Majorityrights News > Category: The American right

Occidental Dissent, “President Trump Reverses His Plan To Withdraw From Syria”, 22 Feb 2019:

As I said in December, the Israel Lobby, the Pentagon and the GOP establishment would find some way to pressure Trump into reversing his withdrawal of troops from Syria:

“WASHINGTON — First, President Trump was going to pull all 2,000 American troops out of Syria immediately. Then he was going to slow down the withdrawal. Then he was going to leave troops in neighboring Iraq.

Now, in the latest about-face, Mr. Trump has agreed to leave about 400 troops in Syria — 200 in a multinational force in the northeastern part of the country and another 200 at a small outpost in the southeast, where they will seek to counter Iran’s influence throughout the country.

His decision to commit what one senior administration official described on Friday as a “couple hundred troops” to the multinational force, operating south of the Turkish border, came after European allies refused to send troops if the United States would not.

Mr. Trump’s national security adviser, John R. Bolton, pressed the president to make the decision on Thursday, this official said, amid signs that the Pentagon’s negotiations to put together a stabilization and monitoring force were foundering on European resistance. …”

Such has been the story of the Trump administration:

– Big Ag and the Chamber of Commerce have gotten Trump to support increasing legal immigration
– Republican senators loudly condemned Trump for withdrawing from TPP and renegotiating NAFTA until he essentially replaced NAFTA with TPP
– The tax reform bill passed without closing the carried interest loophole
– The GOP Congress punted on funding the border wall half a dozen times
– Various immigration bills like Kate’s Law have died in the Senate
– Trump was persuaded to sign the 2018 Omnibus and to cave on the shutdown by Republican senators
– The GOP Congress passed heavy sanctions on Russia and Trump yielded to pressure from conservatives to arm Ukraine and expand NATO
– Trump was convinced by Ryan and McConnell to prioritize their agenda of health care, tax reform and welfare reform

At the end of the day, conservatives in Congress have prevailed on nearly every issue, and Trump has walked back his populist promises over and over again.

By Hunter Wallace. Share this.

Los Angeles, which way have you gone, Western man?

Well, Trump certainly did deliver on his promise - to Israel, to undo the Iran Deal.

But with Trump’s failure to deliver on his promise for an effective Mexican border wall, in fact, delivering more amnesty, Ecce Lux and Dennis Dale have an interesting but alarming discussion about the change in America’s demographics, from the transformation of Los Angeles into Tijuana north, to the transformation of a segment of young Whites into irredeemable anti-White, “anti-fa.”

Dennis Dale, Ecce Lux and a guest discuss this collapse of America’s demographic balance and ways of life - the implications: with Ecce Lux having witnessed the transformation to what is now an advanced stage in Los Angeles, he warns that “most Americans don’t realize how F-d they are.”

In truth, I was seeing an advanced stage of demographic horror and destruction in Newark, New Jersey back in the 1960s. It was just as much of a nightmare that White people could “rationalize” their way around it and go into denial about the clear, catastrophic implications. I could not understand how Whites could not see the clear augury of how F-d they were going to be…

Ecce Lux renders intelligent description of the change and his visceral response, but he doesn’t get some basic matters yet. That probably results from his having only come to the struggle recently. We need to talk to him here. I tried with Dennis Dale and am still open to him but maybe you can’t teach an older dog new tricks.

Ecce Lux seems open to the DNA Nations. As soon as I finally have time (should be this week) to finish a summary audio on the philosophy being espoused here (by me, anyway), I will begin working on implementation.

Abolished

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

        - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

A cliché, and yet so pertinent.
So many people think that the struggle
against the New World Order
is about not becoming their slaves.

But we ARE already their slaves!

by Anthony Migchels, 18 Feb 2019
(henrymakow.com)

The essence of Slavery is that someone else controls the value of our production.

Under Capitalism, people depending on a wage (the 90/99%), typically consume only about 10% of the value of their own production. The entire System is geared to sucking up our production with unearned income: Usury, Landlordism, Speculation, high prices of Monopoly.

In Capitalism, this was achieved by first driving the common people off their ancestral lands by systematically destroying the abundant money systems of the medieval era by forcing Gold Standards everywhere.

This caused a deflation that first savaged the countryside.

In this way, the People lost their means of independence and were forced to work for others for a living, in the cities. Instead of being independent farmers and craftsmen, they were demoted to wage slavery.

By giving him a wage, immediately a large chunk of the value of the worker’s production is taken by the shareholder. The value of the worker’s production is always much higher than his wage.

With Multinationals, profits and shareholder dividends are typically higher than the cost for labor. More than half of the workers’ production is taken by the owners of the company.

Broken

They get away with this because Capital is kept artificially scarce, both through Cartels and through the artificial scarcity of money. In this way, Labor is oppressed, forcing them into low wages and humiliating conditions. With a decent monetary system, not Capital, but Labor would be the scarce factor of production, and men would be either self-employed or co-owner in larger corporations.

The worker receives his wage, and the remaining value of his production is next sucked up with scientific precision.

A wage slave making $2000 per month has a budget something like this: $300 for the State $700 for the Landlord $100 for Energy $200 for ‘health’ ‘care’ $150 for Transportation $50 for Telecom Total: $1500

What remains, $500, about a quarter, is to eat and try to live a life. A fraction of what 40 hours work produced, at least $4000 worth.

The beauty of the System is, that when wages rise, prices, debts (and associated usurious cost), rents, rise along, sucking up the extra purchasing power.

The residual wealth that the Middle Class retains during booms is disowned a little later with the inevitably following crunch, forcing them into liquidation at depressed prices.

Free Markets, Right?! Supply and demand! All good and dandy, we think. Fair enough. We use stuff, so we pay.

But when we take a closer look at where all this money ends up, it transpires that all supply chains we depend on (energy, automotive industry, telecom, ‘health’ ‘care’) are dominated by massive International Cartels.

Cartels keep supply low, and prices high, so a lot of their profits are unearned income, not really related to their production, but to their market power. They use this to keep competitors out, and the Capitalist’s core value is ‘Competition is Sin’ (John D. Rockefeller).

LANDLORDISM

What is more, a great many people are enslaved by Landlordism, which is a vicious Tyranny, first established by the Sword, later overtaken by mortgages, the Money Power’s method of disowning the Landed Aristocracy.

Landlordism is pure parasitism, and all the Land is owned by a really very small group of mostly very old families. For instance: all the homeowners in Britain combined own only 6% of the Land. All the rest is in the hands of a minute percentage of the population. Many of the main Landholders go back all the way to William the Conqueror.

Filthy rich

Usury massively raises all these prices. As we know, Usury is about 40% of prices we pay for all goods and services: cost for capital passed on by the supplier.

This includes the land we live on, and on which we are utterly dependent. In fact, Usury actually QUADRUPLES Landlordism´s rents.

But this is not the only way International Finance profits from everything: they also have a decisive stake in most of the Transnationals that dominate the supply chains we are completely dependent upon. Only 20% of Transnationals (there are about 40,000 of them) are independently owned.

CONCLUSION

In the past, people enslaved in the mines and the sweatshops, say late 19th century Britain, they were even forced by their employers to do their groceries in factory owned shops that charged outrageous prices.

We think we have outgrown this. It’s really time to think again: all that has happened is that Capital (Finance) has upped their game. Local shops on factory compounds are now international supermarket chains. But they are owned by the same people and serve the exact same purpose: reclaiming capital’s losses to wages, usurping our production.

People even go so far as to say ‘Capitalism has lifted people out of poverty’! What is so insane about this, is that a man, in 1694, worked about 15 weeks per year on his own farm. Then with the ascent of Capitalism, two centuries later, he worked 80 hours per week in some soul-crushing ‘job’, and it was still not enough: his wife and his kids had to work too, just to pay for the rent and some potatoes.

Anthony Migchels

Even today, we work at least twice as much as three centuries ago.

The most galling of it all is that people claim ‘freedom’ because once every four years they get to give what remains of their power away to some Kleptocrat insider with ‘democratic elections’.

This is the reality of Capitalism, which is centred around International Finance and its Usury (Banking).

No solution to all this is thinkable, without the end of Usury by interest-free credit for the People.

Halsey “English”

Because he wants to do his level best to get the goyim to believe that he is on their side (he is part of the “solution”, i.e., a White and Jewish right wing alliance against “the problem”,  “The Left”, by which he refers to the international Leftism, i.e., liberalism imposed on Whites, that his (((tribe))) was instrumental in having created and imposed in crass, vast distortion in the first place. Now that his tribe is confronted with the intersection of leftism confronting Jewish hegemony, he will do everything in his power to distract from, assist in burying and thwarting a White Ethnonational Left, a platform which is wise to and secured against his tribe’s game.

Witness this chat, which he participated-in alongside my discussion of the question, “Are Jews good for Western Civilization?” with Luke Ford.

Halsey tries to act as if not the first word of what I say makes any sense, is worth any consideration (let alone having significant insight), it is all just worthless - only summary dismissal is deserved from the get-go. True to his slovenly pig self, he is so heavy handed and mono thematic in the comments that he makes his agenda as such entirely too obvious.

Rodney Martin - Rodney says his family is from Silesia. The Mongoloid invasions of the 1200s shows in his face.

Rodney Martin (who goes by the handle “Movement Critic”) is absolutely disgusting. He tries to say that I am Polish and Jewish (I am 3% trace Jewish from my Italian side). He is a Nazophile who confabs with Jews in typical right wing perfidy. He takes a near identical line against me as (((Halsey))).

This post will look at the chat from the Hangout,  “Are Jews good for Western Civilization?”, 6 Jan 2019, and it is appalling.

But first I’d like to remark that upon review of the audio, one interesting point that I didn’t notice at the time was that Luke was asking how it was that Jews, as such a small percentage of the population, could marginalize people?

Luke Ford (Orthodox Jewish convert): who tries to suggest that Jews can’t have such important influence because they are such a small population; and with that, straw mans my argument about “marginals” by asking how such a small population can create marginals, when I did not say that they were creating marginals, I suggested that they were opening the bounds and borders that would otherwise protect marginals first - they are opening the borders and bounds to liberalization and therefore running roughshod over accountability to and from marginals (which is everybody within a group, from time to time).

Luke Ford - “The social justice warriors are winning” against my Jewish hegemony and White, right wing sell-out coalition

Worse, when I described the theory of horizontal transmission and its prescription (which is separatism, not genocide), Luke Ford then tried to say that I was saying that Jews are parasites. And a few people in the chat tried to make that smear stick.

Furthermore, what Luke Ford is doing by pushing this right wing agenda and coddling Nazi sympathizers is evil - the trajectory of conflict that he’s instigating is evil.

But the whole transcript (which I posted with the audio) is interesting - probably better than waiting through my uhms and ahs - though I must say in my defense, I deliver significant content after a short wait as surely as I hesitate in those ums and aahs. I finally looked at Luke Ford’s chat room and these people are totally full of shit. I mean really stupid, even in their lame attempts to obstruct my voice and message.

Poor (((misguided))) Holly. Part of her personality is fixated at 14 - years of age, that is.

Perhaps the most disappointing antagonist in the chat was Holly R. - a lawyer but a Christ-tard and shockingly stupid. It’s a shame because her comments about the OJ trial and the demands of PC (at Dennis Dale’s Hangout) were well considered, but her remarks on this chat were, well, there is no other word but stupid.

Halsey, it’s to be expected. Like the rest of them, his comments were so lame that I can’t even take them seriously.

The chat’s mind was so clearly made up beforehand that it made it too obvious. There was no way to be hurt by it. There was no pretense of objectivity, just sheer malicious intent from the get go.

Church of Entropy was surprisingly lame in her comments.

There were only a few grudging acknowledgments. Those people really suck. Honesty has a very limited role in their platform.

Below and in further comments I am going to present excerpts from the chat. Here’s a look at all of the most malicious characters. You can get a sense of their political/ideological perspective.

Halsey Right Now

Halsey, we know, is a Jewish guy who is figuring heavily in promoting “The Left’ as the enemy and the Leftist Jews are the bad ones, while we right-wingers need to stick together to fight the real enemy, ‘The Left.”

Of course I am promoting a White Left ethnonationalism which is entirely different and at odds with international leftism or the liberalism that he wants people to take for granted as “the left”. It closes off the Jewish games and entryism, also shuts out their misrepresentations as it affords us capacity to define it for ourselves (not liberal, not taking away private property, not seeking equality, though justice, yes, and not against wealth], and finally, it brings to account those right wingers who would sell us out to them] I call him and people like him out on the games they are playing and suckering people into [ “The Left” is the enemy and the right is the solution is a variant of problem - reaction - solution ] and so he and his kind are doing all they can to bury and misrepresent my platform.

“Movement Critic” is Rodney Martin - calls me “Jewish” because I have 3% trace Jewish ancestry.

“Movement Critic” is the Nazophile Rodney Martin. Rodney used to be on friendly terms with Carolyn Yeager until right wing schisiming did its thing. On a subsequent stream he said that he has no sympathy for the Poles that were killed in the Polish Warsaw uprising.

He calls me “Polish and Jewish” in this stream. I am half Polish and half Italian, with trace 3% Jewish from my Italian side (according to DNA tests).

Holly R. is the aforementioned lawyer and a Jesus freak, making a very strong case for the phenomenon of compartmentalized intelligence.

Not only utterly stupid in her assessment, not only malicious (some Christian), but doing it an a puerile way. I’ve listened back and can’t for the life of me hear how I am supposed to pronounce “modernity” in a ‘gay sounding’ way.

Not sure who James James is yet, maybe Babylonian Hebrew.

Brian Brennan is a confused and misguided White guy.

Brundlefly -Jewish wife, kid and a Christard; that sums it up.

Brundlefly is a Christard with a Jewish wife and son. In a subsequent stream’s chat, he told me to “gass myself.” Some Christian.

Norvin Hobbs: A ginger, thus Halsey attributes no soul.

Norvin Hobbs: pro White Anglo American needs to get out of the right wing.

In the subsequent comments I will present the most virulent excerpts from the chat - there was almost no support except from Norvin Hobbs who said he wanted to talk to me and pushed back on Holly’s insistent Christianity.

Ecce Lux has his heart in the right place, but he’s being misguided into the company of these Jews, and taking the bait of their right wing misdirection.

Alex Delarge, well who cares?

Church of Sky-Lilly, er Entropy

Church of Entropy is a kind of Jewish groupie - takes her physics degree and tries to promote a fanciful version of reincarnation; when it’s clear to anyone that DNA reconstructs at least to some extent over generations. Further, for the degree of intelligence required of that field, she’s surprisingly stupid in her remarks.

1) When I talk about Clerk Maxwells Demons, the Augustinian and Manichean Devils, these are clearly metaphors for two different kinds of classic challenges that people are up against.

a) Augusitinian devils: natural challenges which don’t change their rule structure if you solve them.

b) Manichean devils: man made challenges, which can include deception and trickery - including changing the rules if you solve them.

Stupidly, Church of Entropy acts like I am talking about literal devils rather than clear metaphors.

David Hival​ (Doovid), never evolved to believe in evolution.

David Hival​ (Doovid): Doovid, is a classic liberal Jew. And he doesn’t believe in evolution, lol. Why should anyone take him seriously?

“Movement Critic” is Rodney Martin; more like Jewish minion

27:14 Movement Critic (Rodney Martin - this overcompensating, Mongoloid looking Nazophile’s sentiments are clear from the get go). Typical right winger, look (((who))) he is hanging out with and ingratiating himself with.

Rodney Martin, ‘Movement Critic’ says:

​This is why the Poles lost, they tried to talk both the Germans & Soviets to death and both just got fed up & shot them.

Halsey Jewish

28:14
Halsey News Network (((Halsey)))

​How autistic is this guy?

28:33

Halsey News Network
​Germany, the heart of Somalia

“Movement Critic” is Rodney Martin, looking very much like a victim of Downs Syndrom

29:13
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin….and doesn’t he look like he has Downs Syndrome)
​@Halsey News Network please translate

29:19
Halsey News Network
​This guy is a broken Deep Blur

29:42
Halsey News Network
​Translate what this guy is saying?

29:55
Halsey News Network
​He is saying herpa derp derp

29:56
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​@Halsey News Network yes

30:07
Halsey News Network
​Like I have any clue

30:29
Halsey News Network
​He sounds like he is is broken

30:34
James James (I am not sure who James James is)
​This is why Daniel hasn’t received a phone call since 1980.

30:45
Halsey News Network
​Like a dictionary program that lost some bits

30:47
Alex Delarge (who cares who Alex Delarge is. His mind was made up before the start, like the rest of them)
​LOL James

30:50
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin, his Downs Syndrome is acting up….and doesn’t he look like he has Downs Syndrome)
​@Halsey News Network I think I need a blunt to understand him????

31:18
Halsey News Network
​This guy smoked thirty blunts before he came on

31:38
Halsey News Network
​Ever I am not cranky

36:09
Halsey News Network
​Is this guy trolling?

36:10
Brian Brennan
​funny that 90 people are listening to this

Norvin Hobbs: A ginger, thus Halsey attributes no soul.

36:11
Norvin, hello

36:14
Halsey News Network
​I will call it

36:14
Alex Delarge
​hey Norvin

Poor (((misguided))) Holly. Part of her personality is fixated at 14 - years of age, that is. She is an attorney, making a strong case for compartmentalized intelligence.

36:17
Holly R. (Lawyer, Jesus Freak, Puerile idiot):
​zzz

36:17
Halsey News Network
​Like won

36:20
Levi
​@John Harris america was a refuge for ashkies for centuries

36:24
Halsey News Network
​Save our brains

36:42
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin) [Doesn’t like the fact that I see Christianity for what it is]
​This clown just lost all credibility, he is a Jim Goad

36:43
Halsey News Network
​This guy is as coherent as carrot top

37:11
Holly R.
​☦️☦️☦️

37:19
Alex Delarge
​oh no

37:21
Luke Ford​
holly!

37:26
BatsintheBarbell​ (this guy might be White and sincere)
what did he mean by this

37:26
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin) [there’s a lot wrong with the golden rule, Rodney]
​There is nothing wrong with the Golden Rule

37:29
E. Vee​
oh its Holly

37:32
E. Vee
​hey Holly

37:34
Holly R.
​“Rejecting Christ to own the Jews.” So smart.

37:37
Halsey News Network
​Because gingers have no souls

37:38
Alex Delarge
​anti-Christian too…

37:44
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​This guy is just a crybaby

37:46
Levi [No, they’ve deceived Whites into worshiping one though]
​jews worship a jew on a stick?

37:47
Holly R.
Hi @Luke

38:20
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​Hi @Holly R.

38:33
John Harris
​Daniel is a former catholic?? Repent daniel!

38:39
Holly R.
​Hey @movementcritic

38:39
Halsey News Network
​I am really glad I am high IQ because this guy is making me dumber

38:44
Alex Delarge
​he’s as tedious as Kant

38:58
Norvin Hobbs
​@holly R lots of people are not into Christianity for a number of logical and metaphysical reasons

39:00
Movement Critic (Rodney Martin)
​@Holly R. bet this guy’s GF has air in her

39:18
Holly R.
​LOL @movementcritic

39:26
Brian Brennan
​what’s going through Luke’s head right now?

39:28
Holly R.
​Hi Norvin

39:37
Luke Ford​
guess Brian

39:49
Alex Delarge
​lol Luke

39:58
Jmriccitelli​Luke, u have the patience of a bobcat hunting, they can sit and wait for several hours

40:25
E. Vee​
hey Norvin

40:31
Halsey News Network
​Tell this guy I will throw a super chat if he takes an Adderall

40:35
Holly R.
​Hey EVee

41:32
Chris Alton​
@Halsey News Network lollllll

41:34
John Harris
​lets accept for the sake of argument that the JQ isnt real, now what luke?

41:35
Movement Critic [Nice Nazi sentiments, Rodney]
​@Halsey News Network I’ll give $100 if he snorts Zyklon B

41:48
Holly R.
​@movementcritic I’ve been spending time at Orthodox Christian churches. Pretty amazing.

41:56
Halsey News Network
​That would make him slower movement crotic

42:05
Luke Ford
​John, we could talk NFL

42:16
Halsey News Network
​If he gets any slower he will be fully regarded

42:18
Movement Critic
​@Holly R. very majestic

42:20
Halsey News Network
​Retarded

42:27
Holly R.
​Yes

43:24
Halsey News Network
​Usually it is regular autism, this is autism on Valium after catching chlamydia

44:34
Holly R. [she knows nothing about what I know about Christianity, but talks anyway]
​Christianity is way more mystical & amazing than what you see with these tv preachers. I think this guy is just reacting to cartoonish Christianity.

44:53
Halsey News Network
​This guy knows as much about Jews as Rodney knows about non alcoholic drinks

45:31
Holly R.
​@halsey he doesn’t know Christianity either

45:47
Halsey News Network
​This guy knows as much about Jews as norvin does about holding a job

46:48
Halsey News Network
​Doovid he wants to debate you on violence

47:01
Halsey News Network
​He is warming up, he will be ready in 2036

47:02
El Jim [This is probably ecce lux, a sincerely concerned White activist, who probably doesn’t “get me” yet.]
​@doooovid I suspect he’s a russian bot with pre-recorded responses

47:08
Isaiah Sellassie
​Wrong! it was not the captives who returned to Jerusalem—it was the collaborators of Israel who had joined Babylon in the war against Judah

47:35
David Hival​ (Doovid) I have zero idea what this guy’s position is, after all this talking

47:38
Holly R.
​Abraham wasn’t “a Jew.” Fight me.

47:51
Halsey News Network
​I am not fighting you holly

48:08
Holly R.
​LOL @Halsey

48:20
El Jim
​I would love to see this guy and David Duke have a monologue with each other

48:34
Halsey News Network
​This guy is a human tranquilizer, I would lose to Enoch even right now.

48:41
Norvin Hobbs​@Holly R he was a levtine person, so an early jew

48:55
Isaiah Sellassie
​there is chronic misunderstanding of the Israel-Judah civil war—- it is the main problem I see in exegesis

49:02
Halsey News Network
​This guy is making me so slow David duke would be able to beat me with nothing but the power of steroids and Botox

49:23
Active Monad​Well, this is exciting!!

49:28
Halsey News Network
​No you don’t dooovid.

49:38
Halsey News Network
​He is speaking downs syndrome

49:46
El Jim
​Well, at least he’s not setting his cubicle on fire.

49:55
Halsey News Network
​Duke is a human manaquin.

50:01
John Harris
​frame goy

50:06
Halsey News Network
​The man is more plastic than death vader

50:13
Norvin Hobbs​
@Holly R are you CI?

50:13
Halsey News Network
​Darth

50:31
Josh Randall
​@Halsey News Network he can’t even smile without dislocating his ears..

50:38
Halsey News Network
​Lolololk

50:40
Holly R.
​no @norvin I’m a Lutheran but moving toward Orthodox Christianity
50:56

Halsey News Network
​The last time he ate something hot he popped a lip.

51:26
Halsey News Network
​This guy isn’t speaking English. He is speaking cerebral palsy.

51:35
Movement Critic
​@Halsey News Network This guy must be a 1-900 Gay phone sex operator, keep talking & saying nothing so the Schmuk keeps paying in hopes he says something “interesting”

51:49
E. Vee​
Striker is a good man

52:03
E. Vee​
of course you dont, you dont like Jesus either

52:09
Halsey News Network
​I want to debate Rachel Maddow on Who has a bigger dick, her or Richard spencer

52:34
Halsey News Network
​Luke wants to respond but he has no clue what the guy is saying

52:45

Movement Critic
​@Halsey News Network Rachel, hands down

52:48

Halsey News Network
​Actually yes on January 14
53:10

Movement Critic [I said that my DNA tests say that I have 3% trace Jewish from my Italian side]
​@Halsey News Network This guy is Jewish, he has said so

53:19
Halsey News Network
​Communism vs nationalism

53:22
Holly R.
​I’m so busy cleaning my own side of the street right now I can’t be bothered with this guy & his problems.

53:32
Brian Brennan
​70 verbal IQ

53:50
David Hival
​yes, systemic homeostasis for whites. exactly what I’ve been saying

54:03
E. Vee
​ehh Brian, i wouldnt judge him that harshly. nerves play a role. he is probably better if he’s at ease

54:25
Brian Brennan
​I’m just being mean, he could be smart I don’t know his work

54:33
Halsey News Network
​You think is Luke just snapped his fingers this guy would fall asleep?
54:56
BatsintheBarbell​This guy just says what he wants WHEN he wants

55:02
Church of Entropy
​the virgin cares what people think the chad bores the audience to death

55:09
E. Vee
​lol Bats, interesting take

55:11
Halsey News Network
​This guy been hittin the purple drank

55:18
Holly R.
​What if God DID entrust the Jews with his revealed truth as a priest class? What are you going to do then, if that really happened ?

56:09
Halsey News Network [because he knows his game is exposed]
​This is straight painful

READ MORE...

ALT-RIGHT LIES: THE DRESDEN MYTH

What the Alt-Right literally believes

by Colin Liddell, 13 Feb 2019:

One of the myths commonly trotted out on the Alt-Right at this time of year is the Dresden Myth.

According to this meme, trope, narrative, or whatever you want to call it, the bombing of Dresden on and around the 13th of February, 1945, was one of the most horrendous war crimes ever. Indeed, it was so bad that it stands right up there with the Holocaust—which, of course, many in the Alt-Right deny—and the atom bombing of the Japanese as some kind of ultimate and delegitimising evil.

Of course it was bad, but in war all sorts of terrible things happen as a matter of course. So, using Dresden in this way is rather a hard sell. The normies just don’t get it. To them it’s just one more example of a bombing raid, hardly a rare occurrence in WWII.

Even when the Alt-Right exaggerate the casualty figures and throw in some colourful details about low flying bombers machine gunning fleeing civilians, etc., the reaction is still pretty much “meh.”

This doubtlessly has something to do with the fact that the Germans were pioneers in the mass bombing of civilian centres themselves. Here’s a screenshot of an interactive bomb map of London from the Blitz.

Go to the site and check it out for yourself.

So, everybody bombed someone. So what?

But this is where the second part of the myth kicks in. In order to make you care about this particular bombing, we are told that the war was already over when Dresden was bombed, so that, unlike Warsaw in 1939, Rotterdam in 1940, and London, the bombing of Dresden was not a “normal” act of war, but instead just an act of gratuitous cruelty and sadism.

Here is a typical anonymous comment from a Facebook group putting forward this point of view:

Dresden was a civilian massacre. Call it what it is man, the war was OVER….germany’s infrastructure was finished a year before Dresden was torched. Germany’s rail system was bombed to shit, they had no resources and the army was done.

Yes, indeed, if the war was truly over by February 1945, that would make Dresden somewhat worse. Although, it could also be argued that even if the war was “effectively over” it would have been quite hard for people to just shrug off years of war conditioning and start acting normally as rational, humane beings in the flick of a switch.

But was the war effectively over as is claimed?

Of course, in the sense that Germany could no longer win against the massive forces arrayed against it, or even achieve some kind of negotiated peace, the war was definitely over. But in terms of brutal fighting and high casualties for both sides, it was still very much an ongoing affair.

This can be proved simply by looking at data—y’know that old-fashioned way of resolving arguments and variant viewpoints.

First here is a map of the military situation in the middle of February 1945. As you can see, the Nazis still control almost all of Germany and large areas of other countries. Millions of men were still under arms, and the Western allies had yet to cross the Rhine.

Now, in case someone thinks this is just a big map of nothing, and that the millions of German soldiers under arms were just wandering aimlessly around looking for someone nice to surrender to, let’s look at the monthly casualty figures just for the US Army. The figures for the Soviet army, if they were available and reliable, would probably paint and even more convincing picture that the war was still very much at its peak.

Starting from June 1944, when the D-Day landings took place, here are the month-by-month casualty figures of the US Army in Europe (including the Army Air Corps). These figures come from the Department of the Army’s final report on “Army Battle Casualties and Nonbattle Deaths in World War II (7th December 1941 - 31st December 1946). A copy of that report is online here.

Note, casualties include killed and wounded at roughly the proportion of three wounded to one killed.

        1944
        June 49,061
        July 61,454
        August 49,458
        September 54,937
        October 47,725
        November 65,918
        December 80,994

        1945
        January 70,560
        February 43,603
        March 56,282
        April 49,706
        May 2,201
        June 82

As we can see from these figures, US Army casualties were at their highest in December 1944 and January 1945, the months preceding the bombing of Dresden, which occurred in the middle of February. In those months the Western allies had received a nasty shock with a surprise German offensive in the Ardennes (The Battle of the Bulge), when German forces threatened, albeit briefly, to break through to the Channel again.

Also note that US casualties were higher in March and April 1945 than they were in June 1944, the month of the famous D-Day landings and subsequent battles in Normandy, when German forces were at their peak in opposition to American forces. This is so counter-intuitive to what most people know about the war that it needs emphasising: In both the months following Dresden, German military efforts against the Americans were more intense and took a higher toll than they did in June 1944.

The idea that Germany was “militarily finished” when the Dresden bombings happened is thus clearly absurd.

So why does the lying Alt-Right push this retarded myth? The most obvious answer is that they want to evoke sympathy for Nazi Germany. But this raises a further question: Why do they want to evoke sympathy for Nazi Germany?

Knee-jerk hatred of Jews is the obvious answer, but another possible and highly nefarious possibility is that they want to attach White identitarianism, White nationalism, and European self-determination to what is an extremely toxic brand in order to poison it.

They know that people who are attracted to these healthy forms of self-determination are likely to be more open-minded about history and less inclined to believe establishment narratives. Thus they are more likely to be taken in by blatant lies like the Dresden Myth. If that is the intention, then it is clearly an evil one, designed to keep nationalism on its knees as a pathetic victim identity and confined to a Nazi ghetto.

THE GAME IS OVER. THE PATRIOTS LOST: Though I cannot recommend Matt Parrott for his foolish and unwarranted misdirection away from and against the platform here, he is clever enough to turn a good phrase, as in this article, where the issue isn’t too deep for him. However, for one thing, he needs to understand that the Christards are playing a suckers game in line with propositional nationalism, and being beaten badly for it as well.

Since the time in the late 80’s when I prioritized racial interests over the entertainment of sports and music, when I do observe race mixed sporting events or statistics, I root for the individual performance of White players and against individual black players.

Over at Amren, Paul Kersey entitles an article, “Root for the Patriots in the Superbowl”

Although there is something to be said for the Patriots success while using White players in positions usually associated with black skills, as rather an expression of White selection and identity, betraying negrophila some along with its taken for granteds, the teams are still mercenary, not particularly representing a place or race. Thus, I can’t agree with his conclusion that Whites should feel ok about rooting for mixed race teams as it perpetuates the idiot cuckoldry of White fandom and support of the race mixing agenda through one of its most seductive means - visually exciting sports, adulation of athletic skills beyond merit, way beyond real world value and just reward, while ensconced in the deceptive, soothing pretext of passive objectivity.

Kersey writes:

The white quarterback, Tom Brady, along with white wide receivers Julian Edelman and Chris Hogan, white tight end Rob Gronkowski, and white running backs Rex Burkhead and James Develin, are an anomaly in the “vibrant” NFL. They have a vast overrepresentation of skilled white players who not only excel, but dominate.

[...]

With all this whooping about diversity, an anomaly does not go unremarked: the whiteness of the New England Patriots during their historic run under Tom Brady. For this year’s Super Bowl in Atlanta, all eyes are on Mr. Brady, the 41-year-old quarterback, who will be playing in his unprecedented ninth championship game in 18 seasons (this will be his third consecutive shot at the Lombardi Trophy, and Mr. Brady holds a 5-3 record in the Super Bowl).

With that, he suggests:

Root for the Patriots in the Superbowl

It’s OK to be white.

On Sunday, more than 110 million Americans will huddle around their television sets and watch the 53rd Super Bowl, a matchup between the Los Angeles Rams and New England Patriots.

After two seasons marred by black NFL players taking a Colin Kaepernick-style knee or raising a ‘Black Power’ fist during the National Anthem, television ratings slightly improved during the 2018 season.

[...]

So even if you are not a fan of the NFL, or don’t like the antics of black players who knelt during the National Anthem, there’s nothing wrong with rooting for the New England Patriots and Tom Brady to win Super Bowl 53. In a league where 72.6 percent of the players are POC, there’s nothing wrong with cheering for a team that looks a little more like you.

It’s the white thing to do.

He supplies one good reason NOT to root for the Patriots or any NFL team, here:

Ibid. That year, largely because of pressure from the owners of NFL’s 32 franchises, the league saw only a handful of black athletes—who account for 69.7 percent of the players—take a knee during the anthem. A recent poll of NFL fans shows only 24 percent of white fans strongly support the anthem protests, while 59 percent of blacks do (47 percent of white fans and 7 percent of black fans strongly oppose them). Though the kneeling stopped, the owners did create an $89 million fund for the players to hand out to “improve social justice and racial equality in our country.

Related at Majorityrights:

Seduction of NFL Films, Appeal of L.A. Rams 60’s, 70’s, dodging legacy of sports-fan cuckoldry

Our football coaches weren’t Marxists imposing black integration

(((Schultz/Starbucks vulture capitalism - governmental collusion with NGO’s and tribal interests)))

I haven’t visited Morgoth’s for several months, and not for more than a moment in over a year… but having taken a peek today, a fine comment jumped out…

Augur Mayson rendered a fine comment in response to the question of why people hate journalists.

In regard to his example that the (((media))) conveniently promulgated Harold Schultz’ crypsis, referring to him as “a white man”, Augur might have added discussion of which (((Frame Games))) spilled the beans - it is still on line: [url=The Perplexing Case of Starbucks The Perplexing Case of Starbucks) about the scheme that Starbucks is involved in, making deals with black NGO leaders in order to buy-up inner city property on the cheap and then gentrifying it to turn huge profits in sales and rent. ...while these blacks were moved in as block busters to begin with by tribal elders who benefited by driving out Whites, taking advantage of driving down property values and welfare slum lording.

A Starbucks in your neighborhood means this racket is coming to your city.

One wonders, given Starbucks property vulturism, if Trump and his cronies don’t figure into the Schultz deal - as Kumiko surmised, they are mostly about a second tier of wealth, based on real estate investment, particularly U.S., and their concerns as such.

* I took the liberty to correct the malapopriative term, “left”, for him and replaced it with what it should be - “liberal”

Augur Mayson • 6 days ago

Because journalists enhance Jewish racial crypsis, is my current reason. They’re statists posing as rebels. The major media outlets either through commingling with the state or via self-interested owners of a certain ((( race ))) typically parrot whatever ridiculous claims are coming out of the government, either about domestic social issues or correctness of foreign policy. They are not some unelected but real check against government abuses. They are attack dogs. They are megaphones for the rich and the state. They are overwhelmingly leftists liberals* and disproportionately Jewish.

For example, in America now the presidential election in 2020 is shaping up as follows: Trump for the Republicans, because it’s unprecedented for a party to not run an incumbent, unknown candidate for the Democrats, maybe Mrs. Clinton, maybe Joe Biden, maybe someone else, they have a young gay guy they’re trying to talk up now. And the only big independent as yet talked about in the media is former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, who’s a Jew, who has used Starbucks to push progressive social policies. For example a few Blacks got thrown out of a Starbucks for presumed loitering; media uproar ensued, Schultz declared to do the exact opposite in future, now they have beggars out front, heroin needles in one bathroom and people giving birth in the other.

So this article in the Judenpresse in America talks up Schultz and says point blank he’s a White man.

“And at 65, he’d have to do that as an older white man who’s never run for office before and has zero national name recognition.” https://www.theatlantic.com...

False, as a CEO of a major corporation he had major exposure and name recognition only second to say Hollywood stars and politicians and media. So the journalist paints Schultz as an unknown (read: underdog, as in, a fetching backstory) and says he’s White when he’s really a Jew.

This is why I hate journalists. Plus if you have a Jewish war you’d like to wage in the desert for no good reason you can always count on the likes of CNN or the BBC to carry the load of b.s. you’re pushing.

NEW YORK: Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz, credited with taking the company from small beginnings to an international behemoth, is stepping down as CEO to focus on new high-end coffee shops, handing the reins to Chief Operating Officer Kevin Johnson.

Schultz, 63, will continue to serve as chairman of the Board and will be appointed executive chairman effective April next year. He handpicked 56-year-old Johnson, the company’s president, chief operating officer and a 7-year member of the Starbucks Board of Directors, to serve as the new CEO.

The Seattle-based company said in his new role, Schultz will focus on the “next wave of retail innovation”, design and development of Starbucks Reserve Roasteries around the world, expansion of the Starbucks Reserve retail store format and the company’s social impact initiatives.

“I will remain Starbucks executive chairman, focusing full-time on the incredible growth opportunities we have in expanding Roasteries and building out our portfolio of Reserve stores and on Starbucks social impact agenda which will be a significant part of the focus going forward,” Schultz said in an investor and media conference call yesterday.

Schultz, who was named by Fortune magazine this month in its list of Businessperson of Year is credited with doubling the company’s revenues since he returned for his second stint in 2008, surpassing USD 20 billion for the first time over the past 12 months

Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55746311.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Related at Majorityrights:

(((Frame Games))) Hardens-Up and Greg Johnson Presents His Right-Wing Rear For Entryism (as does JF)

(((Frame Games))) on ethnic component of 2008 crisis & why you need to care about identity politics

Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?

Related:

The Perplexing Case of Starbucks: Frame Games discusses Starbucks with Gariepy