Majorityrights News > Category: Law & Order

We should not adopt, but adapt Chinese racial ruthlessness to the ethnonational cause

Posted by DanielS on Tuesday, 11 September 2018 09:10.

Diversity Macht Frei, “Hardcore racist Chinamen leave weak-willed whites floundering in the dust”, 11 Sept 2018:

By Czakal

Ruthless Chinamen are amazing the world with their hardcore, unabashed racism. These Chinks just don’t care.

What are they up to now?

Brainwashing Muslims to make them forget their faith.

Western countries need to study these Chinese techniques and adopt them.

The Chinaman was then grabbed and deported for “racism”. Africans may soon be getting nostalgic for the soft and benevolent racism of Whitey.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVwhitGpSv0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHg3aj9gl3w

The slant-eyed furies are also going to Africa… 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XEytsKBoco

...and beating the natives with sticks whenever they don’t work hard enough.

The kind of ruthless racial self-assertion that these Chinks engage in is world-beating. Whites can’t compete with it. Not now that we have sunk into the abyss of altruism.

As Baudelaire said: The world belongs to the one who doesn’t care. These Chinamen don’t care.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=lDpJK9sMqJI

They don’t care about human rights. They don’t care about decency. They don’t care about the fucked-up moral standards the Jews have imposed on us. That’s why the world will soon be theirs.

It wasn’t that long ago that Whites were as hardcore as these Chinamen. Ask yourself: is the world really a better place now that they’re not?

“Western countries need to study these Chinese techniques and adopt them.”

Not adopt them. Whites need to adapt ruthless ferocity to the ethnonationalist cause. In the two examples, one would be correct, and one would not.

Where Islamic incursions are quelled, that is correct.

Going to an African country, enslaving them, beating them and so on - when it is not sheer self defense - is not.

But of course, such bad advice (e.g., that we should be brutal slave masters over Africans) is typical of right wing reactionaries - to look for a foundation in natural fallacy, in sheer might makes right supremacism beyond the complexity of social praxis. ...and, of course, when praxis is ignored, then broader patterns of nemesis correction are in store for the hubris.

Related at Majorityrights:

Imperative to replace Golden Rule of Altruism w Silver Rule of Reciprocity for European Moral Order


Matteo Salvini’s BBC Hard Talk interview (12-9-18)

Posted by DanielS on Monday, 10 September 2018 16:11.

Mancinblack: Matteo Salvini’s BBC Hard Talk interview (12-9-18) -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SihWTOyICco

Related at Majorityrights:

Trump Campaign (((Born))) in (((Response))) to Iran Deal. Denies Affinity w European Patriot Salvini

READ MORE...


Swedish Election Report: Most important election ever for Sweden - Nationalism or Total Destruction

Posted by DanielS on Sunday, 09 September 2018 18:40.

“The most important election ever for Sweden”

“If we don’t get a hold of immigration and reverse it, Sweden is lost”


Restricting immigration not enough, we need large scale repatriation - Gustav Kasselstrand

Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 05 September 2018 06:02.

Related at Majorityrights: Alternative for Sweden


Why White South Africans Can’t Leave Even Though They Are In Danger – #BoerTestimony

Posted by DanielS on Saturday, 01 September 2018 10:44.


Salvini and Orban meet: announce an alliance uniting all anti-immigration forces in Europe

Posted by DanielS on Thursday, 30 August 2018 08:43.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor #Orban met today in #Italy with the Italian Minister of Interior, Matteo #Salvini.

The two announced that they will form an alliance uniting all anti-immigration forces in Europe ahead of next year’s election to the European Parliament.

Poland Daily:

Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban met with the Italian Minister of The Interior, Matteo Salvini today, as they seek a solution to the European Union immigration crisis. At the press conference, the two leaders announced that they will form an anti-immigration front ahead of next year’s elections to the European Parliament.

Victor Orban didn’t hide the fact that the Italian Minister of Interior has made a huge impression on him. Salvini has earlier made a name for himself as one of the most ardent opponents of the EU’s open door immigration policy.

Orban: “I would like to get to know him personally. He is my hero and my companion of destiny. I’m a great admirer and I feel that I have some experiences that I could share with him.”

According to Orban, the people who control European institutions, such as the The European Commission and The European Parliament, need to be replaced if the EU’s immigration policy is to be changed.

Orban: “The European elections are coming-up in May. We want to change a lot, but for that to happen, we need a new European Parliament and a new European commission which will start to protect Europe’s borders.”

Salvini announced that he wants to join forces with Orban ahead of the elections in order to shape The European Union’s new immigration policy. 

Salvini: “We have been working for weeks with Germany to find a solution to the issue of immigrants who arrived in Italy and then went to Germany. The most important thing for us is that Italy will not take any new migrants.

Obran stressed that Italy’s quest to stop migrants is vital to the whole of Europe.

Orban: Salvini is very popular in Hungary since he has shown that it is possible to stop migrants from crossing the sea. Out of all Mediterranean countries, Italy is the only one to have done it. Salvini is the first, and Europe’s security depends upon his success.”

Viktor Orban has been in opposition to the immigration policy favored by The European Commission and Angela Merkel for years; lately, he has gained allies, such as Poland and Italy.


Related at Majorityrights: Italy’s Salvini Vows To Create Pan-European Association Of Nationalist Parties


Discourse analysis: (((narrative control))) by David Cole Stein through Robert Stark’s kosher forum

Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 29 August 2018 06:00.

    Discourse analysis of David Cole Stein’s (((narrative control))) as promoted through Robert Stark’s kosher forum.

    Socially constructing the non-social construction of right-wing, “politically incorrect objectivity.”

    Cole-Stein is going to talk about how the porn-industry is “the last refuge of political incorrectness”, how “unlike the ‘Leftist’ controlled media, it simply and objectively caters to the desires of its ‘fan-base.”

    Robert Stark: This-is-Robert-Stark. I am joined here with-uh, David Cole. Uh David, great having you back on the show.

    David Cole-Stein: It’s a pleasure to be back, Robert! It really is. I enjoyed our first go-round and I’m looking forward to doing it again.

    Robert Stark: And I’m also joined here with my ‘Alt-of-Center’ co-host, ah, Mathew Pegus.

    Stark seems to provide/be provided with a different kosher co-host every few shows or so.

    Mathew Pegus: Great to be here Robert. Thank you for having me.

    David Cole-Stein: Speaking of ‘Alt’, I want to apologize to you, Robert; because I know, a couple months ago in one of my Taki-Mag pieces, I kind-of mischaracterized you in my description of you ...and you were very polite about it, you were very nice about it; but I don’t like when I do that, because, number one, I don’t like to make errors in print, but also I don’t like it when people mischaracterize me or affix labels to me that I don’t want or don’t deserve. So I want to just apologize to get things started here, one on one here: I’m very sorry - I think I called you “Alt-Righty.” ...and uh..

    Robert Stark: Or like “Extreme Alt-Right” or “Hard-Core Alt-Right.” ...(chuckles)

    David Cole-Stein: Uh, Ok. Yeah, rub it in! Go ahead! That, that, here - here’s a man trying to like, grovel; and you take that salt and you rub-it right in! Yes, I made a grievous error, a grievous error! and I apologize for it.

    Robert Stark (chuckles): So uh, lets start with your recent article, “Lessons From My Porn-Girl” ..and just as kind of an overall theme, is how pornography is the one area in our culture where one is allowed to be ah, politically incorrect. So by-basically to start things off, by ‘porn-girl’ you’re referencing this woman that you used to know…

    David Cole-Stein: Well, a woman who lived with me. A woman whose porn-name is Kirsten Lee; ah, her real name is Kera. That - I’m not outing anybody, she has, she has outed herself. So this is not me, ah doing anything (coughs) like outing or doxxing. Kera lived with me for almost two years and was pretty much my partner in crime. She was twenty one when I uh, met her and uh…and I, basically, my role in her life was to try to help her out of the porn-biz. It’s a business that has never interested me but it was fascinating during that first year that she and I were together before she got out of it because by the second year she was fully out. You know the, the amazing thing about a porn girl is that once you give them free rent and utilities and food, ah they no longer feel the need to seek money; ah and well, they can just get right out of porn at that point - it’s really a miraculous formula; uh, they, they, once they don’t have any needs or bills to pay or anything like that, well getting out of porn seems pretty simple at that point.

    The White Left will emphasize this point of social safety net to help prevent mud-sharkery in the first place.

    Robert Stark: So, you-you touch on the theme of how pornography is the one, the one uh, aspect of media where politically incorrect content is uh, not only tolerated but promoted; and garners massive amounts of hit-counts in profits. What was the specific case with her and her ah, politically incorrect attitudes about sexual relations in porn.

    Cole-Burner Stain

    David Cole-Stein
    David Cole-Stein: Well I, um, I was amazed, really quite amazed by the people I mixed with during that first year while she was still knee deep, neck deep in the business. Uh, on racial matters, the kind of stuff that is the most taboo for the rest of us to talk about, on racial matters porn is just insanely honest. I’m not affixing a good or bad label to it, or healthy or unhealthy - just saying its incredibly honest: White girl comes in and White girl says, “I’m not going to blow an N-word”, and uh, and the producers of porn companies are like, ‘great, you don’t do the N-word porn’. Um, Kera, my porn-girl, made most of her money doing interracial stuff, because since she was so young and very thin and kind of pristine for lack of a better word; uh, it was kind of rare to have a White girl like that do interracial because ah, normally it was the older women who put on a few pounds who’d do the interracial; uh, but for a blond girl, blue eyes, twenty one years old and looking like she’s just come right-off the fiords, it was, she made a great-deal of money at that.

    Note that Cole-Stein is marking a transition, there was a time when this didn’t happen, or not much among working class women and certainly not much in the public space. It is not a time in memorial truth of societal behavior; and it’s not as if it is a sheer discovered fan base - but he’s normalizing and institutionalizing it as a given fact apart from negotiative components of societal incentive - particularly, money and a Jewish anti-White agenda.

    His argument - “a fan base”, as in, “this is what people agentively want” - is up against the involuntary high contrast tropism and need to gauge genetic distance and competition, not a mere expression of a ‘fan base’ catered-to. As a high contrast tropism, it is simply harder to ignore highly contrasting sounds and sights such as interracial; and the genetic call to grapple with the incitement to competition and deal with its vast, destructive genetic distance. It doesn’t necessarily mean this is what people want. Furthermore, there are elective, i.e., not merely catered-to, non-interracial taboos that are very popular also which can serve as an antidote to the destructive effects of this “catered-to” tropism.

    David Cole-Stein (continues): But yet in her private life, she would never do interracial. That was the thing that fascinated me most was how she was able to compartmentalize the racial thing. When she’s at work and she gets $8,000 to go down on a black dude, well that’s just work, she just does it. And then when we’re out in club and some black guy tries to hit on her and maybe comment on her porn, and she’ll let loose just a stream of expletives, ah ‘you friggin’ N-word’, ‘you N-word this and N-word that’ (Stark giggles) uh, there’s, huh, in her mind, its just, hey, I’m at work, I’m at work and my work right now is blowin’ a black guy; and then when we’re out at a club later that night - hey, this is my private time, I don’t want to talk to a black guy…so..

    It’s at work, ‘it’s ok then’. As with Hannah Arendt, he is shifting an ethnic basis for discrimination to the abstract, individual basis of “public and private.” He is trying to create a distancing effect, ‘this is play’ - to create a distancing effect from the actual participation of the actresses.

    David Cole-Stein (continues): But the whole industry was just sort of honest that way. Ah, most of the women, would - including black girls too and the Latino girls - they were just very honest, ‘cuz you can talk about race in porn in a way that you can’t in real life. It’s, I make the point in my article - where else in American society right now can pay-scale be determined by your race? I mean, if any other business, if Amazon were to say, ‘we’re going to be paying uh, White programmers more than uh, Asian ones’, well of course it would be a huge thing and I’m not advocating that at all. But in porn, White girls who are willing to do black guys make more; uh, White girls who only want to do other White girls make the least. Because that’s, that’s, hell, any White girl will kiss another White girl these days, that’s ...in my day that was barely titillating and I think everyone kind of does that now.

    So.. and then the Mexican dudes, there were some Arab dudes - and they get paid different based on race ..eh that doesn’t happen anywhere else. I mean, its kind of astounding when I was looking at it. I spent years writing about racial politics and racial law and discrimination laws. And I’m like, wow, this, this is the wild-west, this is a part of the entertainment industry - and a profitable one - that has yet to be touched by that Leftist hand of politically correct social justice bullshit.

    READ MORE...


    Elizabeth Warren: “Sad (Tibbetts) is dead, but we have to remember….where the real problems are”

    Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 02:21.

    “Sad she’s dead, but”...

    Washington Examiner, “Elizabeth Warren on the Tibbetts murder: Sad she’s dead, but ‘we have to remember’ we need an immigration system that ‘focuses on where real problems are”, 22 Aug 2018:

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren is sorry that a 20-year-old Iowa student is dead and that a reported illegal alien has been charged in the killing, but the Massachusetts Democrat wants to stay focused on the “real problems.”

    This isn’t a paraphrase of something she said Wednesday on CNN. This is her actual response to a question about reports that law enforcement agents have charged Cristhian Bahena Rivera, 24, in the disappearance and murder of Mollie Tibbetts.

    “I’m so sorry for the family here, and I know this is hard, not only for the family, but for the people in her community, the people throughout Iowa,” Warren told CNN’s John Berman. “But one of the things we have to remember is: We need an immigration system that is effective. That focuses on where real problems are.”

    Berman asking the senator specifically to respond to President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence claiming the Tibbetts murder is proof of the need for stronger immigration enforcement.

    Warren continued, saying, “Uh, last month, I went down to the border, and I saw where children had been taken away from their mothers. I met with those mothers, who had been lied to, who didn’t know where their children were, who hadn’t had a chance to talk to their children. And there was no plan for how they’d be reunified with their children.”

    Tibbetts’ remains were found early Tuesday morning, according to law enforcement officials. Rivera, who authorities believe has been living in the U.S. illegally for four to seven years, has been charged with first-degree murder. His bail was set Tuesday at $1 million.

    “I think we need immigration laws that focus on people who pose a real threat, and I don’t think mammas and babies are the place where we should be spending our resources. Separating a mamma from a baby does not make this country safe,” Warren said.

    Trump signed an executive order on June 20 reversing the policy of separating illegal immigrant families. And as to the issue of mothers being separated from their babies, I think Tibbetts’ mother, Laura Calderwood, might have some thoughts on that.

    The Washington Examiner’s Phil Klein disagreed Wednesday with the criticisms of Warren, arguing the Massachusetts senator had not really stepped in it with “outrageously tone-deaf” comment.

    “I’m no Warren fan, but this strikes me as a stretch. In clip she goes on to say we need to focus on actual threats, and that family separation doesn’t make us safe,” he wrote. “She isn’t saying that a young girl getting killed isn’t a problem.”

    I disagree that the negative reaction is a stretch. The criticisms are well-deserved. Her comments follow a clear path. She starts by saying she’s sorry about the Tibbetts murder, and then changes the subject to attack Trump over an immigration policy he rescinded two months ago.

    It’s true Warren’s remarks were about the White House’s response to the murder. That doesn’t take away from the “but” in her “I’m sorry someone is dead” response. There should never be a “but” in those statements.

    Opinion commentary, by Beckett Adams


    Page 44 of 98 | First Page | Previous Page |  [ 42 ]   [ 43 ]   [ 44 ]   [ 45 ]   [ 46 ]  | Next Page | Last Page

    Venus

    Existential Issues

    DNA Nations

    Categories

    Contributors

    Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

    Links

    Endorsement not implied.

    Immigration

    Islamist Threat

    Anti-white Media Networks

    Audio/Video

    Crime

    Economics

    Education

    General

    Historical Re-Evaluation

    Controlled Opposition

    Nationalist Political Parties

    Science

    Europeans in Africa

    Of Note

    Comments

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 11 Nov 2023 05:31. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 11 Nov 2023 05:14. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 11 Nov 2023 04:34. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 11 Nov 2023 03:57. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sat, 11 Nov 2023 03:50. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:21. (View)

    Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:09. (View)

    Nobody commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 10 Nov 2023 03:50. (View)

    Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Fri, 10 Nov 2023 02:09. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 09 Nov 2023 23:54. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 09 Nov 2023 12:11. (View)

    Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 09 Nov 2023 05:43. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:04. (View)

    Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Wed, 08 Nov 2023 23:31. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 07 Nov 2023 23:03. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 07 Nov 2023 13:19. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 07 Nov 2023 03:26. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 07 Nov 2023 03:11. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 05 Nov 2023 23:47. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 05 Nov 2023 11:19. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 02 Nov 2023 23:27. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 02 Nov 2023 23:25. (View)

    Guessedworker commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Thu, 02 Nov 2023 11:13. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:11. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:39. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 31 Oct 2023 07:25. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 31 Oct 2023 07:14. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 31 Oct 2023 06:44. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:00. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 29 Oct 2023 04:59. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 29 Oct 2023 02:50. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Sun, 29 Oct 2023 02:30. (View)

    Thorn commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:14. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:03. (View)

    Al Ross commented in entry 'A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity's origin' on Tue, 24 Oct 2023 02:40. (View)

    Majorityrights shield

    Sovereignty badge