Majorityrights News > Category: Hermeneutics

Euro-DNA Nations - [Part 3] healthy self-interest; reaching out to the broad Euro-populations

If our mission to defend European peoples is to be understood and appreciated properly by broad masses enough to gain strength of popularity for success, we must negotiate the common currency of our language.

However, to negotiate that common currency with successful results among the broad masses, our spokesmen and advocates must first of all be disabused of YKW misdirection of terms and concepts of group advocacy so as not to perpetuate social systemic dissolution. By disabusing corrupted terms and concepts and redeploying their corrected proper forms first of all through our spokesmen and dedicated advocates, they can reach out with greater success and popularity to our broader masses to engage in our group systemic homeostasis.

In this discussion with Ecce Lux then, I begin to feel-out a project to rescue terms and concepts that would otherwise structure social systemic homeostasis for European peoples - terms and concepts which have been misrepresented by YKW to tangle, confuse, misdirect and disrupt our group homeostasis.

Our spokesmen and dedicated advocates disabused thus of YKW corrupted terms and concepts first of all and prepared with the proper forms rather for our group homeostatic interests, they can reach out with greater success and popularity to encourage our broader masses to engage defense, fostering and advance of our group interests in coordination and harmony with other peoples - thereby increasing our chances for success as well in that occasion for both intra and intergroup conflict is reduced.

Another red cape they have Whites chasing, I forgot to mention - “equality/inequality”. The matter, rather, for paradigmatic, group management, social systemic homeostasis, is “commensurability/incommensurability”, i.e, do rule structures match and complement the paradigm or not. Casting matters in those qualitative terms allows you to harmonize both intra-group roles and niches AND intergroup relations as you are not rousing conflict and ire through false comparisons which disrespect ecological niche functions.

Eradicate Mulatto Supremacism

Audio/Visual Files Now Found on Bitchute!

Here is the Bitchute Version (Audio/Video Removed from Yoube).

Euro-DNA Nations - an introductory discussion [Part 2]

Bitchute File Part 1 Audio

                              Part 2a Audio                  Part 2b Audio

                      Part 2c Audio                                Part 2d Audio

      Part 3a Audio          Part 3b Audio        Part 4a Audio  Part 4b Audio

Halsey “English”

Because he wants to do his level best to get the goyim to believe that he is on their side (he is part of the “solution”, i.e., a White and Jewish right wing alliance against “the problem”,  “The Left”, by which he refers to the international Leftism, i.e., liberalism imposed on Whites, that his (((tribe))) was instrumental in having created and imposed in crass, vast distortion in the first place. Now that his tribe is confronted with the intersection of leftism confronting Jewish hegemony, he will do everything in his power to distract from, assist in burying and thwarting a White Ethnonational Left, a platform which is wise to and secured against his tribe’s game.

Witness this chat, which he participated-in alongside my discussion of the question, “Are Jews good for Western Civilization?” with Luke Ford.

Halsey tries to act as if not the first word of what I say makes any sense, is worth any consideration (let alone having significant insight), it is all just worthless - only summary dismissal is deserved from the get-go. True to his slovenly pig self, he is so heavy handed and mono thematic in the comments that he makes his agenda as such entirely too obvious.

Rodney Martin - Rodney says his family is from Silesia. The Mongoloid invasions of the 1200s shows in his face.

Rodney Martin (who goes by the handle “Movement Critic”) is absolutely disgusting. He tries to say that I am Polish and Jewish (I am 3% trace Jewish from my Italian side). He is a Nazophile who confabs with Jews in typical right wing perfidy. He takes a near identical line against me as (((Halsey))).

This post will look at the chat from the Hangout,  “Are Jews good for Western Civilization?”, 6 Jan 2019, and it is appalling.

But first I’d like to remark that upon review of the audio, one interesting point that I didn’t notice at the time was that Luke was asking how it was that Jews, as such a small percentage of the population, could marginalize people?

Luke Ford (Orthodox Jewish convert): who tries to suggest that Jews can’t have such important influence because they are such a small population; and with that, straw mans my argument about “marginals” by asking how such a small population can create marginals, when I did not say that they were creating marginals, I suggested that they were opening the bounds and borders that would otherwise protect marginals first - they are opening the borders and bounds to liberalization and therefore running roughshod over accountability to and from marginals (which is everybody within a group, from time to time).

Luke Ford - “The social justice warriors are winning” against my Jewish hegemony and White, right wing sell-out coalition

Worse, when I described the theory of horizontal transmission and its prescription (which is separatism, not genocide), Luke Ford then tried to say that I was saying that Jews are parasites. And a few people in the chat tried to make that smear stick.

Furthermore, what Luke Ford is doing by pushing this right wing agenda and coddling Nazi sympathizers is evil - the trajectory of conflict that he’s instigating is evil.

But the whole transcript (which I posted with the audio) is interesting - probably better than waiting through my uhms and ahs - though I must say in my defense, I deliver significant content after a short wait as surely as I hesitate in those ums and aahs. I finally looked at Luke Ford’s chat room and these people are totally full of shit. I mean really stupid, even in their lame attempts to obstruct my voice and message.

Poor (((misguided))) Holly. Part of her personality is fixated at 14 - years of age, that is.

Perhaps the most disappointing antagonist in the chat was Holly R. - a lawyer but a Christ-tard and shockingly stupid. It’s a shame because her comments about the OJ trial and the demands of PC (at Dennis Dale’s Hangout) were well considered, but her remarks on this chat were, well, there is no other word but stupid.

Halsey, it’s to be expected. Like the rest of them, his comments were so lame that I can’t even take them seriously.

The chat’s mind was so clearly made up beforehand that it made it too obvious. There was no way to be hurt by it. There was no pretense of objectivity, just sheer malicious intent from the get go.

Church of Entropy was surprisingly lame in her comments.

There were only a few grudging acknowledgments. Those people really suck. Honesty has a very limited role in their platform.

Below and in further comments I am going to present excerpts from the chat. Here’s a look at all of the most malicious characters. You can get a sense of their political/ideological perspective.

Halsey Right Now

Halsey, we know, is a Jewish guy who is figuring heavily in promoting “The Left’ as the enemy and the Leftist Jews are the bad ones, while we right-wingers need to stick together to fight the real enemy, ‘The Left.”

Of course I am promoting a White Left ethnonationalism which is entirely different and at odds with international leftism or the liberalism that he wants people to take for granted as “the left”. It closes off the Jewish games and entryism, also shuts out their misrepresentations as it affords us capacity to define it for ourselves (not liberal, not taking away private property, not seeking equality, though justice, yes, and not against wealth], and finally, it brings to account those right wingers who would sell us out to them] I call him and people like him out on the games they are playing and suckering people into [ “The Left” is the enemy and the right is the solution is a variant of problem - reaction - solution ] and so he and his kind are doing all they can to bury and misrepresent my platform.

“Movement Critic” is Rodney Martin - calls me “Jewish” because I have 3% trace Jewish ancestry.

“Movement Critic” is the Nazophile Rodney Martin. Rodney used to be on friendly terms with Carolyn Yeager until right wing schisiming did its thing. On a subsequent stream he said that he has no sympathy for the Poles that were killed in the Polish Warsaw uprising.

He calls me “Polish and Jewish” in this stream. I am half Polish and half Italian, with trace 3% Jewish from my Italian side (according to DNA tests).

Holly R. is the aforementioned lawyer and a Jesus freak, making a very strong case for the phenomenon of compartmentalized intelligence.

Not only utterly stupid in her assessment, not only malicious (some Christian), but doing it an a puerile way. I’ve listened back and can’t for the life of me hear how I am supposed to pronounce “modernity” in a ‘gay sounding’ way.

Not sure who James James is yet, maybe Babylonian Hebrew.

Brian Brennan is a confused and misguided White guy.

Brundlefly -Jewish wife, kid and a Christard; that sums it up.

Brundlefly is a Christard with a Jewish wife and son. In a subsequent stream’s chat, he told me to “gass myself.” Some Christian.

Norvin Hobbs: A ginger, thus Halsey attributes no soul.

Norvin Hobbs: pro White Anglo American needs to get out of the right wing.

In the subsequent comments I will present the most virulent excerpts from the chat - there was almost no support except from Norvin Hobbs who said he wanted to talk to me and pushed back on Holly’s insistent Christianity.

Ecce Lux has his heart in the right place, but he’s being misguided into the company of these Jews, and taking the bait of their right wing misdirection.

Alex Delarge, well who cares?

Church of Sky-Lilly, er Entropy

Church of Entropy is a kind of Jewish groupie - takes her physics degree and tries to promote a fanciful version of reincarnation; when it’s clear to anyone that DNA reconstructs at least to some extent over generations. Further, for the degree of intelligence required of that field, she’s surprisingly stupid in her remarks.

1) When I talk about Clerk Maxwells Demons, the Augustinian and Manichean Devils, these are clearly metaphors for two different kinds of classic challenges that people are up against.

a) Augusitinian devils: natural challenges which don’t change their rule structure if you solve them.

b) Manichean devils: man made challenges, which can include deception and trickery - including changing the rules if you solve them.

Stupidly, Church of Entropy acts like I am talking about literal devils rather than clear metaphors.

David Hival​ (Doovid), never evolved to believe in evolution.

David Hival​ (Doovid): Doovid, is a classic liberal Jew. And he doesn’t believe in evolution, lol. Why should anyone take him seriously?

“Movement Critic” is Rodney Martin; more like Jewish minion

27:14 Movement Critic (Rodney Martin - this overcompensating, Mongoloid looking Nazophile’s sentiments are clear from the get go). Typical right winger, look (((who))) he is hanging out with and ingratiating himself with.

Rodney Martin, ‘Movement Critic’ says:

​This is why the Poles lost, they tried to talk both the Germans & Soviets to death and both just got fed up & shot them.

Halsey Jewish

28:14
Halsey News Network (((Halsey)))

​How autistic is this guy?

28:33

Halsey News Network
​Germany, the heart of Somalia

“Movement Critic” is Rodney Martin, looking very much like a victim of Downs Syndrom

29:13
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin….and doesn’t he look like he has Downs Syndrome)
​@Halsey News Network please translate

29:19
Halsey News Network
​This guy is a broken Deep Blur

29:42
Halsey News Network
​Translate what this guy is saying?

29:55
Halsey News Network
​He is saying herpa derp derp

29:56
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​@Halsey News Network yes

30:07
Halsey News Network
​Like I have any clue

30:29
Halsey News Network
​He sounds like he is is broken

30:34
James James (I am not sure who James James is)
​This is why Daniel hasn’t received a phone call since 1980.

30:45
Halsey News Network
​Like a dictionary program that lost some bits

30:47
Alex Delarge (who cares who Alex Delarge is. His mind was made up before the start, like the rest of them)
​LOL James

30:50
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin, his Downs Syndrome is acting up….and doesn’t he look like he has Downs Syndrome)
​@Halsey News Network I think I need a blunt to understand him????

31:18
Halsey News Network
​This guy smoked thirty blunts before he came on

31:38
Halsey News Network
​Ever I am not cranky

36:09
Halsey News Network
​Is this guy trolling?

36:10
Brian Brennan
​funny that 90 people are listening to this

Norvin Hobbs: A ginger, thus Halsey attributes no soul.

36:11
Norvin, hello

36:14
Halsey News Network
​I will call it

36:14
Alex Delarge
​hey Norvin

Poor (((misguided))) Holly. Part of her personality is fixated at 14 - years of age, that is. She is an attorney, making a strong case for compartmentalized intelligence.

36:17
Holly R. (Lawyer, Jesus Freak, Puerile idiot):
​zzz

36:17
Halsey News Network
​Like won

36:20
Levi
​@John Harris america was a refuge for ashkies for centuries

36:24
Halsey News Network
​Save our brains

36:42
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin) [Doesn’t like the fact that I see Christianity for what it is]
​This clown just lost all credibility, he is a Jim Goad

36:43
Halsey News Network
​This guy is as coherent as carrot top

37:11
Holly R.
​☦️☦️☦️

37:19
Alex Delarge
​oh no

37:21
Luke Ford​
holly!

37:26
BatsintheBarbell​ (this guy might be White and sincere)
what did he mean by this

37:26
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin) [there’s a lot wrong with the golden rule, Rodney]
​There is nothing wrong with the Golden Rule

37:29
E. Vee​
oh its Holly

37:32
E. Vee
​hey Holly

37:34
Holly R.
​“Rejecting Christ to own the Jews.” So smart.

37:37
Halsey News Network
​Because gingers have no souls

37:38
Alex Delarge
​anti-Christian too…

37:44
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​This guy is just a crybaby

37:46
Levi [No, they’ve deceived Whites into worshiping one though]
​jews worship a jew on a stick?

37:47
Holly R.
Hi @Luke

38:20
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​Hi @Holly R.

38:33
John Harris
​Daniel is a former catholic?? Repent daniel!

38:39
Holly R.
​Hey @movementcritic

38:39
Halsey News Network
​I am really glad I am high IQ because this guy is making me dumber

38:44
Alex Delarge
​he’s as tedious as Kant

38:58
Norvin Hobbs
​@holly R lots of people are not into Christianity for a number of logical and metaphysical reasons

39:00
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​@Holly R. bet this guy’s GF has air in her

39:18
Holly R.
​LOL @movementcritic

39:26
Brian Brennan
​what’s going through Luke’s head right now?

39:28
Holly R.
​Hi Norvin

39:37
Luke Ford​
guess Brian

39:49
Alex Delarge
​lol Luke

39:58
Jmriccitelli​Luke, u have the patience of a bobcat hunting, they can sit and wait for several hours

40:25
E. Vee​
hey Norvin

40:31
Halsey News Network
​Tell this guy I will throw a super chat if he takes an Adderall

40:35
Holly R.
​Hey EVee

41:32
Chris Alton​
@Halsey News Network lollllll

41:34
John Harris
​lets accept for the sake of argument that the JQ isnt real, now what luke?

41:35
Movement Critic [Nice Nazi sentiments, Rodney]
​@Halsey News Network I’ll give $100 if he snorts Zyklon B

41:48
Holly R.
​@movementcritic I’ve been spending time at Orthodox Christian churches. Pretty amazing.

41:56
Halsey News Network
​That would make him slower movement crotic

42:05
Luke Ford
​John, we could talk NFL

42:16
Halsey News Network
​If he gets any slower he will be fully regarded

42:18
Movement Critic
​@Holly R. very majestic

42:20
Halsey News Network
​Retarded

42:27
Holly R.
​Yes

43:24
Halsey News Network
​Usually it is regular autism, this is autism on Valium after catching chlamydia

44:34
Holly R. [she knows nothing about what I know about Christianity, but talks anyway]
​Christianity is way more mystical & amazing than what you see with these tv preachers. I think this guy is just reacting to cartoonish Christianity.

44:53
Halsey News Network
​This guy knows as much about Jews as Rodney knows about non alcoholic drinks

45:31
Holly R.
​@halsey he doesn’t know Christianity either

45:47
Halsey News Network
​This guy knows as much about Jews as norvin does about holding a job

46:48
Halsey News Network
​Doovid he wants to debate you on violence

47:01
Halsey News Network
​He is warming up, he will be ready in 2036

47:02
El Jim [This is probably ecce lux, a sincerely concerned White activist, who probably doesn’t “get me” yet.]
​@doooovid I suspect he’s a russian bot with pre-recorded responses

47:08
Isaiah Sellassie
​Wrong! it was not the captives who returned to Jerusalem—it was the collaborators of Israel who had joined Babylon in the war against Judah

47:35
David Hival​ (Doovid) I have zero idea what this guy’s position is, after all this talking

47:38
Holly R.
​Abraham wasn’t “a Jew.” Fight me.

47:51
Halsey News Network
​I am not fighting you holly

48:08
Holly R.
​LOL @Halsey

48:20
El Jim
​I would love to see this guy and David Duke have a monologue with each other

48:34
Halsey News Network
​This guy is a human tranquilizer, I would lose to Enoch even right now.

48:41
Norvin Hobbs​@Holly R he was a levtine person, so an early jew

48:55
Isaiah Sellassie
​there is chronic misunderstanding of the Israel-Judah civil war—- it is the main problem I see in exegesis

49:02
Halsey News Network
​This guy is making me so slow David duke would be able to beat me with nothing but the power of steroids and Botox

49:23
Active Monad​Well, this is exciting!!

49:28
Halsey News Network
​No you don’t dooovid.

49:38
Halsey News Network
​He is speaking downs syndrome

49:46
El Jim
​Well, at least he’s not setting his cubicle on fire.

49:55
Halsey News Network
​Duke is a human manaquin.

50:01
John Harris
​frame goy

50:06
Halsey News Network
​The man is more plastic than death vader

50:13
Norvin Hobbs​
@Holly R are you CI?

50:13
Halsey News Network
​Darth

50:31
Josh Randall
​@Halsey News Network he can’t even smile without dislocating his ears..

50:38
Halsey News Network
​Lolololk

50:40
Holly R.
​no @norvin I’m a Lutheran but moving toward Orthodox Christianity
50:56

Halsey News Network
​The last time he ate something hot he popped a lip.

51:26
Halsey News Network
​This guy isn’t speaking English. He is speaking cerebral palsy.

51:35
Movement Critic
​@Halsey News Network This guy must be a 1-900 Gay phone sex operator, keep talking & saying nothing so the Schmuk keeps paying in hopes he says something “interesting”

51:49
E. Vee​
Striker is a good man

52:03
E. Vee​
of course you dont, you dont like Jesus either

52:09
Halsey News Network
​I want to debate Rachel Maddow on Who has a bigger dick, her or Richard spencer

52:34
Halsey News Network
​Luke wants to respond but he has no clue what the guy is saying

52:45

Movement Critic
​@Halsey News Network Rachel, hands down

52:48

Halsey News Network
​Actually yes on January 14
53:10

Movement Critic [I said that my DNA tests say that I have 3% trace Jewish from my Italian side]
​@Halsey News Network This guy is Jewish, he has said so

53:19
Halsey News Network
​Communism vs nationalism

53:22
Holly R.
​I’m so busy cleaning my own side of the street right now I can’t be bothered with this guy & his problems.

53:32
Brian Brennan
​70 verbal IQ

53:50
David Hival
​yes, systemic homeostasis for whites. exactly what I’ve been saying

54:03
E. Vee
​ehh Brian, i wouldnt judge him that harshly. nerves play a role. he is probably better if he’s at ease

54:25
Brian Brennan
​I’m just being mean, he could be smart I don’t know his work

54:33
Halsey News Network
​You think is Luke just snapped his fingers this guy would fall asleep?
54:56
BatsintheBarbell​This guy just says what he wants WHEN he wants

55:02
Church of Entropy
​the virgin cares what people think the chad bores the audience to death

55:09
E. Vee
​lol Bats, interesting take

55:11
Halsey News Network
​This guy been hittin the purple drank

55:18
Holly R.
​What if God DID entrust the Jews with his revealed truth as a priest class? What are you going to do then, if that really happened ?

56:09
Halsey News Network [because he knows his game is exposed]
​This is straight painful

READ MORE...

DanielS goes into the enemy camp, continually hesitant, but inserts the time bombs that will bring down their campaign against White sovereignty and systemic homeostasis.

I’ve never seen Luke Ford so stressed (as I did the first time that I hung out with him briefly at the end of a hangout) and I’ve never seen him look so glum (the second time, when he gave me the floor with just him as an interlocutor). Actually, I take no delight in that. I’m sure that he felt pressure given his own position in defense of Jewry and from the Jewish friendly community around him to try to limit my message exposing the “objectivist” anti-“left” marketing campaign. Even so, I was able to say around 80% of what I’d planned - and some ideas will act like time bombs having gotten in there.

This was my first “HANGOUT” and not having opportunity to practice and get feedback as to how I might sound beforehand, I did not realize how persistently hesitant I was and how it was coming across. It was hard even for me to listen to myself the first time around in this uniquely bad delivery of mine. I hesitate constantly, but nevertheless, the content is there and I realized that the second time around listening to it - that it wasn’t all that bad for that reason. I take solace in the fact of knowing that I don’t have to speak that way and don’t usually, in normal conversation. I was in enemy territory, resources at risk, and that is cause for hesitation. But knowing that my position and resources are robust, it was alright to go ahead - I know that my program works now, it can’t be destroyed by the enemy. The best they can hope to do is distract from it, obstruct and try to bury it.

I am honestly not happy to see Luke looking so glum. It’s telling that he adds a link to Cofnas’ critique, like holy water against a goyim assault (I wasn’t impressed by Cofnas’ critique, BTW).

I come on at (2:20:47) and am confronted by Bob, the “bad cop”, the one with one dark eye-glass, lower right.

I had tested the water with him a few days before, on the evening of December 30th, in a Hangout called the “Victory of Social Justice Warriors.”

Seeing the Jewish sponsored meme that’s been promoted since 2008 - you don’t want any of that social justice warring, do you? - I saw it as occasion to join the conversation, which I do, late in the hangout (2:20:47) having just woken up (I’m in a completely different time zone).

(((Kyle))), comes on and tries to intimidate me with a strawman soliloquy

They had a little test or trap (depending upon how you look at it) waiting for me - three antagonistic, young interlocutors. One Jewish kid named (((Kyle))) was supposed to intimidate me with his brilliance. (((Kyle))) is a rather simple fellow, really, even if he can elaborate extensively on his simple cause - advocating his Jewish people (down with their program against “the left”). He interrupted my flow and straw manned me with soliloquys (he acted like I was “confused” - a typical Jewish canard), to clear up my “confusion” about Cochran, making some big deal about how I supposedly didn’t understand Cochran when he knew nothing about what I know, with my having made a few offhand, half joking remarks not intending any elaboration.

Luke Ford flanked by his good cop/bad cop

Then came a little “good cop /bad cop” pair against me. This Bob guy, goy, a Christian of the “irony bro” ilk (Irony Bro means obnoxious trolling with no pretense of trying to understand what the person you are trolling is trying to say, just bury them). Bob is the one with one dark eye glass - a flaming asshole who was attempting to bludgeon me with antagonism from the get go - “here, take this I.Q. test while you are waiting.” Sure Bob, I’ll do that. “Everything you say comes from 4-Chan” - going to show how he knew nothing about me, whipping out a comment perhaps applicable to Andrew Anglin. I have been to 4-chan briefly two or three times and derive literally none of my ideas from it; but that is the kind of immediate accusation this guy was rendering. He went on to say, “I can understand nothing you say” ...I rejoined that maybe his I.Q. isn’t high enough, idiot. (bad cop)

Salty Sage the “good cop” who tries to tell me that he’s on my side - yeah, right.

At the same time they had this other guy, “Salty Sage”, who claimed to be on my side. I don’t know where his two comments are now; but in the hangout and comments, Salty Sage would “kindly”, condescendingly, ‘re-interpret’ me for the others to understand on “friendly terms”. Then he added in the comments, that my “misdirection” (tries to turn the game around on me, as if I am the one giving misdirection, not Jewry; no, Salty Sage, I am the one diagnosing mis-direction), he tries to suggest that I am the one that is giving misdirection and that he sees it “sympathetically” as stemming from necessary contortions of circumstance..

When I called attention to the fact that Gottfried instigated this marketing campaign against “the left”, another “friend”, Ruston, said that I had a thing against Gottfried, thinks he’s great, and that everyone should read him. Then Salty Sage says he’s on my side (good cop). He groans when I say that Christianity is bullshit, then says he’s on my side (good cop Salty Sage is “on my side”, yeah right).

Anyway, that’s the context of my first hangout with Luke:(2:20:47); I make a few points that I don’t make in my subsequent talk, which is mostly me talking and Luke adding a few rejoinders. I didn’t get to say half of what I’d like to say, but the chat encouraged Luke to use the plausible excuse of my bad delivery to prevent me from subverting their position any further. Listen here: DanielS from Majorityrights talks with Luke on the topic of whether Jews are good for Western Civilization (and Europeans generally); you can listen here or Download the MP3: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593/are-jews-good-for-western-civilization - Pinned by Luke Ford.

Brundlefly

Norvin Hobbs

One of Luke‘s frequent guests, “Brundlefly” (Jewish wife, Jeff Goldblum Avitar) tries his best to put the damper on my position in the comments (which I re-post under the fold) and was probably one of those who got Luke to shut down the discussion more quickly than he normally would (Luke typically allows discussions to go on for a couple hours and I had expected to say all I had planned to say, but wasn’t given the time). Brundedlefly starts-off amicably enough, while giving away the fact that he knows nothing about me, given his surprise that I am familiar with Norvin Hobbs.

Brundlefly, 1 day ago (edited): Lmao at this guy knowing about Norvin Hobbs

After some commentators who agree with me that Jewry is NOT good for Western Civilization, things get more antagonistic and I defend myself. Only two people seem to be directly on my side, “Kat Ruby” and “Jewel Citizen”, who seems almost like Soren Renner, but I’m not sure who it is….

ARE JEWS GOOD FOR WESTERN CIVILIZATION?

Iskandar
23 hours ago
No

Mephistopheles Ghost
22 hours ago
No

The Antagonist
23 hours ago
“Are Jews Good For Western Civilization?”. NO!

Sam Browne
22 hours ago
The answer is no….No they’re not.

United States of Post America
21 hours ago
Whites and Blacks have lived together in the South for 400 years.

United States of Post America
21 hours ago
Majority Rights is hard to listen too.

PersistentPatriot
16 hours ago
Are Termites good for log cabins?

Vegtam Returns
12 hours ago
If.by “good” you mean, enabling the mass invasion of Europe by hostile religious fanatics with low IQs then yes - Jews are very good!

gurugeorge
19 hours ago (edited)
Yes and no.  The question is really: are they a net good?  NAJALT, plus many great contributions to civilization have been made by Jews, so the question is whether the harm that’s been done by Jewish bad apples (as canvassed in, say, Kevin MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique ) outweighs the benefits brought by their fellows (e.g. the great academics, entrepreneurs, storytellers, technologists, etc.), or vice-versa.

The situation is rather comparable to the situation re. Muslims: survey after survey has found that while of course NAMALT, a worryingly large minority do wish ill on the host culture, or are at least willing to turn a blind eye.  It’s like that with the Jews: some good people who are very, very good, some troublemakers who are very, very bad, and a worryingly large minority who do wish ill on the host culture; so the question is whether the trade-off is worth it.  At the moment, it’s not looking good. 

All this is why wise people in the past always thought of the Jewish Question as a really, really thorny problem.  If you eject Jews from your culture, you risk losing many benefits and becoming something of a backwater; if you don’t eject them, you risk being subverted and having your culture and civilization destroyed from within.

General Patton
23 hours ago
The question can easily be decided by looking at one single issue; immigration.
Jews are, for the most part, open borders lunatics, hell bent on wrecking western nations with massive third world immigration.

Kat Ruby
19 hours ago
After listening from beginning to end, I get the impression that Luke doesn’t like you, Daniel. He uses PC gotcha, ‘you don’t like Jews’ which sets you up in a political correct world as a bad man. But Luke is civilized enough and his perspective as one of Jew’s step-brethren can be enlightening.

Brundlefly
14 hours ago
Kat Ruby probably because Daniel is so devoid of charisma that he felt like his time was being wasted.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
9 hours ago (edited)
@Brundlefly We’ll see if I am “void of charisma” and especially if the content I’m producing is a “waste of time”

99hoolio
20 hours ago
This guy is the anti-KMG. I don’t think I’ve heard a less fluent speaker.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
19 hours ago (edited)
It;s hard even for me to listen to my constant hesitations. It’s a shame because the content is there; but being aware of the frustrating delivery, I’ll be sure to be more fluid in the future.

rollo clevich
16 hours ago
@Daniel Sienkiewicz I now why you delivered a prepared script when you were on Sunic’s VOR show many years ago.

Brundlefly
14 hours ago
Daniel Sienkiewicz you need to raise your energy level bud. Also the bumping microphone is distracting.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
10 hours ago
Raise my energy level? The bumps and hesitance in my presentation were due mostly to a lack of experience in hangouts. I had (and have) energy enough for much more that I need to say. You sound like Donald Trump in your low energy criticism. Don’t worry, he had enough energy level to complete the raison d’etre of his presidency - to undo the Iran Deal for his people.

Brundlefly
10 hours ago (edited)
Daniel Sienkiewicz you speak in a low monotone. You have the charisma of a paper bag. Go back and read the chat to see how the audience reacted to your presentational style.

I went back and listened a second time, and I found your perspective unique and interesting. However, your presentation is so poor that I doubt you’ll get many opportunities to share it.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
9 hours ago
@Brundlefly I listened a second time as well, and didn’t think it was bad the second time around; and I have much more to say. I think your perspective is overly harsh because it is influenced by the fact of your Jewish wife. It is wishfully negative therefore - “the charisma of a paper bag.” I won’t bother looking at the chat because it is full of HASBRA-like trolls,  Christians, etc. They will take as antagonistic a view of me as possible. I may not get many opportunities here to share my view some more if the likes of you and your Jewish friends can help it, but its your loss. I will go elsewhere and they will be better off for it.

Brundlefly
9 hours ago
Daniel Sienkiewicz Lmao keep making excuses for being terrible radio. You pontificate for 25 minutes, Luke speaks for 5 seconds and you’re already cutting him off.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
9 hours ago (edited)
@Brundlefly I didn’t cut him off, he can speak all he wants*. I’m not making excuses. The content is there and there is more to come. I’m sorry for your predicament with your wife, but it’s not my problem. You can try disinformation on the basis of criticizing me and my style, but the content is there, it is informative “radio”, and there is more to come, probably with better style as well. 

*You’re talking about the moment when I didn’t want to be tarred with the singular idea that Jews “are parasites” In fact, I got derailed from saying that they are generally antagonistic as a pattern - a different matter from parasitism and also reason to separate from them.

AJC B
9 hours ago
Daniel Sienkiewicz Pop a couple of Modafinils two hours before the show. Wash them down with a double espresso or two but don’t forget the L-theanine!

Brundlefly
7 hours ago
Daniel Sienkiewicz I have no criticism of your ideas. I already said I thought they were unique and interesting. I’m offering you the constructive criticism that your presentation is bad and you should work on it if you care about influencing others with your ideas.

Regarding your poor interpersonal skills, you kept interrupting every single time Luke broke in.  Apparently, speaking uninterrupted for tens of minutes at a time in a sloth-like cadence isn’t enough for you.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
7 hours ago (edited)
@Brundlefly Thank you. I’m glad that you like my ideas and there are more to be heard. I have heard many intelligent things from you as well. I already readily acknowledged in my very first comment that it was even hard for me to listen (to me) for all the hesitancy in my speech (maybe because I’d “been out on the town” the night before) but whatever would be my excuse, I have already said that I will concentrate on doing better. Regarding my interpersonal skills, ultimately, Luke spoke, said everything that he intended to say and would speak every time he wanted. And that’s is perfectly fine with me.

ovfuckyou
6 hours ago
@Brundlefly “I think your perspective is overly harsh because it is influenced by the fact of your Jewish wife.” LOL

Daniel Sienkiewicz
6 hours ago
@ovfuckyou Yes, I think that motivated some of his harsh criticisms - charisma of a paper bag, snails pace, shit like that.

Brundlefly
1 hour ago
Daniel Sienkiewicz where’s the lie? You can’t refute my observations so you resort to ad hominem.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
36 minutes ago (edited)
@Brundlefly My very first comment was an acknowledgement that the presentation should have been better. I was unaware of how I was coming across with my continually hesitant speech in this, my first hangout. I said I’d be sure to do better in the future. You agreed that the content was there. ..but produced a flurry of comments under this and other comments - making ad hominum attacks ON ME: You were surprised that I knew who Norvin Hobbs was. Which means that you barely know who I am. But then you went on to draw full conclusions about me from this, my fist hangout - that I “have no charisma” - which you added to Kat Ruby’s comment below,; that I have “the charisma of the paper bag”, that you doubted that I’d get more opportunities to present my ideas because of my poor delivery” - I believe these “observations” are heavily influenced by the fact that my views are a threat to Jewish participation in White advocacy - and perhaps those married into Jewry, as you are. Recognizing the threat, the chat was probably encouraging Luke to truncate my message - I had about twenty percent remaining of what I planned to say - important stuff - would have headed off some of the misdirection that Halsey et al. were trying to put across in the subsequent podcast . But I have lots more more to say and don’t need to say it here; if you are going to insist on blocking me based on conclusions that you try to draw about “my lack of charisma” when, in fact, you know little about me. I was being attacked from the onset in my brief entry to the hangout the other day - so, the people here are not exactly rooting form me - and it is to be expected as I am in Jewish territory replete with trolls and trolling that will seize upon anything that they can to limit my message.

Brundlefly
28 minutes ago
Daniel Sienkiewicz I’m not blocking anyone. If you think this audience is hostile to your message, then you don’t understand the audience.

Daniel Sienkiewicz
1 second ago
@Brundlefly I disagree. I do understand the audience and the context.

Jewel Citizen
15 hours ago
There are two words in your title that do not belong in the same sentence let alone next to each other and I’m not referring to ”Western Civilisation”…

READ MORE...

Innocent until proven guilty we are.

Nobody alive should be presumed guilty and made to suffer and pay with their lives and ethnonationhood, even if it is true that forebears may have over corrected, even vastly. Where people manifest traits of prior generations so as to act criminally, as homicidal imperial supremacists, that’s another matter.

Until then, it is a general UN agreement that collective punishment is not valid….let alone for the historical misdeeds of regimes from prior generations.

Nevertheless, the vast wounds, the gaping chasms of genetic capital that many may vaguely perceive as family and loved ones lost, yearn over, if not feel acutely - these losses in our genetic capital will likely well up through our unconscious and conscious systemically and must be recognized.

That caveat having been issued, having absolved present generations, we will move on to correct the record of imperialist misdeeds of prior generations and attempted cover-ups by a more recent generation.

We will be addressing the notion that Hitler and the Nazis were acting in sheer defense and that they were making bonafide peace offerings, that the Allies were the true aggressors.

To get a more accurate and fair understanding of the sources of the conflict, we need to be fairly comprehensive about the history - will begin with the more recent history and work back into historical origins… reversing the usual Nazi sympathetic order of historical survey, from Versailles to the present, as if history started there.

Press image above or here for video, Part 4: If we take a historical perspective of ethnonationalists acting in good faith as opposed to that of the empires that were in control of Europe just prior to the World Wars, we can see that it was imperialism, not nationalism, that in fact spawned these wars. If we want to do justice to the homeostatic systemic correction that ethnonationalism affords against runaway liberal internationalism, we need to take advantage of interactive correctability through a more honest historical frame of reference, to locate where ethnonationalism lost homeostatic correctiive reference and became subject to imperial stasis.

That would mean beginning at least at the point where (Germanic) imperialism became a dominant paradigm in and through (central/eastern) Europe, a period issued in by Frederick The Great - when the Polish ethnostate was dissolved, Germanization imposed by the imperial Austro-Hungarian and German/Prussian partitions, while imperial Russia controlled the rest of it.

As far as ethnostatism goes in fact, Germany remained huge following Versailles, retaining a great deal of what is now western Poland, including Breslau (now Wroclaw) and East Prussia, which is now Kaliningrad and parts just south.

We’ll go into the roots of these ethnonational travails, including mistakes on the Polish side, but not focusing there for now, since that’s what you’ve been hearing in the PC of so called WN, in exaggerated form.

Typically disregarded is the Versailles committee’s valid reasoning for areas granted to Poland and of the Sudetenland retained for Czech by the Treaty of St. Germain.

Historical examination will show that Danzig and the Sudetenland (there in green) form a crucial historical frame of ethnonational borders.

Nazi Germany understood this, as Britain’s Daily Telegraph* wrote in 1939:

“Today we realise the truth of Bismarck’s saying that he who possesses the Bohemian chain dominates Europe.

Are we to realise soon the significance of Frederick the Great’s words, “Who rules over the mouth of the Vistula, rules over Poland better than the King of Poland himself”?

Herr Hitler received a birthday gift of the freedom of Danzig. It remains to be seen whether this will involve Danzig’s receiving the “freedom” of Herr Hitler”

Though historically disputed and shifting in demographics, Danzig was occupied by Germans at that time.

In fact, Danzig is ground zero both in the framrwork of World War II and historically, of German / Polish conflict, and international intervention. It is there we need to begin overcoming shallow and mistaken Hitler apologist talk that he just wanted Danzig back -as if it was simply German and rightfully theirs, given to those stubborn Poles, when if fact Poland was merely given a stake in a Danzig made neutral by Versailles for historical and logistical reasons.

Of course these were mere pesky contentions to Hitler, which would one day be made historically incidental when his Plan East was effectively concluded. For the time being, propaganda was necessary to justify this plan and get it underway.

Thus, with regard to allegations made by the Nazis of Polish abuse of German civilians within the the corridor, we absolutely cannot assume the veracity. Even cursory glance at footage of interwar Danzig does not indicate a beleaguered German population under anything like abject duress - on the contrary, it shows as remarkably comfortable and thriving population, commercial well being despite this being during the throes of world wide economic depression.

Whatever cruelties that did in fact come of Polish nationalism toward Germans did not come in a vacuum, as they were responses to having their people and nation subject to cruel repression under the Teutonic Order and Frederick the Great’s Prussia - anti Polinism and programs of Germanification.

Again, its important to note in the abstract, that for whatever grievances the Germans may have had in regard to the response of Polish nationalists in their newly reformed nation upon Versailles, Hitler and Nazism more than made up for it, through policies such as killing 10 times the number of Poles for any German killed by Polish partitions; and retaliations far worse in the overview of their war policy and practice against Poles and Poland - such as the murdering of Polish civilians in the Warsaw ghetto uprising - in far greater number than civilians were killed in the Dresden fire bombing a year later, speaking of more than making up for grievances.

But before we re-animate a German - Polish conflict, as we are ethnonationalists of good will - before adopting the appearance of being motivated to attribute retroactive guilt then - let us reinvoke principle once again.

One of the main reasons why we are confronted with having to deal with this issue of Nazism, so divisive and stigmatic of Whites, is because of PC guilt-tripping of Whites… and a direct backlash against that guilt tripping ...particularly by those among groups not of a perspective where Nazi Germany was directly antagonistic…

And again, there has been much pandering to counter that guilt tripping in order to gain audience and backing among American Whites in particular.

It is key therefore to invoke this antidote to guilt tripping to underscore first of all, that it is history, nobody alive should be made to suffer and pay with their lives and nationhood.

__________________________

* Correction, I had accidentally said, “Daily Mirror.” This quote is actually from a Daily Telegraph article, 5 May 1939.

Audio of Part 3

Hitler and Nazism were Not White Nationalism, Part 3

Thus we have established a first principle of this discourse, a positive tautology that the World Wars are history, the people of today are not to blame and should not be subject to the collective punishment of losing their peoplehood and corresponding nations.

There is a second principle that we will invoke at this point, one which the internet has provided for in spades, but which White Nationalists have not utilized to anything like its full potential.

That is correctability, the correctability of ideas and understanding through interactive participation, whether through comments or speaking directly to people and engaging correction.

To date, what has been imposed as if correction, has largely been World War II revisionism - which tends to be dishonest excuses and apologetics for Nazi imperialism where not outright recitation of Nazi propaganda that could be falsified rather easily if they cared to do it.

Misrepresentation and omissions of important facts can remain if would-be interlocutors are not of good faith, don’t really want to pursue the truth, though Nazi apologetics usually claim the truth as their mission.

On the other hand, taking interactive correctability for granted and expecting the voices of correction to chime-in has left me susceptible to allow oversights to linger, because many would-be WN, who’ve accepted the rightist identity and its own political correctness will not say “boo” and alert me to oversights, especially when calling attention to these matters will call negative attention and shoot holes in their pro-Hitler/Nazi position.

Graudenz, Kulm, Thorn and Bromberg, a would-be occlusive salient. To the south of those cities, Poznan and Gniezno are the cradle of Polish nationhood.

There is a third and ancillary tautology to be invoked which is that for whatever grievances that either side had of the times, they were more than made up for.

We will apply this as a third tautological principle then, after ‘it’s history and nobody had anything to do with it’, and after correctability, that is, the tautology that for whatever complaints of the time, “they more than made up for it in retaliation.”

We will take a critical perspective on grievances and injustices alleged by the Nazi apologists, such as allegations made against Polish nationals and partisans, since those allegations have tended to go uncorrected within the philoNazistic PC of so called White Nationalism.

But we need to circle back to our second principle at this point, which is interactive correctability and the fact that so called WN has not been acting in good faith to call matters to attention, especially when they would reflect badly on Nazi Germany.

In previous discussions of Hitler’s complaints over where Versailles borders were drawn, I have made the claim that there were really only three cities of significance lost by Germany - Poznan, Bromberg and Thorn and one made neutral, Danzig (made neutral, not Polish, as in something the Poles could unilaterally return to Germany as misinformed Hitler apologists often claim they should have); and there were some village areas in the corridor and near the Versailles established border where Germans were caught in Polish territory, and we must add that there were Poles caught in German territory. But though Danzig was at the time occupied by Germans, it was a historically disputed city and a strategic city for all concerned, thus justifiably deemed neutral by Versailles. Cities to the south of the corridor, such as Poznan, Gniezno and Leszno, should not have been considered anything remotely but Polish.

While it is true that in previous discussions of this issue I had neglected to mention two cities of significance in the Polish corridor which were inhabited by Germans, Graudenz and Kulm , known in Polish as Grudziądz and Chelmno, it does not change the thesis.

First of all, circling to principle three (mis-spoke; it is “principle two”, correctability that is invoked here) again, that the comment section has been open and feedback of good will is expected to correct oversights such as that.

More fundamentally, these cities being under German political jurisdiction would only extend the salient that would be formed by Bromberg and Torun to obstruct and potentially occlude crucial strategic and economic sea access for Poland.

In addition, Graudenz and Klum were formed of brutal Teutonic and Prussian imperialism on cities that were originally Polish.

Finally, it is a history that only provides more examples of the enormous toll that the Nazis took against impositions of Polish patriotism in these areas; invoking principle three, that they more than made up for it.

Thus, it is no wonder that the Hitler redemptionists didn’t particularly care to take me up on my open offer to correct whatever prior oversights of mine…

No, the Hitler redemptionists, in their claim to be after the truth of history, tend to begin history at or about World War I. And of course, Germany was a sheer victim of the rest of the world, from the Schiff’s backing of the Trotskies, to the Balfour Declaration to the Treaty of Versailles.  But really, to do enthnonationalism justice, we need to go further back in history…