You, oh lucky reader, are a liberal academic … and ambitious.  Just like Professor Carl Parsons, in fact.  (Yes, yes – I know that in reality you are almost as reactionary and shamelessly bigoted as me.  But just pretend, ok?)

You feel you have it in you to become an official “education expert”.  And why not? Educational spending is going through the roof with New Labour.  The Project can’t be managed without academics to do the intellectual heavy lifting.  You just need to find yourself the right specialism, something that no one else has snaffled yet.

READ MORE...

IRA/Sinn Fein is in trouble.  Its supporters in America have finally understood that the Peace Process was not a peace process in quite the sense they thought it was.

In his 1995 book, Rebel Hearts, journalist Kevin Toolis explained …

Since the late eighties the IRA has been involved in a complex political process to align the Dublin Government and their electoral rivals, the SDLP, in a pan-nationalist front to negotiate a British withdrawal. By politically dissolving the border so that the mass of nationalists in Ireland can be consolidated into one powerful negotiating bloc, Republicans hope to reorder the political stalemate that has marooned them as a minority within the Catholic minority inside the boundaries of a hostile Protestant majority-dominated state.

The aim of the current republican leadership’s pan-nationalist strategy is to achieve a ‘historic handshake’ with the Crown, like that between South African President De Klerk and Nelson Mandela before his release from prison in 1989 which indicated an intention to negotiate political change The ANC did not overthrow the apartheid regime overnight or map out an exact plan for the transfer of authority but from that moment on power flowed steadily De Klerk to the future President Mandela. Similarly in Ireland power would at first trickle, then flow from the Crown into nationalist Ireland until the balance of power was so weighted in the nationalist/republican’s favour that a section of the Unionist community would break away and strike a political deal with the ancient enemy.

READ MORE...

OK, this “comment” is too long for our previous thread.  So I’ve put it up as a new post:-

I cling to the belief, like Ben, that we are not separated by much.  If I set aside all the petty stuff like your belief that evolution has been stopped by liberalism I find just two (admittedly substantial) points of difference between us.  In order to avoid the debate running off into the sand I think it would be profitable to restrict ourselves to those.

First difference ... the rush to judgement.

READ MORE...

Canadians, who no doubt wildly celebrate perhaps the most powerful and successful Jewish advocacy group west of Jaffa, have been apprised that “an upsurge in attacks against the Canadian Jewish community” is due to Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ.

So that’s it, then.  No more films about Christ and Christianity by Christians.  Can’t have that.  Nope, it’s back to tinsel town for the admittedly revisionist but kosher opinion, the one that doesn’t turn us all into violent automatons and gas chamber operatives.

Now, deep breath and repeat after me.  “The B’nai Brith’s wishes are my wishes, and the B’nai Brith’s fears are my fears too.  The B’nai Brith’s wishes are my wishes, and the B’nai Brith’s fears are my fears too.  The B’nai ...”

The current British news page at bbc.co.uk carries eight murder stories at various stages of development:-

Cannibal gets life for killings
Jury hears final Wragg arguments
Man charged over street axe death
Shootings jury considers verdict
Elderly woman ‘killed by burglar
Teenager guilty over cap killing
Killer drink-drive officer jailed
Car ‘breakthrough’ in Milly case

Of the five cases in which the perpetrator or perpetrators are known three have black defendants.  Bear in mind how often we are assured that blacks represent no more than 2% of British society.

It is a subject upon which I blogged last December.  It is a subject upon which I shall blog in the future.  So long as an African population is living amongst us there will be a thumping increase in our violent crime and murder statistics.  Victims as yet still breathing the keen March air will be taken in the name of multiculturalism or economic growth or global hegemony or Jewish security …

Our political masters are not race realists.  But they know very well the racial identities of our most serious criminals.  They simply will not put together the two halves of the equation:  Does that African population benefit us more than it costs us in life, treasure and peace of mind?  And if it doesn’t what should we do about it?

Phil drew my attention to these three politically offensive but ideologically consistent articles all from the May 10th edition of the Economist.  We can look at each and see there the face of the enemy, or enemies: the neocon, the open-borders psycho, the denier of human difference.

I guess that unabashed liberalism arises in a once great publication because, like all reader-aware periodicals, it knows its market and isn’t in the business of telling it things it doesn’t like to hear.  Of course, that interpretation assumes the Economist to be a mere business rather than an organ of change, but I think that’s a fair assumption.

The article on failing black males in UK schools has a particularly nasty little diagram showing that among the lowest of the underclass white British boys perform far worse than the rest.  Oh how much the transnational progressives who read the Economist these days will have salivated over that small lie, “proving” as it does that environment is the blacks’ sole (soul) drawback.

Here are the three Economist articles.  Enjoy.  Intellectually dismember, too, as you reflect upon the duplicity of modern journalism.  But always enjoy …

Bad attitudes
Back in their pomp
Dreaming of the other side of the wire

Today, former Home Secretary David Blunkett made his return to UK political life.  He chose as his subject English identity – an indefinable quantity which, by dint of its indefinability, we purportedly lack.

His objective, according to Madeleine Bunting, writing in the Guardian, is to formulate a progressive definition of Englishness.  She omits to tell us why English identity cannot be left alone but must be formulated – or engineered – to meet the progressive agenda.  I suppose now, a few weeks before the election, is a good time to lay down the Labour marker for Englishness - to make it safe for the Multi-cult, to make the English confident and welcoming multiculturalists.  No matter that the left has spent forty years denigrating us as racist sinners, delegitimising our views, twisting our history, poisoning our language, denying the veracity of our ties of blood and our claims to this land, lauding strangers and silencing our dissent … nothing must be left un-engineered.

READ MORE...

I was still sixteen and a schoolboy in the Summer of Love, such as it was in the suburban South London we knew then.  So I was too young and, anyway, far too reserved to give myself up to the general intoxication.  By the time another year had flown by and my boyish innocence had fallen away so grass smoking and the love-in was joined in the public’s image of youth by communist-orchestrated violence on the streets and the sheer fun of defying authority.

From that, at least, I was comprehensively saved by my drug of choice: horsepower.  Four wide wheels, grunt under the bonnet, juice in the tank … yes.  But left-wing politics?  Jesus, man, fuck that.

READ MORE...