You Are Entering The Twilight Zone of The Alt-Right’s Blackpool Carnival Duck Shooting Gallery

Posted by DanielS on Monday, 26 June 2017 04:01.

You are entering the Twilight Zone of a Blackpool Carnival.

You realize that part of its nightmare is that you could go on indefinitely with this metaphor. There is too much to say -

Its right-wing organizers, their Jewish cohorts behind the scenes and the workers who attend want to maintain the clichés and stereotypes that they have placed as wooden-ducks on the shooting gallery conveyor belts. The Right and Jewish interests want the public to fire at these carefully crafted targets in ostensible justification of their position, which at the same time directs heat away from them and misdirects their potential antagonists. The workers want to maintain these received clichés and stereotypes also because these targets have been carefully crafted to flatter their self esteem and make them feel like sophisticated people for picking them off…

  ...“Diversity,” Blam!  ... “Multiculturalism,” Blam!  ...“The Left,” Blam!  ...“Social Justice Warriors,” Blam!  ...“Equality,” Blam!

The workers further value the cliche and stereotype duck targets as they are rewarded for shooting at them according to kind and gradient of difficulty. Starting with easier targets, they may win a pink clad Lauren Southern Doll for a girlfriend and applause instigated for that from the right wing barkers. Moving on in difficulty, perhaps a Carnival Master Barker Richard Spencer bobble-head; better still, a large stuffed animal with Carnival Patron William Regnery‘s name emblazoned upon it; perhaps a book from his catalogue or a subscription to National Review. The prizes get better with each passing duck ....here they come…..

..“Racist” Blam! You fire, “A code world for anti-White!” You’re down with the White GenNOcide Project. And now Regnery and Spencer take note, you are in line to try for bigger rewards, perhaps celebrity or even an alt-right podcast!

A podcast especially if you hit the next duck….

“Anti-Semite” Blam! You fire, “Jews are behind many conspiracies, but seem pretty White to me and some of my best friends are Jews; fine paleocons who promote Judeo-Christianity.” 

Well done! You can be a regular part of the carnival operation now. A column and regular speaking engagements at conferences and in podcasts with fellow alt-righters is in order having hit that duck. (((The White GeNocide Project))) loves you.

...“Nazi” Blam! You fire, “We were on the wrong side in WWII.” Spencer and Regnery quietly take you aside to a private room, noting your talent as a maverick and Germanophile, with the nerve to take on hard targets, they will tell you, “look, we understand, but you have to cool it for now, most people won’t understand.” Regnery introduces you to his Jewish friends, Paul Gottriend and Gilad Atzmon, who are also sympathetic to Germany and it’s over-zealous persecution. Where not so easily placated by their paleoconservative and liberal alternative respectively, they speed up the ducks and make the targets harder ....next ...

....“Holocaust,” Blam! You answer, “Never happened.” Special note is taken of your potential for stellar initiative. Your talent observed such that you may be taken upstairs and introduced to Horus the Avenger and Dr. Duke; who also tell you, “we understand, but cool it, most others just won’t understand”; nevertheless their ilk can show you how to be a true right wing sociopath, how to run your own franchise dealership, shooting gallery, whatever - you are the Schmittian exception now; you might even sell-out your people in ultimate complicitness with the very Jews that you decry daily.

- They point to TRS, champion dealership now. See?  Even if you are Jewish, no problem, you can go crypto  ...at Alt-Right too. You can also be a semi-open or fully open Jew at Alternative Right, at Stark Radio, throughout the Alt Lite*. Be a celebrity in the Alt Right!


Now, this metaphor of the Blackpool duck shooting gallery may not be appreciated in the sense that it is the kind of metaphor that you’d hear from creepy Red Leftists mocking ordinary people having good-natured, even if low-brow fun.

But the point of going through this metaphor is to illustrate that there is both pressure and reinforcement from a large cultural milieu to be faithful in representation of most of the clichéd and stereotyped ducks offered up as opposition by the alt-right (which is purported guardian of White interests) and encouraged, in fact, usually coined as such by the YKW.

The truth is that this dark, carnival shooting gallery game that is being played by the alt-right is creepy too, like a Twilight Zone episode, “The Blackpool Duck Shooting Gallery.” And it is being played here at MR most assiduously of all, without fail - thus an apt metaphor in overture to deal with the foundationalism and skepticism that lies behind this wooden-duck shooting gallery game played here, at least for the time being.

Applause heard from the right wing gallery as shots ring out, blam! “academic”, blam! “the left”, blam! “sociology”... blam! “construct.”

Reaction is a natural and normal response for White men in particular to the overbearing forces of Jewish leftism. It was for me.

It is surely an expression of reaction to the abuses and misuses of disciplines such as sociology - abuses of the interests of European peoples that largely explain unwillingness to see both emergent and social concerns as important and feeding back upon each other - correctable in ongoing process…

To instead wish to parse-out social concern as artifice, to fiddle in the pretense of a sterile room laid bare of its contaminants, for a universal foundational ontology that must come first, and comprehensively so, even while our sociology, our people as a group, burn.

That seeks rather, universal emergent foundations, through Heideggarian ontology, as if these are pure, “non-academic” concerns.

Where I was first moved to investigate academia in earnest, I was in fact motivated similarly as GW, with an eye toward revenge for its social abuses of my people and in quest of unshakeable, universal foundations through scientific rigor that could not be fucked with by the mavens of PC and liberalism.

Thus, I understand where GW is coming from when he treats my implementation of certain academic concepts as a bad thing because at present he can only see the wooden ducks that he has been dealt. If I present to him the malleability of academic ideas, that is for him only proof of their perfidy.

Blam! “Academic” ... not paying any attention to the fact that I have spent most of my life outside of academia, suffering from PC and liberalism as much as anyone; and without fail have shown to have tooled any academic concepts that I have acquired to the requirements of ethnonationalism - not only theoretical corrections of right wing reaction.

There is an advantage to my having fought my way to rub elbows among top academics. I was able to witness up close and personal, the development, the constructedness indeed of terms and concepts that enter the social order. This has enabled me to see not only why they were deploying terms and concepts as they had, but to get beyond mere reaction, to see the potential use of terminology, why and where we should deploy concepts and terms in our interests. For that experience, I was also able feel my agency in the matter, to not be so prone to want to treat everything as merely found object; and as I experienced my agency, to not feel so averse to malleability.

I was able to investigate the depth of these ideas, to see why they are important, why and how they are deployed against our interests; and given that they are important, that they can and should be deployed for our interests instead - not only after universal foundations have been established, but of necessity, co-terminously with the closer readings of science and ontology.

Not only by contrast, after stopping the social world (as it gets worse and worse) to first and only first, lay bare the universal foundations of the ontology in the belief that it will ground a natural proclivity for ethno-nationalism.

In what is to come, I hope to show that it is needless and improper to avoid attendance to the a broad perspective on urgent social matters for our people; that indeed, we know enough ontology to proceed, that the ontological unit of analysis can alternate with a general orientation on the social, where necessary turning attention to re-examine and correct our “blueprints” so to speak.

Nevertheless, despite my good will, solid efforts and backing, I can only anticipate that no matter how important, no matter how crucial that ideas to be gotten across, that they will be treated as superfluous - like wooden ducks at Blackpool. This introduction alone could go indefintely as I feel the need to begin any statement with a litany of what I am NOT saying. ...again, and again, the wooden ducks.

Because GW is in reaction to academic humanities, it is not clear to him yet that terminology and these conceptual tools are not trivial matters. As such, he apparently believes that because a term might not be eternal, or because a concept is relatively new, that that makes it a trivial matter.

It is assuredly a reaction that cannot see the difference of what I say and do, but must replace what I say with the wooden ducks supplied by the YKW and reactionaries.

This has been a bad surprise, largely because it is unnecessary. Nevertheless, I’ve had to come to anticipate this absurdity resulting from a propping up of these ducks by the YKW and The Alt-Right.

No matter how many times I have said and corrected what I am saying, it will be taken as a wooden duck of cliches and stereotypes provided by Jewish interests and accepted by right-wingers - no matter that it is not a remotely accurate representation of what I am saying and its significance.

Terms and concepts I have corrected to our interests many times before, but nevertheless, their cliched and stereotyped misrepresentations will be set back in place instead. It is like a Twilight Zone of a Blackpool duck shooting gallery indeed.

It’s all “academic nonsense” to be cleared away, leaving only Heidegger and emergentism - somehow not supposed to be “academic.”

Given the urgency of matter and the efficacy of the tools being ignored, how clearly the Alt-Right has been hoodwinked, it is hard to speak about this obstruction in a tactful way - such that it will be both forceful enough to bring about a more cooperative, participatory stance, yet respectful enough to allow adjustment to be made despite its having been so staunchly opposed. There is cause for hope in that predilections for emergentism largely adhere, complement and can be complemented by a broader, social hermeneutic perspective.

It is my sincerest hope that GW will come to see his intelligence and efforts in ontology valued, that his focus on emergence is valid and necessary at one end of systemic topoi. It is also my sincerest hope that he will respond differently than he has to date to confirmation of the validity of that focus, along with overtures that it can be integrated with a social systemic group perspective that is equally essential and in fact, more urgent a matter of attention given that we are being attacked as a group under the rubric of anti-racism.

In its history, Majorityrights has come through a modernist perspective, presuming that ideas coming from practically everywhere and anyone would provide a rigor that would destroy all that was fake and leave only what was foundational in the end.

This was an unfortunate legacy of the boomer generation which was not yet privy to the White Post Modern Turn.

Failing that apprehension, agency and a Manichean streak out there was bound to obfuscate where not wrecking true gains and burying them in nonsense. To salvage, consolidate and advance the fine efforts contributed here, it was necessary to get rid of the trolls and discourage those who hold dear to ideologies that would not allow for ethno-nationalist homeostasis.

There is intelligence and some good ideas generated from the ranks of these folk, but there comes a time when the skepticism and criticism of reactionaries, who do not realize that they are arguing against misrepresentations of ideas which can serve our peoples interests, or worse, who are trolls wanting to keep us from proper theoretical orientation, must be moved beyond. That doesn’t mean that the trolls are going to give up, of course.

It is the case that some of these people cannot move beyond a reactionary position: whether Christianity; its allergic reaction in Nazism; its generic variant, scientism; or just an intransigent contentiousness, so angry and paranoid that they would divine conspiracy theories that would ironically fall into complicity with right wingers and Jews - the very people who generated problems for us; along with their hand maidens, whether in American politics or Russian Active Measures.

Though I have done well to get rid of these people, some probably lurk in the background, encouraging the re-institution of a reactionary position - they egg GW on to be a hero as such.

In this Cartesian anxiety, ideas that I send through, no matter how good, no matter how worthy of discussion and elaboration, are just so many “lefty academic sociology” wooden ducks to be shot down as they come across in the private wooden-duck shooting gallery amusement. Naturally I don’t relish setting forth ideas when I know that even the best of them will be treated dismissively, at best.

But the fact that I discouraged people who insist upon imposing upon us Jesus, Hitler, Jews and scientism - let alone those who traffic in conspiracy theory - as running counter to the proper orientation for homeostasis as European peoples, does not mean that I don’t value participation: on the contrary. And while they have other places to go, MOST people are not like them but do not have a place to come that is quite like MR is becoming.

Participation has been so far difficult to generate for the boomer misconception of communication in the transmissions model - the unilateral authority transmits knowledge to an audience who passively receives the linear transmission.

Despite this being a discussion forum and perfectly suited to participation in the joint construction of knowledge, it has been an opportunity that has been slow to yield. That is largely because MR was populated by boomers with that conception of communication; and for the concomitant fact many of them were right wingers. There have been two unfortunate results. That people who love Hitler, Jesus and Jews won’t like me is a given, but they also want to treat anything that I say like the wooden ducks they’ve been given to shoot and affirm their world view.

Despite the fact that I do NOT want to lord as expert over people, disseminating information from the high and mighty unilateral position; and that I want, rather, to participate in the joint construction of knowledge, the hostility of these folks would place me in that role again and again, not in respect, but because they want to treat any ideas that I put across as wooden ducks; but also because they would like to subject me to ad hominum, like the bobo-doll foil (the bobo doll is the one that you knock down and it keeps bouncing up to be hit again). While I have no desire to be a lone authority, neither do I have any desire to be anyone’s bobo doll - hence, why I have been rather rough for some time now to those who treat me that way - those who pretend that I pompously see myself as an infallible lord of the transmission model which older, right wing generations are familiar with.

So, it has been difficult to transition from the the boomer generation’s transmissions model of communication, to greater participation from the younger generations - probably due in large part because the younger generations have been immersed in the superficiality of tweets and worse, in self confirming internet bubbles as inseminated by right wing boomers: with an eye toward the “cosmopolitan elite” spearheaded by the “68ers” that “sought to take away our traditions and our Christianity”, many of these young alt-righters have “got it all figured out” - they have become young fogies.  ...“The Left,” Blam! Only the same as liberalism or Jewish and other non-White interests. “Diversity,” Blam! A code word for “anti-White.”  ... “Multi-Culturalism,” Blam! Means chasing down the last White person ....“Equality,” Blam! No such thing, an illusion of “Social Justice Warriors.”

Still, I’ve heard a few good ones from them: “anti-supremacist” and “anti-dialogical” ....

Toward the end of preparing the way for that more participatory, joint construction of knowledge, I will penetrate deeper into “academic” philosophical premises, get down to brass tacks in dealing with the foundationalism and misplaced skepticism which it fetishizes. I hope that in sharing the sense of agency that I experienced, this will allow us to move beyond the Cartesian anxiety - to see not a bane of hopeless relativism, but profound opportunity to secure our interests as ethno-nationalists.



Comments:


1

Posted by Theresa May sounding "Tory-Left" on Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:38 | #

Therasa May is said to be adopting a Tory-Left sounding rhetoric; inasmuch as that’s true, I (DanielS) approve.


2

Posted by Bill on Fri, 30 Jun 2017 03:59 | #

I keep asking, which Britain are they, (political class) talking about, 1950’s Britain or 21st century multicutural Britain?


3

Posted by Meta-Meta Cernovich on Sat, 01 Jul 2017 02:44 | #

* In this Youtube video looking at the transcript and commenting on (((Cernovich’s 60 Minutes))) interview, pilpul is witnessed for sure.

However, the poster of this video of the Cernovich/60 Minutes Interview transcript, Robert Timsah, interjects on Cernovich’s comment, when Cernovich asks, “Well, if you have a lot of people, a large swatch of the company or country that is suffering, then I think we owe it to all Americans to help them out. So is that right wing or is that left wing? I don’t know.”

At round the 4:50 mark, Timsah, who otherwise doesn’t say much, chimes-in quietly, ixnay, psssst, “It’s Left Wing.”

However, given that America is a proposition nation, the idea of “owing it to all Americans” would not be White left, it would be Red Left - translate, liberalism when it comes to Whites.

While the rendering of a “White Left” in the American context does have to contend with a complexity from Marxists in the sense that it could be conceived of as imperviously unionizing gains which have perhaps been ill gotten by right wing activities exploitative of other peoples - e.g., if the average “worker” who voted for Trump makes 71 K a year, it is possible for people of this interest group to misuse the concept to sustain right wing exploitation, and to maintain their aspiration to become haute and Jewy themselves. Maintaining exploitation, however, is not the purpose of articulating the concept. The White Left concept has the means of accountability to its own group and therefore to other Left Nationalisms, not just “market” and other abstract principles of “nature”, might makes right, whatever.

  Comment by DanielS



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Pragmatism as ethnonationalism’s tool against radical skepticism
Previous entry: On Sibelius and Heidegger

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

O.J. Simpson's cheerful parole hearing commented in entry 'O.J. Simpson & Nicole Brown's Alleles Combined' on Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:56. (View)

The PIS side of the story commented in entry 'Since July 12th all courts in Poland are under threat of being controlled by ruling party (PIS)' on Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:40. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Are Whites stupid, or what? Tara will be an epoch light out of the darkness, especially if...' on Sat, 22 Jul 2017 19:35. (View)

Didess42 commented in entry 'Are Whites stupid, or what? Tara will be an epoch light out of the darkness, especially if...' on Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:55. (View)

Tara blows it epistemically commented in entry 'Are Whites stupid, or what? Tara will be an epoch light out of the darkness, especially if...' on Sat, 22 Jul 2017 08:55. (View)

"she did not have to die" commented in entry 'Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges hired Mohammed Noor, the city's first Somalian police officer.' on Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:04. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:12. (View)

Killercop: affrimative action hire by Hijabwearing commented in entry 'Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges hired Mohammed Noor, the city's first Somalian police officer.' on Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:58. (View)

Betsy tries not to laugh, shrugs it off commented in entry 'Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges hired Mohammed Noor, the city's first Somalian police officer.' on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 15:56. (View)

told you commented in entry 'Heimbach & Parrott's Jesus group acts into right wing altercast of YKW' on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:36. (View)

Officer Noor and family commented in entry 'Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges hired Mohammed Noor, the city's first Somalian police officer.' on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:23. (View)

Betsy the Hijra Hole commented in entry 'Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges hired Mohammed Noor, the city's first Somalian police officer.' on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:25. (View)

Orbán, Soros and Bibi commented in entry 'Hungary’s PM Orbán: Nowhere Do Human Rights Prescribe National Suicide' on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:14. (View)

Belarusian nationalist Tanya Tay commented in entry 'BELARUSIAN NATIONALISM, A WHITE NATIONALISM' on Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:22. (View)

Incredibly creepy Besty Hodges campaign video commented in entry 'Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges hired Mohammed Noor, the city's first Somalian police officer.' on Wed, 19 Jul 2017 07:35. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Kristol>NeoCon>Meyer>Paleocon> Gottfried>Francis>NPI> Gottfried>AltRight/lite> Paleocon>Bannon>Trump' on Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:52. (View)

Bannon hired Milo to pander to White tech paleos commented in entry 'Alt-Right or Alt-Lite? It's worse than you think.' on Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:40. (View)

Mudshark Mayor of Minneapolis commented in entry 'Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges hired Mohammed Noor, the city's first Somalian police officer.' on Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:23. (View)

Thousands protest coup against Polish constitution commented in entry 'Since July 12th all courts in Poland are under threat of being controlled by ruling party (PIS)' on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:49. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Mon, 17 Jul 2017 03:12. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?' on Sun, 16 Jul 2017 17:16. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?' on Sun, 16 Jul 2017 17:02. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Sun, 16 Jul 2017 11:08. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?' on Sun, 16 Jul 2017 03:29. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:01. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?' on Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:24. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:30. (View)

John K Press commented in entry 'Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?' on Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:24. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Thu, 13 Jul 2017 03:46. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:18. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:55. (View)

Evidence of Trump collusion piling up commented in entry 'Trump Jr. admits Goldstone arranged meeting with Russians for dirt on Hillary' on Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:58. (View)

Political Islam commented in entry 'Before treating Unz Review as friendly Jewish ally, better look under the dress' on Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:47. (View)

Heraclitus commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:24. (View)

Parmenides commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:01. (View)

affection-tone