Majorityrights News > Category: U.S. Politics

     
“If I go down, Europe goes black.” ~ Gaddafi

 

French girl doesn’t want to give out her phone number

Television News reporter and cameraman shot live on air

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34062118

“Alison made ‘racist’ comments”

black woman spits in White woman’s face at Trump rally:

The worst of Black Lives Matter.

DAILYKENN.com—Contrary to the theory of cultural relevance — the false notion that all cultures are innately the same — violence is a universal reality in black population centers.

Black violence is the norm rather than the exception.

Due to the advent of the Internet, ‘citizen journalists’ often capture a tiny insight of the violence on their video devices, then upload them to the Internet for all to see.

Why do we publish this rubbish?

Simple: To expose minds to reality.

Reality is the antidote that destroys the cultural Marxism virus. Our minds are infected with cultural Marxism bacterial virus when we expose ourselves to cinematic productions and view television. Those images are produced in Hollywood sound stages with the intent of infecting our minds with a false reality.

By exposing our minds to genuine reality, the truth becomes the antibiotic vaccine that kills the cultural Marxism bacteria.

Here’s dose of reality ▼

       
        Mnneapolis-St. Paul Airport

TNO, “Somalis Given “Airport Security Tour”, 4 2016:

The Obama administration gave Somali Muslims “behind-the-scenes” tours at a major U.S. airport after the group complained to Homeland Security about feeling harassed and profiled, after a report showed that Minnesota “leads the nation” in the number of U.S. nationals joining ISIS.

According to the Judicial Watch website, the special security tours are not offered to any other group, and occurred at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport after Department of Homeland Security (DHS) roundtable meetings with local Somali leaders to obtain feedback for “modifications to practices that would allow for operations to be more culturally sensitive.”

          Mika Brzezinski: Don Black says that she looks like “a bird”

A thought occurs to me in contrast to my long standing position in deference to “the wisdom of the body for its tens of thousands of years of evolution by contrast to social judgment.”

​I usually like to take the side of the “abnormal” because, like everybody, I have witnessed ignorant bullying of certain nonstandard types by crassly subjective people - those oblivious to the fact that others may object to the complete dismissal of what really are other valid values (perhaps even necessary from an ecological standpoint) and aesthetics - a recent example: Don Black saying Mika Brzezinski “looks like a bird.” That’s his stupid opinion. I admit that his wife, Chloe, is hot - still, it is a bit weird that she was Duke’s wife first. And I must object as Mike Brezinski is a pretty lady too.

Chloe Hardin-Duke-Black (whatever), here with Duke. She’s definitely cute, too.

I still maintain the wisdom of the body as a correct bias and a correct basis for social critique - especially with regard to bodily shapes, forms, functions that really cannot be helped. And I am on the record as saying that women with big noses and flat chests can be beautiful as well - even though these things can be “helped.” I had a girlfriend who was flat chested and she was quite fine to me. Neither she nor other flat chested women should have breast implants, nor should most women who have bigger noses have nose jobs - there is a such thing as ugly big, but more often such a thing as elegant, impressive, big noses. I hate it when people take the position that “a woman cannot look that way” (when in fact, they can sometimes look better than women with big boobs and small noses). But a contrasting position occurs to me with regard to fat - and the “fat shaming” which I suspect that the YKW are lobbying against.

It is valid too, to an extent, to object to getting heavy handed with fat shaming, along with other arguments against the tyrannical regularity of certain types presented as normal and beautiful - viz., in respect to the fact that it is truly a bit harder for some people, especially as they get older, to stay thin. Another side to it has unfolded before me - though not really a side which in this case that I had been fully against anyway and which would have been discovered if anyone had questioned me.

I just completed an 8 day fast. No food. Plenty of water. Coffee (sorry, I know the pro’s and cons, not going to stop it); vitamins and minerals: vitamin D, Zinc, Omega 3 with B6, Magnesium, Vitamin C pellets); and my one caloric indulgence - over the course of the 8 days, I had a total of 5 small cups of tomato juice.

I did some exercise also - went pretty easy, only pushing myself in a few moments, overall doing slower, steadier activity - like walking. I like doing exercise that gets me somewhere or something done - shoveling a ditch that I need fits the bill - so I did some of that too.

Kardashian - somehow not hard to resist

It wasn’t a really big surprise but it was a little surprised to find myself fatter than I thought that I would still be after this. I don’t look very fat, but I do look like the guy who is perhaps confident, if not a bit too comfortable with himself - more comfortable than I really am in that regard. However, I will not be fat, even if my body does not sense that yet. This is where I am getting to a semi-interesting realization that I had today. Even after having finally eaten 3 ounces of steak, 4 ounces of chicken (with pieces of garlic in it), a cup of blackberries, a half kilo of cherries, an apricot, an avocado, beansprouts, a red and a yellow bell pepper, a small red hot chili pepper, a small amount of coleslaw, a small amount of beet salad, and a half a head of broccoli…

I am not really surprised to find my mind more fixated on food and my brain signaling, “tasty food,” “eat” - even more than when I was in the midst of the 8 day fast - because that is what happened last time that I fasted. My body is saying, “boy, wasn’t that steak tasty” mmm and “that avocado, yum.”

However, I am not starving. My gut is not issuing hunger pains. I believe that these are secondary signals long evolved from the time when food might not be available in days to come, so my body encourages me (and I will now say) a bit stupidly, and not wisely, to eat more and even get fat for the possibility that I may not have access to food in the near future. In these episodes, my body and its biology are “stupider” than my conscious mind and society.

My conscious mind does know that I will be eating again before long - I will fast again tomorrow but then have a modest meal on Saturday and then eat on alternating days until I get to the weight I want, at which point I will figure out a maintenance diet and regime.

But especially when you are NOT starving, not nutrient deprived, will not be, then you know that your body’s sending faint warning signals against these things - necessary and wise though these signals are to have in place - can and should at this time be overridden by conscious intelligence; an intelligence which connects with the social patterns which keep telling me: “hey, you don’t look so bad - but your stomach is sticking out.”

I also have observed that the first thing women instinctively look at is the top of my stomach - (not that I am necessarily trying to pick them up, but I don’t like having social engagement cut off as abruptly as that, either) that seems to be a place by which they can intuitively gauge your age: too old if the top part of your stomach is protruding—probably because its harder for older people to stay thin and that’s a typical indicator.

Jennifer Lopez - a Whitish looking face and a ghetto booty: I can live without it.

Anyway, so while the “fat shaming” can be overdone, it can be underdone as well - and that is a case where conscious and social wisdom can, at times, be wiser than the “wisdom of the body.”​

But that’s the thing - people on the right don’t realize that the YKW (as usual) are exaggerating good social positions and critiques beyond all reason in order to make them didactic.

Quoting myself: one evening in McSorley’s Old Ale House, a TV talk show crew came in with a lesbian couple (black and White woman) who were asking men’s opinion as to whether the White girl should get breast implants since she thought that would please her black girlfriend. I was asked my opinion by the production crew. I answered that in particular, “I rather like flat chested women, so my opinion is particularly biased against breast implants for that reason for starters; but there were more reasons to be against it than that; including as part of a more general stance against bodily alteration - I believe that given that our bodies have evolved over tens of thousands of years, that they are bound to be wiser, smarter if you will, than our conscious decision making and should be given the benefit of the doubt against our anxieties and against popular consensus; rather, we should try to learn what our bodies have to teach us about our interface with the social ecology and bring our corporeality to bear in social critique if necessary, rather than the other way around - bending to what may well be a popular fad against the better wisdom of our evolution.” I was told by the couple that my answer was good and they asked me to sign a release; but the bartender, yes that one, asked, “what was that ‘stuff’ you were saying? I don’t think that was what the TV producers were looking for.” I suppose that he was right and that my opinion was not aired.

  Daily Kenn provides a fine description of Feral black inner city culture

        “Privileged White liberals won’t go near.”

        The truth of this culture is not victims of racism or White privilege, but rather victims the liberal mindset.

This is what happens when kids are raised by the village instead of by the parents.

What I want to know is this: how long are we going to live in denial? ...and pretend that this type of activity does not exist in our “urban centers” (the politically correct term for black neighborhoods)?

Folks, what you see in this video is not the exception, it’s the norm.

This is why privileged White liberals won’t go anywhere near urban centers.

What privileged White liberals do, is that they will isolate themselves in insular White neighborhoods in the suburbs, segregated neighborhoods - they might have one or two token neighbors who are not White; so they isolate themselves in insular White neighborhoods, where they pretend that they care about “people of color.”

The fact of the matter is that they don’t care. If privileged White liberals really cared about these black kids, they would pack up the U-Hall, they would move to the housing projects and redistribute their White privilege. They would try to help these kids. They’re not doing that because they don’t care

So once again what we see in this video is an adult male, who is working for a living, contrasted by four (I counted four) urban savages who are trying to make their living by stealing.

The question comes to mind, at least to my mind, is where are their fathers? Where are their parents?

The answer to the question is that these kids weren’t raised by families. They were raised by the village…by the government.

The way it works is this: a 14, 15, maybe 16 year old kid will copulate with the females around; a female gets pregnant; and the male is just totally out of the picture. He’s a father but not a dad. He’s just not there. So the child is raised by the mother in a housing project. But the mother is not really that interested in her babies. So as soon as they’re old enough to run the neighborhood, they’ll open the door and let them out. It’s kind of like keeping a dog; you don’t keep a dog in the house you open the door and let the dog run the neighborhood. They literally treat their kids like pet animals, only they are not very good at taking care of their pets, they let them run wild. And they do what dogs do, they form packs. They call them gangs or crews or whatever - there’s not necessarily a hierarchy, they just get together; and they basically live a life of crime. They attack people, they beat up people, they rob from each other.

That’s what goes on in the urban centers. And we pretend it is not there. As you can see in this video, it definitely is there and it happens all the time.

At some point, we are going to have to escape our delusion.

We’re going to stop pretending that these people are victims of White privilege, that they are victims of White racism, that they are victims of anything other than the liberal mindset.