, was shot in the head by a powerful black, or at least one with a firearm, in the early hours of this morning.  She is undergoing emergency surgery.

Ms Johnson is known as “The Self-Styled Black Panther of Oxford” for her courageous protest against the white violence and supremacist supremacism represented by the statue of Sir Cecil Rhodes in the mens at the Addicts Arms on the corner of Needle Street and Adrenalin Road.

In her short political career she has demanded a Racists Registry as well as slavery reparations for one-time black slaves in the Ghanaian boroughs of Croydon, Willingdon, and Hackney.  She is also alleged to have tweeted that white people should be enslaved, although later claimed that this was the work of white supremacist hackers because, like, obviously, she doesn’t want to pay the reparations.  The Association of White Supremacist Hackers has denied Ms Johnson’s claim and launched a legal action in the High Court for damages in the sum of £50 million payable in Bitcoin.

The AWSH has put out a statement this morning calling on the government to keep Ms Johnson alive.  The Minister for Our NHS has been contacted for comment but has yet to respond, provoking allegations from London’s white racist community that the government did not want Ms Johnson’s courageous political activity in the first place.

London’s white racist community, on the other hand, have expressed deep shock at the shooting.  Sid Croak, membership secretary for Little Sitcom White Supremacists, spoke for many when he said, “I can’t fuckin’ believe it.  Some blud near done ‘er in.  Just when our membership ‘ad started pickin’ up again.  First time in eighty bleedin’ years.  Absolutely fuckin’ typical.”

Vic Drone of Little Sitcom’s sister organisation, Hackney-Born Losers, added, “We’re all rootin’ for Sash cuz of ‘er courageous political activity.  We’re ‘er biggest fans.  Well, ‘avin’ said that, we’re ‘er only white fans.  Well, actually, I’m thinkin’ we might be ‘er only fans, d’ya know wot I mean?”

No one was rumoured to know what Mr Drone meant, but local reports say this is not unusual.

Darren Miniscule, proprietor of the Adolf Cafe in Kensington Palace Gardens, declined to give his name but sounded a note of optimism among the downcast supremacist gloom.  “She’ll be back jus’ the same,” he said, “I’ve been shot in the ‘ead many times, an’ it never made no difference to me.”

A whip around among Mr Miniscule’s bigoted customers for Ms Johnson’s nascent political party, Taking the Initiative Party, had raised twelve shillings and sixpence in old money.  But Mr Miniscule added, “For a bit of a laugh one of my regulars has gone and wrote a cheque for an ‘undred farsand parnds but, see, the silly arse spelled the third bit of the payee’s name P-i-s-s.”

Mr Miniscule still holds the cheque and is writing to the Electoral Commission formally seeking a party registration in that name.

With apologies to the late, great Peter Simple.

“This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a “Corona Scandal” and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas. And for this reason I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.”

- - German-Amercan attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, who is taking out a class action, probably in Canada, for the consequences of the PCR Test fraud and COVID-19 government and media fraud. Fuellmich is supported by the work of an international team of court judges, doctors, scientists, economists, entrepreneurs, experts and business lawyers.  They will plead the biggest tort case of all time.

The big news from yesterday’s FA Cup Final between Leicester and Chelsea?  OK, it was the first crowd - just 20,000 strong - to be admitted to watch a match since the third lockdown started.  It was also the first time in their long history (they were founded in 1884) that Leicester City have lifted the trophy, after a 1-0 victory.  But the interesting political news from Wembley is that the fans booed the hallowed pre-match BLM moment.  Just like old times.  Sadly, there was no light airplane towing a banner overhead to remind the European-descended millionaires debasing themselves on the pitch that White Lives Matter too.

Apparently, the BBC’s pee-cee engineers leapt into action to turn the amps down on the broadcast feed so viewers did not have to hear working-class white men’s disdain for the BLM insult, enabling the rest of the corporate media to downplay the event.  “Social media” ... that’s Handwringers’ Central to you and me, since they’re all that’s left on TwittBook ... reacted according to corporate requirements.  But someone forgot to moderate the Daily Mail thread.  Click the first link above and have a read if you want to know what non-handwringers think.

There must be many nationalists who have asked themselves, “Why Israel?  Why is the Israeli Likud government ... supposedly the nationalist government of the most ethnocentric and tribal people on the planet, uttery persuaded of its own g-d given right to minister forever over of all humankind ... why is that government coercing and deceiving its Jewish population, including pregnant women and children, into taking the Pfizer jab; and why is it racing ahead with the roll-out of the instrument of totalitarian control which is the Covid passport?  Why, of all governments, has that government collectively taken upon itself the task of experimenting on, of all peoples, that people and, if Mike Yeadon and others are to be believed, of committing them to a future of fatally compromised physical and reproductive health?

At the very least they, the Israeli government, cannot know that the Pfizer jab is safe, most especially for babies in the womb.  No democratic governments are elected to gamble with the life of the unborn.  But while nationalists across the developed world readily suspect their own governments, aided and abetted by formal Jewish organisations, of such venality, still there was an understanding that Israel’s Jews would always be kept safe by their politicians.  That was the famous Jewish double standard: “Universalism for you, nationalism for me.”  It was an article of faith for seven-decades of nationalists after the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel was proclaimed on 14 May 1948 by David Ben-Gurion.  And yet here we are, with the Israeli people committed by their government to the same perilous path as the rest of us.

It just does not fit with the standard nationalist narrative of Talmudic struggle, or with the Zionist struggle, or with the post-1980s sanctification of the six million and, thereby, of every Jewish life.  If these things have been let go by the Jewish elites in Israel in favour of the Schwabian Re-Set and, furthermore, if it involves the oft-alleged strategy of mass depopulating vaccination, it represents the most extraordinary reversal of ethnic investment and unity, comity and service any of us have ever seen.

Here, to validate the process, is the passionate testimony of Ilana Rachel Daniel to the Dutch video platform blckbx.tv.  She is a health worker and, now, an activist and information officer for a new political human rights party named Rappeh:

https://rumble.com/embed/vd2935/?pub=4

You don’t have to listen to the whole interview because the meat of it is stated over the first 2 minutes and 46 seconds.  That said, one very interesting fact from later in the interview is that the Israeli state machine, the social media giants, major employers, banking sector and so forth are treating dissenters exactly as the parallel institutions in the UK treat salient dissenters and nationalists here.  As the lady says, “They are making this complete Re-Set.”  Olam ha-ba it ain’t.

As a side comment, the behaviour of the elites in Israel puts me in mind of a VDare article by Peter Brimelow that I read back in 2004, on the tenth anniversary of the publishing of The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.  Brimelow remembered his friendship and his last meeting with the Jewish-American psychologist Richard Herrnstein, who co-wrote the book with Charles Murray.  Herrnstein was dying from lung cancer, and Brimelow was able to visit him close to the end and press into his hands a pre-release copy of the book.  Brimelow described him as “a great man”, and he certainly might have been a remarkably observant and prescient one given that his motivation for writing the book was to warn against the developing caesura - he called it cognitive dissonance - within the body of his own people between its elites and its masses.

His thesis seems now to have become fact inside Israel in the most definitive way.  Is there any other explanation for the extraordinary events in that country?