The Times (UK)

Wendy Duncan and her husband Brian are white. Nineteen months ago, the Lincolnshire housewife gave birth to a beautiful, healthy, Indian daughter.

Freya, brown-skinned and dark-eyed, is not a medical miracle after a long and fruitless quest through IVF and adoption, but the product of a booming industry in India that is offering embryos for adoption.
[…]
Couples such as the Duncans are lining up to be treated. Their experience was so successful that they are returning next week to the Bombay fertility clinic that produced Freya, to try for a second child.
[…]
The Duncans had no qualms about bearing a child of a different race. They are Freya’s natural birth parents and legal guardians in British law.

“To us colour is not an issue. I already have a mixed-race daughter, whose father is Arab, from a previous relationship,” Mrs Duncan said. “Lots of people say you would never think Freya wasn’t ours. She is so like me, it is unbelievable. She should have been a redhead - she has the temperament.”

Keep in mind “Freya” is the Norse goddess of fertility.  The depths of hostility toward their ancestors inculcated by their academic and media indoctrination is exemplary of the hostility of those those institutions to the host people and is sufficient to justify destroying the civilization supporting such indoctrination systems.

Nazir Ahmed, Baron Ahmed of Rotherham no less (actually Mizpur, Pakistan but no matter), has joined the big push for integration.

Labour’s leading Muslim peer reignited the row over the full-face veil on Tuesday by condemning its use as “defiance” of British values.

Lord Ahmed said that “the veil is now a mark of separation, segregation and defiance against mainstream British culture.

... They were supposed to be worn so that women would not be harassed. But my argument is that women, and communities as a whole, are now being harassed because they are wearing them. They are physical barriers to integration.

This is insulting.  Alien people with a less than endearing religious culture [video 48min] can’t just decide to “integrate”, and whether their women (and their terrorists) do or do not wear big black tents is completely immaterial.  We possess the power of choice, in that we can choose who belongs with us and who doesn’t.  The decision with Moslems appears to me to have been taken decades ago, and it isn’t going to change.

I grant that if we were nothing more than the capacious cultural bag of Britishness, into which anything can be stuffed, Rotherham Sahib might have more of a point.  But we are not.  We are the English.  That is, we are genetically of that Northern European sub-set identifiable as English.  Britishness is only an elected, political thing, and it is dying fast.

Of course, the other side of the coin is that Rotherham Sahib is genetically Pakistani, with all that implies:-

READ MORE...

Look out Matt Drudge, here comes:

Majority Report

I’m probably going to regret this but I’ve whipped together one of those “100 line Perl script to save the world” kind of things and put it up on my Laboratory of the States website.

It’s a “Web 2.0” application in that it dynamically adjusts the front page news layout in response to user demand.

Since I just got the idea to do this yesterday, I haven’t had a lot of time to bang on it so it probably has horrible security or application-model weaknesses that will be exploited by the enemies watching this site.  I’ll shut it down temporarily when they crack into it.

Enjoy while the enjoying is good.

The AP (via Forbes) reports that:

In 1996, women in federally monitored programs donated eggs just over 3,800 times. That number has risen steadily, to more than 10,000 in 2004, the most recent year for which the Centers for Disease Control has compiled data.

White female eggs are in exceptional demand.  Many white women are saying they are donating out of a desire to help others.  This of course is unacceptable to one:

Jeffery P. Kahn, who says:

“It does feel a little more like the Wild West than it ought to,” says Dr. Jeffrey Kahn, director of the University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics. And he only sees the problem growing as states such as California move closer to funding major stem-cell research, requiring more donor eggs.

“We worry that we offer people so much money that they are blind to the risk and their motivation is strictly the money,” Kahn says.

That’s the very reason, he notes, that it is illegal to sell an organ, such as a kidney, for donation. “So I’m not comfortable saying we should start that with human eggs,” he says.

Hey, Dr. Con, perhaps reducing pressure on young women to make money would help.  For starters let their prospective husbands’ earnings keep pace with land prices—for example by opposing immigration that lowers wages and raises demand on real estate.  You oppose that and we can start to talk about your “ethics”.

By the way, Dr. Con, I looked at your academic web site and followed it to your “Links and bibliography” expecting something about your specialty “bioethics”.  Perhaps you can explain why all I found there was Holocaust activism:

The Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at the University of Minnesota is one of many national and international centers dedicated to the study of the Holocaust and contemporary Genocide and teaching about the subject. The links and bibliographical information listed below are recommended for extended study of the subject headings.

Links

A growing list of Web sites related to the Jewish Holocaust and other genocides around the world. Please send us URLS of sites on these subjects. E-mail the Center at: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Bibliography

A bibliographical database of relevant books and articles that can be searched by author or subject. This database is updated regularly. We welcome suggestions for additions. Be sure to send all the referencing information by e-mail to the Center at: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Special Thanks
Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies offers generous thanks to Mordecai Specktor, editor of the American Jewish World, for donations of review copies of books relevant to our work and added to our permanent collection.

Isn’t this rather insensitive after the white population of the US—you know, the guys who fought Germany in WW II—has just, in the last generation, undergone a 40 million loss in its population followed by immigration replacement due to policies inspired primarily by your coethnics?  I mean at least you guys got Israel out of the deal.  Where is our Israel?

The gloriously incorrect municipal stance of Herouxville in Quebec has been widely applauded on the radical right.  We have paid it too little attention.  Here, then, is a bulletin - admittedly over a week old - from immigrationwatchcanada.org which touches on all the key aspects of the case.

PRESS RELEASE

The tumultuous entry (now broadcast around the world) of Herouxville, Quebec into Canada’s immigration debate demonstrates the great divide that exists in Canada on the immigration issue.

On one side are the majority of Canadians who instictively feel something is wrong with Canada’s mass immigration policy (currently about 250,000 per year, the highest per capita in the world). On the other side are Canada’s mass immigration industry and its supporters (often described as a fifth column) who tell Canadians that mass immigration is wonderful.

The national and international uproar that Herouxville has caused is wildly out of proportion to its size. The town has a population of 1300 and is located in rural Quebec, about 150 km. northeast of Montreal. Most Canadian towns and cities of all sizes have passively accepted the historically high immigration levels that Canada’s federal government set for the country in 1990, but which it has never justified. In doing so, Herouxville is literally like David taking on Goliath.

In fact, the little town’s virtual “Declaration of the Rights of Canadians”, which bravely contradicts official multicultural policies, sounds almost like a call to revolution.

READ MORE...

I am indebted to Troy Southgate for putting up a link to this video, Roots, by folk-rock musicians and, it seems, English cultural heroes Show of Hands ...

As what, I suppose, might be described by our liberal friends - without much love - as a professional Englishman, my reaction to it was a curious mix of mild embarrassment and stubborn pride.  The one was a middle-class sensibility and the other something wholly Anglo-Saxon.  In fairness, this isn’t quite my usual musical stamping ground, and I’m not accustomed to hearing my own English voice shouting so unselfconsciously into the political wind (though I gather from Troy’s frequent references to such music on New Right Forum that there is a thriving sub-culture in statements of this sort).

After a couple of plays stubborness got the upper hand, I’m glad to say.  I was reminded of a moment towards the end of Tolstoy’s War and Peace, which I read thirty-five years ago, where the colours of the defeated French are ceremonially lowered before General Kutouzov, with all his Grand Army, a monument to stubborness, looking on.  I think the real event occurred after the Battle of Maloyaroslavets.  Anyway, Tolstoy has it that as the colours are lowered the company wait in silence for the words of their great chief.  None, however, come.  Instead he, well knowing the spirit of the common soldier, issues an almighty oath and turns his horse away.  The men assembled across the hillsides hear and understand, and they respond in kind with a long and faithful roar.

This crude vigour lives in our people, too.  The elegant flutterings of the intellectual lepidoptera never call it forth.  But music does, and it is here in this song.

The cartoon culture war in the Telegraph rages back and forth.

Alright, Garland’s little dishonesty could, by the charitable, be ascribed to cowardice.  How is a fellow to draw a too, too black hand holding the gun?  Oh, the agony.

But there is not an ounce of Garland’s equivocation in this, from Springs, though equivocation of a different kind may apply.  It plagiarises that celebration of the familial life of our healthy, monoracial past, the Bisto Kids.  The “Kid’s Stuff” title might help the more subtle reader towards a deeper intention: what’s gone wrong with childhood?  Answer (possibly): it’s black.  But if that’s the case the use of the generic “Housing Estate UK” after Garland’s “High Street UK” is unhelpful.  And, anyway, design by ommission, if that’s what this is, remains dangerously uncertain, and is a very long and discursive way from the old newspaper tradition of fearless free speech.  How difficult is it, really, to state the facts of black sociobiology?

One wonders, after these awful past decades of PeeCee, what political synapses inside the heads of Telegraph management still function normally.  Not many, I think.

This week’s Frontierist News is an experimental audiocast.