Majorityrights News > Category: Health

This last week the Oklahoma legislature has joined Louisiana in passing a law prohibiting the enforcement of dictates from supranational bodies within state boundaries.  Most particularly, it nullifies the monopoly power over global health sought by the World Health Authority.

SECTION 1. NEW LAW

A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6301 of Title 74, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

A. The World Health Organization, the United Nations and the World Economic Forum shall have no jurisdiction in the State of Oklahoma. The state and its political subdivisions, including, but not limited to, counties, cities, towns, precincts, water districts, school districts, school administrative units, or quasi-public entities, shall not engage in the enforcement of, or any collaboration with the enforcement of, any requirements, instructions, mandates, recommendations, or guidance provided by the World Health Organization, the United Nations or the World Economic Forum.

B. Any mandates, recommendations, instructions, communications or guidance issued by the World Health Organization, the United Nations or the World Economic Forum shall not be used in this state as a basis for action, nor to direct, order or otherwise impose, contrary to the constitution and laws of the State of Oklahoma any requirements whatsoever, including those for masks, vaccines or
medical testing, or gather any public or private information about the state’s citizens or residents, and shall have no force or effect in the State of Oklahoma.

SECTION 2.

This act shall become effective June 1, 2024.

SECTION 3.

It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.”

Passed the House of Representatives the 24th day of April, 2024.

In a number of countries there has been opposition to the WHO’s pandemic treaty, some governmental, some not.  All see in it a naked bid for technocratic totalitarianism in health:

■ New Zealand’s new coalition government will reserve against proposed amendments to IHR.
■ Slovakia’s prime minister announced the government will not support strengthening the WHO.
■ A comprehensive bill by a congressman is gaining traction and public support in the Philippines.
■ Two South African parliamentarians champion the WHO Withdrawal Bill and mobilise on it.
■ A Parliamentarian in the Netherlands filed a letter making a reservation due to lack of due process.
■ Eleven European Union parliamentarians are formally challenging procedural failures in IHR amendments.
■ Bill HR 79 (to defund and exit WHO) was introduced by United States Congressman Andy Biggs.
■ Parliamentarians continue advocating to reject IHR amendments and question the WHO in Japan.
■ A letter from the Australian people communicates rejection of the WHO’s proposed amendments to the IHR.

Inevitably, the British government describes itself as a leading force in the formation of the pandemic treaty.  It was a signatory to the original joint-letter proposing the treaty.  The other signatory governments were a motley group of twenty-two, namely Fiji, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Kenya, France, Germany, Greece, Korea, Chile, Costa Rica, Albania, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago, Netherlands, Tunisia, Senegal, Spain, Norway, Serbia, Indonesia, and Ukraine.  The Chinese and US governments did not sign but indicated strong support.

The date for agreeing the text of the new instrument is at the World Health Assembly at the UN in New York in May 2024.

Nationalists like to talk about honour.  This is honour.

The centralised and totalistic nature of the British National Health Service make it uniquely suitable for large-scale top-down driven experiments and pilot tests.  This video by former investigative journalist zedphoenix:

... argues that documentary evidence in his possession and publicly available resources on-line reveal the intention to revolutionise health delivery across the country, based on the digitalisation groundworks laid by NHS England, NHSX and NHS Digital (the latter of two of which will merge into a single Transformation Directorate from May of this year).  Manifestly, the Covid crisis and its associated vaxxing had been key to launching a digital passporting system.  But NHSX went live three years ago, and the programme is rolling forward regardless of the failure with the virus to go the whole way.  The intent is unchanged. 

Much of the digitalisation/data issue has been discussed by Brian Gerrish and Co at UK Column since 2019 at least. But Zed’s additional documentation has enabled him to arrive at a much more complete picture of what seems all too likely to lie ahead.  That picture includes:

1. The shift from hospital treatment to home treatment.
2. Diagnosis and prescription only by AI, eventually without medical professional oversight.
3. The closure of local doctor’s surgeries and of the great majority of hospitals, and the redundancy of up to 75% of NHS staff.
4. Constant monitoring of all of us by means of “wearables” on our person (and, presumably, by implant at some point).
5. Food-intake and life-style dictate (which one would imagine would be linked to a programmable digital currency so alternative foods cannot be purchased by you and me.  It’s bugs or nothing.

... and so on, along the merry way to “Sustainable Development”.

None of this is subject to parliamentary debate.  No new laws need to be made, though one would hope that aspects of it should come before the Health and Social Care Parliamentary Committee.  Having said that, the committee has just taken evidence on the future of general practice, with an depressingly “look the other way” agenda of exploring “regional variation in general practice, the general practice workload, and the partnership model of general practice”.

If Zed’s right it’s going to take every lorry on the road and then some to get this stopped!

It seems to me that a Great Charter of Our Freedom, somewhat akin in form if not, of course, content to the Leveller’s Manifesto, is required to take out to all the people for agreement and signature, and that the above five government crimes in commission now constitute a fair basis for its Health section.  I might have a think about that.  One to put in the hands of Laurence Fox’s party, and let them go at it.

UPDATE

I’ve just been taking a look at the WEF health “platform” page, and here is the lead copy:

Transforming systems to keep more people healthy.

The World Economic Forum is committed to using new models of public-private collaboration to develop more resilient, efficient, and equitable healthcare systems.

We aim to move past our capital-intensive, hospital-centric healthcare delivery model, which is unsustainable and ineffective – and to create new opportunities to advance the use of data-enabled systems and virtual care.

So “the virus” which caused the Westminster government to lie to the people for two years, Big Pharma to grow terra-rich and the rest of us dirt poor, and about 17,000 deaths in reality, is all over bar the last few painless, entirely safe and obviously really, really necessary jabs.  They say.  But, then, they would because Boris Johnson’s political career is in desperate trouble.

He’s ordering the Royal Navy to seal off the Channel and stop the migrant invasion, too.  It’s amazing what a principle-free hypocrite ... sorry, a national leader can get done when he really wants to.  We all know that the Channel won’t be sealed for a moment, of course.  Still, those bites sound good, and that’s the main consideration.  Likewise, Boris has ordered Dorries to make a few right-wing harrumphing sounds about the biased BBC and its licence tax.  Probably nothing will ever be done.  But, y’know, it’s the perception that’s the thing.

Well, while pondering what to make of all this red meat, I have to take my hat off to the writer of the pithy top comment on the relevant ZH thread, one IAMEVERYONE, who simply asked us to:

Imagine a virus so deadly and contagious that it disappears when a politician is at risk of losing public office.

For that small mercy let us be grateful.  Others may be less so.  If the great lockdown wind-down winds its merry way to endemicity, and anything like normality circa March 2020 comes to pass, that will leave several other Western governments ... the ones who are currently bent on a mad war against the unvaxxed ... looking decidedly yesterday.  Klaus Blofeld, in his lair deep within the Schiahorn above Davos, must be absolutely livid.

At 9.35pm this evening the Telegraph posted the following news report, which echoes the position of the Great Barrington Declaration.  Remember that?

Fourth Covid jab: We can’t vaccinate the planet every six months, says JCVI chief
Further inoculations should not be offered until there is more evidence, says Sir Andrew Pollard, with priority given to the most vulnerable

Fourth Covid jabs should not be offered until there is more evidence, the head of Britain’s vaccine body has said - as he warned that giving boosters to people every six months was “not sustainable”.

In an interview with The Telegraph, Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, chairman of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), said “we need to target the vulnerable” in future, rather than giving boosters to all over-12s.

Sir Andrew said there was no point in trying to stop all infections, and that “at some point, society has to open up” ...

Wiki states that the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation  (JCVI) is:

an independent expert advisory committee that advises United Kingdom health departments on immunisation, making recommendations concerning vaccination schedules and vaccine safety. It has a statutory role in England and Wales, and health departments in Scotland and Northern Ireland may choose to accept its advice.

So its voice is important in government, and right now its recommendations seem to be contrary to current government policy, the opinion of SAGE and NHS practitioners.  The edifice is cracking.

This is Dr Malone’s full three hour interview:

Afterwards, Malone, who is described as “the inventor of mRNA”, said:

“I think over the course of three hours Joe and I lay out just how dire the situation is in the USA. I know it is a long interview, but please try to get friends and family to watch or listen to this - maybe it can change some closed minds. I seriously hope so.”

Anyone who really does not want to listen to the whole thing can go here and get the choicest cuts.

Also well worth perusing, Malone’s latest post to his own website, including the usual good advice:

... please keep taking that vitamin D3 and get your levels tested, if you haven’t already.  Use a formulation that combines the D3 with Vitamins A and K. Please keep up with the zinc, vitamin C and magnesium.  Work on weight control, glycemic control and please exercise!  All are important.

... So, don’t let the fear-porn get to you – Omicron is coming to a town, village, city, restaurant, or grocery store near you.  But for the vast majority of us, we will be fine.  We have tools to fight this more mild variant, and there are life-saving treatments.  Just work to stay or get as healthy as you can, eat your vitamins, eat real food and go get some exercise!

This video is made by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which is a group of some 500 doctors, scientists, and health professionals dedicated to informing the public about the Covid vaccines when actual informed consent does not form part of government Covid activism.

As an aside, the Twitter account of Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology, has been suspended because he tweeted a link to this video:

After Lewis Hamilton’s race activism and Seb Vettel’s homo-activism we get a mob-handed jab-activist video from the “driver community” of F1.  It is very difficult to imagine the swashbuckling greats of FI’s past like Nigel Mansell, Graham Hill, or James Hunt obediently following the corporate script.  Are men today really so much smaller in their personal stature and sense of right and wrong?  Is that what the vast wealth they can accrue today does to them?

Interestingly, the only driver who has absented himself from jab-duty is Kimi Räikkönen, who probably does belong to the individualist model of yesteryear, and who, anyway, is leaving the circus after tomorrow’s final race of the season.