|
[Majorityrights Central] Some intel on the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 12 March 2026 23:32. [Majorityrights Central] Defining the borders of the English kin-group Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 11 March 2026 23:51. [Majorityrights News] Jason Jay Smart on the approaching collapse of Putin’s reign Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 11 March 2026 22:42. [Majorityrights Central] Empires, the Chinese Mind, a theoretical nationalism of ethnicity Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 14 February 2026 01:54. [Majorityrights Central] Gemini - not an identical twin to ChatGTP Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 06 February 2026 16:58. [Majorityrights News] Warburg on the impact of Russian forces’ loss of access to Starlink Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 06 February 2026 10:17. [Majorityrights News] Toast à la Little Saint James Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 04 February 2026 23:48. [Majorityrights News] Southport, migrant hotels, the national flag, and Amelia Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 02 February 2026 00:14. [Majorityrights Central] Argot Rosetta Stone For GW/Heidegger/Etter Posted by James Bowery on Saturday, 31 January 2026 17:18. [Majorityrights Central] ChatGPT redux Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 29 January 2026 01:11. [Majorityrights News] The national revolution in Iran cannot be stopped Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 10 January 2026 00:38. [Majorityrights Central] Into the authoritarian world redux Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 03 January 2026 17:56. [Majorityrights News] Moscow Times: Valdai residents report no sign of drones attacking Putin residence Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 30 December 2025 11:33. [Majorityrights News] Paul Warburg on America’s self-destructive new strategy Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 16 December 2025 12:32. [Majorityrights Central] Thoughts on Mark Collett’s strategy for nationalism in the British future Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 24 October 2025 15:01. [Majorityrights Central] Living in the Jewish Mind: Part One Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 29 September 2025 09:37. [Majorityrights News] Nationalism on the Kramatorsk front. Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 20 September 2025 15:55. [Majorityrights Central] And Chat GPT just the same Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 08 September 2025 15:18. [Majorityrights Central] Grok the modern nationalist Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 07 September 2025 19:14. [Majorityrights Central] Principles, parts, processes of ethnic nationalism, Part 1: inflection? Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 31 July 2025 12:03. [Majorityrights Central] A window onto a world of Russo-Chinese hegemony Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 08 July 2025 20:47. [Majorityrights Central] The DT takes the first step on the journey Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 03 July 2025 05:02. [Majorityrights News] Iranian comment machine switched off by Israeli bombs Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 25 June 2025 09:07. [Majorityrights Central] After Casey and the ensuing child sexual exploitation inquiry Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 17 June 2025 00:21. [Majorityrights News] 4 minutes and 43 seconds of drone warfare history - updated Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 04 June 2025 16:50. [Majorityrights Central] An approaching moment of Russian clarity Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 11 May 2025 12:34. [Majorityrights Central] “It’s started. You ignored us. See where it’s going to get you.” Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 04 May 2025 00:42. [Majorityrights News] Another dramatic degradation of Russia’s combat capacity Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 23 April 2025 08:49. [Majorityrights Central] A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin’s war Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 14 April 2025 00:04. [Majorityrights News] France24 puts an end to Moscow’s lie about the attack on Kryvyi Riy Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 07 April 2025 17:02. [Majorityrights News] If this is an inflection point Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 03 April 2025 05:10. [Majorityrights News] Sikorski on point Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 28 March 2025 18:08. [Majorityrights Central] Piece by peace Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 19 March 2025 08:46. [Majorityrights News] Shame in the Oval Office Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 01 March 2025 00:23. When Deja News (plausibly a government spook shop run by Bobby Inman‘s boys spun off of the MCC) went belly up, the only web-searchable archive of Usenet newsgroups disappeared. That archive was revived when Google became the dominant search engine. So now, we can go back and see who was saying what about what regarding racial politics and when they were saying it, right? Wrong: This isn’t even a matter of free speech anymore. Its a matter of erasing evidence. Pretty much everyone knows there were agents provocateur running around Usenet conducting psyops, so it is pretty obviously “unproductive” to leave that information open for later analysis. PS: This gets to be almost comical: According to Google’s version of Usenet history, I wrote only 2 Usenet posts between 1990 and 1997, one of which cannot be retrieved because it was posted to alt.politics.nationalism.white. We need to acquire the Russian sense of humor quickly.
Tomislav Sunic’s first book, Against Democracy and Equality: The European New Right, has just been released in a Croatian language edition. It carries a lengthy preface by Alain de Benoist, which sets out the background and principle positions of the ENR. I reproduce it in English here, as translated by Tom.
The New Right: 40 Years After ... In 1990, as a current of thought under the name “European New Right” (ENR) had began to celebrate its twenty-first birthday, a Croatian friend of mine, Tomislav Sunic, published in English the first edition of his book on the New Right. This was originally the text of his doctoral dissertation, defended two years earlier at the University of California in Santa Barbara, (1). Having acquired a very good knowledge of French during his studies at the University of Zagreb, Sunic was keen to probe into the ENR very early on. Moreover, he also had the opportunity to read ENR works in the original French language. Unlike many other commentators who spoke of the ENR on the basis of hearsay and formed judgments from second hand sources, he demonstrated the ability to go right to the core of the issue. He demonstrated a sympathy for the ENR which plainly distinguished him from those commentators. It was also plain that his book’s interest derives from something more than sympathy. Its importance is due to its pioneer character. Certainly, in the late 1980s several books (but also a number of scholarly works) had already been published on the ENR. But they were almost all published in French. Tomislav Sunic’s book was one of the first to appear abroad (a privilege he shared with some Italian authors). Presenting the history and main ideas of the ENR to a public who had never heard of it before was not an easy task. Thanks to his informed mind, his sense of synthesis, but also his knowledge of the readers he addressed, there is no doubt that Sunic succeeded immediately in his endeavor. In hindsight, what I find most remarkable is that Tomislav Sunic’s book was written in English, especially given that the author resided at that time in a country - the United States - that he knew from the inside-out and which he viewed in a very critical manner (as evidenced by his latest book, Homo Americanus).
The ongoing Princeton lecture series, The Strong Free Will Theorem by John H. Conway and Simon Kochen bears on “creationism”. It presents science with a choice: Either believe free will is, in a strong sense, universal or deny your own free will. How will scientists choose? PS: I hate to break it to sophomoric anti-creationists like Dawkins, but the fact that so-called “creationists” have their cranks that insist on the literal interpretation of Genesis doesn’t mean you can just dismiss the field. Evolutionary theory has a lot more room for religion than the determinists would have us believe.
Chatting with a friend of mine about the confluence of events in the 1960s (approaching fertility of the baby boomers, birth control, the technosocialist nightmare of NASA, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, takeover of Anglo Saxon bastions by Jews, rise to cultural dominance of TV, replacement of Christianity with Holocaustianity) I reflected on the seeming common direction. All these things happened right at the point in time when the most pioneering subpopulation of humanity was ready to send its largest and most educated generation into a lifetime mission to bring life to space—and not only stopped it, but may have risked that life on Earth will extinguish itself. A mutual friend of ours, who is known for his wild theories, has previously offered up his interpretation of this coincidence—that it is aliens from outer space! They don’t want terrestrial life messing things up, so they come down here in their UFOs and manipulate our so-called leaders to do these things that are so stupid it boggles the mind. Come now—why wait until the 1960s to do all this subtle manipulation? Why not just wipe out the planet? So I said, “Well, I guess, looking at how incredibly insane our “leaders” have behaved over the prior decades, it might make a little more sense to consider the possibility that the Nazis really did discover antigravity toward the end of WW II but all they could do was build a few space ships—just enough to establish a lunar colony. You know, hang out on the “dark side of the moon” while occasionally lending a helping hand to the most virulent Jews as revenge against the Allies or something. Who knows? Just about anything would make more sense than what has been done to the boomer generation.” Then my friend sent me a link to this Finnish movie production: The only problem is, if the Moon Nazis wait until 2018 to return and conquer Earth, their sweet revenge on the Allies may have gotten out of hand and destroyed Earth!
Michael White, a very senior Guardian journalist of 30 years standing, wrote two successive pieces covering immigration and the BNP in two days ... here and here. He must be appalled by the number of stout-hearted pro-BNPers posting to his threads - though it’s the same pretty well everywhere these days. The anti-racist shriek tactic that has served the left so well down the years is scarcely evident now. Similarly, there are no intellectually powerful respondees to drive home the postmodern dictat. Why don’t the leftist academics pitch in anymore? Someone posting on both Guardian threads as “stjohnwithout” has noticed that, without them, these arguments are a push-over. It is almost as though the liberal-left, which has dominated political debate for the last half-a-century, has suffered a crisic of confidence. It cannot find the energy to prosecute its Weltanshuuang on its own sacred turf. The balance of power is shifting - at least on the MSM threads. I find myself wondering where it will go from here. Obviously, there can be no question of a fightback by the other side. The nativist memes will become more and more embedded in readers’ consciousness. The only question is if and when those memes will provoke said readers to think past their learned negative response. If the staggering injustice of what is being done to our people can be communicated sufficiently forcefully, pretty quickly, I would say. I’ve always maintained that it takes years to change a man’s mind. But sea-changes among the suggestible - and the vast majority of liberals are, by definition, suggestible conformists - don’t obey the same laws. There is a sea-change happening. Our friend Silver would disagree, insisting that only a highly selective discourse and a special sensitivity for the work can produce results. But under present conditions, which I confess are favourable, I think that force and clarity of opinion, justice of cause, and absence of malice are enough. These are good times to be a political renegade.
The following essay was written for the The Occidental Observer site, and sent on to me by the author to publish here. SOCIOBIOLOGY OF A COMMUNIST KILLING FIELD: THE CROATIAN BLIEBERG By Tomislav Sunic In the study of communist terror different methods from different fields have been applied, ranging from the fields of political science, historiography and philosophy to international justice. An impressive number of books about communist crimes have enabled observers to grasp this unique phenomenon of the twentieth century, which inevitably brings about a large and emotional outcry, followed by constant haggling about different body counts. Whether it is the former communist Cambodia or the former communist Poland, in the memory of many citizens of former communist countries communism is a synonym for an inhumane political system. Despite the fall of communism as an ideological and political-legal system, the communist ideas of egalitarianism and the belief in permanent economic progress are still alive, albeit in other forms and under different names, and even amidst people who self-describe themselves as anti-communists. Perhaps the reason for that lies in the fact that the ideas of equality, internationalism (‘globalism’) and economic growth are today better achieved, or appear better achievable, in the liberal capitalist West than in the former ‘real-socialist’ countries in the East.
The Washington Post reports that:
If you think that the significance of this is merely limited to the general decadance of the capitol of the United States, think again: The front page of my website Laboratory of the States lists United States demographic variables sorted by the degree to which they influence the prediction of other United States demographic variables. Top of this list? Prior to including incarceration statistics in the mix, the top demographic variable was cumulative AIDS cases. Something big is definitely going on with this virus and it seems somewhat mysterious. An interesting observation here is that the correlation between cumulative AIDS cases and HIV positive tests in 2001 is 95% but the correlation between cumulative AIDS and the conjunction of a largely black or hispanic population with a largely Jewish white population is 98%. In other words, as of 2001, available ethnic demography better explained regional incidence of AIDS than did the available HIV infection data. Some may object on the grounds that the 2001 HIV data on Washington, DC was missing (a fact itself demanding explanation), hence the ethnic correlation was skewed by the availability of ethnic data on the extreme case of Washington, DC. But even if we toss out the DC data, we still get a 92% correlation (with significantly less missing data).
Page 170 of 340 | First Page | Previous Page | [ 168 ] [ 169 ] [ 170 ] [ 171 ] [ 172 ] | Next Page | Last Page |
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & NewsCommentsThorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:33. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:45. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:25. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:38. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:17. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:04. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:02. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:42. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 12:16. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:26. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 05:41. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 04:56. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 03:43. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:26. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Thu, 07 Mar 2024 22:30. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Thu, 07 Mar 2024 03:26. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Wed, 06 Mar 2024 02:54. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Wed, 06 Mar 2024 02:47. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Mon, 04 Mar 2024 23:11. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Mon, 04 Mar 2024 01:59. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:42. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 02 Mar 2024 23:07. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 02 Mar 2024 21:25. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 02 Mar 2024 11:52. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 02 Mar 2024 00:02. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 01 Mar 2024 23:34. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:42. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:12. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:57. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 25 Feb 2024 17:28. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 25 Feb 2024 11:17. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:18. (View) ![]()
|