Majorityrights Central > Category: Activism

Alexander has launched an e-petition on the Downing Street website proposing the end of the private fractional reserve system:

Abolition of credit creation by private banks

Responsible department: Her Majesty’s Treasury

To remove the power of credit creation from private banks and place it in the hands of either the Treasury or the Crown so that all credit for public spending shall be issued debt-free, and if necessary for Britain to withdraw from the Treaty of Maastricht with particular reference to Article 104(1) and its prohibition of debt-free government credit creation.

This constitutes an attack, in Britain at last, on the third great pillar of globalisation - the enslavement in debt of all the European peoples.  I hope you think it is worth disseminating knowledge of the petition wherever appropriate and worth signing yourself, of course.

Like many Jewish websites and publications, JewishFederations.org is packed with examples of how Jews in America network and collaborate in their own ethnic interests.  There are entries here on women’s philanthropy, youth leadership, planned giving and endowments, lobbying in Washington, and a page of wider resources that leave no Jewish stone unturned.  European nationalists would do well to emulate one tenth of this industry.  Actually, beyond a few failing micro-parties, we in Britain have really nothing.

Over the last few days I’ve had some conversations with certain British nationalists - real ones, that is, enthno-nationalists - about this question:

If a political party standing in isolation as the nationalist vehicle will always struggle to tip the balance and actually win in a multiracial democracy, what additional vehicles/measures do you think the wider movement could bring forward to make the political win more possible?

I am thinking here about media and PR, cultural organisations, think tanks, fund-sourcing agencies ... all and anything that might advance the cause of our ethnic interests.  My conversations have been quite interesting, but this is such a rich area to consider I’m sure there must be many more strong suggestions that can be made - and some that will have been thought through pretty carefully.

I should add that this is not a purely speculative question. With the BNP leadership election concluded and the party, to all intents and purposes, locked up and bound to decline over the next four years - if it lasts that long - this is the moment when people are looking for fresh thinking.  That much is clear.  Perhaps we will even thank Nick Griffin for inadvertently forcing the development of an holistic and multi-faceted approach to the problem of the public mind, public discourse, and only then, the ballot box.

The case for a new discourse of genocide in our lands

by Christian Miller

The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations.  Make no mistake - this is not mere coincidence.  It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application.  The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations.  All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock.  All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history.  Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration.  The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations?  Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration.  This observation is mostly accurate.  However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.

Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world.  It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline.  There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce.  The elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system.  The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate.  Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent.  Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor.  Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan.  There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans.  Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration.  Japan is not the target.  Japan is free to remain Japanese.  It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide.

READ MORE...

by Trainspotter

I’ve had a recurring vision for some time now, and I’m no longer certain as to whether it is a dream or a fantasy.  I only know that I cannot forget it.  In this vision, we have won.  Victory is complete and total, our own land for our own people. The tribe, our tribe, is free to breathe with deep lungs.  There are pretty girls to be admired, songs to be sung.  Our songs, the way only we can sing them.  Great vistas open up before us, and there is the inescapable feeling that thousands of years have somehow been won.  The past,  present, and future, the call of the stars.  The magnitude of it all is, quite simply, staggering. 

Yet, in this vision, I am drawn away from the joy, in fact I don’t feel it at all, at least not for long.  No, that’s not right.  Not at all.  There is a task at hand, something that has been weighing upon me for a long time, no longer to be ignored. There is a grave to visit, a grave from another world.  A world now mercifully dead and buried, but a world that still leaves its stain, its mark.  Channon and Christopher’s graves. 

I go to the grave site, but what can be said? Do I not fancy myself as something of an orator?  Yet, in this vision, words fail me, they tire me, they embarrass me.  They seem so utterly ridiculous and patronizing, and most anything that I could say would be a preposterous lie, dishonoring me and them.  Yet I know what has to be said, that and nothing else.  The words are inescapable, they force themselves upon me.  “We came too late.”  That’s it, but now again.  “We came too late.”

Those words, those four words, are the only ones spoken in this dream of mine. I find that these four words impose themselves upon me, one way or another, all too often these days. 

I look at my nephews and nieces, and I can’t help but smile.  Really great kids, I think the world of them.  It’s not too far from the truth to say that they worship me; I’m by far their favorite uncle.  I think they feel about me the same way that, in my own childhood, I felt about an older cousin.  He was a God walking on earth, a hero among mere mortals, as far as I was concerned.

Yet, what does the future hold?  These children will be, in fact already are, subjected to daily assault by our most dedicated enemies.  One niece in particular, not even three, is the Nordic archetype.  A truly beautiful child, striking to strangers.  I know that every effort will be made to separate her from her people, to make her despise them, or at least instill indifference.  A mere ten or so years from now, she could be gyrating to the most noxious Negro music, her head filled with the most repugnant thoughts. This child, and millions more like her, innocent and by all rights entitled to a sane world governed by her own people, stands as sheep ready for the slaughter.  Is it my fate to become the weird uncle, the crank, the strange symbol of a dying people that the young can only look at with derision and wonder?  Is that it?  Is that where this is heading?

I feel something similar whenever I see young white children these days.  Can we win in time? Without thinking, I do the simple math, it’s automatic now. 

“O.K., let’s see, this child has about ten years left before being thrown to the wolves.  Can we win by then?  Will we be too late?”

The bottom line is that we are running out of time.  The body count keeps growing, the river of blood continues to rise but is never sated.  Our people are being destroyed in countless ways, great and small.  For how many more victims, for how many more families, must we say, “We came too late?” 

I have made no secret of my conviction that, in order to win, the cultural ground must be prepared first.  Until street activists start reporting real success and a true resonance with our message, we will know that we must do better. Ultimately, that’s the proof that we need, the only proof that matters.  It is our job to do what we can to develop appealing, winning white nationalist ideas, and spread them to the best of our ability. 

We must develop ideas that are capable of challenging the status quo and existing norms, and we must do it soon.  To that end, I propose a project, namely one post a week for fifty weeks.  Each post will cover a distinct topic, each building upon the last.  The “50” should, to the extent practicable, be comprehensive, dealing with everything from ontology to economics, from first principles to strategy and tactics, from evolutionary psychology to political systems.  I realize that is a lot for 50 topics, which is why the single most important part of this project is at the beginning, coming up with the “50” questions or propositions.  Then, unleash the carnivores of majorityrights, hammer it out, and move on to the next topic in the following week. 

I realize the limitations of handling things this way, and it will only work with meaningful collaboration.  But we’ve got to impose some sort of structure on ourselves, and some type of time limit.  This project, by its nature, imposes both.  I am not proposing “philosophy by committee,” though it might seem that way at first.  Whoever hosts this will, ultimately, have to make the final call.  Personally, I believe that others may be better suited for this task than I.  Certainly guessedworker and Greg Johnson come to mind, just for starters.  I understand that Haller is working on something, so maybe he would be interested.  However, I am willing to do it. 

The first task is to come up with the comprehensive “50.” If there is interest in this project, please submit any ideas for the list on this thread.  Feel free to offer just one, or your entire list of 50.  The more the merrier.  If I’m doing this, I will synthesize the suggestions, and come up with the final 50.  Again, the idea is that the 50 topics should provide a comprehensive overview of who we are, where we are going, and ultimately how to get there.  We’ve only got 50, so we’ve got to make them count.  I’m stronger in some areas than others, so if the list were left entirely to me, I think some important areas will find themselves neglected.  I hope to avoid that. 

Let’s do this, for all that have come before us and for generations yet unborn.  Let us at least try, for even if we fail in this particular task, it will only free us up for another approach.  We will not quit. 

For many victims of the butcher, we will never escape the stain of “We came too late.”  What’s done, most tragically, has been done. Our losses, while already grievous, compare as nothing to the good that we may accomplish.  Just as our past stretches back into the primordial mists of time, so too may future generations of our tribe journey into worlds distant and far.  It is up to us to see that they will have an existence at all. 

So much is at stake here and, though we did not choose it to be so, all signs point to our fate largely being determined in the years ahead.  Like it or not, it’s our fight.  Perhaps we are, or can be, what the Germans once called a “community of fate.” Let’s make the most of it, for the good of the tribe. 

For Victory In Our Time,

Trainspotter

A Majority Rights Radio presentation of a libertarian nationalist political economy and its traitors is now available. This is the winning political paradigm in the present circumstances. We can ignore, for the sake of argument, that it is also philosophically and practically superior to other political economy paradigms.

So we have all got well and truly used to the idea that the left is out of office after thirteen long, hard years.  The political class generally has lost the trust of the people, and will not easily win it back.  In Europe the post-national project is in trouble.  The internal inconsistencies of the single currency seem set to tear the Union in two.  Power, it seems to me, is more fluid than it has been for twenty years at least.

Yet at the very moment that political nationalism in England should be rising irresistibly on the back of this and of its European Parliament success of a year ago, it is mired in self-doubt and introspection.  The Labour Party, shamed and defeated on Election Night though it was, out-thought and out-classed it in Stoke and Barking, and the usual squeeze on minor parties did the rest elsewhere.  The same old questions return again and again about the leadership, about the calibre of senior activists, about finances.  There is an inescapable feeling that the BNP has a narrow performance corridor in which it will, from here on, oscillate electorally, but from which it will never escape.  It is not going to shake the ground.  It is not going to destroy the Establishment.

The Establishment, meanwhile, may be tempted into returning to the legal fray to destroy it:

The British National party faces the prospect of renewed legal action from the government’s equalities watchdog over allegations that it has failed to remove potentially racist clauses from its constitution. The court case could potentially see the BNP’s leader, Nick Griffin, jailed or fined for contempt of court, or see party assets seized, lawyers believe.

... The BNP constitution was challenged in court last year by the government’s Equalities and Human Rights Commission. In March, Judge Paul Collins ruled that even after the BNP lifted a direct ban on non-white members, the revised document was indirectly discriminatory because it required applicants to oppose “any form of integration or assimilation of ... the indigenous British”, something the EHRC argued could not be endorsed by those in mixed-race relationships.

READ MORE...

Run time 61 mins. File size 23.9MB.

Like many, I’m sure, I was much taken with Hervé Ryssen’s piece titled The psychopathology of Judaism, translated by John de Nugent and published this month at the reinvigorated TOQ.  It contained the clearest identification I have ever seen of what it is to be Jewish with the dissolution of the world’s distinct peoples.  But it also contained some killer quotes, one of which was this, from Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv, writing in Israel magazine:

Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.

Quotes of this kind are valuable debating tools, and there are hundreds of them lying around - mostly on our respective hard drives.  So I thought I would create a thread which would enable anyone interested to share similarly precious finds and perhaps build up a useful resource.

Be my guest.