My thanks to Donna and Sue on the Charlene thread that has been simmering away since March 2006, and to the untangled refusnik named Smith, all of whom have provided “heads-up” gen on the trial now begun at Preston Crown Court of (alleged) burger-bar butcher and paedophile Iyad Albittikhi.

The good news is that the MSM has finally begun reporting Charlene’s fate, locally and nationally.  This is an advance, obviously, on the near-perfect silence that greeted the breakthrough of the initial arrest and commital to trial.  But it remains a cause of journalistic shame that such an exceptional and vile crime against a 14-year old adolescent girl is acknowledged only in the judicial breach, so to speak, and is then accorded a completely unacceptable and thusfar universal shunning of the central feature of the case.

Look, for example, at the headline of the Mail article: Killer joked that he put schoolgirl lover in his kebabs.  Schoolgirl lover?

In the body of the copy we read that prosecuting council Tim Holroyde, QC, told Preston Crown Court:-

READ MORE...

The massive flight from diversity having become mainstream business news presents an opportunity for explicating otherwise implicitly oppressed white identity (see Psychology and White Ethnocentrism by Kevin MacDonald for why this is important).  If each person who is about to make a move in order to find a refuge from “diversity” were to write a letter like the following to their real estate agent, we would find very quickly and “mysteriously” that many of the games normally played by Congress against the people would be turned for the people.  When you are waving around a real estate purchase, you are waving around the biggest chunk of change you have.  Use it or lose your country:

_name of real estate agent_:

You may not like this email but it is hard core business.  Read this WSJ article:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010045

I’m looking at possibly moving to _name of area_ and would like to get some critical data on the demographic trends.

I lived in _name of “diverse” area_ for _number of_ years.  I have experience with demographic transitions.

I’m not interested in moving again only to find it is to an area with a Mexicans moving in.  If that makes me racist, so be it.  It’s my money and my life.  Giving _number of_ years of my life to test the theory that diversity is wonderful should be enough dues to pay for me to have some peace of mind for the rest of my life without being harassed by morally vain hypocrites.  I’ve run into my fair share of real estate agents who like packing houses full of people from Mexico, India, Pakistan, etc.—all of whom form ethnic gangs that local law enforcement and corporate policies simply do not deal with, regardless of the lip service to law and policy—so I’m quite happy to alienate you if you are part of the problem.  If you aren’t, then maybe we can do business.

I’m interested in RECENT information.  The demographic transitions have been so fast that the census data does not represent the current state of affairs.

Also, I’m not interested if the ratio of median wages to median house prices is low, as it is in “diverse” areas.  If I wanted to make like a Latin American land baron, I’d change my name to something like “Rivera” and try embarking on a life of crime and corruption in Los Angeles rather than trying to move to _name of area_.

So, is _name of area_ a reasonable place to move for someone like me or should I look elsewhere?

Sincerely,

_your name_

The following little activist’s goldmine was posted four days ago by Steven Palese on the BNP results thread.  Some will have read and admired it.  But I thought it deserved headline status.

GW

It’s really a shame that pro-white posters here and elsewhere continue to view the left as a pack of foolish idealists rather than what they are: A coalition of pro-minority bigots busily calculating better ways to extract more group-specific privileges off the backs of white children.

This pro-minority extortion coalition is primarily composed of five groups: paranoid Jews, racial minorities, militant lesbians (the so-called “feminists”) and militant gays plus an army of daydreaming dupes seduced from the majority. Aside from the dupes, members of these minority groups are perfectly conscious of their pariticipation in the coalition and of its objectives; to advance everybody’s group-specific interests against those of the majority. Their cohesiveness, as groups and as a coalition, owes to extensive propaganda aimed at characterizing whites as their common “oppressor” and as their universal scapegoat for all grievances.

That’s what the left is as opposed to what it says it is. Of course, the right is hardly better. The pro-minority bigots operate at the metapolitical level within both the left and the right. The left is dominated to the point it serves them exclusively while the right to the extent it accepts that asserting group interests while white is illegitimate. I say that’s hardly better because, personally, I prefer being attacked from the front to being stabbed in the back.

Bear in mind that by “left” I’m talking about the “new left”, whose evolution is complete in the US and almost done in the UK. I’m not sure how far it’s progressed in continental Europe, e.g. Finland. The measuring stick is the importance of old fashioned worker’s concerns. If private workers and labor unions count for nothing, as in the US, then that country’s left has completed its gramscian long march to become a pure pro-minority extortion coalition that is focalized exclusively on bashing the “white hetero male oppressor”.

READ MORE...

Soren interviewed Alex Linder a few days ago, and the result is now on the radio page.  Alex can make strong meat taste like boiled chicken, and a certain degree of editing was needed to calm my prissy English sensibilities.  And my fear of going to prison, of course.

The interview was aimed not at exploring the JQ but at exploring Alex.  The man is an energised, flowing speaker, and genuinely sees the JQ as the problem, if not the only problem.  That isn’t Soren’s view or anyone else’s at MR, and the views Alex expresses are, of course, wholly his own.

But if you listen hard, you will find that the humorous, harshly sarcastic ideologue of VNN is also courageous, honest and true.

File size is 36.1MB.  Run time about 38 mins.

From yesterday’s Telegraph:-

Coming soon, a pill that stops periods forever

A contraceptive pill that aims to halt indefinitely a woman’s period is expected to receive full approval from US health officials this week, a move that could end discomfort and pain for many women.

The US Food and Drug Administration is expected to give the green light to Lybrel tomorrow. Wyeth, the drug’s manufacturer, has requested approval from British officials for the drug, which will be marketed here as Anya, but it is unlikely the pill will be available until next year.

... Lybrel, however, is taken for at least a year at a time. Like the majority of oral contraceptives it is a combined pill, containing both oestrogen and progestogen, but the doses of hormone have been lowered to allow for it being taken without a break.

Supporters of Lybrel claim there is no need for women to menstruate and the pill is an easy and safe way to eliminate what many consider to be a monthly ordeal.

Gynaecologists say they have been seeing a slow but steady increase in women asking how to limit and even stop monthly bleeding.

Surveys have found up to half of women would prefer not to have any periods and most would prefer them less often.

... Rebecca Findlay, of the Family Planning Association, said yesterday: “It’s a good lifestyle option for some women, and gives them extra choice, though clearly will not be welcomed by all women.”

Some experts believe that blocking periods could be unsafe. Paula Derry, a health psychologist in Baltimore, wrote in the British Medical Journal two weeks ago that “menstrual suppression itself is unnatural”, and that there was not enough data to determine if it was safe long-term.

Her stance is supported by research in the US which has found many women view their periods as symbols of fertility and health. Christine Hitchcock, of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research, told The New York Times: “My concern is that the menstrual cycle is an outward sign of something that’s going on hormonally in the body. [I worry about] the idea that you can turn your body on and off like a tap.”

The same hormones that control the menstrual cycle act on the brain, bones and skin and the long-term effects of suppressing them were unknown, she said. “You need to think whether there are consequences for the whole body that we don’t know about,” she added.

Of course, we can’t have any of this going on, can we?

A typical piece of non-conventional Hutchinson analysis appeared today at Prudent Bear.  If perhaps the bearishness at the very close has a somewhat studied air, nonetheless the whole speaks plainly enough about the aims and interests of power - and its results.
GW

The immigration bill brought forward and apparently likely to pass demonstrates an unattractive new political trend in the United States: the end of the classless society for which the U.S. has been famous and the opening of yawning political as well as economic gaps between rich and poor.

Traditionally, the United States has been economically unequal, but without a sharp divide between rich and poor in the political arena. Democrats represented the South, minorities and unionized labor, while Republicans represented small business and the professional classes. The truly rich have always been more or less evenly divided between the parties. Thus, except for a brief period in 1932-46, the U.S. never had a real class-based politics.

READ MORE...

Ever since circulation of my net asset tax white paper, I have had very little to say to the world of politics.  However, I do have one thing to say to the traitors of the sovereign people: 

Men returning from Iraq are having trouble affording housing because your immigration policy favors land barons over the fetuses sired by these young men—fetuses being yanked from the wombs of their mates and shoveled into dumpsters, because those women know those young men can’t reliably secure a family’s subsistence, a community or a nation’s borders.  Moreover, you can’t contain the news of why it is the flesh of their no-longer-potential children is rotting in the dumpsters—if they even got to the stage of being a fetus.

You’re white heterosexual men—most of you.  Do you really think anyone will care if you are killed?  You’ve created a secular theocracy in which even being a dead white heterosexual man is considered a moral outrage.  How much less do you think anyone will care if the even greater outrage of you breathing while white, male and heterosexual is terminated?

With thanks to Flavio Gonzales at Troy’s forum, I’m pasting - without additional comment - the meat of an article on Bilderberg 07 by Daniel Estulin
GW

The delegates at Bilderberg 2007: Istanbul, Turkey May 31-June 3

This year’s delegation will once again include all of the most important politicians, businessmen, central bankers, European Commissioners and executives of the western corporate press. They will be joined at the table by leading representatives of the European Royalty, led by Queen Beatrix, the daughter of the Bilderberg founder, former Nazi, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and Bilderberger President, Etienne Davignon, Vice Chairman, Suez-Tractebel from Belgium. According to Bilderberg Steering Committee list which this author had access to, the following names have now been confirmed as official Bilderberg attendees for this year’s conference (In alphabetical order):-

READ MORE...