But it is that of a Scot, nineteen-year old Thomas Waddell, who raped and strangled an Asian woman, Farah Noor Adams, 34.

The BBC thinks we should hear a lot about this murder, and has taken the time and effort to inform us here, here, here and here.  Oh, then there is here, here and here.

The Scotsman reported the case here, telling us that:-

Ms Adams, a well-known community activist and volunteer, was separated from her husband, an Asian Muslim.

Her father, Haji, is a leading member of the city’s Muslim community, involved in the care of Glasgow Central Mosque.

In point of fact, this fine, upstanding Scottish rag covered the story in even greater detail than the Beeb.

But lest you think that is simply because of the Scottish connection, think again.  Here is the Telegraph, The Mail and The Independent.

Meanwhile, the story of Charlene Downes goes unreported - except, according to the BNP website, by the Manchester Metro paper edition, which notes:-

The body of a missing schoolgirl may have been turned into burgers and kebabs and served up at a seaside fast food outlet.

Police fear the remains of 14 year old Charlene Downes, who went missing in November 2003, may also have been ground up into tile grout.

Iyad Albattikhi, 28, who ran the Funny Boyz takeaway in Blackpool, is charged with her murder.

The co-owner of the business Mohammed Raveshi, a 49 year old former social services worker and foster father, is charged with assisting in the disposal of her body.

The men appeared at a hearing at Blackpool maistrates court yesterday.

The teenager whose body has never been found left home on Halloween saying she was meeting friends on Blackpool’s North Pier.

READ MORE...

The BBC reports this story without one word of the usual high-moral journalistic delinquency.  Apparently, there can be no charge of hate or racism ... none of the hard-edged Trot-speak that would be instantly spewed out if a politician of European descent were to make such an unequivocally plain and ethnocentric statement:-

Kadima was founded on the premise that Israel’s long-term survival depends on safeguarding its Jewish majority and preventing Palestinian Arabs becoming the majority at any time in the future.

Demography was the motivation for Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s withdrawal of troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip last year and Kadima’s election pledge to make future “territorial compromises” in the West Bank.

... “In the coming period we will move to set the final borders of the state of Israel, a Jewish state with a Jewish majority,” Mr Olmert told Kadima supporters in a televised speech on election night.

He added: “We will try to achieve this in an agreement with the Palestinians ...  If not, Israel will take control of its own fate, and in consensus among our people and with the agreement of our friends in the world, especially US President George Bush, we will act.”

“The time has come to act,” he reiterated.  Indeed, the time probably has come already.

... Kadima is trying to set the tone for this by talking about the Jews’ “national and historic right to the Land of Israel in its entirety” (ie including all the occupied territories).

But its manifesto continues by asserting: “The balance between allowing Jews to fulfil their historic right ... and maintaining the continued existence of Israel as the national Jewish home necessitates territorial compromise”.

So this is the realist, “compromising” Sharonite party speaking - the one that, if it overcomes the resistance of last-ditch Likudniks, will be applauded by all the mainstream media and every race-replacing Western government.

Having previously discussed the theoretic global potential of iron fertilization to peacefully increase the population of whites,  the immediate problem is how to bring this theoretic potential into actual practice in the near term.  In all likelihood this new regime will be opened up in the same way other new regimes are opened: with high value products or services that are under increasing demand and/or decreasing availability.  With over-harvesting of natural ocean fisheries and the increasing demand from growing Asian markets, a point is rapidly approaching where oceanic cultivation of some of the higher value products will be capitalized.  This essay is about one such potential and how it can seed the iron fertilization potential for white population increase: Oceanic Cultivation of Bluefin Tuna.

READ MORE...

Yes, Monday 27th March 2006 is a day that will go down in the annulls of anti-racism, anti-white people-ism and anti-ism in general.  It is the day the UK’s unwanted Independent Police Complaints Commission introduced us to a new level of absurdity in cultural marxist ambition.

The story goes like this:-

Way back in the early hours of 1 April 1998 Christopher Alder, a black former soldier, choked to death on his own vomit in a prison cell in Hull whilst dead-drunk.  He had been arrested for affray earlier that night.  His passing was caught on CCTV, and showed that a few feet away four policemen were chatting contentedly and perfectly oblivious of his extremis.  The stark separation of life and death in those images fuelled a long campaign by Mr Alder’s relatives to pursue first the four officers concerned and then, when that failed, Humberside Police.

Enter the IPCC and their exciting young Chair, Nick Hardwick.  This is what he said:-

READ MORE...

Thanks to Michael R for this link.  The Dutch government has decided to screen a film to all new Moslem wannabee citizens.  It challenges their Middle Eastern sensibilities with two homosexuals kissing in a park and a topless woman emerging from the sea and walking onto a crowded beach.  Those who can’t adjust don’t make the cut.

This is a big improvement on the old open door policy.  However, I can exclusively reveal that the authorities have also been trialling the earliest and most stringent possible examination of Muslim flexibility on arrival at main international airports, and here is a leaked transcript of the proceedings.  With apologies to the good people of Holland.

OK guys, my name’s Piet and I am your Tolerance Counsellor for today.  During the next couple of hours I’m going to talk to you about what it means to live here in Holland.

First, for my own safety can I ask you all to place your ceremonial daggers in the bin provided by the door?  Thank you very much.

What was that you said, sir?  Yes sure, body harnesses go in the bin, too.

And your goat, please.

OK, welcome to Amsterdam Schiphol.  I hope you had a nice flight and it wasn’t too cold for those of you who travelled in the baggage compartment.  And to the others, what can I say?  Six and a half hours is a long time to hold your breath.  So, a big well done to everybody who stowed in a wheel housing.

READ MORE...

Hitchens the Good - Peter, that is - has been charged with leading the Daily Mail’s attempt to join the blogging revolution.  All the dailies are at it now, following the Guardian’s percipient lead.  They are singing along with the late Lionel Bart’s prince of cunning, desperately reviewing the situation.

The situation is this ...

The print media has managed to survive the depredations of news broadcast by radio and then television by offering the reader a special relationship.  Newspapers stand or fall according to the loyalty of the reader.  So the deal is: the paper plays on his bias, however crude that may be and, from a journalistic point of view, however much disingenuity that entails.  And in exchange the reader gives them his undivided attention.  Week in, week out.  “You gettum titillated, me gettum rich … and powerful.”

None are more rich nor more powerful than Rupert Murdoch.  In his speech to The Worshipful Company of Stationers and Newspaper Makers in London a fortnight ago he identified “reasoned comment” (though God knows its mostly just comment) as the diamond and pearl encrusted centre-piece of this arrangement.  But is it beginning to prove inadequate to its task?  Murdoch may think so.  Certainly, he thinks that the internet revolution, with blogging at its heart, will be the death of newsprint.

READ MORE...

Yesterday, the Agora blog posted the considered judgement of UN Special Rapporteur Doudou Diéne on the cartoon wars.  The Danes, it seems, are racists and xenophobes.

To get away with saying this sort of thing Doudou must be - or consider himself to be - one of the global great and the good.  No stain of racism, no smear of xenophobia attaches to his international personna.  Or his Armani.

He is not, however, a very deep Doudou.  His UN report, incredibly vital and influential though it doubtless is, has the title, “Situation des populations musulmanes et arabes dans diverses régions du monde - Rapport soumis par le Rapporteur spécial sur les formes contemporaines de racisme, de discrimination raciale, de xénophobie et de l’intolérance qui y est associée.”  Pity it’s not more pithy.  Some of it has been translated into English by Agora and can be read here, if you have run out of sleeping pills.

I can’t work myself up into much of a lather of indignation at this sort of thing.  It’s a rigged game.  Can one really expect the UN to pronounce that the Danish constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech, must be upheld?  Or that it’s high time Muslims around the world learned to accept mild criticism with humility and a willingness to learn why they are perceived negatively?

Pigs, of course, might fly.  But never in the Dar al-Islam.  And never in the United Nations headquarters in New York.

Nick Griffin broke his long silence on the Jewish Question today with a lengthy article you can read here.

He seems to have been goaded into action by criticism from American WN’s, presumably occasioned at the Amren Conference at which he was a speaker.  He makes an interesting case - the right case for Britain, no doubt.

In it he pays some respect, at least, to ethnic genetic interests, which is the first time I have heard these three promising words from any leading BNP official.  He acknowledges the well-known negative aspects of the Jewish philosophical contribution to Western politics.  He stresses very few potential positives to be got from engagement with Jews, so I wouldn’t necessarily put him in the “Taylor camp”.  The attraction seems to be conflict avoidance ... don’t start a war on two fronts.  One of them, against Jewry, you can never win.  And losing that will lose you the other war as well - the war you must win.

My only real criticism of this article is that he directs his fire at obvious and easy targets but declines the most serious and interesting.  Conspiracy theorists and “activists of German descent” come in for most of it.  I am not sure how much he gains by bearding these guys while leaving the MacDonald thesis unaddressed.  He acknowledges that highly intelligent Ashkenazics take leading roles in every political-philosophical argument, not merely those of the left.  This is true, and he cites TBC and the great Richard Hernnstein, for example.  But, Hernnstein was still acting out of his perceived ethnic interests, a factor which Griffin prefers not to mention.

So, if Jewish activism in toto is indeed doggedly ethnocentric and as such a survival strategy, as MacDonald contends, then what possible change can be effected through rapprochement?  The answer seems simply to be “None but it does not matter - it is realpolitik.”