Majorityrights Central > Category: History

From the hubris of objectivism to the implicative force of Mulatto Supremacism

READ MORE...

Something rather wonderful happened last week in London’s Green Park.  The long-awaited monument to the aircrew of Bomber Command was unveiled by the Queen in front of some 800 surviving aircrew.  It had been funded by private subscriptions and funds from the National Lottery.  It is sixty-seven years late, but it is there at last.

For those who are unaware, the post-war Labour government of Clement Atlee chose to deny the boys who had flown in Bomber Command - the boys in their Hampdens, Whitleys and Wellingtons, Stirling, Halifaxes and Lancasters - the customary campaign medal marking their service to the nation at war.  The policy of denial was continued in the thirteen years of Conservative government that followed. The bomber aircrew were alone among all those who fought under British arms to be so denied.

The problem, of course, was that the sudden unfolding at the end of the war of the devastation caused to Germany’s cities and towns by the Area Bombing campaign and the USAAF 8th Air Force’s daylight offensive was a huge shock for the political Establishment, and a gift for many ambitious men.  The wartime service values of duty, discipline and self-sacrifice were falling away as the nation struggled to find its feet and move forward.  In the battle for the new moral centre there could only be one victor - moral universalism - and the treatment accorded at this time to Arthur Harris was a highly visible function of that.

The political exodus from support for Bomber Command fractured national feeling more or less along the lines that pee-cee and anti-racism fracture it today.  During the war, aircrew were treated with great affection and generosity by the public.  They understood that in the long years from the Battle of Britain to D-Day the strategic bomber was the only means of carrying the war to Germany.  The service performed for them by Bomber Command constituted an act of endurance at arms matched in British military history only by the BEF in 1914-18.  They, the public, did not shift their opinion as their rulers and “moral betters” shifted theirs.  They did not condemn the aircrew because of the excesses of the campaign, or because of the questions over its strategic value.  If its results were very terrible then that, too, represented a victory of sorts over the enemy, for the Germans, who sunk their development efforts into jets and rockets, never produced a bomber with the lifting capacity of the Lancaster, or any bomber at all with four engines.  Had they done so, they would have used it on Britain’s cities and towns to the same effect.

For nationalists the subject of the Allies’ destruction of urban Germany comes with two large and extremely sore points attached.  First, there is the feeling among many, which I do not share, that “the wrong side” won ... the Jewish side, the side of anti-nationalism, of European national destruction.  The people who make this wholly utilitarian argument are very often American WNs of German descent.  But if pressed on their politics they turn out equally often to be right-liberals (in the English sense of that word).

Second, there is the belief among older British nationalists - the generation who fought (and lost) on the streets to the anti-racist left in the final decades of the 20th century - that National Socialism and like forms of Judaic fantasia are viable and true philosophies in their own right ... indeed, that they are nationalism.  If I thought that I’d give up thinking entirely.

I often wonder what kind of national feeling the boys in those bombers, in all their war-will, would have expressed.  That, too, is there somewhere in the new monument to them in Green Park, in the folds of the battle-dress, in the set of the jaw and the line of the eye’s gaze.  One day before too long, I hope, I shall go there and ponder that.

by The Narrator

We often (very often) hear the jingoism “take America back” by all and sundry on both sides of the political/social divide.  Particularly on the conservative side we see the notion put forward that The America is somehow far adrift from her foundational roots, as laid down by the Founding Fathers.  But is this really the case?  Is modern Americanism fundamentally different from 18th century revolutionary Americanism?  What would the Founding Fathers think of The America today?

In addressing that, we must first consider what The America is and what The America is not.  What The America is not, is a nation.  What The America is, essentially, is a religion/empire, with much akin to a Marxist state.  And one of the “gifts” which both Marxism and Americanism have bequeathed to the world is the ability to re-define words and even reality itself.

One example of that is the definition of nation. Since the advent of Americanism/Marxism the definition has been completely re-written to the point that it now actually means the complete opposite of what it meant for thousands of years.

As stated, The America is not a nation, which makes such linguistic concoctions as “a nation of immigrants” one of the more profound examples of an oxymoron and generally reflects the intellectual apathy found amongst the populace.

READ MORE...

by David Hamilton

The patricians’ view ... “The Garden of Eden with the Fall of Man” by Jan Brueghel the elder and Peter Paul Ruebens 

We are led to believe that mass immigration is a blessing to us and that only Enoch Powell and a few narrow-minded and prejudiced people have ever seen danger in it. All decent folk of good will, we are told, have embraced this break in our national continuity as a sign of enlightenment, with people progressing to a higher state of civilisation - that of a one-world utopia made up of coffee-coloured persons.

It has also been presented as an ideological battle between left and right.  But, actually, it is between people of common sense and utopian idealists.

Most ordinary people relate to the world by common sense.  We who wish to preserve our traditional way of life know how human nature works from our experience of how peoples treat with one another and what they are capable of.  We have learned from history how different ethnic groups vie with one another for power and territory.  Looking at the world around us, we see that in practice immigration is not assimilation, but the colonisation of our territory.

So the impracticable dream of a multiracial utopia has had to be socially-engineered, which required totalitarian methods.  The Utopians see immigrants as essentially good, and if we are nice to them they will be nice to us.  But this utopianism does not do away with human nature, and we perceive foreigners being brought in as cheap labour, with idealism just as a smokescreen.  If the high-minded ones are so benevolent and moral, why have their plans been underhand, we ask.  And why the public infamy for those who foresaw danger in just letting it happen?

READ MORE...

When I wrote my post about the Bielski brothers, who are lionised in Edward Zwick’s 2008 film, “Defiance”, I mentioned that a Polish-American reader of this blog had provided me with much of the background material.  The same source has now sent me a chapter from a book by a Polish national hero, Stefan Korbo?ski.  The book is The Jews and the Poles in World War II, and this fifth chapter is titled The Jews in postwar Poland.

In the decade up to 1955 Poland somehow acquired Jewish overlords not only in government and the communist party but in the secret police, in the adminstration of justice, in the machinery of political indoctrination, and so on.  It was the darkest period of the communist era, the period of “the midnight knock at the door, arbitrary arrests, torture, and sometimes secret execution”.  Korbo?ski does not dwell on the horrors that were committed during this time, but explains where political power and responsibility lay.  He leaves us to supply motive.

This is by no means dead history.  The political and legal architecture of the communist state was very different, of course, from the Western democratic model.  But in terms of its ethic nepotism and sheer tribal aggression, Jewish engagement in the “dictatorship of the proletariat” demonstrates how unchanging is the character of Jewry and how singular its interest in the monopoly of power.  As Korbo?ski noted somewhat reservedly of Stalin’s appraisal of Jews, they were “cosmopolitans whose loyalties would be to Zionism rather than the country of their residence.”

I reproduce below the entire Chapter V from The Jews and the Poles in World War II.

THE JEWS IN POSTWAR POLAND

READ MORE...

by The Narrator

There are various ways of describing and understanding the unfortunate turn many in Western Civilization have taken over the past century. Comparing events to “revolutions” and the course of specific nations to the Titanic striking the iceberg are common (engaged in by this writer as well). But every now and then a new perspective may help better see the possible causations as well as the potential remedies/outcomes to our plight.

“History repeats itself” we are told and sure enough that seems to most often be the case. More than that, specific historical incidents seem to foreshadow events on a greater scale and era.

Such an event is the Mutiny On The Bounty.  (I should state that I’m no expert on the subject and that my casual interest in it was sparked by viewing the 1984 film ’The Bounty’.)

That mutiny, wherein a group of men from a civilized Western nation, having temporarily grown accustomed to a leisurely life of hedonistic nihilism on a tropic Island, rebel against their commander when faced with returning to a orderly and disciplined, (Western) way of life, has a general theme which can be applied to our current situation.

Though it is common today to lay part of the blame for our slide into ruin on the influence of outside groups who, through media and finance, encourage activities that harm us, it is not quite telling the whole story, nor is it reflective of the less glamorous parts of Western history.  That that influence is there is undeniable. However when we look at the way Western Men, born and raised in a strong and potent Western nation at the height of its power, behaved on their own, far away from outside influence, over two hundred years ago, in an era that openly recognized racial and class differences, we see men who acted not much different than some men do today.

READ MORE...

The following essay was written for the The Occidental Observer site, and sent on to me by the author to publish here.
GW

SOCIOBIOLOGY OF A COMMUNIST KILLING FIELD: THE CROATIAN BLIEBERG

By Tomislav Sunic

In the study of communist terror different methods from different fields have been applied, ranging from the fields of political science, historiography and philosophy to international justice. An impressive number of books about communist crimes have enabled observers to grasp this unique phenomenon of the twentieth century, which inevitably brings about a large and emotional outcry, followed by constant haggling about different body counts. Whether it is the former communist Cambodia or the former communist Poland, in the memory of many citizens of former communist countries communism is a synonym for an inhumane political system.

Despite the fall of communism as an ideological and political-legal system, the communist ideas of egalitarianism and the belief in permanent economic progress are still alive, albeit in other forms and under different names, and even amidst people who self-describe themselves as anti-communists. Perhaps the reason for that lies in the fact that the ideas of equality, internationalism (‘globalism’) and economic growth are today better achieved, or appear better achievable, in the liberal capitalist West than in the former ‘real-socialist’ countries in the East.

READ MORE...

By David Hamilton

City drugs turf war

DOZENS of extra police officers patrolled the streets of a Sheffield suburb last night after yobs from rival gangs armed with sticks and swords clashed in a drug-related turf war and a man was stabbed in the city centre.

The trouble between the Afro-Carribean and Somali gangs has been simmering all week but finally spiralled out of control when youths armed with sticks and swords fought on the streets of Broomhall on Thursday night and a man was stabbed outside Primark in Sheffield city centre yesterday morning.

Today Ch Supt Jon House, Sheffield district policing commander, said ... ““We now feel, following conversations with the leader of the council and the leader of the Labour Party, a more robust stance of stop and search must be taken to reassure members of the public.”

... Coun Mazher Iqbal, former Sheffield Council cabinet advisor for community safety, said the city centre stabbing followed problems starting last weekend. “It started as a dispute between Somali and Afro-Caribbean youths but has escalated and involves two gangs. We’ve had people carrying serious weapons, baseball bats, knives and pick-axes.

From yesterday’s Sheffield Star

The following article was published at

http://www.cdall.net/ on 2nd August 2007.

TAMING GANGS - THE SHEFFIELD SOLUTION

History is exciting narrative and can also guide us with contemporary problems. It does not repeat itself exactly but similarly and study can clarify present disorders. A major problem for decent people living their everyday lives is the take over of our towns and cities by violent gangs that have been allowed here by the authorities. A precedent 1920’s Sheffield, England, was terrorised by gangsters. They lived in cramped back to back houses in courtyards which sociologists use as the excuse. But joining a gang gives power, a sense of importance, of belonging to something, money, possessions, prestige and women offering themselves to you. It gives identity as most gangs are formed on Ethnic lines and based on a territory.

These gangs gambled. Bookies operated outside factory gates with “runners” inside collecting bets for them and one made £75 to around a £100 each day even though it was illegal. Another popular form of gambling was “pitch and Toss.” This was a simple form of betting that required no equipment to pack up and carry away. It was tossing 3 coins into the air with the two forefingers and betting on the proportion of, say, heads that turned up. The biggest and most profitable “Pitching” site was on “Sky Edge” a promontory that gives a panorama over the city and with well-placed lookouts or “Crows” raiding policeman could be spotted from afar.

READ MORE...