Majorityrights News > Category: U.S. Politics

Black & Hispanic Democrats vs White, Liberal Democrats - Potential White Left Recruiting Ground

Posted by DanielS on Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:02.


                Lots of White faces at Bernie rally.

TOO, Sam Dickson, “Black and Hispanic Democrats versus White, Liberal Democrats,” 22 March 2016:  With all the attention on Donald Trump, there has been little discussion of the astonishing rift between Black and Hispanic Democrats on one hand and White liberal Democrats on the other.

Hillary Clinton has shut Bernie Sanders out of the Black and Brown voters. She is their candidate. She is catering to them to an astonishing degree. She has endorsed all the fantasies and lies about White cops killing Black males. She has hauled the mother of Travon Martin around, putting her on the stage to endorse her candidacy, and talking about how Lil’ Travon was murdered by George Zimmerman but there was no justice. She has extolled the Gentle Giant.

She made statements about a breaking story about three Black coeds who claimed they were attacked by Whites on a bus who called them “nigger.” When a surveillance video from the bus revealed that the whole story was concocted, Hillary refused to retract her statements or to apologize for joining in false accusations against innocent people.

There is no limit in race-betrayal that Clinton will not go to.

Clinton is now virtually the captive of the Blacks and Browns. They cast about half the votes in the Democratic Party. They are the ones who have given her the nomination.

The White Democrats — even the wimmin — have deserted her and flocked to Sanders in droves.

Sanders has gotten nowhere in his efforts to chip non-White voters away from Clinton.

He is the candidate of the White wing of the Democratic Party.

What does this mean for White Nationalists like us who are thinking in long range terms (like Jews) instead of next weeks primary vote?

A lot.

For many years I have predicted that there would come a point at which White liberals would realize that their Black and Brown friends don’t have the slightest interest in issues that excite White liberals: gay rights, environmentalism, funding for the arts, conservation, public parks.

No. The Blacks and the Browns are only interested in “The Gimme.”

And increasingly Blacks and Browns will control and dominate the Democratic Party. Already, they are sending the White liberal Democrats to the back of the bus.

The alliance between White liberals and the racist minorities is breaking up. They are splitting.

Add in the fact that there are a lot of White liberals at the local level who have caught on that the Jews are running their own racist ethnostate and that their posturings about fighting racism and their deep, deep concern about the plight of Blacks and the need for open borders are utterly insincere.

At some point our White liberal racial brothers and sisters are going to be up for grabs.

The shizoid nature of Democratic voter behavior along racial lines shows that this is coming.

How can we reach out to them and help raise the consciousness?


Hillary Leaked Email: Destroy Syria for Israel

Posted by DanielS on Monday, 21 March 2016 08:36.

TNO, Clinton: Destroy Syria for Israel, 20 March 2016:

A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”

In an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” to personally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.

In the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government.

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government — and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.

“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.

Even though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.
READ Depression—Biological and Gender Factors

She specifically links Iran’s mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.

Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to be destroyed.

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.

If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

It is, Clinton continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.

This would not come about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”

The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.

Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.

Clinton goes on to asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” to do:

In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

The email proves—as if any more proof was needed—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.

It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.

In addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of war in Syria.

The real and disturbing possibility that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people—could become the next president of America is the most deeply shocking thought of all.

Clinton’s public assertion that, if elected president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.


Trump’s Jewish Cabal

Posted by DanielS on Monday, 21 March 2016 06:26.

Trump’s Jewish cabal

Who Controls Donald Trump?

Donald Trump’s Jewish Cabal
http://pastebin.com/cRZDHRc6

Michael Cohen (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Special Counsel, The Trump Organization
http://forward.com/news/312123/meet-michael-cohen-donald-trumps-jewish-wingman/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/03/21/meet-donald-trumps-karl-rove-michael-cohen.html
http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-features/154763/donald-trump-more-my-boss-he-a-patriarch
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-political-pit-bull-meet-michael-cohen/story?id=13386747
http://heavy.com/news/2015/07/donald-trump-foundation-lawyer-michael-cohen-ivana-biography-rape-claim-spouse/

Michael Cohen

Gil Dezer (Ashkenazi Jew) – President, Trump Dezer Development
http://gildezer.net/
http://www.dezerdevelopment.com/
http://dezerproperties.com/about/
http://www.dezerdevelopment.com/about/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gil-dezer-bab24432
http://www.linkedin.com/company/trump-dezer-development
http://therealdeal.com/issues_articles/life-in-the-fast-lane/

Gil Dezer

Michael Dezer (Ashkenazi Jew) – Founder, Trump Dezer Development
http://www.dezerdevelopment.com/
http://dezerproperties.com/about/
http://www.dezerdevelopment.com/about/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Dezer
http://www.linkedin.com/company/trump-dezer-development
http://www.alumni.pace.edu/s/1655/02-alumni/social.aspx?sid=1655&gid=2&pgid=526

Michael Dezer

Alan Garten (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and General Counsel, The Trump Organization
http://launchpadli.com/mentor/alan-garten/
http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Alan-Garten/32339178
http://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-garten-405a1013

Alan Garten

Michael Glassner (Ashkenazi Jew) – National Political Director, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glassner-81417313
http://www.jewishjournal.com/nation/article/from_aipac_to_trump_michael_glassners_journey
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/30/politics/donald-trump-michael-glassner-political-director/
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/donald-trump-2016-sarah-palin-ade-political-director-120811
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/donald-trump-michael-Glassner-campaign-political-director/2015/07/30/id/659633/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/07/30/trump-hires-former-palin-aide-as-political-director/

Michael Glassner

Jason Greenblatt (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and General Counsel, The Trump Organization
http://blogs.yu.edu/alumni-news/2012/10/04/jason-greenblatt-89yc-is-no-apprentice-yu-alumnus-serves-as-donald-trumps-general-counsel/

Jason Greenblatt

Brian Harris (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chief Executive Officer, Ladder Capital (Donald Trump’s largest lender)
http://www.laddercapital.com/our-team/management/
http://ir.laddercapital.com/CorporateProfile.aspx?iid=4422251
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443571904577631773945505102
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2015-how-trump-invented-trump/

Brian Harris (middle)

Carl Icahn (Ashkenazi Jew) – Owner and Chairman, Icahn Enterprises
http://carlicahn.com/
http://twitter.com/Carl_C_Icahn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Icahn
http://www.forbes.com/profile/carl-icahn/
http://www.cnbc.com/2014/04/29/25-carl-ichan.html
http://www.nasdaq.com/quotes/institutional-portfolio/icahn-carl-c-18190

Carl Icahn

Charles Kushner (Ashkenazi Jew) – Founder and Co-Owner, Kushner Companies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Kushner
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kushner_Properties
http://therealdeal.com/closings/charles-kushner/
http://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/charles-kushner

Charles Kushner

Jared Kushner (Ashkenazi Jew) – CEO, Kushner Companies; Publisher, Observer Media
http://www.kushnercompanies.com/about/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Kushner
http://fortune.com/40-under-40/jared-kushner-25/
http://observer.com/2015/07/when-donald-trump-is-the-father-in-law-of-your-publisher/
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/29/realestate/commercial/a-conversation-with-jared-c-kushner.html?_r=0
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3247623/Ivanka-Trump-husband-Jared-Kushner-expecting-child.html
http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/02/18/ivanka-trump-and-husband-jared-kushner-tout-benefits-of-shabbat-observance-we-turn-off-our-phones-for-25-hours/#

Jared Kushner

Richard LeFrak (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman and CEO, LeFrak Organization
http://lefrak.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_LeFrak
http://www.forbes.com/profile/richard-lefrak/
http://therealdeal.com/new-research/topics/people/richard-lefrak/
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=184052&privcapId=184021
http://www.crefc.org/CREFCbio/Speaker_Bio_Popup/CREFC/Events/Speaker_Bio.aspx?hkey=3dbfc4c6-922e-465a-8ca2-3f1d15537391&id=55116

Richard LeFrak

Corey Lewandowski (Ashkenazi Jew) – Campaign Manager, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corey_Lewandowski
http://www.linkedin.com/in/corey-lewandowski-46016810
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/06/the-dark-money-man-behind-the-donald/
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/man-behind-donald-trump-run-lewandowski-120443
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/20/corey-lewandowski-donald-trump-campaign
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/04/us/politics/donald-trump-corey-lewandowski-campaign-manager.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/meet-donald-trumps-campaign-manager-corey-lewandowski/story?id=33459967
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/07/23/meet-the-man-behind-donald-trumps-presidential-campaign/

Corey Lewandowski

Stephen Miller (Ashkenazi Jew) – Policy Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/trump-snags-top-aide-to-jeff-sessions/
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/266944-sessions-aide-joining-trump-campaign
http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/26/donald-trump-hires-top-aide-to-jeff-sessions-to-help-with-policy/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/01/25/top-sessions-aide-joins-trump-campaign/
http://yellowhammernews.com/politics-2/top-sessions-immigration-communications-guru-joins-trump-campaign/

Stephen Miller

Sam Nunberg (Ashkenazi Jew) – Former Policy Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
http://ballotpedia.org/Sam_Nunberg
http://www.meforum.org/staff/Sam+Nunberg
http://www.linkedin.com/in/sam-nunberg-8179298
http://www.jta.org/2015/08/03/news-opinion/politics/trump-campaign-fires-jewish-adviser-over-racist-facebook-posts

Sam Nunberg

Stewart Rahr (Ashkenazi Jew) – Former Owner, Kinray
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Rahr
http://www.forbes.com/profile/stewart-rahr/
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.570652
http://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-billionaire-boosts-hatzalahs-ambucycle-fleet-by-50/
http://www.jewishjournal.com/israel/article/billionaire_stewart_rahr_sets_sights_on_israel
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/08/fashion/the-world-through-stewart-rahrs-neon-glasses.html
http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Features/Flamboyant-billionaire-Stewart-Rahr-wows-Israel-341331
http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2014/02/14/stewart-rahr-convinces-the-donald-to-donate-100000-to-united-hatzalah/

Stewart Rahr

George Ross (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Senior Counsel, The Trump Organization
http://georgerosslive2015.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._Ross
http://www.apbspeakers.com/speaker/george-h-ross
http://www.leadersmag.com/issues/2015.1_Jan/ROB/LEADERS-George-Ross-The-Trump-Organization.html
http://capitalismmagazine.com/2004/10/donald-trumps-right-hand-man-george-ross-firing-up-business-students/

George Ross

Phil Ruffin (Ashkenazi Jew) – Owner, Treasure Island Hotel and Casino
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Ruffin
http://www.forbes.com/profile/phillip-ruffin/
http://www.gamblingsites.org/biographies/phil-ruffin/
http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/election/article64073772.html
http://calvinayre.com/2016/02/25/casino/donald-trump-mulling-las-vegas-casino/
http://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-firm-weighs-return-to-gamblingwith-a-vegas-casino-1456430694
http://vegasinc.com/business/gaming/2016/feb/03/interview-with-phil-ruffin-why-he-thinks-trump-wou/
http://hauteliving.com/2015/07/phil-ruffin-reveals-the-secrets-of-running-a-billion-dollar-empire/577539/

Phil Ruffin

Felix Sater (Ashkenazi Jew) – Former Senior Adviser, The Trump Organization
http://www.felixsaterweb.com/
http://felixsater.com/#prettyPhoto
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSpFtCmoD5o
http://www.linkedin.com/in/felix-sater-153455
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/17/nyregion/17trump.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/donald-trump-advisor-ties-mafia-article-1.2461229
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/memory-lapse-trump-seeks-distance-advisor-past-ties/story?id=34600826
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/will-donald-trumps-ties-to-a-criminal-hurt-his-campaign/article/2569496
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/29c255c0b69a48258ecae69a61612537/trump-picked-stock-fraud-felon-senior-adviser
http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/12/04/misconduct-allegations-follow-trump-associate-with-mob-past

Felix Sater

Allen Weisselberg (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, The Trump Organization
http://www.linkedin.com/in/allen-weisselberg-bb88a016
http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Allen-Weisselberg/317289759
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=344997&privcapId=344985&previousCapId=344985&previousTitle=The Trump Organization LLC

Allen Weisselberg

Steve Wynn (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman and CEO, Wynn Resorts
http://www.wynnlasvegas.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wynn
http://www.forbes.com/profile/steve-wynn/
http://www.biography.com/people/steve-wynn-201198
http://www.businessinsider.com/wynn-stock-tumbles-to-start-year-2016-1

Steve Wynn

Lara Yunaska (Ashkenazi Jew) – Associate Producer, Inside Edition
http://twitter.com/laraleatrump
http://www.linkedin.com/in/larayunaska
http://www.erictrumpfoundation.com/board-of-directors/lara-yunaska-trump
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/eric-trump-marries-lara-yunaska-palm-beach-wedding-article-1.2004472
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2832130/Welcome-Trump-family-Lara-Yunaska-poses-Eric-parents-Donald-Ivana-Melania-official-wedding-photo.html
http://heavy.com/news/2016/02/eric-trump-wife-lara-yunaska-photos-pictures-age-bio-married-cbs-inside-edition-injury-wiki-facts-daughter-in-law-charity/


Lara Yunaska


White American Advocacy of Trump: The Arguments

Posted by DanielS on Friday, 18 March 2016 10:23.

Republican leaders talk about how to deal with Trump (apparently, these are not actors):

First of all, my (DanielS) concerns are primarily metapolitical in nature, where political at all. I have never had faith in the dog and pony show of politics to look after our E.G.I.

Nevertheless, there are people who care about European/White E.G.I. who think it is important for strategic reasons to get White people en mass behind Trump.

Again, it won’t be this White man who cares, I have never liked Trump and don’t trust his values. A businessman is, by training, Manichean: truth and justice is not his objective, defeating others is; and in that game that he plays, changing the rules, if necessary to win, is what he will do.

Cyberneticists have famously observed that the engineer and the scientist by contrast, is focused on Augustinian devils - natural devils.

Perhaps that focus makes a scientist such as MacDonald gullible to the tactics and naive to the motives of a businessman like Trump.

However, in service of squaring things-off, so that we can have an accurate dialectic going on here, in order to arrive at what is more the case, rather than arguing against cardboard figures, lets try to render some of MacDonald’s best arguments as to why Trump is someone for Whites to get behind.

MacDonald’s arguments as I understand them:

1) Because he is independently wealthy, he can flout the PC norms that have hog-tied Whites and address the true and important concerns of what has been the implicit base in support of the Republican Party - White people.

- That candor to move the Overton window is opposed to the concerns of people in the clip; and the Jews who have policed White ethnocentric dissent with iron PC rule.

2) He will either a) take that implicit White base, tarry with its interests at least to some extent, gain its support; thus owe some genuine regard for its concerns for a change through its Republican auspices. Or b) Destroy the GOP (which the men in the video would hate).

Plan b is not a bad option according to MacDonald and to most White people in the know - the Republican Party has looked like us but has shown White people no loyalty. Quite the opposite, it has been every bit as complicit in our demise as the Democrats.

Bring on the grassroots of ethnocentric Whites to form a third party; and if he will, let Trump set it in motion, MacDonald says.

That is what Whites have always needed, an independently wealthy White man who will actually put his money behind Whites the way Jews put their wealth behind their interests.

3) If it were not for Trump, issues of the American border and immigration would not even have been mentioned by the Republican Presidential Candidates. Trump forced that issue upon Cruz, Rubio et al.

Trump brought that critical issue into White American consciousness and legitimized it despite the masters of discourse having de-legitimized discourse of its concern since 1965.

That is also crucial, according to MacDonald, since it will force people to pay more attention to who is behind mass non-White migration to America. KM adds, there is no question that it was Jewish interests that have done this; and once Whites begin to understand that, they will see that Jewish interests have had nefarious aims - that the results for White E.G.I have been and will be deadly.

4) Though KM and Duke do not emphasize the corporate complicity, they do acknowledge that it is working Whites who suffer the most from these immigration policies, from unskilled labor to H1B migrants.

- Trump has not only explicitly called for deportation and the building of a fence to keep out unskilled migrants

- He has also cited Rubio for calling not for reduction but the increase of H1B Visas.

5) Trump’s destruction of Jeb Bush, Rubio and Cruz means the destruction not only of politics as usual for the Republican Party, as these are the people that they wanted to nominate - but also of the Neo-Con agenda which lies deeper behind them.

In fact, William Crystal threatened to start a third party if Trump got the nomination.

MacDonald adds that the Neo-Con agenda is strictly Jewish. It has nothing to do with White interests and has been a disaster or White interests.

Therefore, MacDonald says, “so be it.” Let the White outrage begin if their votes are treated as if they don’t matter; let it be known who runs the Republican Party - Jewish Neo Cons and Corporate interests - let it be destroyed and a new third party that takes the side of Whites be born instead.

6) Trump is the best option also because he has the best chance for White interests against Hillary Clinton - if she wins that is a disaster because she is the quintessential neo-liberal, neo-con dream all in one: completely beholden to the worst domestically and foreign - of right wing economic and military objectives and PC cultural agendas.

7) It is important to get behind Trump now because if it takes another 8 - 12 years for someone like him to come along it might be too late for Whites to wield voting power enough to sway the political direction to their interests.


Centerville, U.S.A. - Churches and Liquor Stores

Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:10.

Living the nightmare of “Centerville U.S.A.” - a nightmarish trip from which a large part of Americans will not wake.

Speaking of discursive structures directing the sheeple to be herded into Abrahamic mind-control centers, there is a church on every corner in the towns of Indiana, U.S.A.

Reality is not lived there, it is a lived nightmare.

           

So TT informs us, to his utter disgust.

If only the majority of American White men would wake up. But no, the nightmare known is preferred.

They’d prefer to live “The Book of Revelation, Beast from the Abyss, Seven Deadly Plagues”, etc. LOL.

“Can’t save the sheeple, they will just have to be culled.” - TT

 

Living the nightmare trip as it were….


            “churches and liquor stores ” - Centerville, U.S.A.

READ MORE...


The Guardian newspaper is an archaic outfit whose propaganda operations will always be defeated.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Monday, 01 February 2016 17:00.

Public opinion about supposedly ‘vulnerable’ Islamist men on an international level has become so ‘toxic’ that the Guardian no longer wants to offer up its comments section as a vehicle through which people all around the world can say things that the Guardian editors and journalists don’t agree with.

See here:

Guardian, ‘The readers’ editor on… handling comments below the line’, Stephen Pritchard, 31 Jan 2016 (emphasis added):

[...]

Certain subjects – race, immigration and Islam in particular – attract an unacceptable level of toxic commentary, believes Mary Hamilton, our executive editor, audience. “The overwhelming majority of these comments tend towards racism, abuse of vulnerable subjects, author abuse and trolling, and the resulting conversations below the line bring very little value but cause consternation and concern among both our readers and our journalists,” she said last week.

As a result, it had been decided that comments would not be opened on pieces on those three topics unless the moderators knew they had the capacity to support the conversation and that they believed a positive debate was possible.

The policy would be worldwide, applying to our UK, US and Australia offices, as the issues were global. And, where they were open, it was likely that threads would close sooner than the typical three-day window.

[...]

This was not a retreat from commenting as a whole, she said; it was an acknowledgement, however, that some conversations had become toxic at an international level – “a change in mainstream public opinion and language that we do not wish to see reflected or supported on the site”.

[...]

You can only choose one narrative.
Totally exploitable.

This is almost like a return to the 1970s, except with a massively expanded infrastructure for communication, which results in black propaganda and grey propaganda being pushed by all sides of the political spectrum until one side finally cries out in pain and shuts everything down.

The difference now is that if the Guardian staff refuse to facilitate these conversations because they find it to be too painful, it won’t make them go away, it just means that these conversations will be shifted to other locations which are not under the watch of people in their political camp.

One thing that social democrats have never been able to understand is how to win at Information Operations (IO). They had forgotten that some audiences are more sophisticated than others, and that in a completely globalised communication environment in which the internet ‘remembers everything’, their attempts to fabricate a false reality to support their political positions in different temporal and geographical contexts will always be exposed. There will always be some commenter who will ask “Why did they say this thing here, but then this other thing over here? It’s contradictory! It makes no sense at all!”

For example, if a news organisation, such as perhaps the Guardian, or the Huffington Post, writes articles in its North America edition that try to induce feelings of guilt and paralysis among the Americans of European descent by taking the position that the Pilgrims who landed in North America on the Mayflower were actually a collection of religious fundamentalists who ended up carrying out genocide and were subsequently hated and reviled by the Amerindians, then that is an anti-Pilgrim line they can take. It’s based on reality so a person could indeed say it. But they would have to be consistent about it.

A problem emerges for that newspaper if it should happen to mysteriously become pro-Pilgrim in a Middle East and North African context, where the Islamist reactionary ‘refugees’ who are fleeing from the Middle East and North Africa to find ‘a new life’ in Europe, are presented as being beyond reproach because of their similarity to the American Pilgrims. American Pilgrims who are suddenly recast as noble heroes fleeing from a supposedly repressive Europe to find ‘a new life’ in the Americas. ‘Pilgrims fleeing repression’ is also a narrative based on reality. But its moral content and implied policy prescriptions are 180 degrees opposite to that of the aforementioned anti-Pilgrim narrative.

It’s 2016, social democrats. If you constantly contradict yourselves like that, then it becomes possible to find the key which is held in common between the different kinds of propaganda you are creating, by simply comparing them to each other. That’s something which is pretty trivial to do in the era of digital media. So that happened, and will continue to happen.

I would say to everyone who has been struggling against social democrats, that this latest move to restrict speech which is being carried out by the Guardian should be regarded as a victory of sorts over the Guardian. They are in fact conceding that the people in the various ethno-nationalist camps—globally—have a level of influence over mainstream public opinion which has been able to move the mainstream out of lockstep with social democrats.

Counterpropaganda involves shining a light in the darkness, and the Guardian’s desire to retreat into the darkness when hit with that light only further reveals the perniciousness of their propaganda campaign, and also its fundamental weakness.


Donald Trump stares into the abyss in Iowa as it stares into him. And also you.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Monday, 01 February 2016 03:12.

Of course.
It’s true. I think you know where this article is going to go.

One of the most notable features of the Donald Trump phenomenon which is being feted by just about every ethno-nationalist website—except Majorityrights, thank goodness—is the remarkable opportunism and irresponsibility which seems to appear at every turn.

The Donald Trump phenomenon is a presidential candidacy phenomenon which was initiated by the actions of one man, Donald Trump himself, who is trying to subsist off of the pre-existing electoral lobbies inside the Republican party. It is not a movement. It’s Donald Trump saying things that he thinks will convince the various contradictory segments of the Republican party voting base to imagine that he empathises with them while you wait with bated breath to see what he’ll say next, so that you can write yet another breathless article on how the Trump train ‘cannot be stopped’.

Excited People

Just because Donald Trump has managed to weaponise the slack-jawed voters of Iowa against their former owners—for now—does not mean that some great revolution has arrived or that there is a ‘train’ that is going somewhere. Donald Trump has merely succeeded in getting people who identify as Republican to become excited about voting for the Republican party.

That doesn’t make them suddenly not a bunch of disorganised idiots who believe idiotic things. It means that they are now merely an excited bunch of disorganised idiots who believe idiotic things excitedly.

Economic Power Precedes Political Power

Now, some of you are reading this and thinking to yourselves, “Why have these people at Majorityrights always got to ruin everyone’s fun?”

Your fun has to be ruined, because it is harmful. Attaching yourself to a political candidate like Donald Trump, and running articles that praise him for an entire electoral season, even though you know that you have no means through which you can control him during his hypothetical presidency because you have no lobby, is a pretty bad idea.

It is said that economic power precedes political power. Where does economic power come from? Not strictly from an abundance of wealth, but rather, from controlled scarcity. For example, if I had control of all water in a country, my power over its governance would be unrivalled. But if everyone could create disparate water-fountains everywhere without my permission, then my power would vanish almost immediately. The same logic applies to political movements, if they are to have any power in the material world at all, then they have to be able to make credible bargains.

In the context of American ethno-nationalist movement figures who claim to appreciate the merits of National Socialism or some variant of it, which kind of economic power should they be aiming to control? They should be aiming to control the one thing which is in abundance everywhere. The people’s labour power. Most people in the United States have only their labour power that they can either choose to give to an employer or withhold from an employer, and any movement that were to gain the ability to switch labour on or off at will and at mass, would be one of the most powerful lobbies in the United States. Given that labour union density in the United States hovers around a pathetic figure like 10%, it is not like there is much competition in that realm from the liberals or anyone else.

Despite this, year after year Americans do nothing other than wait for the next white saviour to descend and save them, while paradoxically festooning their websites with the symbols of a labour movement that actually emerged as a ‘workers party’ from the ground up and not from the top down.

Celebrating for no reason

I’ve been looking at the on-the-ground reporting that Matt Forney has been doing, as he’s been chronicling his adventures in Iowa and a lot of what he’s written I’ve found to be extremely well done and I have no intention of deriding his efforts in that regard.

However, I want to quote something from an article he recently wrote because I think that he has in fact highlighted a large part of the problem without having been aware that it is a problem:

Return of Kings, ‘Donald Trump’s Presidential Campaign Is The Biggest Political Uprising In Decades’, Matt Forney, 27 Jan 2016 (emphasis added):

[...]

Finally, Trump has expanded the conservative base to a degree that no other politician in the U.S. has done in eons. During the introductory speeches, one of Trump’s campaign co-chairs asked how many people in the audience had never voted in the caucuses before. Close to half the crowd’s hands went up. Trump has done the seemingly impossible: get people who are tuned out of the political process involved again, and supporting conservative principles at that.

It’s clear that Donald Trump’s combination of nationalist, conservative policy proposals, his personal charisma and his willingness to speak the truth will carry him through the presidential primaries. But the real question is whether he can win Iowa, the only one of the early contests where he’s lagged behind: he’s been trailing Ted Cruz in the polls for the past month, though he’s been posting solid leads in the past week.

[...]

This is precisely the danger. Life has been returned to a party which ought to actually have died. Furthermore, what has been occurring are not ‘policy proposals’, more so than a disparate collection of forcefully repeated statements and semi-comical tweets, which no ethno-nationalist group has any power to hold him to after he is elected.

In Iowa, who was he actually making deals with? Christian Zionists and Evangelicals. Many of them are highly motivated and are unfortunately not actually stupid at all. Christian leaders do not see Trump as their first choice for president, in fact only 2% of them view him in that way. However, they are nothing if not pragmatic. They realise that they have the ability to command large numbers of people who sit in pews and are receptive to messages that come across the pulpit about who to vote for. They also have an economic bazooka which stems from that organisational power, which enables them to sit down at the table with the highly cynical Donald Trump, and make actual deals with him.

Trump has been calling out to those people as though to bring them to the table from since the very beginning of his campaign. The message that “If I’m president, you’re going to see ‘Merry Christmas’ in department stores, believe me.”, which was a probing attempt to see what the reaction would be, was his first outreach. Getting a response that looked like it was backed by a voting block with solid fundraising power (albeit funds that he may not necessarily need but would be helpful to him nonetheless) then led to him increasing the appeal to a new level with his statement on how he intends to “protect Christianity”. Next he went on to say that he believes that “Christianity is under siege” and that Christians “don’t exert the power” that he thinks they ought to have.

Trump was calling for Evangelicals to make a deal with him. He may get it, but it will be a two-way street, he will have to give them something in order for them to give him something. They see it as a case not where Trump will somehow grant them cultural leadership again, but rather, a case where Donald Trump can be induced to create the environment in which they would be more free to operate. They enter into alliance with him cautiously and with actual representatives on the ground who know what disgusting things they want and how to get those disgusting things.

Platform melted

That ability to go out and make deals and threats, is an ability that American ethno-nationalists do not have, because American ethno-nationalists haven’t put anything onto the table that they could threaten to remove from the table. Instead, it was as though Donald Trump approached the American ethno-nationalists and they said about it, “It was love at first sight, we looked at Trump and our platform melted away.”

Finding people who are willing to shill for you 24/7 can often be difficult. Generating a good SEO plan with the kind of agility required by a political candidate whose positions change depending on who they are artfully making deals with on any given day, would be gruelling work with an exorbitant cost. Mercifully for Donald Trump, he has almost the entire Alt-Right’s followers who reside in the nexus where Twitter, 4chan, Youtube, Facebook, and Reddit meet, who will do all of that work for him for free, and he can ultimately treat them in any way he likes because he is in no way structurally beholden to them. Trump can get amazing results on the internet for $0.

Donald Trump’s social media accounts could generate interest all day long, simply by entertaining ‘controversial’ ideas and statements. Those accounts could then do even better by mocking the responses of ‘outraged’ social-democratic news sites afterwards. Donald Trump’s Twitter and Facebook could become home to 4chan Pepe the Frog memes, which are often witty and which save the campaign staff the effort of having to invent their own memes. That actually happened. Why then should they do any work at all?

‘Everything is totally fine and stuff’

Another example of a great misunderstanding, comes from the Daily Stormer, which carried a triumphalist article after Donald Trump initially received a boost in Iowa. The boost was attributable to the Sarah Palin endorsement, and the mathematics of Evangelicals realising that Trump may be the person they would need to make a deal with.

Somehow the Daily Stormer interpreted it like this:

Daily Stormer, ‘Trump Jumps 11 Points in Iowa, Dominating All’, Andrew Anglin, 24 Jan 2016 (emphasis added):

[...]

It is looking like Trump is actually going to be the next President, short of some insane and unpredictable event.

I’m deeply surprised Jews haven’t already launched some serious tricks.

[...]

Is this actually real life?

The Daily Stormer people seem to be unaware that the Jews already launched a collection of serious tricks. Those tricks are known in aggregate as ‘the Donald Trump campaign’.


Iran nuclear deal: ‘New chapter’ for Tehran as sanctions end.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sunday, 17 January 2016 19:23.

BBC News, ‘Iran nuclear deal: ‘New chapter’ for Tehran as sanctions end’, 17 Jan 2016:

Iranian man walks across airstrip. (AP)

Iran “has opened a new chapter” in its ties with the world, President Hassan Rouhani said, hours after international nuclear sanctions were lifted.

The move came after the international nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said Iran had complied with a deal designed to prevent it developing nuclear weapons.

Most Western governments hailed the move but Israel accused Tehran of still seeking to build a nuclear bomb.

Four dual US-Iran nationals were released from jail by Iran on Saturday.

They include Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian, who was arrested in 2014 and jailed in November for espionage.

Early reports said all four had left the country, however unnamed US officials later said that while “those who wished to depart Iran have left” and that one of the four, Nosratollah Khosravi-Roodsari, was not on the plane headed for Switzerland.

A fifth American, Matthew Trevithick, was also been released separately.

The US offered clemency to seven Iranians being held in the US for sanctions violations.

Nuclear sanctions have been in place since 2006, on top of other sanctions stretching back decades:

  • The economic sanctions being lifted now were imposed progressively by the US, EU and UN in response to Iran’s nuclear programme
  • The EU is lifting restrictions on trade, shipping and insurance in full
  • The US is suspending, not terminating, its nuclear-related sanctions; crucially, Iran can now reconnect to the global banking system
  • The UN is lifting sanctions related to defence and nuclear technology sales, as well as an asset freeze on key individuals and companies
  • Non-nuclear US economic sanctions remain in place, notably the ban on US citizens and companies trading with Iran, and US and EU sanctions on Iranians accused of sponsoring terrorism remain in place

A flurry of Iranian economic activity is anticipated:

  • Nearly $100bn (£70bn) of Iranian assets are being unlocked
  • Iran is expected to increase its daily export of 1.1m barrels of crude oil by 500,000 shortly, and a further 500,000 thereafter
  • Iran is reportedly poised to buy 114 new passenger planes from the Airbus consortium

What it means for Iran’s economy and world markets

UN, US and EU sanctions have hit Iran hard for years.

Mr Rouhani said everyone was happy with the deal, apart from those he described as warmongers in the region - Israel and hardliners in the US Congress.

“We Iranians have reached out to the world in a sign of friendliness, and leaving behind the enmities, suspicions and plots, have opened a new chapter in the relations of Iran with the world,” he said in a statement on Sunday morning.

The lifting of sanctions was “a turning point” for Iran’s economy, he added, saying the country needed to be less reliant on oil revenues.

US Secretary of State John Kerry, an architect of the deal, said it had been pursued “with the firm belief that exhausting diplomacy before choosing war is an imperative. And we believe that today marks the benefits of that choice”.

However US Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan said the Obama administration had moved to lift economic sanctions “on the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism”.

And Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said: “Without an appropriate reaction to every violation, Iran will realise it can continue to develop nuclear weapons, destabilise the region and spread terror.”

‘Expectations are high’ - Amir Paivar, BBC Persian business reporter

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani says the lifting of sanctions is a victory for the Iranian nation. It is one for him too.

Mr Rouhani had pledged to strike a deal ending the nuclear standoff. He just delivered his biggest promise. This will boost his allies in parliamentary elections next month.

But hardliners will not sit and watch. They call the shots in domestic, security and cultural areas. There is always danger of a backlash unless Mr Rouhani’s faction shares the post-sanctions financial benefits with them.

Expectations are high, and managing them will be a difficult job. The impact of lifting of sanctions in livelihoods of many Iranian will not come overnight. Rouhani now says he will focus on boosting foreign direct investment and Iran’s non-oil exports. Easier said than done.

The prospect of Iran doubling its crude oil exports has contributed to the continuing fall in the oil price. Benchmark Brent crude closed below $29 (£20.3) on Friday. Share prices in Saudi Arabia, the Arab world’s largest stock market, fell more than 6% following the lifting of sanctions.

The IAEA said it had installed a device at the Natanz plant to monitor Iran’s uranium enrichment activities in real time, in order to verify that uranium enrichment levels were kept at up to 3.67% as agreed in the deal with world powers.

As part of the deal, Iran had to drastically reduce its number of centrifuges and dismantle a heavy-water reactor near the town of Arak, both of which could be used in creating nuclear weapons.

Iran has always maintained its nuclear programme is peaceful, but opponents of the deal say it does not do enough to ensure the country cannot develop a nuclear bomb.

This is of course a wonderful development. Despite all the obstacles that were placed in the way, a sane and encouraging outcome has emerged.

As a retrospective look back, I’ll offer you all a set of links to accompany this story:

Those links should cover the highlights on how things ended up like this, and who the key winners and losers have been.

Broadly speaking, the winners have been all oil importers, particularly the United States, the European Union, and certain oil-importing countries in South America and South East Asia.

The losers have been all oil exporters, but especially Saudi Arabia and Russia. Israel also emerges as a loser, having failed to accomplish most of its objectives.


Page 79 of 81 | First Page | Previous Page |  [ 77 ]   [ 78 ]   [ 79 ]   [ 80 ]   [ 81 ]  | Next Page

Venus

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 17 Sep 2023 10:48. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 17 Sep 2023 05:41. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 17 Sep 2023 04:52. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 17 Sep 2023 04:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 16 Sep 2023 23:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 16 Sep 2023 16:05. (View)

Timothy Murray commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:54. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 16 Sep 2023 08:25. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 15 Sep 2023 22:09. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:04. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:09. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 15 Sep 2023 08:05. (View)

Timothy Murray commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:51. (View)

Timothy Murray commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:49. (View)

Timothy Murray commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:24. (View)

Timothy Murray commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:05. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Richard Lynn' on Thu, 14 Sep 2023 17:22. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three' on Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:35. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Richard Lynn' on Wed, 13 Sep 2023 23:16. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:35. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:12. (View)

james commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three' on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:32. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:38. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:23. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 06:37. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:33. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Wed, 06 Sep 2023 23:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 05 Sep 2023 22:24. (View)

timothy murray commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 05 Sep 2023 01:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 13:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:55. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:32. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 02:39. (View)

timothy murray commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 02:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 02 Sep 2023 12:16. (View)

Majorityrights shield

Sovereignty badge