Majorityrights News > Category: Cultural Nationalism

White Flight

- a.k.a. ethnic cleansing of Whites from the cities and the Biden Plan to hunt them down wherever they go.

Jason No White Guilt

We are talking about moving, for the safety of ourselves, the safety of our families so that we can continue to articulate and activate and be activists for White well-being… in psychological defense for the psychological warfare being waged against us.

And guess who knows where we would like to move? Guess who else is looking at statisticalatlas.com?

Right here in The Biden Plan:

Government funded housing to be offered to all. Additionally, the document states that the intent is to force all communities to accept new housing patterns that will place government funded housing in all neighborhoods.

“Democrats will supercharge investment in the Housing Trust Fund to greatly expand the number of affordable housing units on the market, reduce home prices and create jobs. We commit to providing Section 8 Housing support for every eligible family. We will make energy efficient upgrades for millions of low income households in suburban and rural areas.”

...this is right out of the Biden verbiage: affordable housing in rural areas.

Public housing units that save families money on their energy bills, create jobs and provide safe and healthy homes to black and other people of color ...long unresolved to this day.

[Verbatim quote from The Biden Plan: “America’s history of using public policy and private lending restrictions to close neighborhoods off to Black families and other people of color is long, painful, and unresolved to this day.’]

This will be implemented as soon as Biden or the next Democrat gets into the Presidency. You will have no recourse to stop this from happening, because the nodes of power, too many of them, are in the hands of the anti-Whites.

This is right in the Biden Plan.

  ...you will move your family to exurbs and rural areas to protect your family from anti-Whites; and then as soon as Biden or another individual that comes after another four years of Trump comes into office, this Biden Plan, in full, which by the way, [goes along with what] the Democrats are moving to implement, the entire Heroes Act [goes] in the spending bill. 

The Heroes Act calls for an anonymous hotline where people will be able to call on you for heretical thoughts and turn you in to the FBI; so they’ll be making a list and checking it more than twice about all of those who are heretical out there, in other words, all of those who aren’t anti-White. 

So, if you think that you’re going to move to some area, but you might vote for Biden because you think that’s somehow going to benefit, well he’s going to build a tenement right out where you live. 

And he’s going to fill it with anti-White non-Whites. 

In the Biden Plan the Democrats are openly saying -

Vote for Biden and we’re going to create section 8 housing in every rural and exUrbian area.

Related at Majorityrights:

Undoing inherited wisdom & means of separatism / forcing integration - YKW doing as YKW do

Exclusive: Michelle Malkin Lays Out Who Is Funding Open Borders Activism

Open Borders Inc: Taxpayers and Church donors fund their own destruction and displacement.

Soros teams-up with NGO’s and Religious Charities to open borders. So called conservative Republicans culpable as well.

Google and other Tech giants in cahoots with SPLC and ADL to enforce censorship and “cancel culture.”

Anne Corcoran’s site - Refugee Resettlement Watch - shut down.

......

(4:00)

Michelle Malkin:

Whether its quoting from the tax documents of these tax exempt non profit charities that are essentially the political action arm of the Democrat party, or exhaustive lists of the legal organizations that make up the illegal alien lawyers lobby ...more than 400 groups that I mention…

I think that its important that American tax payers know that it’s largely their money that is funding their own destruction.

(4:45)

Alex Marlow:

And for me one thing that really hurt, as a Catholic, was knowing how much the collection money goes straight to the illegal alien enablers.

You (Michelle) go after the financial beneficiaries of immigration.

Michelle Malkin:

Yes, and your average consumer of conservative information is very familiar with the name George Soros.

But I think they’re less familiar with the interaction and the infrastructure between George Soros and The Vatican and The Catholic Church..and every one of its sub-organizations; the conference on Catholic Bishops, the Campaign for Human Development, Catholic Charities, Catholic Relief Services ....The Jesuit Refugee Service, and its role in standing up the illegal alien shelter network stretching all the way from Central America to churches inside the United States.

So people need to think very carefully if they’re going to sit in Catholic Church pugh’s if they’re going to contribute to the annual Thanks Giving Fund.

Because that is multiple, multiple millions of dollars that is going to go straight into amnesty shills that operate as a smuggling network.

(6:30)

Alex Marlow:

And you also are not afraid to go after people on the right…

You don’t hold back from people who are on the dole from the right on the Open Borders Lobby.

This includes the tech giants and their role.

I had no cue as to how open borders that Jeff Bezos was.

He backs all these open borders groups.

and he’s probably the least threatening of the tech giants at the moment. ..we know Google and Facebook’s history of it…the thing in Washington now is that people on the right are getting bought off by these people.

(7:37)

Michell Malkin:

Yes, I would agree.

There are many of these beltway establishment Republicans who are completely bought off.

I talk openly about the Koch brothers; the Libra Organization they sponsor is as bad as any Soros operation that shills for so called illegal alien dreamers.

(10:08)

Alex Marlow:

“Talk to us about this war on national sovereignty…and what it really means, which is a war for globalism”...

Michelle Malkin:

“Yes and this is not some wild, black helicopter conspiracy ....all of the Soros paid minions have already attacked me as some sort of conspiracy theorist….I call them Soros flying monkeys.”

“But Soros is very explicit about it in his books and in his speeches all over the world, that sovereignty is a quote unquote obstacle - OBSTACLE.

So, he sees our borders as obstacles. ...and our walls and every attempt to enforce our sovereignty and the rule of law.

...and you’ve got a lot of very learned listeners who understand what the United Nations agenda is”...

Alex Marlow:

Their agenda is grifting brown people.

Michelle Malkin:

There you go, that’s pretty much the bottom line.

And so people wonder how did Minneapolis turn into what it turned into (this was posted last September).

...and Lewiston, Maine and Nashville, Tennessee.

Well, if you have been paying attention to UNGA assemblies every year, you would understand that.

[In opposition to these global compacts] It is very encouraging to me to hear plans floated of zeroing-out the refugee resettlement numbers - a moratorium is long overdue.

Not only for the financial and cultural impact that it’s causing on a lot of these working class neighborhoods and towns that never got a say in whether they wanted these refugees, largely from Muslim countries and African countries in the first place, but also, on September 11th, to consider the national security implications of bringing people over here who have an unshakable hatred of all things Western.

Alex Marlow:

Yeah, this is about a war on the West, this is where this is going.

Michelle Malkin:

And where does this come from?

This is why I thought it was very important to include a chapter on The Southern Poverty Law Center.

Long before the deplatformings that we’ve seen over the last year or so, back in 2006 and 2007 there was a little video that popped up on Youtube ... in partnership between La Raza and the ADL..

..creating a guide book of code words of hate, and Michelle was on this list and in this video because she had used the word “invasion” (Azatlan, Reconquista and Invasion).

Alex Marlow:

I had no clue that Google was working with the SPLC.

Michelle Malkin:

...of course it’s not just Google. We mentioned Amazon and Tim Cook, who is in the hip pocket of the SPLC, Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg.

But even other platforms where I had never worried that they would be polluted by politics - WordPress.

I mentioned in the book that a heroine of mine, Anne Corcoran, who runs, or ran, an incredible reporting blog called Refugee Resettlement Watch, had that whole blog, the plug was just completely pulled, just two months ago (July 2019) by Word Press.

...my blog is on Word Press, and I wake up every morning worrying that my blog will no longer exist.

Related at Majorityrights:

Say MORATORIUM! You Can! 10 Reasons. Appeal to R. Goode & Doing Good for Doing Good: The Golden Rule

If I understand correctly, Pete Townshend is rendering a similar account through his Rock Opera “Tommy”... the story of a traumatized boy, Tommy, who reacts with selective mutism (also deafness and blindness in “Tommy’s” case).

Anyway, “Tommy” came right to mind when listening to Rose Kitten’s true story of childhood trauma and the resulting selective mutism that she overcame.

The Who - Tommy, Can You Hear Me?

CaesarSextus@CaesarSextus

“Germans” - notice the Poles rightly don’t use the blame-shifting “Nazis”.

BasedPoland@BasedPoland

Today is the 76 anniversary of the outbreak of the #WarsawUprising

The Germans murdered 200,000+ Poles during the 63-day-long uprising. Many of them children

Just in my district (Wola),they executed 50,000 civilians in 4 days

Our football fans have excellent historical memory!

I must disagree with the sentiment here. It’s far better to take the weight off of the Germans per se, especially subsequent generations, and place the burden on the Nazi regime and those who went along with it (who were thus, Nazis).

Tarring all Germans and leaving them no route of distinction from the Nazi regime is no way to move forward and foster good neighborly relations among nations.

The Poles would not appreciate it, and quite rightly not, if the entire nation of their people were blamed for the misdeeds of some rogue regime of theirs from history.

.....

This is why I maintain the term “Nazi.” In order to distinguish a rogue regime from German people per se - those who never really thought it was the right course of action and those who went along with it but might not have with the guidance of a better regime; recognizing their human agency as it might pursue neighborly coordination as opposed to the natural fallacy of deterministic conflict and war that was epistemic of Nazi ideology.

Further, “Nazi” is used so as to avoid the ennobling, misrepresenting and misleading title, “National Socialist.” Hitler’s regime was imperialist, not nationalist, supremacist not socialist - not “social” in most of the positive connotations of “social” - particularly, not in the non-economic, social sense of humaneness and social accountability; not only to qualitative niches of its own, but also in recognition and respect for the niche qualities of other groups; and in the need to get along with these human ecologies - as the world view of praxis, with its apprehension of reflexive effects, would do.

I’m going to keep hammering-home the importance of centralizing our world view through praxis - that is to say our people groups, their biological nature (requiring optimal, not maximal need satisfaction), mammalian nature (caring for relationships) and their distinctly human capacities - for example to learn to get along, to coordinate interests, by means of social accountability to correct runaway trajectories of natural fallacy and ideals beyond human nature; which otherwise rupture human and pervasive ecological systems.

If humans are to evolve, devolve as it were, in a dehumanizing eusocial manner, it is far more likely to occur through the kind of natural fallacy that the Nazis operated on.

Whereas the Post Modern project - properly understood, which I call the White Post modern project in order to distinguish it - by taking the post modern turn to centralize our world view through praxis, provides for the coherence, social accountability, correctivity and agency to stave-off such pernicious devolution.

....

* “White Post Modern Project” - as distinguished from the da da, ironic, hyper relative, hyper critical deconstructionist misrepresentations of the post modern project.

Aleš Ernecl 4 July 2020, conducts a Big Interview

Dr Kevin MacDonald Evolutionary Psychology, Jews, Europeans and Christianity

Paleoconservatism as “Cultural Controlled Opposition” in response to Neo-Conservatism and its Clean Break Memo.

They typically come across as your best asset. If you recognize it for what it is and keep it on the radar screen as such, not getting caught up, controlled opposition can have its utility as they are often funded to provide valuable resource, typically enlisting intelligent people and allowing them fine and clear articulation of some important information for WN. Nick Fuentes nicely articulates Israeli Operation Clean Break, a.k.a., “Project for a New America Century.”

Although Nick’s Paleoconservatism is not what most people consider to be classic controlled opposition, make no mistake. While we are tossing around the word “culture” of late, adding “cultural capitalism” and “cultural nationalism” on the radar screen with cultural Marxism, it can be said quite accurately that Paleoconservatism is a “cultural controlled opposition”.... a bit softer and more flexible perhaps than classic, but undoubtedly allowing the enemies of European peoples to act on key points.

EBL 31: Michel Foucault “The Birth of Biopolitics” (with Alex McNabb)

Thamster WitNat
2.96K subscribers

The EBL crew is joined by special guest Alex McNabb for a discussion of Michel Foucault’s 1978-79 series of lectures titled “The Birth of Biopolitics”. The crew examines facets of neoliberalism in the light of Foucault’s classic treatise

I stopped reading Foucault after the first book of his that I read, The History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure.

I was intrigued by the title, which indicated a classical Epicurean inquiry, a worthy avenue it seemed to me. However, except for the provocatively useful, but un-elaborated upon term, “bio-power”, there wasn’t much that i found to be of use in the text. On the contrary, I found him coming back repeatedly to the idea that (some) ancient Greeks (allegedly) considered homosexual pedophilia normal as transparent justification for his own predilection among this contextual relativization of history.

Even so, the term “bio-power” provides a clue as to an angle that can be used in inquiry and warning as to how it is that Africans can be a danger, i.e., not merely antagonistic, but having capacity, dangerous capability ...e.g., as a people some 200,000 years evolved prior to and thus compared to the precarious 41,000 years of European evolution.

There are several advantages to this angle which I will not elaborate on, but only add that it helps to mitigate against the Nazophiles who try to minimize black antagonism, looking upon themselves and their singular concern for the J.Q. as the ultimate in sophistication (and not naivete).

It also goes to show that sometimes a book a thousand pages long can be justified by one term or even the title.

While I had always meant to read Foucault’s most important books, Discipline and Punish and Birth of the Clinic for the provocative angles that Foucault takes on social problems, I never got around to it having been turned off enough by Foucault’s pedophilia apologetics and having read enough people quoting the texts to get the idea…

Josh Neal, Alex McNabb, Jefferson Lee and Thampster have a discussion in and about Foucault having apparently been provoked by the same term - bio-poltics/bio-power - and finding the same thing, the Foucault does not elaborate.

However, they have a decent discussion in and about what Foucault’s lecture on bio-politics does talk about - neo-liberalism…

....“the market (and its infamous ‘magic hand’) becomes the space of truth.”

....while the panel ventures some into Birth of The Clinic and Discipline and Punish.

Again, I’m not endorsing Foucault but he does provide provocative angles, prompting ways to think about power relations and their historical context in the determination of how social problems come to count.