Majorityrights News > Category: British Politics

The epistemic grounds to reject Hitler should be clear enough to anyone proposing that they are qualified for a leadership role in WN. But these two are apparently carrying-on as if they are pragmatists. How do they propose that their explicitly unapologetic Hitler/Nazi coddling will be anything but terribly divisive of White Nationalism in addition to being epistemologically unnecessary?

If one is to exercise 20/20 hindsight, why not wish that Hitler didn’t attack other European nations; putting efforts instead toward cooperative deportation of non-Europeans?

This is not so much addressed to Enoch-Peinovich, as he has already been quarantined from this platform as an eminently dubious actor. However, Collett…

I won’t elaborate on this much here, as I have an article coming up regarding apparent triangulation against WN in the appeal to Hitler/Nazism, but to address a few absurdities by Collett in this podcast…

First of all, Collett invoked this rule that WN bandies about, which does not make perfect sense: i.e, “never apologize.”

Well, what if you’re terribly wrong? I remember people from the White Voice (guest Heimbach high-fiving host Adams for) refusing to apologize when they mistook Elin Krantz with the actor who posed mounted on top of a black in the mock Swedish National Anthem commercial: therefore “she got what she deserved”. Why not apologize for Elin’s sake?

But this is different. Not asking for an apology from Collett but rather for signs of intelligence enough (or honesty enough) that he can see things better now.

       
Carolyn Yeager once described this image (of a Polish woman killed by a Luftwaffe strafing) as “a wounded Polish woman.”

Collett invokes the long ago BBC ambush report which finds him now confirming that he’d still rather his daughter be born in 1930s Germany than some parts of England because she would be “more safe.”

And would his daughter be more safe still, in 1940s Germany, once the Nazi regime got through with murdering millions of people, including millions of civilian women and children, thus provoking revenge and violent retribution upon her?

Would it not be a better idea to find a way to move to a safer part of England while fairly assured that your parenting would give your daughter a better chance to not be groomed, and that you’d have some time for community activism, the kind you engage now, to root-out the problem?

Adding to the foible that he’d rather his daughter be born in 1930’s Germany, while that remark was initiated a long time ago, this one wasn’t: Listing his three favorite books - firstly Mein Kampf. Was that long ago Mark? Sure as reliable Mike Enoch set in motion the whole stiff arm thing that made Richard Spencer Fuhrer for a day…

..now you’ve got Enoch (who thinks he’s proved that he deserves to participate in European advocacy - he thinks so), running interference for you. He says that he’s not going to apologize for his admiration for certain figures of the Nazi era, “they’re going to call everyone Nazis anyway.”....

....“and look at the gun shows”, how the Nazi memorabilia is snapped up (therefore, it’s really ok to see Hitler’s as just another voice in our round table.) He challenges any of us “optics cucks” (the marketing campaign that Enoch is part of calls for him to suggest that there is no profound reason to reject Hitler, that the argument boils down to how Nazi imagery will look to the “brainwashed” normies), he believes that he can out-verbalize any of us in terms of winning over the “normies.” ...confident in his kosher verbal skills, he is.

“...but in terms of who is going to be a part of this movement, it’s got to be White people and really, Jews should be excluded; and, and if you’re going to let in a mixed Jewish person then they really have to have done something to earn that - you know, and I think that in my case, I did.” - Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich

mancinblack:

The truth hurts, hopefully

Barrister Richard Booth QC tweeted “This is utterly disgraceful from the Home Office, painting lawyers as villains. A slippery and dangerous slope”.

It would be a “slippery and dangerous slope” for subversive, money grubbing “activist lawyers” if the government did the right thing and didn’t just talk around the problem.

MSN.com 27 Aug 2020

The Home Office has been accused of “painting lawyers as villains” amid a row over migrant crossings.

More migrants have arrived in Dover on Thursday morning as Britain shakes off the high winds of Storm Francis.

The new arrivals – brought in on Border Force speedboats – were taken ashore in the Kent port.

It comes as the Home Office faces criticism over its renewed attack on “activist lawyers” which it says are hindering their efforts to deport migrants.

A video posted to its Twitter account on Wednesday evening showed a moving graphic of deportation planes leaving the UK.

The clip has been branded “scandalous” and “utterly disgraceful” by senior law figures, and many on social media likened it to something from the TV show Dad’s Army.

More than 5,000 migrants have crossed to the UK in small boats so far in 2020, analysis by the PA news agency shows.

Home Office@ukhomeoffice

Small boat crossings are totally unnecessary and we continue to return migrants with no right to be in the UK.

Another flight left today with more planned in the coming weeks.

7:30 PM · Aug 26, 2020
7.2K people are Tweeting about this

The Law Society condemned the video, and president Simon Davis said: “Attacks on the integrity of the legal profession undermine the rule of law.

“To describe lawyers who are upholding the law as ‘activist lawyers’ is misleading and dangerous.

“We should be proud that we live in a country where legal rights cannot be overridden without due process, and we should be proud that we have legal professionals who serve the rule of law.”

READ MORE...

Home  Contact  About  News  Our Plan  Get Involved  Events  Demographics  Education

Get Involved In Memoriam

August 9th is the International Day of the World’s Indigenous People – and as we are the indigenous people of these islands, we thought it would be a great time to celebrate!

On July 4th a group of 70 patriots went walking in the Peak District and displayed a 10-metre-long banner that simply read ‘WHITE LIVES MATTER’. You can read about the day.

Since that event, the pictures have gone viral and many liberals have had screaming tantrums and public meltdowns.

On August 9th we thought we would repeat the exercise on a much larger scale and use the publicity to get #WhiteLivesMatter trending on social networks.

The day was a roaring success! Hundreds of patriots gathered at various locations in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to carry out banner reveals, stick up posters and hand out leaflets.

We even had people take part in America, New Zealand, Austria and Denmark! Our activism was picked up by a number of local news outlets, bringing a spike of registrations to the Patriotic Alternative website.

Thank you to everybody who took part on the day.

It was a fantastic show of force and optimism.

Photographs from the day can be found below.

Common Questions and Objections

Who are the British?

To be British is to be one of the various ethnic groups of the United Kingdom, namely: the English, the Scottish, the Welsh, the Northern Irish, the Cornish and the Orcadians (the indigenous inhabitants of the Orkney Islands, Scotland).

What are the differences between the various British ethnicities?

Although the ethnic groups of Britain are overwhelmingly NW European, there are slight differences in the ancestry of each group. For example, the Scottish will have more Viking ancestry, while the English will have more Anglo Saxon ancestry, and the Welsh will have more Celtic ancestry. The important thing to remember is that all of these groups came from the same region, therefore, despite our differences, we are very similar to each other (especially when compared to a non-British ethnicity).

Objection: Only the Welsh, who are Celtic, are indigenous to Britain.

False. All the groups mentioned above are indigenous to Britain. The English, for example, are around 60% Celtic and 40% Anglo Saxon (two groups who originated from the same place). A common argument that you will hear is that, as the English have Anglo Saxon heritage as well as Celtic, they are not native. This is the equivalent of having some red paint on a paint palette, and then adding some more red paint and saying it has changed colour. Coincidentally, the Māori (who are the indigenous Polynesian people of New Zealand) arrived in New Zealand around 700 years ago. The Anglo Saxons invaded Britain around 1500 years ago. Nobody ever argues that the Māori aren’t indigenous, but they will argue that the English aren’t.

Objection: Britain has always been a nation of immigrants.

False. There is a difference between settlers (those who arrived somewhere first and established their own nation), invaders (those who invade a nation by force) and immigrants (those who are welcomed to a nation by its government) – although we don’t mind if you want to compare modern-day immigration to an invasion. Britain has never experienced anything like the modern-day, mass immigration we experience today.

Mass immigration started to Britain in 1948, yet it was really amplified from 1997 onwards when Tony Blair became Prime Minister under a Labour government. Before 1948, Britain was overwhelmingly ethnically British. Sure, there were small amounts of immigrants here and there (you may read about the odd Black skeleton being dug up), but their numbers were insignificant when compared to Britain’s overall population size. It is also worth noting that any invasion that Britain previously faced was an invasion by other Europeans (I.E., people who were very similar to us).

Objection: The English are a mongrel race.

False. People will usually cite various waves of invasion to Britain in order to suggest that the English are a “mongrel race” made up of the Celts, Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Normans, etc. As discussed above, the English are a Celto-Germanic ethnic group. Not every invasion that Britain faced had an impact on our gene pool. The Romans for example, despite being in Britain for around 400 years, operated as a ruling class and had next-to-no impact on our genetics. As also discussed above, all of these groups are other Europeans anyway so it would hardly constitute a “mongrel race” even if it were true. For more information about our status as indigenous people, please find below a useful video by Survive the Jive.

The History of Britain and her People

Survive the Jive 5 Oct 2019

A talk I did in London on the subject of Britiain’s demographic history. I begin with the Ice age, cover the Neolithic revolution, the arrival of the Beaker folk, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, the blackamoors act of Elizabethan times and right up to present day HMS Windrush etc.

There was a fault with the editing so the image of the Homo Erectus appears 30 seconds later than it should, please ignore that. It appears as I am discussing Neanderthals, but don’t worry, I know the difference between erectus and neanderthal!

READ MORE...

                        Mark Collett and Laura Towler

British far right ‘becoming more racist’ after Black Lives Matter protests, report finds

Independent 16 Aug 2020:

Exclusive: Growth of new Patriotic Alternative group suggests ‘shift towards more openly racial politics’

The British far right is becoming more openly racist in the wake of a backlash against international Black Lives Matter protests, experts have warned.

A report by Hope Not Hate, seen exclusively by The Independent before its release, said that years of dominance by Tommy Robinson and other figures focused on Muslims was giving way to rising white nationalism.

It found that the growth of the new Patriotic Alternative group, which openly calls for non-whites to be ejected from the UK, suggests a “shift towards more openly racial politics”.

Author Simon Murdoch said far-right activists were becoming “much more extreme ideologically”.

He said the increase in migrant boat crossings over the English Channel and anger over so-called “cancel culture” had an impact.

“The biggest backlash has been to the Black Lives Matter movement,” the researcher added. “There is more willingness to discuss race generally across the far right now.”

Large protests following the police killing of George Floyd in the US city of Minneapolis in May sparked a deluge of racism and anger on far-right social media networks.

Claims that demonstrators were to target the statue of Winston Churchill and other monuments in London, after a slave trader’s figure was torn down in Bristol, culminated in a violent protest by groups claiming to “defend” them.

Police and journalists were attacked and some protesters appeared to perform Nazi salutes, following smaller clashes elsewhere in the UK where demonstrators were filmed making “white power” gestures and shouting: “Why don’t you go back to Africa?”

Mr Murdoch said that dominant groups and activists in the British far right, such as Robinson, have focused on Islam in recent years and left overt racism to the “extreme fascists” like banned terrorist group National Action.

But the rise of the Europe-wide Identitarian movement and spread of a conspiracy theory claiming that white people are being “replaced” by non-whites has influenced extremists in the UK.

“There’s this move from people previously focused on other topics like Islam, and alongside that is a contingent of the young British far right who have been embracing more extreme and traditionally fascist, white nationalist and antisemitic ideas,” Mr Murdoch said.

He warned that the younger group are active in online networks that have greater reach than the “old guard” of National Front and British National Party (BNP) supporters.

Patriotic Alternative was formed last year by the BNP’s former director of publicity, Mark Collett, and has been attracting activists from across the far-right spectrum.

Its growth has sparked concerns it may unite competing factions from the fractured extreme right-wing scene in Britain.

Last weekend, it held publicity stunts displaying “white lives matter” banners across the UK to to tie in with the International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, and leaders are planning a third national conference in September.

On its website, Patriotic Alternative claims that “native British” people are being eradicated and proposes extreme measures to protect “the indigenous peoples of the United Kingdom”.

It says it would call a “complete halt” to immigration and pay people “of immigrant descent … to return to their ancestral homelands”.

Patriotic Alternative claims that children are being exposed to pro-LGBT and anti-white “propaganda” and advocates home-schooling using its own package of hateful material on “history and culture”.

Patriotic Alternative’s website calls for non-whites to ‘return to their ancestral homelands’

Mr Murdoch said the group had attracted support from figures previously active in neo-Nazi groups, but also those with backgrounds in “more moderate” movements.

He warned that Patriotic Alternative was “trying to give the friendliest possible face to extremely fascist ideas” by using veiled terminology.

But Hope Not Hate’s report found that private online chats between members were “awash with extreme racism, Holocaust denial and open veneration of fascism”.

It said Patriotic Alternative had “antisemitism at its core” and played into conspiracy theories claiming Jews are orchestrating the “replacement” of white Britons.

One post by a supporter seen by The Independent reads: “British people are white. They aren’t brown, black, Asian or Jew.”

Hope Not Hate also found Patriotic Alternative had links with the UK-based Hundred Handers group, which incites people to spread racist stickers around the world with slogans including “Western civilisation is white civilisation” and “Stop immigration, start repatriation”.

Mr Murdoch said it appeared to be capitalising on a “sense of rootlessness” in the British far right during the coronavirus pandemic.

“Black Lives Matter, the anti-government elements of coronavirus and the economic downturn are grist to the mill for them but they’ve lacked a sense of direction,” he added.

“Despite grossly exaggerating their size and influence, Patriotic Alternative could be the group that unites the fractured, ageing UK far right, injecting it with young activists.

“They could present a real threat given their extreme views.”

The New Culture Forum Channel 16 Aug 2020: On this week’s #NCFCounterCulture, the founding members of “Save Our Statues (S.O.S.)”, an organisation established in response to this summer’s attacks on historic statues, discuss the wider agenda motivating many of the leading forces behind the recent protests (from BLM to the Socialist Workers Party).

Joining Peter Whittle (founder & Chairman of S.O.S.) are:

* Richard Bingley, General Secretary
* Richard Poll, Social Media director
* Emma Webb, Political Outreach coordinator
* Rafe Heydel-Mankoo, Committee Member
* Tom Stranack, a student who organised a successful petition to retain the statue of Lord (Robert) Baden-Powell in Poole

If you are interested in joining the fight for Britain’s heritage & history, please do visit the Save Our Statues website to donate or become a member: https://www.SaveOurStatues.org.uk

Laura Towler gives a presentation of the invasion of Britain from the perspective of “pathological altruism” - a term which drew hot objection from Tanstaafl.

Tan objects to the term put forward by Kevin MacDonald saying that it apparently comes by way of Jared Taylor’s White advocacy as Taylor wishes to take the blame off of Jewish power and influence per se.

However, Laura’s use of the term isn’t naive. She acknowledges that this condition of pathological altruism has instigating sources - of which she is well aware.

Daughter of Albion nominates Enoch Powell as figure of British patriotism to rally about.

Paleoconservatism as “Cultural Controlled Opposition” in response to Neo-Conservatism and its Clean Break Memo.

They typically come across as your best asset. If you recognize it for what it is and keep it on the radar screen as such, not getting caught up, controlled opposition can have its utility as they are often funded to provide valuable resource, typically enlisting intelligent people and allowing them fine and clear articulation of some important information for WN. Nick Fuentes nicely articulates Israeli Operation Clean Break, a.k.a., “Project for a New America Century.”

Although Nick’s Paleoconservatism is not what most people consider to be classic controlled opposition, make no mistake. While we are tossing around the word “culture” of late, adding “cultural capitalism” and “cultural nationalism” on the radar screen with cultural Marxism, it can be said quite accurately that Paleoconservatism is a “cultural controlled opposition”.... a bit softer and more flexible perhaps than classic, but undoubtedly allowing the enemies of European peoples to act on key points.