[Majorityrights News] Alex Navalny, born 4th June, 1976; died at Yamalo-Nenets penitentiary 16th February, 2024 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 16 February 2024 23:43.
[Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19.
[Majorityrights News] Is the Ukrainian counter-offensive for Bakhmut the counter-offensive for Ukraine? Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 18 May 2023 18:55.
The promotion of legal and illegal nonwhite “immigration” into Europe is to blame for the latest terrorist bombings in Brussels, and such attacks will increase unless the Third World invasion is halted and reversed.
The controlled media’s coverage of the attacks will, as usual, focus on the minutiae of the events rather than their real cause—and will do anything to hide the fact that mass Third World immigration is the real culprit.
Above: A CCTV still of the suspected bombers. The two circles indicate the gloves worn to hide the suicide vest triggers. The nonwhite on the right apparently fled after his device failed to detonate.
The Brussels Metro blast scene.
The March 22 Brussels attacks—carried out by Muslims in revenge for the earlier arrest of “immigrant” terrorist Salah Abdeslam—have only been possible because race-denying liberals have allowed the Belgian capital—and many other cities in Europe—to be overrun with Third World immigrants over a period of decades.
In their mania to deny the reality of race and racial differences, the ruling liberal elite in Europe has claimed that nonwhites can come to Europe, and, once they learn the language and adopt Western-style clothing, will become “Europeans” in culture, intelligence, achievement, and social responsibility.
Of course, nothing of the sort happens. Because intelligence, social responsibility, achievement, psychology, and physical appearance are genetic in origin, all that actually happens is that the chaos which these Third Worlders have created in their own countries, merely gets transferred en masse to Europe.
Brussels is a case in point. Anyone who knows and understands the demographics of that city would have been able to predict the nature of that city’s inhabitants without ever having been there.
That city is now so overrun with nonwhites that Mohamed is the most common male name in the Brussels region—and has been for many years, as the Morocco World News service recently boasted.
READ Jews Object to “Xenophobic” Euro Parties; But Support Ultra-Xenophobic Israel
Although the [liberals] who run the Belgian government have made it illegal to record the race of the capital’s population, a 2012 report in the Brussel Niewus news service revealed that 62 percent of Brussels residents have a “foreign origin.”
While this unquestionably includes many Europeans—not only because the European Union is headquartered in that city—the reality is that a very large percentage of that number are nonwhite “immigrants,” both legal and illegal; “asylum seekers,” and “refugees.”
Furthermore, given that the “62 percent” figure is already nearly four years out of date—and the nonwhite invasion has increased dramatically over the last year alone—it is likely that the percentage of nonwhites in Brussels is far higher than what many might expect.
Thus the attacks in Brussels come as no surprise, just like the nonwhite terrorist attacks in Paris last year. Indeed, nonwhite immigration has been the cause of every single major terrorist incident in Europe for the last ten years at least—and possibly longer.
The reality is therefore clear: the acts of terrorism which are spreading across Europe are directly related to the increasing number of nonwhites living on that continent. Anyone who denies this is only deluding themselves.
From this fact it is equally clear that the only way in which terrorist attacks such as that in Brussels and Paris can be brought to a halt, is by the expulsion of all nonwhites from Europe. There is simply no other way to solve the problem.
The physical expulsion of the Third World population from Europe is something which is easy to physically implement. All that needs to be done is to gather the political willpower to do it—by empowering those parties and political movements which will carry out such a policy.
If this political will is not created, then Europe will be condemned to self-destruction, increasing terrorism, being overrun by the Third World—and, ultimately, physical extermination at the hands of the nonwhites.
Posted by DanielS on Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:02.
Lots of White faces at Bernie rally.
TOO, Sam Dickson, “Black and Hispanic Democrats versus White, Liberal Democrats,” 22 March 2016: With all the attention on Donald Trump, there has been little discussion of the astonishing rift between Black and Hispanic Democrats on one hand and White liberal Democrats on the other.
Hillary Clinton has shut Bernie Sanders out of the Black and Brown voters. She is their candidate. She is catering to them to an astonishing degree. She has endorsed all the fantasies and lies about White cops killing Black males. She has hauled the mother of Travon Martin around, putting her on the stage to endorse her candidacy, and talking about how Lil’ Travon was murdered by George Zimmerman but there was no justice. She has extolled the Gentle Giant.
She made statements about a breaking story about three Black coeds who claimed they were attacked by Whites on a bus who called them “nigger.” When a surveillance video from the bus revealed that the whole story was concocted, Hillary refused to retract her statements or to apologize for joining in false accusations against innocent people.
There is no limit in race-betrayal that Clinton will not go to.
Clinton is now virtually the captive of the Blacks and Browns. They cast about half the votes in the Democratic Party. They are the ones who have given her the nomination.
The White Democrats — even the wimmin — have deserted her and flocked to Sanders in droves.
Sanders has gotten nowhere in his efforts to chip non-White voters away from Clinton.
He is the candidate of the White wing of the Democratic Party.
What does this mean for White Nationalists like us who are thinking in long range terms (like Jews) instead of next weeks primary vote?
A lot.
For many years I have predicted that there would come a point at which White liberals would realize that their Black and Brown friends don’t have the slightest interest in issues that excite White liberals: gay rights, environmentalism, funding for the arts, conservation, public parks.
No. The Blacks and the Browns are only interested in “The Gimme.”
And increasingly Blacks and Browns will control and dominate the Democratic Party. Already, they are sending the White liberal Democrats to the back of the bus.
The alliance between White liberals and the racist minorities is breaking up. They are splitting.
Add in the fact that there are a lot of White liberals at the local level who have caught on that the Jews are running their own racist ethnostate and that their posturings about fighting racism and their deep, deep concern about the plight of Blacks and the need for open borders are utterly insincere.
At some point our White liberal racial brothers and sisters are going to be up for grabs.
The shizoid nature of Democratic voter behavior along racial lines shows that this is coming.
How can we reach out to them and help raise the consciousness?
A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”
In an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” to personally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.
In the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government.
The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.
Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.
The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government — and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.
“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.
Even though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.
READ Depression—Biological and Gender Factors
She specifically links Iran’s mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.
Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to be destroyed.
Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.
An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.
If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.
It is, Clinton continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.
This would not come about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”
The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.
Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.
Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.
Clinton goes on to asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” to do:
In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.
With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.
The email proves—as if any more proof was needed—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.
It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.
In addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of war in Syria.
The real and disturbing possibility that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people—could become the next president of America is the most deeply shocking thought of all.
Clinton’s public assertion that, if elected president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.
The Turkish government has started to halt the flood of invaders sailing to the Greek islands in terms of its “deal” with the European Union—proving that they could have done it all along and merely used the nonwhite invasion to blackmail Europe.
On Friday, March 18, Turkish police intercepted 3,000 invaders attempting to cross on land and sea in a major operation involving coast guard and helicopters, as the “deal” was being struck in Brussels.
Even so, some 1,498 invaders were still able to land on the Greek islands from March 18 to March 19, Greek “crisis teams” on Lesbos reported. According to the Greek coast guard, the increase is likely related to the fact that Turkey has undertaken to crack down on the invaders.
In terms of the deal, after midnight on Saturday, March 19, any invader who lands on the islands will no longer be able to catch ferries to Athens, but will be immediately “interviewed” by asylum officials or judges at new detention camps.
Presumably these “interviews” will decide which of the invaders are “genuine” refugees or not—even though it is abundantly clear that none are genuine, as they are all leaving a safe third country—Turkey—and are thus not fleeing for their lives at all.
In fact, there are approximately three million “refugees” living peacefully in Turkey, a fact which completely undermines the claim that they are “fleeing to Europe in fear of their lives.”
From April 4, deportations to Turkey are set to begin with EU officials expressing the hope that the process will take no more than a few days to complete.
Those who appeal against their deportations will be brought before Greek judges in “instant court” sessions in a €20 million per month project involving 4,000 staff—funded by the EU.
The EU-Turkey “deal” will mean that Turkey gets a €6 billion bribe to stop the invasion, while at the same time the EU has agreed to directly transfer some 72,000 “Syrian” invaders directly to the European mainland from Turkey. This exchange will only be stopped if the numbers of invaders deported to Turkey exceed that figure.
In return, Turkey’s 75-million strong population will be granted visa-free access to Europe from June 2015, as long as that country introduces “forgery-proof passports” in time.
In addition, the “deal” provides for the speeding up of negotiations to let Turkey join the EU so that they aim to be finalized before the end of June. Cyprus—still in a dispute with Turkey over the occupation of the northern part of that country—will be denied the right to veto Turkish EU membership.
Meanwhile, the Bulgarian army has been stationed along that country’s border with Macedonia in an attempt to halt the infiltration of the thousands of nonwhites trapped in Greece after most of the Balkan nations unilaterally closed their borders to all but those who could “prove” that they were “Syrians” (fake passports notwithstanding).
There are an estimated 46,000 such invaders waiting on the Greek–Macedonian border, and about 12,000 piled up at the border village of Idomeni.
Africans posing as refugees at Idomeni
Black Africans pretending to be refugees wait at the border between Macedonia and Greece, looking for an opportunity to break through the fence and join the parasitic hordes already living off the white taxpayers of western Europe.
Republican leaders talk about how to deal with Trump (apparently, these are not actors):
First of all, my (DanielS) concerns are primarily metapolitical in nature, where political at all. I have never had faith in the dog and pony show of politics to look after our E.G.I.
Nevertheless, there are people who care about European/White E.G.I. who think it is important for strategic reasons to get White people en mass behind Trump.
Again, it won’t be this White man who cares, I have never liked Trump and don’t trust his values. A businessman is, by training, Manichean: truth and justice is not his objective, defeating others is; and in that game that he plays, changing the rules, if necessary to win, is what he will do.
Cyberneticists have famously observed that the engineer and the scientist by contrast, is focused on Augustinian devils - natural devils.
Perhaps that focus makes a scientist such as MacDonald gullible to the tactics and naive to the motives of a businessman like Trump.
However, in service of squaring things-off, so that we can have an accurate dialectic going on here, in order to arrive at what is more the case, rather than arguing against cardboard figures, lets try to render some of MacDonald’s best arguments as to why Trump is someone for Whites to get behind.
MacDonald’s arguments as I understand them:
1) Because he is independently wealthy, he can flout the PC norms that have hog-tied Whites and address the true and important concerns of what has been the implicit base in support of the Republican Party - White people.
- That candor to move the Overton window is opposed to the concerns of people in the clip; and the Jews who have policed White ethnocentric dissent with iron PC rule.
2) He will either a) take that implicit White base, tarry with its interests at least to some extent, gain its support; thus owe some genuine regard for its concerns for a change through its Republican auspices. Or b) Destroy the GOP (which the men in the video would hate).
Plan b is not a bad option according to MacDonald and to most White people in the know - the Republican Party has looked like us but has shown White people no loyalty. Quite the opposite, it has been every bit as complicit in our demise as the Democrats.
Bring on the grassroots of ethnocentric Whites to form a third party; and if he will, let Trump set it in motion, MacDonald says.
That is what Whites have always needed, an independently wealthy White man who will actually put his money behind Whites the way Jews put their wealth behind their interests.
3) If it were not for Trump, issues of the American border and immigration would not even have been mentioned by the Republican Presidential Candidates. Trump forced that issue upon Cruz, Rubio et al.
Trump brought that critical issue into White American consciousness and legitimized it despite the masters of discourse having de-legitimized discourse of its concern since 1965.
That is also crucial, according to MacDonald, since it will force people to pay more attention to who is behind mass non-White migration to America. KM adds, there is no question that it was Jewish interests that have done this; and once Whites begin to understand that, they will see that Jewish interests have had nefarious aims - that the results for White E.G.I have been and will be deadly.
4) Though KM and Duke do not emphasize the corporate complicity, they do acknowledge that it is working Whites who suffer the most from these immigration policies, from unskilled labor to H1B migrants.
- Trump has not only explicitly called for deportation and the building of a fence to keep out unskilled migrants
5) Trump’s destruction of Jeb Bush, Rubio and Cruz means the destruction not only of politics as usual for the Republican Party, as these are the people that they wanted to nominate - but also of the Neo-Con agenda which lies deeper behind them.
In fact, William Crystal threatened to start a third party if Trump got the nomination.
MacDonald adds that the Neo-Con agenda is strictly Jewish. It has nothing to do with White interests and has been a disaster or White interests.
Therefore, MacDonald says, “so be it.” Let the White outrage begin if their votes are treated as if they don’t matter; let it be known who runs the Republican Party - Jewish Neo Cons and Corporate interests - let it be destroyed and a new third party that takes the side of Whites be born instead.
6) Trump is the best option also because he has the best chance for White interests against Hillary Clinton - if she wins that is a disaster because she is the quintessential neo-liberal, neo-con dream all in one: completely beholden to the worst domestically and foreign - of right wing economic and military objectives and PC cultural agendas.
7) It is important to get behind Trump now because if it takes another 8 - 12 years for someone like him to come along it might be too late for Whites to wield voting power enough to sway the political direction to their interests.
